Connect with us

World

Why have England and Wales nearly run out of prison spaces?

Published

on

Why have England and Wales nearly run out of prison spaces?

Prisons in England and Wales are facing a severe overcrowding crisis amid reports that fewer than 100 spaces remain in men’s prisons.

According to the Ministry of Justice, prisons have been operating at more than 99 percent capacity since the start of 2023.

At the end of last week, the prison population stood at 88,234, up by 341 offenders the previous Friday, according to official figures. On Wednesday, UK media cited the Prison Officers’ Association saying only 83 places remained in men’s prisons.

On Friday last week, magistrates courts in England and Wales, lower courts which handle minor criminal cases, were told to delay the hearings of offenders on bail who are likely to be jailed until at least September 10.

The Labour government, which came into power last month in a landslide election, has repeatedly condemned the former governing party, the Conservatives, for neglecting the justice system and says its inaction has led to the current crisis.

As former director of public prosecutions, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Tuesday that he “could not believe” he had to count available prison places to cope with those who had been arrested for involvement in the far-right riots which targeted Muslim and minority communities earlier this month.

“Not having enough prison places is about as fundamental a failure as you can get. And those people throwing rocks, torching cars, making threats, they didn’t just know the system was broken, they were betting on it, gaming it,” he said.

But why are prisons in England and Wales so overcrowded, and what is being done to remedy the problem?

Advertisement

How fast have prison numbers been rising in England and Wales?

Within Western Europe, the UK has the highest rate of incarceration, with prison numbers sharply rising since the pandemic due to case backlogs, court delays and a new requirement for serious offenders to serve at least two-thirds of their sentences behind bars following a 2023 sentencing bill.

According to figures from the Prison Service, 23 percent of inmates had to share cells due to crowding in 2022-2023.

The Ministry of Justice predicts that the prison population will grow to between 95,000 and 114,000 by 2027 once case backlogs have been cleared.

Official figures from last year showed that magistrates’ courts handled more than 1.33 million criminal cases of varying severity.

Why is England and Wales running out of prison space?

Mark Fairhurst, National Chair of the Professional Trades Union for Prison, Correctional and Secure Psychiatric Workers, confirmed that only 83 places remain in men’s prisons when Al Jazeera spoke to him.

Advertisement

He said prisons are in this situation because over the past “five or six years the previous government was warned they would need at least 96,000 prison spaces” to cater to demand.

“[But] the government failed to act on that advice and failed to supply enough spaces,” he said.

“They didn’t build enough prisons, and they didn’t create enough spaces within existing prisons. On the back of their [the Conservatives’] 14-year tenure in government, they closed 20 public sector prisons with the loss of 10,700 cell spaces. Whereas if they would have invested in those prisons and modernised them, we wouldn’t be in this situation now.”

The recent far-right riots in the UK have further exacerbated the crisis.

Prosecutors have been trying to fast-track those accused of being involved in the riots, in which about 1,000 people were arrested, and 466 have so far been charged after courts sat for 24 hours per day to hear cases of those arrested in the riots.

Advertisement

What is the new government doing to manage the crisis?

Following the riots earlier this month, the government announced Operation Early Dawn, under which defendants waiting to appear in court will be held in police station cells and not summoned to magistrates’ courts until space is available in prisons.

The measure is expected to reduce the number of new inmates in already overcrowded prison facilities.

In July, the new justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, also announced plans to reduce the minimum time inmates should serve from 50 percent of their sentences to 40 percent.

Then, last Friday, magistrates courts were told to delay hearings for offenders likely to be imprisoned.

Advertisement

“There is now only one way to avert disaster. I do not choose to do this because I want to … but we are taking every protection that is available to us. Let me be clear, this is an emergency measure,” Mahmood said.

“This is not a permanent change. I am unapologetic in my belief that criminals must be punished,” she added.

The changes are expected to come into effect in September, resulting in 5,500 people being released in September and October.

However, Nasrul Ismail, a senior lecturer in criminology at the University of Bristol, told Al Jazeera that the emergency measure to hold defendants in police cells raises “significant concerns regarding cost, rehabilitation, and sustainability”.

“For instance, between February and July 2023, an average of 274 police cells were used daily to cope with the prison capacity crisis, equating to 612 pounds [$806.48] per day – six times higher than the average cost per prison place per day,” Ismail said.

Advertisement

“Police cells are not designed for medium- or long-term imprisonment, making it nearly impossible to provide effective rehabilitation programmes,” he added.

Which sorts of prisoners will have their sentences shortened?

The temporary measure of reducing minimum serving time will not apply to those convicted of sex offences, terrorism, domestic abuse or other violent offences.

Those involved in the recent riots will also not be eligible for shortened sentencing.

A July news release from the Ministry of Justice stated that anyone released will be “strictly monitored.”

What does this mean for society?

Fairhurst said that temporary measures will affect everyone because “what has been swift justice for some will be delayed justice for others”.

Advertisement

“What do the victims of crime think about somebody who, for example, may have been sentenced to 10 years, but they’re actually only going to serve four? That does not create a good public image for government or the prison service,” he said.

“So, I think what is important to note is that this is a temporary measure, which will probably only last for a maximum of 18 months before the government need to come up with some long-term strategy,” he added.

Ismail said other effects on society could also flow from a lack of effective rehabilitation programmes for inmates due to the overcrowding issue.

He added once an inmate had been released early due to the temporary measures, the issue of “severely overstretched” housing and probation systems arises.

“This prompts the urgent need for comprehensive reform across the entire criminal justice system, not just in addressing the lack of prison space,” Ismail said.

Advertisement

What should the government do now?

In the lead-up to July’s general election, the Labour Party’s manifesto included a pledge to deliver 14,000 prison places at a cost of 4 billion pounds ($5.2bn).

However, Fairhurst said this would not address the problem in isolation. “I think we need to reduce the prison population, and I think a good way of doing that would be to scrap the new build prison programme and plough that 4 billion pounds back into public services,” he said.

He argued that using the money to fund probation and mental health services would address the overcrowding crisis and make society “a lot safer” than using it to increase prison places, which would lead to more people being sentenced to fill up the spaces.

Ismail also said the government should take more preventive measures and fund rehabilitation programmes and youth clubs to reduce rates of criminality.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

ESPN Inks 12-Year, US Open TV Rights Extension

Published

on

ESPN Inks 12-Year, US Open TV Rights Extension

U.S. Open tennis matches will stay on ESPN’s networks through 2037 under a deal announced Wednesday.

The tie-up represents ESPN’s longest-term tennis agreement. Beyond America, it also includes broadcast rights in Latin America, the Caribbean and Canada. ESPN has aired the New York-based event since 2015. Financial details were not announced.

IMG brokered the deal as the media rep for the United States Tennis Association. “The new agreement will super-charge this iconic, captivating Grand Slam’s exposure, production, promotion, content and economic investment, ensuring record year-on-year growth for the next decade and beyond,” IMG EVP and head of Americas, media Hillary Mandel said. 

Last year’s U.S. Open saw viewership jump 40% on championship weekend for its second highest mark on the channel. The women’s final, won by Coco Gauff, was ESPN’s most-viewed women’s final. The current tournament concludes September 8.

Advertisement

“I talked earlier about our continued commitment to women’s sports,” ESPN EVP, programming and acquisitions Rosalyn Durant said Wednesday. “Tennis is one of those sports that lends itself to that.”

The new agreement comes with expanded streaming rights for ESPN, something the network has prioritized as it prepares to launch a digital service next year. Among the new elements will be an ESPN+ exclusive whip-around show set to debut in 2026.

ESPN2, meanwhile, will carry live coverage during “Fan Week” before the main draw starts. ABC will air matches on the middle and final Sundays of the competition. ESPN has also retained limited sublicensing rights. The previous, 11-year deal was reportedly worth more than $825 million.

“This agreement reinforces our long-term dedication to tennis,” ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro said in a statement. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Boy accidentally destroys 3,500-year-old artifact in Israeli museum

Published

on

Boy accidentally destroys 3,500-year-old artifact in Israeli museum

A boy on a visit to a museum in Israel accidentally knocked over a 3,500-year-old jar, shattering the relic. 

“There are instances where display items are intentionally damaged, and such cases are treated with great severity, including involving the police,” Lihi Laszlo of the Hecht Museum told the BBC. 

“In this case, however, this was not the situation,” Laszlo said. “The jar was accidentally damaged by a young child visiting the museum, and the response will be accordingly.”

The jar dated to the Bronze Age, between 2200 and 1500 B.C. — predating the time of Kings David and Solomon — and it was totally intact, making it a rare find and valuable artifact. Experts have speculated that the jar likely carried local supplies, such as wine and olive oil.

ISRAEL OPENS TOMBS FROM ANCIENT ROME TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME: ‘WONDERFUL PAINTINGS’

Advertisement

A young preschooler accidentally shattered a nearly 3,500-year-old jar that was not behind glass at the Hecht Museum in Haifa. (Hecht Museum)

The museum, located in Haifa, had put the piece on display near the entrance and without protection to show a piece “without obstructions.”

The boy had pulled on the jar to find out what was inside, and that caused it to fall over, shattering to pieces. The museum immediately appointed a specialist in conservation to restore the jar, which will return to its place near the front entrance once completed.

ARCHAEOLOGISTS UNSEAL 2,000-YEAR-OLD TOMB, FIND MUMMY IN ‘EXCELLENT STATE’

Remains of a broken 3,500-year-old jar

The 3,500-year-old jar was accidentally smashed by a reported 4-year-old boy visiting the Hecht Museum last Friday. (Hecht Museum)

The museum insisted that the piece will also return without obstructions. 

Advertisement

Israeli museums are no stranger to incidents that destroy priceless works: An American tourist allegedly smashed a sculpture in the Israel Museum in Jerusalem in October last year. 

ARCHAEOLOGISTS DISCOVER UNDERWATER MOSAIC BELIEVED TO DATE BACK TO ROMAN EMPIRE

A set of jars on display at the Hecht Museum in Haifa

The Hecht Museum did not place the 3,500-year-old jar behind glass, believing there is a “special charm” to showing historical finds without obstructions. (Hecht Museum)

The tourist allegedly destroyed a pair of Roman statues dating from the 2nd Century because they were “against the Torah.” His lawyer, however, denied that he had acted out of “religious fanaticism.” 

One statue depicted Athena, daughter of Zeus, and the other depicted a griffin grasping the wheel of fate of the Roman god Nemesis, according to The Times of Israel.

Advertisement

Police arrested the tourist at the scene, identifying him only as a 40-year-old Jewish American tourist. 

Continue Reading

World

Economic portfolios are key in talks to chose new EU commissioners

Published

on

Economic portfolios are key in talks to chose new EU commissioners

All governments must announce their nominees for the European Commission by August 30.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ursula von der Leyen is facing challenging negotiations to create her new College of Commissioners with economic portfolios among the most coveted by European Union member states.

Italy, the Netherlands, Finland, Czechia and Romania have all indicated they hope to claim one such portfolio, with the one including the budget highly sought after.

“We have the Multiannual Financial Framework to be negotiated in the next term. This will be a very difficult and very heavy dossier, but it will also be something which will be very determining the priorities of the years to come,” Janis Emmanouilidis, a senior policy analyst at the European Policy Center (EPC), told Euronews.

France is also in contention for a strong portfolio as it has nominated Thierry Breton, now Commissioner for the Internal Market, to stay in Brussels for a second term.

“There is always a great interest in Competition and Trade, areas where the EU has a lot of competence,” Sophia Russack, a researcher at the Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS), told Euronews.

Advertisement

“The same applies to those that have a particularly high impact on the budget, for example the cohesion and agriculture funds which together represent around a third of the entire EU budget,” she added.

The new portfolios for grabs

In these power plays, Ursula von der Leyen can also use defence, a new portfolio dedicated to the military industry, seen as very relevant due to the war in Ukraine.

The Mediterranean – linked to migration management – and housing will also have dedicated commissioners for the first time.

To complete the “puzzle” and designate executive vice-presidents, the centre-right Commission chief will also have to take into account which political parties backed her reappointment in the European Parliament in July.

“One can assume that again – given that she is from the EPP, the Conservative Party – there should be a Socialist, a Liberal, and potentially a Green, among the top positions in the Commission,” Emmanouilidis said.

Advertisement

Italy, the EU’s third-biggest economy, has yet to officially indicate its candidate. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni abstained during the European Council vote to renew von der Leyen at the helm of the bloc’s executive.

The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), to which Meloni’s party Brothers of Italy belongs, became the fourth biggest political group in the European Parliament and voted against von der Leyen’s confirmation. What portfolio Italy will get is one of the hottest topics in Brussels.

The gender issue

Another trump card to use in the negotiations with the 27 capitals is gender balance as requested by von der Leyen whose first college achieved parity. But fewer than 10 women have been nominated so far by governments to head to Brussels.

“She can argue that if the country offers a very good candidate, then it can also offer her a very interesting portfolio. There are these kinds of backroom deals that can be made to put pressure on member states. So it’s a mix of gender, political and geographical issues, a very complex agreement to implement,” Emmanouilidis said.

On Wednesday, Portugal nominated former Finance Minister Maria Luís Albuquerque, but Denmark announced a male name, Dan Jørgensen, former Minister of Climate and Energy.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

“The issue of gender is also a sign of current times. Parliament itself is currently made up of fewer female members than it was in the past, not even 40%. But we also have to say that in some countries there are internal procedures, for example, that the Parliament and or the President have to agree with the choice of the Prime Minister,” Russack said.

After receiving all the names, von der Leyen will conduct individual interviews and present the final selection to the European Parliament, which will hold hearings with the 26 candidates. If some are rejected, new names must be presented until the entire team is approved in a plenary session.

Continue Reading

Trending