Connect with us

Wisconsin

BadgerBlitz – Takeaways from No.21 Wisconsin's 83-72 Victory over Iowa

Published

on

BadgerBlitz  –  Takeaways from No.21 Wisconsin's 83-72 Victory over Iowa


MADISON, Wis. – The rust was evident on the University of Wisconsin, an oxidizing layer around the Badgers’ defensive rotations that started to corrode other parts of their game. Fortunately, the 21st-ranked Badgers have enough depth and talent compared to last season to fight through a little bit of stormy weather.

Wisconsin’s 83-72 victory over Iowa Tuesday to restart Big Ten play was a showcase of how effective the Badgers can be in a variety of ways. UW (10-3, 2-0 Big Ten) was somewhat out of sorts on both ends of the court and still managed to trade punches and do enough to frustrate one of the highest-scoring offenses in the country in the first half.

Once Wisconsin got its act together, it was game over.

“I think we’re a pretty confident group going into every game,” said forward Steven Crowl, following his third double-double of the season. “I keep going back to last year, but this year it just feels a little bit different with our confidence.”

Advertisement

Here are my takeaways from Wisconsin’s sixth consecutive win in a Big Ten home opener.

Wisconsin’s Tyler Wahl (5) shoots against Iowa’s Owen Freeman (32) during the second half. Wahl had a game-high 19 points. (Andy Manis/AP Photo)

Wisconsin Battles Through Rough Opening Half

The first half was the furthest thing from a beauty contest. The Badgers were sloppy with ball security, had no perimeter presence, and struggled rotating out to perimeter shooters.

The Hawkeyes weren’t much better. Committing five turnovers in 4:30, Iowa’s four-forward lineup couldn’t stop Wisconsin’s dribble penetration and struggled to get to the free-throw line.

The play was sloppy, the pace was frenetic at points, and the average quality of basketball feels typical of the Big Ten regular season.

Head coach Greg Gard and guard Max Klesmit pointed to the defensive end as the big culprit, which dominoes into problems on the offense with low-grade shot attempts and attacking driving lanes that weren’t high-percentage looks.

Advertisement

“Sometimes that can happen when you play a team that likes to go up and down and create a lot of chaos,” said Klesmit, referring to the Hawkeyes having one of the faster tempo offenses in the country.

Although the Badgers held Iowa to .941 points per possession in the first half, Gard admitted he didn’t feel comfortable because of the way the Hawkeyes can score.

The Badgers were also caught off guard by Iowa trapping the post, something the Hawkeyes hadn’t shown on tape, and caused decisions to be rushed.

“We tried to hit home runs instead of making the simple play with it,” Gard said. “It looked like we hadn’t played in 10 days.”

The Difference in the Game was at the Rim

Even with the problems in the first half, Wisconsin went into the locker room tied at 32 because the combination of A.J. Storr, Steven Crowl, and Tyler Wahl pummeled the low post. The trio scored 14 of UW’s 22 paint points in the first half.

Advertisement

The number dwindled to just 10 in the second half only because Iowa couldn’t stop fouling. The Badgers went 20-for-26 from the line in the final 20 minutes, with Wahl making a career-high 11 free throws on a career-high 13 attempts.

Overall, UW scored 42 points in the paint and went 25-for-35 from the line, outscoring the Hawkeyes by six inside and a whopping 14 from the line. The makes and attempts were the second most of the season behind their 27-for-40 game against Robert Morris.

“This team is too good to put on the free throw line 35 times,” Iowa coach Fran McCaffery said. “They were in the double bonus relatively early in the second half. It’s hard to come back when you do that.”

The free throw success is encouraging for Wahl, who shot 63.4 percent last year and was at 63.6 percent entering Tuesday.

Defensively, the Badgers saw Iowa shoot over 13 percentage points higher but defended better, especially keeping leading scorer Ben Krikke out of rhythm with foul trouble and holding Payton Sandfort scoreless after he scored nine in the opening half.

Advertisement

Wisconsin was just 4-for-16 from three-point range, yet still averaged 1.186 points per possession.

Storr is “Oozing Potential”

Storr has been lauded over the past two months for the athleticism he has brought to Wisconsin’s rotation, changing the way the Badgers function offensively and adding a dynamic that was sorely missing last season, especially in transition.

