Connect with us

Montana

Montana PSC orders NorthWestern to take closer look at low-income programs – Daily Montanan

Published

on

Montana PSC orders NorthWestern to take closer look at low-income programs – Daily Montanan


NorthWestern Energy will need to provide more information to regulators about how well its energy assistance programs are helping low-income customers in the wake of double-digit utility rate increases.

The monopoly utility also will need to identify barriers low-income customers face to using those programs and determine the best way to reach those customers.

“Evidence in the record regarding affordability is limited,” said the Montana Public Service Commission.

Tuesday, the Public Service Commission unanimously voted to approve an order that largely keeps in place a settlement agreement it greenlighted this fall with Northwestern Energy.

Advertisement

That agreement resulted in a rate increase of 24% for residential electricity customers and 25% for small businesses compared to rates in August 2022 — and commissioners didn’t specifically discuss rate changes.

But the Public Service Commission received three motions to reconsider its earlier decision, and after hearing legal and rate analyses from staff at a meeting Tuesday, it rejected two of the three motions.

However, the PSC bought into arguments made by one group of parties, the Human Resource Council District XI, Natural Resources Defense Council, and NW Energy Coalition.

The Human Resource Council and its partners argued the “effects of any utility rate increase are disproportionately felt by low-income customers,” but it said the PSC didn’t discuss those customers specifically.

The group also said NorthWestern offers no low-income programs other than what it’s required to do by law; the money that’s available isn’t enough; customers have faced roadblocks with its weatherization program ever since NorthWestern contracted with the Department of Public Health and Human Services; and participation rates in low-income programs “have declined by more than 25% over the last decade.”

Advertisement

At a PSC hearing in April, data from NorthWestern showed the decrease in participation.

Under questioning by a lawyer representing the Human Resource Council and its partners at the time, a vice president for the utility admitted the company wasn’t proposing any changes in its outreach to low-income customers.

Tuesday, however, the Public Service Commission ordered NorthWestern Energy to do more to analyze its service to low-income ratepayers.

“The commission is sensitive to the impacts that utility rate increases have on all customers, including low-income customers,” said the draft order. “The commission acknowledges that (its earlier order) does not separately and explicitly address the impact of the settlement on low-income customers and, on reconsideration, finds that the request … for an analysis of the impact is reasonable.”

The PSC said it might seem intuitive that low-income customers are more affected by rate increases, but the lack of evidence means commissioners can’t reach any conclusions.

Advertisement

“Nevertheless, on reconsideration, the Commission agrees with HRC/NRDC/NWEC that an evaluation of the efficacy of available low-income energy assistance programs through a stakeholder process is warranted,” the order said.

“At a minimum, the stakeholder process should attempt to address apparent information gaps concerning trends in energy affordability for low-income customers in relation to the residential class as a whole, barriers to participation in existing assistance programs, coordination across assistance programs, and the most effective outreach and delivery mechanisms for low-income assistance.”

The PSC, made up of five commissioners who are all currently Republican, also clarified it expects NorthWestern to maintain a permanent stakeholder group to evaluate “demand-side management,” or strategies to control energy use, and expand its engagement.

But in its order, the PSC rejected motions to reconsider from 350 Montana and Broad Reach Power.

In its motion, 350 Montana had argued the PSC invented a “magical” new way of analyzing costs that wasn’t legal, failed to consider emissions, sent $3.4 million to shareholders that belonged to customers, and discriminated against residential customers and small businesses.

Advertisement

However, an analysis from PSC staff said commissioners based their order on judicial and agency precedent, and it also said NorthWestern will need to include data about carbon emissions in future reviews.

As for the money 350 Montana alleges belongs to customers — the difference between the authorized cost of debt and NorthWestern’s actual cost of debt — the PSC said it would have to undo a decision made by an earlier commission in a separate case to go that route.

The staff analysis also indicated larger customers subsidize the cost of electricity for residential and small businesses — as part of the accounting principles of “gradualism” and moderation to decrease rate shock. At least a couple of commissioners wanted to stress that subsidy.

“Certainly the order has softened the blow … at the expense of other classes in order to lessen rate shock on residential and small business customer classes,” Commissioner Jennifer Fielder said.

Broad Reach had said it was denied due process because the PSC didn’t reschedule a hearing on the settlement after it was filed. The PSC disagreed and said the burden of canceling the hearing and requiring more testimony and discovery would have outweighed the benefit of moving ahead.

Advertisement



Source link

Montana

Secretary of State postcard complaint dismissed • Daily Montanan

Published

on

Secretary of State postcard complaint dismissed • Daily Montanan


A postcard that came under fire from Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen is not a violation of Montana’s code of ethics or other campaign laws, Commissioner of Political Practices Chris Gallus said Friday in response to a complaint.

In a letter rejecting the complaint, Gallus said the mailing could be viewed as partisan but that doesn’t mean it creates a violation under his jurisdiction.

Last week, a Harlowton voter filed a complaint alleging the Secretary of State’s Office should not have used taxpayer dollars to pay for the postcard, which said “only citizens should be allowed to vote.”

The Secretary of State’s Office has not responded to a question about the cost of the postcard or how many Montanans received it. Montana has nearly 785,000 registered voters.

Advertisement

The postcard announced a partnership with the federal government to “strengthen election security” and featured a picture of Secretary Christi Jacobsen and President Donald Trump.

The complaint said the postcard pushed a false narrative that “elections are rigged” and “someone other than citizens” are voting.

However, Gallus said the complaint does not clearly allege any violation of statute over which he has jurisdiction. He also said elected officials have a responsibility to communicate with citizens, and voters elected the Secretary of State based in part on her political leanings.

“Expecting that all communication following an election would be devoid of a political bent so as to avoid any criticism or open debate is unreasonable and impracticable,” Gallus wrote in the letter.

Gallus said he wanted to address the complaint in detail because his office has received numerous inquiries about the postcard in relation to “the use of government funds or resources.”

Advertisement

“Montana’s elected officials routinely provide communications to Montana citizens which under a certain lens may appear to be political,” Gallus wrote. “Montana laws do prohibit the use of public resources for political purposes.”

But he said he and staff in his office reviewed the mailer, and it does not appear to violate any provision of the Montana Code of Ethics or any campaign regulation because it “does not have a political purpose” as defined by law.

In making that determination, he said, he looks for words that solicit support or opposition to any political committee; nomination or election of a person to public office; or passage of a ballot issue. That means language such as “vote,” “oppose,” “support,” “elect,” “defeat,” or “reject.”

Gallus said his office also looks at whether material depicts a clearly identified candidate, party or ballot issue “in a manner that is susceptible of no reasonable interpretation other than as a call for the nomination, election or defeat” of the candidate or issue.

Gallus said it is a high bar, and the postcard doesn’t meet the threshold. He said neither Jacobsen or Trump are currently running for office, and the mailing doesn’t include any express words of support.

Advertisement

“Public officials have associated duties, which include communicating with constituents,” Gallus wrote. “For Montana’s Secretary of State, this means communicating with all voters regarding elections, voting and the SOS positions on citizen only voting, which she appears to be doing here.”

In a subsequent news release, the Secretary of State’s Office said it had identified 23 potential non-citizens who had voted. A spokesperson did not answer questions about when they most recently voted, what counties they had voted in, or what the next steps would be.

Missoula County Elections Administrator Bradley Seaman said earlier the 23 potential non-citizens indicated the current system is working well; it represented 29-one-thousandths of 1 percent of voters.

Seaman also said it is important to address those findings as soon as possible. He pointed to a recent tied vote in Missoula County where one vote would have made a difference. (In that case, a council race, the Missoula City Council made the appointment.)

To vote in Montana, people need to be a U.S. citizen, at least 18 years old before the election, and a Montana resident for at least 30 days before the next election.

Advertisement

Jacobsen mailer question_Beley response letter (1)



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Mixed reaction to BLM decision to cancel American Prairie bison permits

Published

on

Mixed reaction to BLM decision to cancel American Prairie bison permits


GREAT FALLS — Governor Greg Gianforte on Friday today praised the federal Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposed decision to cancel grazing permits authorizing bison grazing previously issued to the American Prairie.

Mixed reaction to BLM decision to cancel American Prairie Reserve bison permits

Advertisement

“Today’s decision by BLM is a win for Montana’s ranchers, our agricultural producers, and the rule of law,” Gianforte said in a news release. “For years, we have raised serious concerns about the federal government’s failure to listen to the folks who live and work the land. By proposing to cancel these permits, BLM is finally acknowledging that federal overreach cannot come at the expense of our local communities and the production agriculture that feeds our nation.”

Gianforte said the proposed decision marks a “significant victory” for agricultural producers and rural communities across Montana and the United States, reversing a prior federal authorization that allowed APR to graze non-production bison on over 63,000 acres of federal public lands.

“This administration will always stand with our farmers and ranchers against federal overreach,” Gianforte said. “We will continue to protect our way of life and ensure that Montana voices are heard in Washington, D.C.”

American Prairie CEO Alison Fox responded to the decision by calling the outcome “unfair, deeply disappointing, disruptive, and inconsistent with long-standing public-lands grazing practices in Montana.”

Fox said in a news release, “Our organization and conservation model remain resilient, but that does not negate the fact that this creates uncertainty for all livestock owners who depend on public lands for grazing. We have followed the law, complied with every requirement, and prioritized transparency at every step.”

Advertisement

Fix emphasized that her organization is merely seeking equal treatment under the law, not special treatment or a change in precedent. Fox noted, “We have had permission to graze bison on BLM land since 2005, and have done so successfully for the past 20 years.”

Beyond land stewardship, American Prairie’s bison program has delivered significant and measurable benefits to Montana communities. The herd has helped feed Montana families through hundreds of public harvests, and local organizations have raised more than $150,000 over the past decade by raffling donated bison harvests — funds that stay in local communities.

Fox said American Prairie is reviewing the decision and determining its course of action, and will continue to advocate for a public-lands grazing system that is lawful, predictable, and applied equally.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Montana sees sharp decline in Canadian tourism | Explore Big Sky

Published

on

Montana sees sharp decline in Canadian tourism | Explore Big Sky


EBS STAFF

Tourism officials in Montana are feeling the economic impact of a sharp decline in Canadian visitors, particularly from Saskatchewan, a historically reliable source of consistent visitation. New data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, as reported by CBC News, shows 62,000 fewer travelers crossed from Saskatchewan into the U.S. in 2025, equating to a 20% decline in Minot and 16% decline in Big Sky, two of the more popular destinations, according to the communities’ tourism agencies.

“Financially, having the loss of Canadian traffic is massive,” Brad Niva, CEO of Visit Big Sky, told CBC. “In my community, it’s half a million dollars of lost revenue.”

Niva said some Canadian visitors have told tourism officials they plan to delay U.S. travel for several years, citing political concerns and affordability. Niva told CBC that Big Sky has temporarily halted marketing efforts aimed at Canadians and hope conditions improve by 2026.

Advertisement

While Canadian travel south has slowed, Saskatchewan has seen an increase in U.S. visitors, a shifting cross-border tourism pattern that Montana communities like Big Sky are watching closely as they plan for future seasons.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending