Connect with us

News

Why political leaders are so unpopular now

Published

on

Why political leaders are so unpopular now

Stay informed with free updates

The writer is chair of Rockefeller International

Joe Biden’s record low popularity ratings get a lot of attention, yet leaders across the developed world are in a similar predicament to the US president — they have rarely been this unpopular.

I track leaders’ approval ratings in 20 major democracies, using leading pollsters such as Morning Consult, Gallup and Compolítica. In the developed world, no leader has a rating above 50 per cent. Only one country (Italy) has seen its leader gain approval in the 2020s. At 37 per cent, Biden’s rating is at a record low for a US president late in his first term — but above average for his peers.

Advertisement

Signs of old age may be hurting the 81-year-old Biden’s ratings but this does not explain the wider trend. Between 1950 and 2020, the average age of presidents and prime ministers in developed countries fell from above 60 to around 54. The leaders of Britain, Germany, France and Japan are far younger than Biden — but even less popular. All four have ratings below 30 per cent.

The debate about Biden centres on why he gets such low marks despite relatively strong recent economic data, including lower inflation. Yet approval ratings have been trending down for first term US presidents since Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. Biden supporters hope the improving economy will eventually lift his ratings, but he is up against deeply entrenched trends.

Leaders across the developed world are, at least in part, victims of a long-term decay in national morale. Slower economic growth, rising inequality and a growing feeling that the system is rigged against the average person — all these factors are magnified by the polarising impact of social media.

In the US, Democrats have grown less likely to vote for a Republican, much less marry one, and vice versa. Polarisation is personal, bitter. Similar splits are widening in Europe, where voters have more parties to choose from and are turning on the established ones. Between the early 1990s and 2020 the vote share of extreme parties in Europe increased from near zero to 25 per cent. This was led by gains on the far right, which casts itself as a defender of the common people against outsiders and a pampered, global elite.

Social media appears to intensify partisan rancour. A solid majority in most developed economies — and nearly 80 per cent in the US — believe these platforms are widening political divisions. It may also be that the public is becoming increasingly alienated from democratic leaders because fewer talented people are entering politics, put off by the ploys required for survival in a digitised arena.

Advertisement

In the developing world, however, while social media can be just as widespread and as hostile in tenor, it seems to be inflicting less damage on incumbents. In my poll tracker for 10 of the largest developing nations, the majority of leaders still have a rating above 50 per cent. The sense of disappointment that shadows leaders of developed countries has yet to overwhelm their peers in the developing world.

One possible reason is that while globalisation and digitisation have helped lift the fortunes of many in the developing world, the developed nations have in recent decades seen slower growth. This is particularly true for the middle classes. From highs of at least 3 per cent in the 1960s and 1970s, growth in average per capita income has slowed in the US to 1.5 per cent, and in the large European countries and Japan to around one per cent or less. Perhaps not coincidentally, Japan has suffered the sharpest long-term decline in per capita income, and today has the least popular prime minister, Fumio Kishida, with an approval rating of 21 per cent.

Polls show that voters in advanced economies are losing faith that the modern capitalist system can generate opportunities for everyone, and are increasingly inclined to believe that “people can only get rich at the expense of others”. Most see themselves as “others”. In 2023, the number of people who expect to be “better off in five years” hit record lows below 50 per cent in all 14 of the developed countries surveyed by the Edelman Trust Barometer. Optimists were a minority everywhere. Even the positive vibes emanating from a rising stock market aren’t cheering people outside the financial world.

This bodes ill for incumbents, with national elections in many of the leading democracies this year. As recently as the early 2000s, incumbents were winning 70 per cent of their re-election bids; lately they have won just 30 per cent. To restore their traditional advantage, incumbents need to recognise that the connection between headline economic data and political support has broken. Voters are reacting to long-term decline, and are looking for fresh fixes.

Advertisement

News

Dangerous Arctic cold, lake effect snow to grip Michigan through weekend

Published

on

Dangerous Arctic cold, lake effect snow to grip Michigan through weekend

Today’s Winter Storm Warning continues for Oceana, Muskegon and Ottawa counties (shown in pink on the map above), with Winter Weather Advisories stretching across most of the southern half of the Lower Peninsula.

Incoming snow could range from 9-12 inches along the Lake Michigan shoreline communities to just 1-3 inches across Southeast Michigan.

Temperatures will moderate a bit today, with some area across the southern tier reaching the low 30s, while the Upper Peninsula inches toward 20 degrees for a daytime high.

After today, all the focus will shift to the extremely cold air mass headed our way. It will be the coldest air of winter, and the coldest air some of us have felt since 2019, forecasters say.

Here are the forecast highlights from the National Weather Service offices across Michigan today:

We will face a potentially life-threatening cold outbreak beginning Thursday night, with temperatures plunging well below zero and wind chills reaching minus 35 degrees or colder across much of the state through Saturday morning.

Light to moderate snow will taper off across southern Michigan this morning, but lake effect snow will return to areas along Lake Superior this afternoon and tonight, bringing three to six inches to the Keweenaw Peninsula and higher terrain.

Winter Weather Advisories are in effect for northern Houghton and Keweenaw counties. The National Weather Service warns that blowing snow and reduced visibility will create hazardous travel conditions, particularly Thursday night through Friday afternoon when widespread 20 mph winds combine with fine, powdery snow.

Advertisement

The most significant threat arrives Thursday night as the coldest air mass of the season sweeps into Michigan. Temperatures will drop below zero across most of the Upper Peninsula and northern Lower Michigan by Friday morning, with some areas plunging to minus 15 degrees or colder. An Extreme Cold Watch remains in effect for western and central Upper Michigan, where apparent temperatures of minus 25 degrees or colder are likely Saturday morning. Even southern Lower Michigan will see single-digit highs Friday and Saturday, with overnight lows dropping below zero in many interior locations. The bitter cold will persist through at least Sunday morning.

Lake effect snow will continue intermittently through the weekend, though accumulations will be limited by the extremely cold air, which produces very fine snowflakes.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Air Force One Turns Around With Trump Aboard

Published

on

Video: Air Force One Turns Around With Trump Aboard

new video loaded: Air Force One Turns Around With Trump Aboard

Air Force One turned around while carrying President Trump due to a “minor electrical issue,” an official said. Trump was on his way to Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum.

By Shawn Paik

January 21, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Wall Street-backed landlords a target for both Trump and Democrats

Published

on

Wall Street-backed landlords a target for both Trump and Democrats

An aerial view of a housing development in Las Vegas on Aug. 8, 2025.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Back in 2020, Ashley Maxwell and her husband were looking to buy their first home, near Indianapolis.

“We looked at over 80 homes in probably a span of two months,” she said.

The couple was in a tight spot. They had three kids and were forced to move because their landlord was selling their rental. That pressure made their search all the more frustrating.

Advertisement

“We would pull up to a house, our agent would get out and be like, ‘There’s 10 additional offers, sight unseen, all cash.’ Typically that means it’s an investor,” Maxwell recalled.

The couple, who eventually found a place, was one of many whose path to homeownership was stymied by a nationwide surge of institutional investors, then driven by record-low mortgage rates, snapping up single-family homes to rent out.

It’s an issue that President Trump now aims to take on. In a recent social media post, he said he wants to “ban large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes,” to help bring down housing costs.

It’s a popular idea, especially among some Democrats. But passing such laws has proved difficult, and economists say the link of investor-owned homes to high prices is not so simple.

A cap on investor rentals just took effect in this city

In Fishers, Ind., a suburb of Indianapolis, Republican Mayor Scott Fadness was taken aback when he saw new data in a housing report compiled by his team that showed the extent of investor landlords in his city.

Advertisement

“We have neighborhoods today that are now creeping up to 35, 38% of the homes have been purchased for investment purposes,” he said.

It got so bad, he recalled, that one of his employees who was house hunting sent letters to homeowners, explaining that they were going to work for the city “and would they please consider allowing them to buy the home” instead of an institutional investor.

To address the problem, Fadness last year proposed capping rentals at 10% per neighborhood to protect local homeownership.

“It’s been a source of generational wealth in our country for a very long time, particularly in the middle class,” he said. “I hate to see that go away.”

It’s also more difficult, he said, to deal with code enforcement and other issues when the property owner is an out-of-state corporation.

Advertisement

Realtor groups opposed a cap, arguing it infringed on private property rights and could deprive sellers of the highest bid, but the City Council backed the plan unanimously. The new law just took effect Jan. 1.

“It was the first time I had proposed an ordinance in our community where outside interests, business interests, came into town and spent money trying to kill the legislation,” Fadness said.

It was a rare win for such a proposal. Cities and states across the U.S. have debated restricting investor homebuyers, yet most measures have failed to pass. One proposal went nowhere in Congress, which Trump has said would need to codify any ban. California Gov. Gavin Newsom joined Trump this month in saying he’s determined to do something.

Economists say large investors are not the biggest factor driving home prices

But housing experts say it’s too easy to blame corporate landlords entirely for skyrocketing prices.

“People see the connection, but they don’t necessarily separate out the cause and effect,” said Laurie Goodman, an economist with the Housing Finance Policy Center at the Urban Institute.

Advertisement

Prices do go up where investors buy, but she said, “That is part of their strategy,” because the places they choose are already growing. And often, they buy serious fixer-uppers.

“Most of us don’t have the knowledge to do the repairs,” Goodman said. “[Even] if we did, we couldn’t get the financing.”

Nationally, the largest companies own about 3% of the single-family rental market, with larger shares in some places like the Sunbelt. And the institutional buying spree has cooled from its peak in 2022, as higher interest rates have made homes more expensive.

The main driver of rising prices is a housing shortage, Goodman said, and some investors are actually helping to ease that now, by building their own single-family houses to rent.

“The best way to make housing affordable is to simply build more of it — to increase supply,” she said.

Advertisement

The debate continues in Las Vegas

In Las Vegas, Democratic state Sen. Dina Neal still worries that the build-to-rent trend is undercutting people’s shot at homeownership. She pointed to one corporate investor near her district that built an entire neighborhood of houses to rent.

“They didn’t build the whole entire neighborhood to give it up,” she said. “They wanted to make sure they would secure rental income from 200 different families and keep it.”

What’s more, like Fadness in Indiana, Neal worries that investor rentals are priced so high it can become impossible for many people to save up for a down payment. She said her previous next-door neighbor sold to an investor believing she could trade up, but had to rent a place down the street — from a different corporate investor.

Neal has proposed a cap on corporate landlords three times, but Nevada’s Republican governor, Joe Lombardo, has blocked it, most recently last month.

Neal is surprised — and cautious — now that Trump is taking up her cause. “I am trying to figure out how I entered into a universe where I became aligned with a president who is a nemesis to the Democratic Party,” she laughed.

Advertisement

But if Trump’s interest can persuade more Republicans to join the push, she said she’ll take it.

Continue Reading

Trending