In a first half that needed a boost, Storr delivered with three dunks of different degrees – one by putting the ball on the floor and attacking the rim, one in transition on an alley-oop from Klesmit, and another in a one-on-one situation against Iowa senior Tony Perkins.

But the highlight of the night was when Chucky Hepburn delivered a pass off the glass that Storr finished with a flush over unsuspecting forward Patrick McCaffery.

“It was special,” Storr said. “Obviously playing with an unselfish guard in Chucky, so just run the floor. He’s going to throw it off the board if it’s available.”

Advertisement

Storr said playing at Wisconsin is “advancing my whole game” because the Badgers are having him play out of the post more than he did last season at St. John’s. With that has come playing more off two feet, which has changed Storr’s offensive approach.

“You’re more physical when you play off two,” he said. “You have better balance, so go up there and playing off two feet, I feel like I can finish better.”

Finishing ability, explosiveness, and getting to the rim in the full and half court are all things Storr has delivered in just 13 games with Wisconsin.

“With him, you see all the ability,” Gard said. “It oozes what his ability and potential is. I think the scary thing is he doesn’t understand how good he can be yet. He’s learning a lot. He’s been awesome to coach.”

Advertisement

McGee, Depth Helped Hepburn’s Health

Had Wisconsin not had an extended break, the likelihood of Hepburn missing a game or games would have been high. Gard revealed that Hepburn hadn’t gone through a full practice since suffering a lower-body injury in UW’s Dec.22 win over Chicago State. He purposely tried to keep Hepburn’s minutes down in the first half and followed through on that plan because of Kamari McGee, who Max Klesmit said gave the Badgers “life” in the first half.

The junior guard stripped Sandfort and finished the possession with a reverse layup and picked off Sandfort’s pass two possessions later, only to find Nolan Winter under the rim for an uncontested dunk. He finished with two points, two assists, two rebounds, and three steals.

“You look at the stat sheet and you see three steals in the column, that’s huge,” Klesmit said. “Having a guy like that can come off the bench and spark life into us carried over into the second half big time. It’s a credit to Kam and how much he works.”

Gard said Hepburn “has been feeling good,” which was evident in the second half of his back-to-back possessions with steals and having a hand in transition points, which boosted UW’s lead to 10 and was the turning point in the game.

By the Numbers

74.4 – Iowa is averaging 99.0 points against mid-major teams but Wisconsin dropped the Hawkeyes’ ppg against major conference teams to 74.4.

Advertisement

83 – Wisconsin’s 83 points are the most since the Badgers scored 87 in a nine-point win over Iowa on Jan.6, 2022.

8 – With 16 points, Storr has scored in double figures in eight straight games and 11 of 13 this season.

36 – With a game-high 19 points, Wahl upper his career point total to 1,117, moving past Marcus Landry (1,114) and Brian Butch (1,115) to 36th on Wisconsin’s career scoring list. Next up is James Johnson (1,147) and Ben Brust (1,148).

353 – On a night the Badgers honored the passing of Senator Herb Kohl, Wisconsin improved to 353-68 (.838) in the building that bears his name.

_________________________________________________

Advertisement

*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den

*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel

*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)

*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @RaulV45, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_

*Like us on Facebook

Advertisement





Source link

Wisconsin

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees

Published

on

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees


Nearly all artificial Christmas trees in the world today are made in China. And with that comes an up to 30 percent tariff rate on imported Christmas products — including artificial trees. 

Kris Reisdorf is co-president of the Racine- and Sturtevant-based home and garden store Milaeger’s. On WPR’s “Wisconsin Today,” Reisdorf said tariffs are affecting their prices on artificial trees, but she’s mitigating most of the rate hike through negotiations with manufacturers and by taking on lower profit margins herself. 

“We are doing our fair share in making Christmas affordable,” Reisdorf said. “When the average person is thinking 30 percent (tariffs), that’s not by any means what they’re really paying.”

News with a little more humanity

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

Milaeger’s “almost real” trees range from under $100 to well over $3,000. Reisdorff said she’s raised prices for all artificial trees by only around $20 compared to last year.

Residorf said tree sales are largely stable despite the uptick in tariff pricing.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll last year found that 58 percent of Americans were buying artificial trees instead of real ones. That’s up from 40 percent in 2010. 

Advertisement

Greg Hann owns Hann’s Christmas Farm in Oregon. Hann also sits on the Wisconsin Christmas Tree Producers Association Board and is president-elect of the National Christmas Tree Association. 

Hann told “Wisconsin Today” the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created a surge in business for real evergreen trees and that demand has been holding relatively steady ever since. That said, Hann acknowledged real Christmas tree sales are up for him and fellow growers this year. He attributed the increase in sales to the tariffs and the fact that farmers’ supplies are finally catching up to the higher demand brought on by COVID-19. Nearly all real trees come from the United States or Canada, according to Hann. 

Hann said a recent survey by the National Christmas Tree Association found 84 percent of Christmas tree growers nationwide have kept prices the same over the last two years, and that includes his own farm. Being grown locally in Wisconsin, Hann said his business is largely unaffected by tariffs.

“It’s kind of nice to have a good supply with a stable price in this economy,” he said. 

Reisdorf said that some artificial tree manufacturers are moving operations outside of China to places like Cambodia. But most other countries in the east are also facing tariff threats. 

Advertisement

Instead, Reisdorf said artificial tree importers are lobbying President Donald Trump to lower his 30 percent tariffs on Christmas products like trees and ornaments, because those kinds of goods aren’t coming back to be made in the U.S.

Meanwhile, Hann said his organization is lobbying to have tariffs on artificial trees increased to 300 percent. He said the added tariff costs help create an “even playing field” between real and artificial trees, since farmers have to pay farm staff and cover fertilizer costs. 

But it isn’t always about the cost. Reisdorf said artificial trees have the benefit of lasting “forever,” essentially.

Hann said many of his customers come to the farm looking to keep up the Christmas tradition of picking out their own family tree. 

“They’re looking for that fragrance of a real tree,” he said. “They want to start that tradition of the family together. They pick the tree, they take it into their house.” 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal

Published

on

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal


In a bit of a surprise, Wisconsin Badgers starting center Jake Renfro is using a medical hardship year and entering the transfer portal for his final season of eligibility.

Renfro, a sixth-year senior in 2024, battled numerous injuries this season, limiting him to only four games after having season-ending surgery. He was a full-time starter for Wisconsin in 2024 after missing the entire 2023 season except for the team’s bowl game due to injury.

Prior to his time at Wisconsin, Renfro had played for head coach Luke Fickell at Cincinnati for three seasons. He played in seven games as a freshman in 2020, making six starts at center. He then was the full-time starter as a sophomore in 2021, earning All-AAC honors before missing the entire 2022 season due to injury.

Now, he’s set to come back to college football for a seventh year, rather than turn pro, and will look to do so at another school.

Advertisement

“I want to thank Coach Fickell, the entire coaching and training staff, my teammates, and the University of Wisconsin for everything over the past three seasons,” Renfro wrote. “I am grateful for the support, development, friendships, and memories I have made during my time in Madison. After much prayer and consideration, I have decided to enter the transfer portal and use a medical hardship year to continue my college football journey. I will always appreciate my time as a Badger.”

Renfro was one of the biggest supporters of Fickell publicly, being a vocal leader on the team as the starting center.

With his departure, Wisconsin could need a new starting left tackle, left guard, and center next season, depending on whether Joe Brunner heads to the NFL or returns for another season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister

Published

on

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister


play

  • Sisters Alicia and Lizzy Andrew will face each other in the NCAA volleyball tournament regional semifinals.
  • Alicia is a redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin, while Lizzy is a sophomore middle blocker for Stanford.
  • Alicia and Lizzy Andrew have similarities on and off the court as they each contribute to college volleyball powerhouses.

MADISON — It did not take long for Alicia Andrew to text her younger sister after watching the NCAA volleyball selection show with her Wisconsin teammates in a lounge area in the south end zone of Camp Randall Stadium.

“I was like, ‘Girl!’” Andrew said. “She’s like, ‘I know! I’ll see you in Texas! And I was like, ‘I’m so excited!’”

Advertisement

Andrew will not see her younger sister in the Gregory Gym stands like any other family members, but rather on the court as an opposing player in the Badgers’ NCAA tournament regional semifinal match against Stanford.

Alicia Andrew is a 6-foot-3 redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin. Lizzy Andrew is a 6-foot-5 sophomore middle blocker for Stanford. The sisters will play against each other for the first time with a spot in the NCAA regional finals on the line.

“Certainly when you’re having two high-level Division I starters on teams that are top five, top 10 in the country playing the same position, that’s pretty unique,” Wisconsin coach Kelly Sheffield said. “They’re both talented and competitive. But I also know that the players aren’t going to make it about themselves or the person that’s on the other side of the net. They’re parts of teams that are trying to move on and move forward and play great volley.”

Alicia has naturally fielded questions about the sibling rivalry, but she is “not reading too much into rivalry stuff and just playing this sport.”

Advertisement

“It’s another game,” she said after a recent UW practice. “Yes, it’s her across the net. But it’s a business. We both want to move on to the next round.”

Both players have played key parts in their respective teams’ path to this stage.

Alicia, after transferring from Baylor, is the only UW player to appear in all 98 sets this season and one of five to appear in all 30 matches. She is second on the team with 111 blocks, barely trailing fellow middle blocker Carter Booth’s 119.

“Really wants to be good for the people around her,” Sheffield said of Alicia. “Wants to do her job. Takes pride in her job. There’s a maturity, but yet there’s a playfulness that is a really good balance for her. Love coaching her. She’s wired the right way. She really is.”

Advertisement

Lizzy, meanwhile, ranks seventh in the country with a .441 hitting percentage in 2025 after earning a spot on the all-ACC freshman team in 2024. She also has experience playing with the U.S. U21 national team.

“I’m so proud of how hard she worked and her journey to Stanford,” Alicia said. “She puts in so much work, and she just loves the sport of volleyball. And I have loved watching her grow. It’s been fun to see her get better and better every year. And this past season, she’s been playing lights out.”

That pride has turned Alicia into a frequent viewer of ACC volleyball, of course whenever it has not conflicted with the Badgers’ own matches.

“We try to watch as many of each other’s games as we can, and I always just love watching her play,” she said. “I’m so proud of her. She’s just worked her tail off at Stanford, so to see her excel has been so fun.”

The Andrew sisters — Alicia, Lizzy and Natalie, who is on the rowing team at the U.S. Naval Academy — competed together in high school. (They also have a younger brother, William.) Competing against each other is a new concept for them, though.

Advertisement

“We’re not huge trash talkers, neither one of us,” Alicia said. “So I think that she’s going to play her game. I’m going to play my game. We’re going to have our heads down. There might be some looking across and smiling because we make the exact same expressions and quirky faces and reactions.”

The sisters don’t look the same – Lizzy has blonde hair and Alicia has brown hair. But Alicia quickly sees the resemblance with those on-court mannerisms.

“If there’s a silly play or if there is like a really unexpected dump or something, she’ll turn around and make the exact same face that I will,” Alicia said. “And it’s funny watching her on TV because I’m like, ‘Wow, that looks scary familiar.’”

Advertisement

They have some similarities off the court, too.

“We’re just goobers,” Alicia said. “We just like to have a good time together. Obviously she’s my little sister, but we have always been a close family — like all the siblings — so I feel like we’ve done all the things together growing up in all the sports.”

The Andrew parents are perhaps the biggest winners of the NCAA tournament bracket.

“My parents were super excited,” Alicia said. “They don’t have to split the travel plan, so they can save some frequent flyer miles there and both be in Texas. … They’re always trying to coordinate all the schedules.”

The Andrew family made T-shirts for the unique sisterly matchup. (Alicia thinks she is getting one considering they asked her and Lizzy for their shirt sizes in the family group chat.) The shirts are black, too, so there is no favoritism between Wisconsin and Stanford’s variations of cardinal red.

Advertisement

“They have a Stanford ‘S’ and a tree on it and then a Wisconsin ‘W’ and a little Badger on it, too,” Andrew said. “They’re really excited about these shirts. They’re being non-biased; they’re repping both daughters.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending