Connect with us

Finance

Appeals Court Wary of GOP Operative’s Campaign Finance Appeal

Published

on

Appeals Court Wary of GOP Operative’s Campaign Finance Appeal

A federal appeals court appeared unlikely to reverse a Republican political operative’s conviction for funneling political contributions from a Russian billionaire to former President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard Jesse Benton’s challenge on Monday in a case that delved into complex campaign finance laws and communications to the jury at trial.

Benton, a one-time aide and grandson-in-law to Ron Paul, the former Texas GOP congressman and presidential candidate, is fighting his conviction on six counts of campaign finance violations and obstruction of justice. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

On appeal, Benton has challenged instructions given to the jury on how to consider a since-pardoned campaign finance conviction, and how a political contribution should’ve been defined.

Judge Florence Pan signaled she was inclined to find that Benton had missed his chance to challenge jury instructions at trial.

Advertisement

“I don’t see why you’re relieved of your obligation to contemporaneously object at the time the jury instructions are submitted,” Pan said. “You agreed to the jury instructions that were given, and now you’re challenging the same jury instructions that you co-sponsored.”

Judge Karen Henderson similarly questioned why Benton “couldn’t have lodged an objection to this” at the time.

Still, when questioning Justice Department lawyer, W. Connor Winn, she raised concerns about the instruction allowing the jury to consider Benton’s earlier campaign finance conviction in 2016 for which he was pardoned by Trump.

“I would think a lay juror would think, if he did the first one, he did this one,” she said.

Pan also appeared skeptical of Benton’s argument taking issue with the government’s decision to charge him under both the Federal Election Campaign Act and a financial recordkeeping law. Benton’s lawyer, Nicholas Harper of Gibson Dunn, told the judges that these statutes weren’t meant to overlap.

Advertisement

“The government routinely charges overlapping statutes,” Pan said. “What you’re proposing is extremely novel.”

Judge Bradley Garcia also said that the distance in time between when the two statutes were passed, and “what is going on” in the more recent recordkeeping statute, “might be a problem for you.”

Foreign Money

Benton was once a force in Republican politics. He also managed Senate campaigns for Kentucky Republicans Rand Paul, Ron Paul’s son, and Mitch McConnell, now minority leader.

Benton was indicted in 2021 after prosecutors said he solicited a sizable contribution from Roman Vasilenko, labeling it as consulting services and then giving some of the funds to Trump’s campaign committee.

According to prosecutors, Vasilenko wired Benton $100,000, and Benton in exchange arranged for Vasilenko to visit the US and attend a fundraising event for Trump, where the businessman could meet and take a photo with him.

Advertisement

Benton then sent $25,000 to Trump’s fundraising committee to cover Vasilenko’s ticket, and didn’t disclose that the money came from Vasilenko, prosecutors said.

Campaign finance laws prohibit foreign nationals from making contributions to political committees, or related to federal presidential elections.

Benton was initially indicted in the scheme alongside Douglas Wead, a former official in the George H. W. Bush administration. Wead died before trial.

At the appeals court, Benton’s lawyers honed in on Vasilenko’s intent when providing the funds to Benton.

In court filings, they argued that Vasilenko “had no interest” in US politics and didn’t provide the funds for the purpose of swaying the campaign, and that the government had provided “bare bones” evidence to the contrary. They also contended the jury had been “misled” in instructions related to this issue.

Advertisement

Benton’s team also took issue with the lower court’s decision to allow his prior conviction to be raised at trial.

“The district court’s decision to admit Mr. Benton’s prior conviction contravened the President’s judgment that he is innocent of those offenses and improperly swayed the jury to convict,” Benton said in court papers.

The government said in court papers that Benton had asserted a “novel argument” on the standard for a political contribution, and regardless, that they had presented “ample evidence” that Vasilenko intended to influence the election.

The case is: USA v. Jesse Benton, D.C. Cir., No. 23-3028 Oral Argument

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Penn Township fires finance director after about 5 months on the job

Published

on

Penn Township fires finance director after about 5 months on the job

The Penn Township commissioners unanimously voted Wednesday to fire Finance Director Jaime Peticca after about five months on the job.

Peticca was hired by the township Aug. 20 to fill a vacancy left by Colleen Gain, who resigned in June.

Township Secretary/Manager Mary Perez declined to comment on the reason for Peticca’s termination. Perez said her last day was Jan. 9.

Attempts to reach Peticca on Wednesday evening were unsuccessful.

Advertisement

Before working for the township, Peticca worked about three years as manager of Trafford Borough and 3½ years as secretary and zoning officer for South Greensburg. She also previously worked as a recruitment specialist and membership manager for the Girl Scouts of Western Pennsylvania.

Perez, who is operating as the interim finance director, said the township will advertise the position in the coming weeks.

It has been difficult for the township to fill vacant job posts in recent years, she said. A code enforcement officer and building inspector role that commissioners will vote on filling next week has been empty for nearly two years, Perez said.

“It’s helpful if (candidates) have government experience. A lot of folks do not,” Perez said. “It’s difficult to find someone from another municipality. A lot of what we do is different than the private sector. There’s a lot of unique reporting requirements that we have that they just aren’t familiar with when they come in.”

The finance director is the only employee of its kind in Penn Township, meaning that person manages everything from accounts and payroll to audits and financial reporting.

Advertisement

“We have a larger budget,” Perez said. “We need to have someone here who understands how to read those financial statements, how to prepare those financial statements alongside our auditors and perform the accounting functions that are necessary to issue those statements.”

The township commissioners approved a $12 million spending plan for 2026 in December, holding property taxes at 17.4 mills and the fire tax at 1.3 mills.

Continue Reading

Finance

3 smart financial habits to incorporate in 2026

Published

on

3 smart financial habits to incorporate in 2026

While you certainly do not have to wait for the beginning of the new year to overhaul your financial habits, the calendar’s fresh start can offer a natural opportunity to reassess. But all too often, when we identify an area of our life that is not quite going as planned, there is a temptation to tear it all down and start from scratch, in the form of a broad-ranging — and overwhelming — resolution.

Sometimes, though, making small tweaks to existing habits, or introducing some fresh ones, is all it takes to course correct, allowing one good financial decision to snowball into the next. Sounds more manageable, right? Read on for some ideas to get started.

1. Dial up your retirement contributions

Continue Reading

Finance

Ghana dispatch: Former Finance Minister detained by US immigration authorities pending extradition review

Published

on

Ghana dispatch: Former Finance Minister detained by US immigration authorities pending extradition review

Former Ghana Finance Minister Kenneth Ofori-Atta was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on January 6 in Washington, DC, where he remains in custody at the Caroline Detention Facility in the state of Virginia. His detention follows Ghana’s December 10 formal extradition request to the US Department of Justice for Ofori-Atta, who faces 78 counts of corruption and corruption-related offenses.

ICE agents arrested Ofori-Atta around 11:00 AM at a luxury apartment complex in Washington, DC. According to the ICE Online Detainee Locator System, Ofori-Atta remains “in ICE custody” as of January 11, 2026. Ghana’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice Dr. Dominic Ayine confirmed that Ofori-Atta is represented by private legal counsel. His lawyer, Frank Davies, stated that Ofori-Atta traveled to the United States for medical treatment and that a legal challenge to his custody has been filed in court. According to a January 10, 2026 press release signed by Ghana’s Ambassador to the United States Victor Emmanuel Smith, Ofori-Atta has declined consular assistance from the Ghana Embassy.

The US State Department revoked Ofori-Atta’s visa in 2025, according to Ghana’s Attorney General Dominic Ayine. The Attorney General further emphasized that it was the visa revocation—rather than a visa overstay or expiration—that triggered US federal enforcement action. The US Department of Justice is currently reviewing Ghana’s extradition request under the “dual criminality” doctrine, which requires confirmation that the alleged financial crimes in Ghana would also be prosecutable in the United States.

Kenneth Ofori-Atta served as Ghana’s Finance Minister under former President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo. He faces charges related to alleged corruption in multiple government contracts, including a GHS 125 million contract between the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) and Strategic Mobilisation Limited (SML), the $400 million National Cathedral Project, ambulance procurement for the Ministry of Health, and electricity company contracts. Ghana’s Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) formally charged Ofori-Atta on November 18, 2025. The OSP seeks to recover misappropriated public funds through the government’s Operation Recover All Loots (ORAL) initiative launched after the National Democratic Congress won the 2024 presidential election.

The extradition request follows a months-long effort by Ghanaian authorities to secure Ofori-Atta’s return. The OSP requested Ofori-Atta appear for questioning on February 10, 2025 via a letter dated January 24, 2025. His solicitors responded January 31, stating he had left Ghana in early January for medical treatment in the United States and was “out of the jurisdiction indefinitely for medical examinations.” The solicitors requested rescheduling and offered to provide information to aid investigations.

Advertisement

On February 10, the OSP directed Ofori-Atta to provide a reasonable return date, warning that failure to comply would compel the OSP to “take all legal steps to secure his return to the jurisdiction.” His solicitors responded the same day, stating a doctor recommended he remain in the US for possible surgical intervention. The following day, February 11, his solicitors inquired whether the OSP conducted a search of Ofori-Atta’s premises, which the OSP denied.

During a February 2025 press conference, the OSP declared Ofori-Atta a fugitive, stating it was unconvinced by the medical report and disagreed that returning to Ghana would endanger his life. The OSP characterized his extended stay as “an attempt to avoid return to the jurisdiction.” By June 2025, Ghana secured a judicial arrest warrant and successfully placed Ofori-Atta on Interpol’s Red Notice database, though the notice was temporarily removed from public visibility following a challenge by the accused. The OSP transmitted a letter to the Attorney General on December 9 requesting formal extradition proceedings.

The charges against Ofori-Atta and seven other individuals include conspiracy to commit the criminal offense of directly or indirectly influencing the procurement process to obtain unfair advantage in contract awards, contrary to section 23(1) of the Criminal and Other Offenses Act, 1960 (Act 29) and section 92(2)(b) of the Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 663) as amended by Act 914. The charges stem from investigations into alleged corruption and financial irregularities in the GHS 125 million contract between the Ghana Revenue Authority and Strategic Mobilisation Limited. The Special Prosecutor is seeking to recover the amount, describing it as unjust enrichment obtained through unlawful means.

Among the most prominent allegations against Ofori-Atta involves the National Cathedral Project. In November 2024, the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice concluded an investigation into the project, which was initiated by former President Akufo-Addo with an estimated cost of $100 million from private funds. The cost surged to $400 million, with the investigation revealing that the contract awarded to Ribade Company Ltd was void ab initio for violating mandatory provisions of the Procurement Act. The investigation recommended that the Board of Public Procurement Authority cancel the contract and investigate the Board of Trustees. Ofori-Atta allegedly authorized the release of $58 million in state funds toward construction costs. The project remains an incomplete excavation site in central Accra, on land formerly occupied by government buildings and judges’ residences. Additional charges relate to alleged corruption in ambulance procurement for the Ministry of Health and the termination of a contract between the Electricity Company of Ghana and Beijing Xiao Cheng Technology.

The extradition proceedings will be governed by Ghana’s Extradition Act, 1960 (Act 22), which applies where an extradition agreement exists with the requesting state. Section 2 of the Act mandates declining extradition requests if the offense is of a political character, with a Magistrate responsible for determining whether charges meet this standard.

Advertisement

Article 40 of Ghana’s 1992 Constitution requires Ghana to observe treaty obligations and settle international disputes peacefully. This aligns with Article 1 of the UN Charter, which requires states to maintain friendly relations based on principles of equality and respect for human rights. The principle of pacta sunt servanda, enshrined in Article 26 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), requires states to observe treaty obligations in good faith. Both Ghana and the United States are bound by their extradition agreement and are barred from invoking municipal law to avoid treaty obligations under Article 27 of the Vienna Convention, except in circumstances permitted under Article 46, which addresses capacity to conclude treaties and inconsistencies with normal practice and good faith.

The extradition request comes as Ghana and the United States maintain reciprocal cooperation on extradition matters. Ghana previously cooperated with US extradition requests, including the extradition of Ghanaian citizens to the United States for alleged crimes against US citizens. In one case, Abu Trica and other Ghanaian citizens were extradited to face charges related to an alleged $8 million romance scam targeting US citizens, demonstrating the mutual nature of bilateral treaty obligations.

The case against Ofori-Atta represents part of broader anti-corruption efforts in Ghana. Corruption has been a persistent challenge in the country since independence, with state officials diverting public resources to personal ventures. Ghana has implemented multiple measures to combat corruption, including Article 8(2) of the 1992 Constitution and Section 16 of the Citizenship Act, 2000 (Act 591), which restrict dual citizens from occupying certain key offices. The country has also created specialized institutions including the Office of the Special Prosecutor and the Economic and Organised Crimes Office. The 2024 presidential and parliamentary elections saw a change in political power, with the National Democratic Congress defeating the New Patriotic Party by approximately one million votes. The worst recorded corruption cases under Ghana’s fourth republic occurred during Ofori-Atta’s tenure as Finance Minister, prompting public demands for accountability that influenced the election outcome. The current NDC administration immediately established Operation Recover All Loots to recover misappropriated public funds.

Opinions expressed in JURIST Dispatches are solely those of our correspondents in the field and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST’s editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending