Connect with us

Indiana

Mackenzie Mgbako is the key to IU’s fortunes. And he’s starting to unlock his game.

Published

on

Mackenzie Mgbako is the key to IU’s fortunes. And he’s starting to unlock his game.


BLOOMINGTON – This looked like a tricky game for Indiana.

Rolling Minnesota, early tipoff on a Friday night with weather expected, five days before Purdue and three days after a fiasco of turnovers and missed free throws at Rutgers. The Gophers arrived on a seven-game win streak, surprising the conference with their dangerousness across a 3-1 Big Ten start and with nothing really to lose as road underdogs in one of the league’s toughest venues.

Indiana, still smarting from that Rutgers loss, arrived knowing a bigger game lay in wait over the hill. Both because of the weight of rivalry in this sport in this state, and also because that game might by itself have the capacity to turn the Hoosiers’ season for better or for worse, permanently.

Advertisement

IU won wire-to-wire vs. Minnesota. But hears why you could hear Hoosiers’ fans groans.

More: IU beats Minnesota behind balanced scoring, stout defense

Friday night’s game should have been difficult for Mike Woodson’s team.

Friday night’s game was over in eight minutes.

And no one was more important to the manner of victory — or frankly the victory itself — than Mackenzie Mgbako, the player who more than any other Hoosier holds his team’s fortunes between now and the end of this season in his hands.

Advertisement

“I thought he was aggressive right from the start. I thought our whole team was aggressive on both ends of the floor,” IU coach Mike Woodson said. “(Mgbako) got some good looks early that he made. I ran a couple plays for him that he was able to knock shots down, and the way they double-team, it opened him up.”

Mgbako scored a game- and career-high 19 points, in a 74-62 win over Minnesota that was scantly even that close. The Gophers were second best in every way in what turned out to be the most important phase of the game: the first two media-timeout segments, when IU (12-5, 4-2) opened a 25-8 lead, put inarguably Minnesota’s two most important players in foul trouble and, with downhill aggressiveness and relentless pressure, buried the visitors.

The Hoosiers, who didn’t actually make it home from New Jersey until Wednesday morning because of the weather, left their turnover problems in Piscataway, and any pity they felt for themselves on the floor of the Rutgers Athletic Center (known contractually as Jersey Mike’s Arena).

Minnesota (12-4, 3-2) looked like a gopher hole — pun absolutely intended — for Indiana’s horse to step into, a hot team with virtually nothing to lose facing up to one that could be forgiven its concerns and doubts.

Advertisement

The Gophers typically score the ball efficiently, and share it remarkably well, and yet this game was never close. Minnesota’s best effort cut the deficit to five, late in the first half. The only 18 seconds of the game Indiana did not lead were the 18 seconds Indiana needed to score its first basket, a Trey Galloway 3-pointer, Assembly Hall, sold out and rowdy despite the impending weather.

“Once we started the game aggressive, it carried over on to our defense, and then defense creates offense,” Mgbako said. “Just being aggressive on both sides of the floor is what created the win tonight.”

This is the formula for the Hoosiers, if they are to make this season into what they want it to be. Branch McCracken Court must be a fortress. Road teams must be required their best effort and their hardest fight just to make anything of a trip to Bloomington, against an undeniably imperfect but — as Friday night showed — still remarkably talented team.

Make Bloomington a difficult place for opponents to come across these next two months, and this team can scrap out for itself the results necessary to demand a place in the NCAA tournament.

But it will take all of what the Hoosiers showed Friday, and precious little of what they showed Tuesday, this week providing a remarkably timed juxtaposition of IU at its worst, compared to IU at its best.

Advertisement

“We’ve got to somehow convert how we play here at home on the road,” Woodson said. “That’s going to be the difference moving forward.”

And while Mgbako need not do most or all of it himself, Friday night provided the latest and perhaps most convincing evidence he is the as-yet-undefined number that changes the calculus for this team.

Kel’el Ware and Malik Reneau (33 points, 20 rebounds Friday) will always produce in the post. Xavier Johnson can be mercurial, even frustrating, and Tuesday reminded us his game will at times cross certain lines. But he is also remarkably creative, and when his focus is properly trained he is dogged on defense.

Friday was the best of Galloway, Kansas game excepted, his 10 points, two 3s, three rebounds and seven assists all crucial. There were important contributions from Gabe Cupps, Anthony Walker, CJ Gunn — that looks like Indiana’s bench for the foreseeable future, Woodson paring his rotation down earlier in the calendar, perhaps, than he did in either of his first two years.

Advertisement

There’s so much that feels, if not settled, then at least proven about these Hoosiers, good and bad. The one open question is perhaps the biggest of the season, even dating back as far as June and July, when this team came together to begin the process of making something of itself.

