World
Why have England and Wales nearly run out of prison spaces?
Prisons in England and Wales are facing a severe overcrowding crisis amid reports that fewer than 100 spaces remain in men’s prisons.
According to the Ministry of Justice, prisons have been operating at more than 99 percent capacity since the start of 2023.
At the end of last week, the prison population stood at 88,234, up by 341 offenders the previous Friday, according to official figures. On Wednesday, UK media cited the Prison Officers’ Association saying only 83 places remained in men’s prisons.
The prison officers’ association has told GMB that the number of spare places in men’s prisons in England and Wales has fallen to just 83.
That’s the lowest figure on record and the closest the prison service has come to running out of space. pic.twitter.com/JZlVOGvdLf
— Good Morning Britain (@GMB) August 28, 2024
On Friday last week, magistrates courts in England and Wales, lower courts which handle minor criminal cases, were told to delay the hearings of offenders on bail who are likely to be jailed until at least September 10.
The Labour government, which came into power last month in a landslide election, has repeatedly condemned the former governing party, the Conservatives, for neglecting the justice system and says its inaction has led to the current crisis.
As former director of public prosecutions, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Tuesday that he “could not believe” he had to count available prison places to cope with those who had been arrested for involvement in the far-right riots which targeted Muslim and minority communities earlier this month.
“Not having enough prison places is about as fundamental a failure as you can get. And those people throwing rocks, torching cars, making threats, they didn’t just know the system was broken, they were betting on it, gaming it,” he said.
But why are prisons in England and Wales so overcrowded, and what is being done to remedy the problem?
How fast have prison numbers been rising in England and Wales?
Within Western Europe, the UK has the highest rate of incarceration, with prison numbers sharply rising since the pandemic due to case backlogs, court delays and a new requirement for serious offenders to serve at least two-thirds of their sentences behind bars following a 2023 sentencing bill.
According to figures from the Prison Service, 23 percent of inmates had to share cells due to crowding in 2022-2023.
The Ministry of Justice predicts that the prison population will grow to between 95,000 and 114,000 by 2027 once case backlogs have been cleared.
Official figures from last year showed that magistrates’ courts handled more than 1.33 million criminal cases of varying severity.
Why is England and Wales running out of prison space?
Mark Fairhurst, National Chair of the Professional Trades Union for Prison, Correctional and Secure Psychiatric Workers, confirmed that only 83 places remain in men’s prisons when Al Jazeera spoke to him.
He said prisons are in this situation because over the past “five or six years the previous government was warned they would need at least 96,000 prison spaces” to cater to demand.
“[But] the government failed to act on that advice and failed to supply enough spaces,” he said.
“They didn’t build enough prisons, and they didn’t create enough spaces within existing prisons. On the back of their [the Conservatives’] 14-year tenure in government, they closed 20 public sector prisons with the loss of 10,700 cell spaces. Whereas if they would have invested in those prisons and modernised them, we wouldn’t be in this situation now.”
The recent far-right riots in the UK have further exacerbated the crisis.
Prosecutors have been trying to fast-track those accused of being involved in the riots, in which about 1,000 people were arrested, and 466 have so far been charged after courts sat for 24 hours per day to hear cases of those arrested in the riots.
What is the new government doing to manage the crisis?
Following the riots earlier this month, the government announced Operation Early Dawn, under which defendants waiting to appear in court will be held in police station cells and not summoned to magistrates’ courts until space is available in prisons.
The measure is expected to reduce the number of new inmates in already overcrowded prison facilities.
In July, the new justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, also announced plans to reduce the minimum time inmates should serve from 50 percent of their sentences to 40 percent.
Then, last Friday, magistrates courts were told to delay hearings for offenders likely to be imprisoned.
“There is now only one way to avert disaster. I do not choose to do this because I want to … but we are taking every protection that is available to us. Let me be clear, this is an emergency measure,” Mahmood said.
“This is not a permanent change. I am unapologetic in my belief that criminals must be punished,” she added.
The changes are expected to come into effect in September, resulting in 5,500 people being released in September and October.
However, Nasrul Ismail, a senior lecturer in criminology at the University of Bristol, told Al Jazeera that the emergency measure to hold defendants in police cells raises “significant concerns regarding cost, rehabilitation, and sustainability”.
“For instance, between February and July 2023, an average of 274 police cells were used daily to cope with the prison capacity crisis, equating to 612 pounds [$806.48] per day – six times higher than the average cost per prison place per day,” Ismail said.
“Police cells are not designed for medium- or long-term imprisonment, making it nearly impossible to provide effective rehabilitation programmes,” he added.
Which sorts of prisoners will have their sentences shortened?
The temporary measure of reducing minimum serving time will not apply to those convicted of sex offences, terrorism, domestic abuse or other violent offences.
Those involved in the recent riots will also not be eligible for shortened sentencing.
A July news release from the Ministry of Justice stated that anyone released will be “strictly monitored.”
What does this mean for society?
Fairhurst said that temporary measures will affect everyone because “what has been swift justice for some will be delayed justice for others”.
“What do the victims of crime think about somebody who, for example, may have been sentenced to 10 years, but they’re actually only going to serve four? That does not create a good public image for government or the prison service,” he said.
“So, I think what is important to note is that this is a temporary measure, which will probably only last for a maximum of 18 months before the government need to come up with some long-term strategy,” he added.
Ismail said other effects on society could also flow from a lack of effective rehabilitation programmes for inmates due to the overcrowding issue.
He added once an inmate had been released early due to the temporary measures, the issue of “severely overstretched” housing and probation systems arises.
“This prompts the urgent need for comprehensive reform across the entire criminal justice system, not just in addressing the lack of prison space,” Ismail said.
What should the government do now?
In the lead-up to July’s general election, the Labour Party’s manifesto included a pledge to deliver 14,000 prison places at a cost of 4 billion pounds ($5.2bn).
However, Fairhurst said this would not address the problem in isolation. “I think we need to reduce the prison population, and I think a good way of doing that would be to scrap the new build prison programme and plough that 4 billion pounds back into public services,” he said.
He argued that using the money to fund probation and mental health services would address the overcrowding crisis and make society “a lot safer” than using it to increase prison places, which would lead to more people being sentenced to fill up the spaces.
Ismail also said the government should take more preventive measures and fund rehabilitation programmes and youth clubs to reduce rates of criminality.
World
Deshaun Watson’s Massive Contract Keeps Browns Hamstrung
The Cleveland Browns are sticking with Deshaun Watson. They have no other choice.
The NFL team is expected to keep the embattled star quarterback on the roster after restructuring his contract for a third time in three seasons. The Browns may have buyer’s remorse for doling out his historic $230 million fully guaranteed deal, but they continue to get creative in managing its financial impact.
This latest restructure which Watson agreed to still calls for him to receive his $46 million guaranteed for each of the next two seasons, but it reportedly allows the Browns to spread his dead money over multiple seasons if he stays with the team through the 2026 season. This allows the Browns (3-12) to avoid a massive cap charge in 2027 when Watson is no longer under contract while adding a third and fourth void year pushing dead salary cap into 2030 (he already had two void years from previous restructures), according to ESPN.
Despite the restructuring on Friday, Watson still carries a $72.9 million salary cap hit for the 2025 and 2026 season (the second highest ever in the NFL), ballooning from his current hit of $27.9 million this season. That’s because of the previous two contract restructures over the last two years which created more than $30 million in cap space but has increased the burden on the back end of the deal.
Watson, who suffered a season-ending right Achilles tendon injury in late October, didn’t do much to silence his naysayers this season. The 29-year-old had one of the league’s lowest total quarterback ratings through the seven games he played this season and has a record of 9-10 as the starter since joining the team. A league record $172 million dead cap hit would be triggered if Watson is released this offseason (pre June 1 designation).
The Browns are a storied franchise known for its failures and signing the three-time Pro Bowler was supposed to change the narrative. The five-year contract he signed in 2022, which included the most guaranteed money in league history, has become arguably the worst in sports history. It joins other NFL slipups including Albert Haynesworth’s $100 million bond in 2009 (one of several head-scratching moves by former Washington owner Dan Snyder) and Andre Rison’s $17 million deal in 1995 (another Browns misjudgment of signing a questionable player to an unprecedented deal).
But Watson’s deal is perhaps the worst given not just the massive contract but also that the Browns traded three first-round pick to Houston to acquire the quarterback who received an 11-game suspension in 2022 for violating the league conduct policy related to 23 sexual misconduct lawsuits filed against him by massage therapists. The most recent sexual assault allegation from earlier this year could’ve given the Browns an out for the remainder of the contract, but the league couldn’t find sufficient evidence in its investigation to nullify it.
The Browns are trying to make the most of the situation with little cash to acquire a veteran signal caller through free agency. General manager Andrew Berry and the front office haven’t committed to Watson as their long-term quarterback. But they’re not in position to ditch their investment, still believing that a turnaround is possible and hoping he can return to the Pro Bowl form he displayed in his first four seasons in Houston.
World
Plane veers off airport runway in South Korea and crashes, killing at least 23: report
A Jeju Air flight drove off the runway in South Korea and collided with a fence, leaving at least 23 passengers killed, the Yonhap news agency reported.
The agency attributed the devastating crash to malfunctioning landing gear.
Jeju Air, a low-cost airline in South Korea, was carrying 175 passengers and six crew members in the Boeing 737-800 when the incident occurred Sunday morning local time at Muan International Airport in Muan County, South Jeolla Province.
RUSSIA DOWNPLAYS SPECULATION OVER DEADLY AZERBAIJAN AIRLINES CRASH AS REPORT LAYS BLAME FOR DOWNED PLANE
The plane landed at 9:07 a.m. local time at the airport when the incident happened.
The plane was flying back to South Korea from Thailand, the report said.
Photos shared by local media showed smoke billowing out of the plane.
World
Plane veers off runway and crashes in S Korea, killing at least 29: Report
DEVELOPING STORYDEVELOPING STORY,
The crash occurred as the Jeju Air plane was landing at the Muan International Airport in South Korea.
A passenger plane has veered off the runway and crashed at an airport in the South Korean city of Muan, killing at least 29 people, according to the Yonhap news agency.
The accident took place on Sunday as the Jeju Air plane was landing at the Muan International Airport, Yonhap reported.
It was carrying 175 passengers and six flight attendants and was flying back from Thailand.
Photos shared by local media showed thick clouds of black smoke coming out of the plane.
South Korea’s Acting President Choi Sang-moo has ordered “all-out-efforts for rescue operations” at Muan, according to Yonhap.
Two people have been found alive as the rescue mission is continuing, the agency reported.
More soon…
-
Technology1 week ago
Google’s counteroffer to the government trying to break it up is unbundling Android apps
-
News1 week ago
Novo Nordisk shares tumble as weight-loss drug trial data disappoints
-
Politics1 week ago
Illegal immigrant sexually abused child in the U.S. after being removed from the country five times
-
Entertainment1 week ago
'It's a little holiday gift': Inside the Weeknd's free Santa Monica show for his biggest fans
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Think you can't dance? Get up and try these tips in our comic. We dare you!
-
Technology4 days ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
News5 days ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister
-
Business4 days ago
On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry