Connect with us

World

What does the ‘status quo’ mean at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque?

Published

on

What does the ‘status quo’ mean at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque?

The authorized standing of Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, recognized to Jews because the Temple Mount, is a recurring flashpoint within the Israel-Palestine battle.

Final week, Israeli police raided the Al-Aqsa Mosque, attacking and arresting Palestinian worshippers who had been contained in the prayer corridor. Rockets had been shot into Israel from Gaza and Lebanon in retaliation, resulting in a quick flare-up in violence.

In 2021, an identical raid led to an 11-day Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip.

To know how a single police raid can precipitate a conflict, one should perceive the established order governing the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound.

Advertisement

What’s the establishment?

For Palestinians – and underneath worldwide legislation – the matter is kind of easy.

“Israel doesn’t have sovereignty over [East] Jerusalem and due to this fact doesn’t have sovereignty over Al-Aqsa,” which is in Israeli-occupied East Jerusalem, says Khaled Zabarqa, a Palestinian authorized skilled on the town and the compound. Consequently, Zabarqa says, worldwide legislation dictates that Israel will not be authorised to implement any establishment.

For the Palestinians and the Waqf, the Jordanian-appointed physique that manages the Al-Aqsa compound, it’s a establishment rooted within the website’s administration underneath the Ottoman Empire, which dictated that Muslims have unique management of Al-Aqsa, in line with Nir Hasson, a journalist for Haaretz overlaying Jerusalem.

The Israelis, nonetheless, see issues otherwise, regardless of worldwide legislation not recognising any try by an occupying energy to annex territory it has occupied.

“The established order that Israelis talk about is totally completely different from the established order that the Waqf and Palestinians talk about,” explains Hasson.

Advertisement

For Israel, the established order refers to a 1967 settlement formulated by Moshe Dayan, a former Israeli defence minister. After Israel occupied East Jerusalem, Dayan proposed a brand new association primarily based on the Ottoman settlement.

In keeping with Israel’s 1967 establishment, the Israeli authorities permits the Waqf to take care of day-to-day management of the realm, and solely Muslims are permitted to hope there. Nonetheless, Israeli police management the positioning’s entry and are accountable for safety, and non-Muslims are allowed to go to the positioning as vacationers.

Shmuel Berkovits, a lawyer and skilled on holy locations in Israel, says the established order established in 1967 will not be protected by any Israeli legislation. In reality, in 1967, Dayan established the established order with out the federal government’s authority, he says.

Since 1967, laws, courtroom actions and statements by the Israeli authorities created a framework for this establishment. Whereas no Israeli legislation prohibits Jews from praying at Al-Aqsa, the Israeli Supreme Courtroom determined that the prohibition is justified to take care of the peace, explains Berkovits.

For a lot of Israelis, even that is thought of “beneficiant”, in gentle of their victory within the 1967 conflict.

Advertisement

Latest adjustments to the established order

Between 1967 and 2000, non-Muslims might purchase tickets from the Waqf to go to the positioning as vacationers. Nonetheless, after the Palestinians’ second Intifada, or rebellion, broke out in 2000 following former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s contentious go to to Al-Aqsa, the Waqf closed the positioning to guests.

The positioning stayed closed to guests till 2003, when Israel compelled the Waqf to acquiesce to the entry of non-Muslims. Since then, non-Muslim guests have been restricted by the Israeli police to restricted hours and particular days.

In keeping with Hasson, the Waqf doesn’t acknowledge these guests, and considers them “intruders”.

In 2015, a four-way settlement between Israel, Palestine, Jordan and america reaffirmed the 1967 establishment. As a part of the settlement, Israeli chief Benjamin Netanyahu reaffirmed his nation’s dedication to the established order.

Advertisement

Whereas the 1967 model of the established order remains to be given lip service right this moment, Zabarqa says: “That is an try and mislead worldwide public opinion.”

Since 2017, Jews have tacitly been allowed to hope within the compound, in line with Eran Zedekiah, from the Hebrew College of Jerusalem and the Regional Considering Discussion board.

Not all Jews are responsible of those breaches. In reality, earlier than coming into the Al-Aqsa compound, guests cross an indication warning Jews that the Chief Rabbinate forbids them from coming into due to the holiness of the positioning.

An indication forbidding Jews from coming into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound [Adam Sella/Al Jazeera]

It’s primarily non secular Zionists, at present represented in Israel’s authorities by hardliners just like the far-right Safety Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who pray on the website and apply strain to vary the established order, says Hasson.

For them, this strain has paid off. Hasson says the police have given the Jews who pray on the Al-Aqsa compound extra freedom since 2017.

Advertisement

Zabarqa laments that the Israeli police power “has reworked itself from an expert physique that preserves the rule of legislation to a physique that gives safety for individuals breaking the legislation”.

Palestinians, in the meantime, see these adjustments as an try and “make the compound Jewish and to dismiss the Muslims and Islam from Al-Aqsa”, says Zabarqa.

For them, Al-Aqsa is the final small nook of Palestine not underneath full Israeli occupation.

Hasson says Palestinians due to this fact take satisfaction in resisting Israel’s occupation of the positioning, but when Palestinians lose Al-Aqsa, it will likely be as if “it’s all misplaced. Nothing is left.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Video: Beirut Residents Stunned as Israeli Strikes Hit City Center

Published

on

Video: Beirut Residents Stunned as Israeli Strikes Hit City Center

Israeli strikes on Monday killed members of Palestinian militant groups in Lebanon, including the representative of Hamas in the country. One of the attacks targeted a central Beirut neighborhood for the first time in nearly two decades.

Continue Reading

World

Death toll rises to 18 in South Africa mass shootings, police say

Published

on

Death toll rises to 18 in South Africa mass shootings, police say
  • One more person has died from mass shootings at two houses in a South African village over the weekend, raising the death toll to 18.
  • Police are still searching for the suspects who opened fire on a family event in Lusikisiki village in Eastern Cape province on Saturday.
  • South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said that 38 people had been killed in mass shootings in the past two years.

One more person has died from mass shootings at two houses on the same street in a South African village over the weekend, bringing the death toll to 18, officials said Monday.

Police are still searching for the assailants who opened fire Saturday on people who had reportedly gathered for a family event in Lusikisiki village in Eastern Cape province.

The shootings, which took place in two separate houses on the same street, fueled outrage over a recent spate of mass shootings in the country.

MISSING NORTH CAROLINA STUDENT BROOK CHEUVRONT, 20, FOUND DEAD IN SOUTH AFRICA

The motive for the killings remains unknown and police said on Monday that the investigation is continuing, and no arrests have been made.

This photo shows the scene where 17 people were killed in two mass shootings that took place in close proximity to each other on Friday night in Lusikisiki, South Africa, police said on Sept. 28, 2024. (South African Police Services via AP)

Advertisement

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa condemned the killings and promised that the government would deploy all needed resources in the investigation.

He said Monday that 38 people had been killed in previous mass shootings in the past two years and 25 suspects have been arrested.

“I feel deeply for all the families and members of the broader community affected by this attack, and on behalf of all of us as South Africans, I offer you our deepest sympathies,” he said.

“While we are united in our grief, we are also united in our outrage and condemnation of this excessive criminal assault which will not go unpunished,” he said.

Shooting scene

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa condemned the killings and promised that the government would deploy all needed resources in the investigation. (South African Police Services via AP)

The shootings follow a mass killing in KwaZulu-Natal province in April 2023. Ten members of the same family, including seven women and a 13-year-old boy, were killed at their home.

Advertisement

Sixteen people were fatally shot in a bar in the Johannesburg township of Soweto in 2022, the worst mass shooting in South Africa in decades before the latest killings in Lusikisiki.

South Africa has one of the highest homicide rates in the world. It recorded 12,734 homicides in the first six months of this year, according to police.

Continue Reading

World

Why tensions with neighbours have stalled North Macedonia’s EU bid

Published

on

Why tensions with neighbours have stalled North Macedonia’s EU bid

EU ambassadors failed to approve the opening of the next chapter of EU accession talks with Skopje last week.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the rural highlands where North Macedonia’s north-east borders Bulgaria’s west, workers swelter in the late September heat.

They’re entering the final stages of building a strategically critical high-speed road connecting the capitals of Skopje and Sofia.

The road is part of the planned ‘Corridor 8’ route linking Italy’s Adriatic coast by sea to Albania, then stretching all the way through North Macedonia to the port of Varna on Bulgaria’s Black Sea coast. A rail connection along the same corridor is also in the works.

When complete, it will anchor the Western Balkan nations of Albania and North Macedonia into Europe’s transport and trading network, quite literally paving their way into the European Union, while also providing NATO with a strategic military corridor.

But the rail and road project, like North Macedonia’s bid to join the European bloc, has been rigged with obstacles, delays and disputes.

Advertisement

The country’s populist prime minister Hristijan Mickoski has accused Bulgaria of failing to commit to the rail route on its territory, saying the railway will end in a “dead end” on the Bulgarian border. He has threatened to divert the EU funds dedicated to the project to another route known as Corridor 10, which would link Skopje with Belgrade and Budapest to the north, where Eurosceptic nationalists considered close to Mickoski are in government. 

The corridor dispute comes amid what Bulgarian officials see as a further unravelling in relations between the two countries, which have plunged to a new low since the right-wing VMRO-DPMNE party scored victory in North Macedonia’s parliamentary and presidential elections last May. 

A long-standing dispute with Greece over North Macedonia’s name has also resurfaced, as nationalists in Skopje informally refer to the country as ‘Macedonia’ in what officials in Athens see as a blatant violation of the 2018 Prespa agreement.

It meant there was no unanimous agreement among EU ambassadors last week to open the first negotiating chapters on North Macedonia’s accession to the bloc. Neighbouring Albania, meanwhile, has been given the green light.

EU bets on cash-for-reforms strategy

Despite Albania now overtaking its neighbour, officials in Brussels and Skopje still hope the recently-installed Macedonian government will remain focused on its accession path.

Advertisement

The EU executive is betting on its new €6-billion Growth Plan for the Western Balkans, under which it will inject investment into the seven Western Balkan candidate countries over the next three years in return for reforms designed to bring their economies and societies closer to the EU.

The €6 billion – which consists of €2 billion in grants and €4 billion in concessional loans – will be distributed according to each country’s GDP and population, but only made available once they have implemented so-called ‘reform agendas’ designed to align their laws, standards and practices with those of the EU.

Another unique feature of the Growth Plan is that countries that fail to hit their reform targets could see the funds allocated to them diverted to other countries in the Western Balkans region.

EU sources say the model is designed to create “competition” between neighbours and incentivise quicker reforms.

“Luckily, the new North Macedonian government has really bought into the EU accession process as did the previous government,” a diplomatic source said. “When the new government was sworn in, there were no major deviations from the reform agenda negotiated by the previous government.”

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

“But the proof is in the pudding. We’ll need to wait and see if they implement these reforms,” the diplomat added.

The cash-for-reforms model is part of Brussels’ plan to accelerate reforms on a raft of issues including the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the fight against corruption. The reform agendas are expected to be endorsed as early as October, meaning the first “pre-financing” payments could be disbursed by the end of this year. 

All countries – with the exception of Bosnia and Herzegovina – have to date submitted their draft reform agendas, as officials in Sarajevo are still deciding how the country’s parliamentary assembly should endorse the plans.

“If a country doesn’t meet its commitment under their reform agendas, the money allocated to it could be transferred to another country in the Western Balkans, creating an element of competition completely new compared to previous financing instruments,” an EU official explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another EU official, speaking on condition of anonymity, added that tackling corruption was one of the biggest challenges in North Macedonia and other candidate countries in the region, but that the EU executive had robust mechanisms to safeguard its funding.

“Corruption is present. But we have a policy of zero tolerance for corruption and very strict frameworks in place,” the EU official said, “If it happens, and it does, our mechanisms kick in.”

Member states wield veto power

But even if Skopje successfully meets all its targets and reaps the benefits of the Growth Plan, it can only progress on its path to EU membership if it continues to mend the relationship with neighbouring Bulgaria.

Advertisement

That will prove challenging as lawmakers in Sofia and Skopje continue to exchange combative rhetoric.

ADVERTISEMENT

Each member state must give its explicit green light to the opening of each step in the EU accession process.

Responding to EU ambassadors’ failure to move on accession talks with North Macedonia, former Bulgarian premier Boyko Borissov – who leads the biggest party in the Bulgarian parliament and chairs its foreign affairs committee – said Skopje had to “face the consequences of its actions,” accusing Mickoski’s government of blaming Bulgaria for delays in its membership bid.

Borissov recently called for the resignation of North Macedonia’s deputy prime minister and transport minister after a war of words involving the Corridor 8 route linking the country’s capitals.

Bulgaria will vote in its seventh election in just three years on October 27, following multiple failures to form a government.

ADVERTISEMENT
Continue Reading

Trending