Mgbako is — not just because of his five-star billing or his All-American status in high school but simply his obvious gifts, traits and abilities — the player with both the greatest ceiling, and the clearest ability to raise his team’s as well.

You saw it Friday night.

The downhill assertiveness against defenders incapable of managing Mgbako’s blend of length, size and athleticism on the drive. The reach and instincts that, finally applied consistently on defense, make him a frustrating matchup. The 3-point shot that has not-so-quietly come around — Mgbako is shooting 38.9% from behind the arc over his past 12 games, and 45.5% (10-of-22) from range in Big Ten play.

Advertisement

This isn’t meant to suggest none of his teammates can or will improve across the coming weeks. Reneau clearly already has. Ware remains somewhere south of his prodigious and almost certainly NBA-ready ceiling. Should Galloway find more of the offensive and creative consistency he’s shown beginning with the Kansas game (when he scored 28 points), he can be a difference maker for this team.

The list goes on. But it starts and it stops with Mgbako. Indiana will insist upon playing him at the three, unless in case of emergency, for the rest of this season. That will certainly challenge him again defensively, but it will also present more nights like Friday, when he faces a cover so much shorter, so much less athletic and so clearly overmatched Mgbako will find, if he works for them, stretches of the game which he can very simply dominate.

Earlier this season, Woodson flatly disagreed with the notion a player of Mgbako’s top-10 billing should simply be expected to arrive in college the finished article. Woodson promised his freshman forward would continue to improve, both technically and tactically, as he spent more time at the college level, an improvement Mgbako now both shows and, crucially, recognizes.

“He’s put the work in,” Woodson said. “He’s continuing to work, along with the rest of our young players. All we can do as coaches is continue to teach and push and try to get as much out of them as we can as we continue this journey.”

For one of the most distinct players — because of his position, his skills and his role within his team — in the Big Ten, the curve finally appears to be steepening toward Mgbako’s best.

Advertisement

The more that curve climbs, the better Mgbako gets, the more he understands what he’s capable of and what’s required of him and why he makes such a remarkable difference for his team, the higher Indiana’s own ceiling climbs. No player currently enjoys greater influence over either the course, or the outcome, of this season in Bloomington.

Follow IndyStar reporter Zach Osterman on Twitter: @ZachOsterman.



Source link

Indiana

Projecting the Indiana Fever’s 2026 Starting Lineup

Published

on

Projecting the Indiana Fever’s 2026 Starting Lineup


The start of training camp officially marks the beginning of the 2026 WNBA season. The Indiana Fever were fairly quiet during free agency after successfully retaining most of their top-tier talent such as Kelsey Mitchell, Aliyah Boston, Lexie Hull, and Sophie Cunningham. Though they still managed to add a few solid pieces to further stack their depth.

Advertisement

Last season the Fever made an impressive postseason run despite facing multiple injuries, particularly in the backcourt. The front office clearly prioritized guard depth as a result, as well as looking to upgrade at the power forward position.

Advertisement

The Fever brass aimed to shore up any defensive deficiencies on the perimeter in the draft by adding guard Raven Johnson out of South Carolina, who brings a reputation as a defensive stopper. As for bolstering the frontcourt, to play alongside, and even provide some relief for Aliyah Boston, newly acquired 6-foot-4 Monique Billings and veteran forward Myisha Hines-Allen fit the bill. Indiana also picked up another solid player in Tyasha Harris at the guard position to provide backcourt depth and relieve pressure on Kelsey Mitchell and Caitlin Clark.

As for the starting lineup, here’s who the Indiana Fever are projected to run with:

Advertisement

Caitlin Clark, Guard

Jun 17, 2025; Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark (22) shoots the ball in the first half against the Connecticut Sun at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images | Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images

This comes as no surprise, but Clark will look to lead the way for the Fever in one of the two starting guard roles. Coming off of a season riddled with injuries, her return is highly anticipated. In true Clark fashion, she showed positive signs of production during the FIBA World Cup qualifiers where she led Team USA in assists and points.

Clark is expected to return to form in 2026. She provides speed in transition, is a deep threat from beyond the arc, and is elite at setting up her teammates. The only thing standing in the way of a productive season for Clark is remaining healthy for the duration of the season.

Advertisement

Kelsey Mitchell, Guard

Sep 30, 2025; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA; Indiana Fever guard Kelsey Mitchell (0) dribbles against the Las Vegas Aces during the first quarter of game five of the second round of the 2025 WNBA Playoffs at Michelob Ultra Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images | Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images
Advertisement

Re-signing Kelsey Mitchell was yet again the main offseason priority for the Fever and they did just that. Coming off of a career year, Mitchell will be a key component in the Fever reaching a championship. She averaged 20.2 points per game last season and carried the team on her back during Clark’s absence.

Advertisement

As a premier scoring guard, she complements Clark’s game well and when the two are on the floor together, they’re easily the most explosive backcourt in the entire WNBA. Mitchell has exceptional speed and is a gifted isolation scorer. Her ability to quickly cut and drive to the rim makes her a nightmare for opposing teams to defend and contributed to her earning a 2025 All-WNBA First Team selection.

Mitchell is one of the most dangerous clutch situation players in the league making her a stellar weapon for the Fever.

Advertisement

Lexie Hull, Forward

Aug 17, 2025; Uncasville, Connecticut, USA; Indiana Fever guard Lexie Hull (10) reacts after her three point basket against the Connecticut Sun in overtime at Mohegan Sun Arena. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images | David Butler II-Imagn Images

Entering her fifth WNBA season, all with the Fever, no other player on the roster has grown as much as Lexie Hull. Her steady development has made her a key piece and earned her a starting role in the rotation as last season progressed. Listed as a guard, her defense and versatility has allowed her to frequently fill the role of small forward. She impacts the game on both ends of the floor and saw career highs in 2025 in points per game (7.2), rebounds per game (4.3), assists per game (1.8) and steals per game (1.2).

Her impactful instincts even contributed to her being near the top of the WNBA in offensive fouls drawn last season. With her high-percentage shooting from beyond the arc, solid perimeter defense, and elite hustle, Hull fills the wing role nicely for the Fever.

Advertisement

Monique Billings, Forward

Sep 17, 2025; San Jose, California, USA; Golden State Valkyries forward Monique Billings (25) boxes out Minnesota Lynx forward Alanna Smith (8) in the fourth quarter in game two of round one for the 2025 WNBA Playoffs at SAP Center. Mandatory Credit: David Gonzales-Imagn Images | David Gonzales-Imagn Images
Advertisement

Heading into the 2026 season, the Fever desperately needed to add talented size up front to complement Aliyah Boston’s skill set. With the departure of veteran Natasha Howard in free agency, the Fever acquired their likely next starting power forward in Monique Billings.

Advertisement

Billings is a strong finisher around the basket, has soft hands, runs the floor well, and is adept at screening for guards. She can also defend multiple positions and is a more than capable rebounder. Billings checks all of the boxes of a needed component for Indiana.

Aliyah Boston, Center

Advertisement

Las Vegas Aces center A’ja Wilson (22) defends Indiana Fever forward Aliyah Boston (7) during Game 4 of the WNBA semifinals on Sunday, Sept. 28, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The Fever defeated the Aces 90-83. | Christine Tannous/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

After making WNBA history with a record contract, Aliyah Boston looks to continue to elevate her game. Boston has quickly ascended as one of the league’s biggest threats in the middle of the floor. What makes this season even more promising for Boston is the dominant performances she put on display during Unrivaled.

She’s in peak physical shape, faster and has worked on her three-point shooting – an area she committed herself to improving on in the offseason. The three-time All-Star has already established herself as a force on the block due to her combination of size and footwork. Her step-through moves have increased her efficiency in scoring under the basket.

Boston seems poised to have the best season of her career in 2026.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.

Published

on

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.


(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.

To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.

But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.

The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.

Advertisement

“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”

The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.

It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.

A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.

Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.

Advertisement

A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.

The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.

Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.

“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”

School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum

Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.

Advertisement

But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.

“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.

The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.

As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.

Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.

Advertisement

The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.

In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.

With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.

Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.

“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”

Advertisement

Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’

Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.

But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.

Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.

Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.

A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.

The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.

Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.

“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.

A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.

Advertisement

Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.

“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”

Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl

Published

on

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl





© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Ty Simpson was a guest on the “Downs 2 Business” podcast with Caleb Downs and Josh Downs, and he discussed why he believed Indiana beat Alabama in the Rose Bowl.

The Crimson Tide’s offense was unable to score a touchdown against the Hoosiers in the 38-3 loss. Simpson shone a light on why he felt Indiana had so much success against Alabama on X.

“From my point of view, I was like they don’t much,” Simpson said. “I was like they do the same thing every down and so when I get the ball, I knew exactly what was going to happen. They just didn’t mess up, bro. They were in the exact same spot they were supposed to be, and they were so well coached. It was so much different than the SEC. In the SEC, they’ll play man, they’ll do these unorthodox coverages because kind of how it is. That game was crazy to me. Of course, I got hurt; that was a bummer. But I just knew what they were going to do, but we couldn’t really run the ball. We didn’t really throw it. It was so crazy to me how it happened.”

Advertisement

Indiana went on to beat Oregon in the semifinals of the College Football Playoff, and the Hoosiers defeated Miami in the National Championship after defeating the Crimson Tide.

Simpson and Caleb Downs are now both gearing up to be drafted this month.







Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending