Connect with us

World

Von der Leyen’s portfolio paradoxes

Published

on

Von der Leyen’s portfolio paradoxes

Exotic hybrid portfolios, overlapping policies, and candidates with a problematic past could all plague plans for the new European Commission outlined by Germany’s Ursula von der Leyen yesterday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen pledged to get rid of “rigid stovepipes”, as she unveiled plans for her second mandate yesterday (17 September).   

She may indeed seek to avoid the kind of stiff structures that can lead to isolated and contradictory policymaking. 

But complex compound portfolios and overlapping responsibilities risk making her Commission look more like tangled spaghetti.  

Weird pairings

One common theme of the new portfolios she has handed to her 26 lieutenants is the creation of exotic compound briefs.  

Slovakia’s Maroš Šefčovič will pair trade — a flagship policy area where Brussels holds significant power – with overall relations with other institutions such as the European Parliament.

Advertisement

Denmark’s Dan Jørgensen has been given responsibility for housing alongside energy, while Belgium’s Hadja Lahbib combines crisis management and equality – prompting outrage from activists who worry she’ll have to split her time between pandemics, forest fires and women’s rights. 

Those choices may be as much about the quality of the candidate as the portfolio. Šefčovič is seen as a safe pair of hands who’s hoovered up many miscellaneous duties in his time in Brussels; Lahbib, as a woman with Algerian roots, is perhaps viewed as a good pick for equality in the normally lily-white, male-dominated Commission. 

Socialist MEPs, having insisted on a post to tackle Europe’s housing shortage, wanted it to go to one of their own, and Jørgensen is one of the few centre-left options von der Leyen had.

Bumping heads

In other cases, overlaps among portfolios are likely to lead to duplication or territorial infighting.

Such squabbles are nothing new: there’s been a longstanding dispute over who’s responsible for food policy between the Commission’s health and agriculture services.  

Advertisement

Those aren’t necessarily now resolved: according to the brief sent by von der Leyen, Hungary’s Olivér Várhelyi remains responsible for food safety and affordability — though Luxembourg’s Christophe Hansen is officially designated as “commissioner for agriculture and food.” 

Worse still, Várhelyi will have to tussle with Lahbib over the newly established Commission department for Health Emergency Preparedness (DG HERA).

Among her duties as Commissioner for the Mediterranean, Croatia’s Dubravka Šuica is invited to fix tensions in the Middle East, “promoting all the steps needed for a two-state solution” to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

That might seem a tall order for the former mayor of Dubrovnik, whose previous responsibilities included preparing a report on demography and organising the Conference on the Future of Europe.

It also may mean bumping heads with Estonia’s Kaja Kallas, responsible for the EU’s overall foreign policy.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

Cooperation between the two “is not clear yet”, one senior commission official said today; while Kallas will deal with “questions of war and peace,” the requirement for frequent travel to the region means it’s too big a job for one person, added the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Hearing trouble

In some cases, von der Leyen’s picks might lead to trouble when she submits her roster for confirmation by the European Parliament. 

Alongside his climate brief, the Netherlands’ Wopke Hoekstra has been handed responsibility for tax – though he’s a finance minister from a country that’s long been in Brussels’ sights for aggressive tax planning, and the Paradise Papers leak of 2021 revealed his links to the Virgin Islands, a tax haven.

Ireland’s Michael McGrath may also feel the heat for having opposed a 2018 referendum to legalise abortion.

ADVERTISEMENT

The topic is only indirectly related to the justice portfolio he’s been handed.

But it’s also the kind of issue that resonates in Brussels, as Malta’s Roberta Metsola discovered when her longstanding opposition to abortion nearly stymied her bid to become European Parliament President in 2022.

Gerardo Fortuna contributed reporting. 

Advertisement

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Surging UK Green Party pushes church-state split, critics warn of break from Britain’s Christian roots

Published

on

Surging UK Green Party pushes church-state split, critics warn of break from Britain’s Christian roots

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

LONDON: The left-wing British Green Party has said it wants to separate the Church of England from the state if it wins the next general election, which must be held before August 2029.

Advertisement

The Church of England has been the “established” church since the 16th-century Reformation, with the British monarch serving as its supreme governor. For traditionalists, this link is not merely ceremonial but is the foundational bedrock of British identity.

The Greens have come under fire for seeking to remove centuries of British history and tradition by separating the church from British politics, with critics characterizing it as the latest move against Christianity in the U.K.

GB News reported last month that the Green Party policy document stated: “No person shall hold office in the state, or be excluded from any such office, by virtue of their or their spouse’s membership or non-membership of any religion or denomination of religion.”

UK FLAG CLASH AS FOREIGN BANNERS FLY, CITIZENS PUSH BACK AGAINST WOKE POLICIES RESHAPING BRITAIN

King Charles ascended the throne in September 2022 following his mother’s death, and his coronation was in May 2023. (Richard Pohle – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Michael McManus, the director of research at the Henry Jackson Society, a U.K. think tank, told Fox News Digital, “Britain is a tolerant society but with clear Christian origins and culture. Aiming to disestablish the Church of England could be seen as an attempt to reject that ethical foundation without being clear what would replace it instead.”

High-profile figures have also weighed in on the debate, with actor and comedian John Cleese responding to a comment about the Greens’ proposal by stating on X: “The UK has always been based at the deepest level on Christian values, regardless of dogma. Despite the many mistakes made by churches, for centuries British people have been influenced by Christ’s teaching. If these values are replaced by Islamic ones, this will not be Britain anymore.”

FORMER UK PM DEFENDS TRUMP FOR HIGHLIGHTING ‘SHARIA LAW’ IN BRITAIN DURING UN SPEECH

The Greens are a growing political force, placing second behind Reform UK in a recent YouGov poll. Another YouGov poll linked the Greens’ rise in popularity with younger voters in the country, finding a majority of those between 18 and 24 supported them, while also doing well with women and other groups.

UK Green Party leader Zack Polanski. (Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images)

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Green Party told Fox News Digital, “We will be setting out our detailed plans for government at the time of the next General Election, just as we did at the last General Election. As always, our members will be shaping our priorities. These will again address the real and immediate needs of people and the planet, such as tackling the climate crisis, bringing down the cost of living and rebuilding our public services, including the NHS. Our focus is on the issues that impact ordinary people most.”

CHURCHILL, SHAKESPEARE AND THE UK FLAG ALL UNDER SIEGE IN MODERN BRITAIN, COMMENTATORS SAY

Green Party leader Zack Polanski has defended a secular state. He has also drawn criticism for his support of legalizing drugs such as heroin and cocaine, his climate policies and anti-Israel positioning.

A view of Christmas morning Eucharist service at Canterbury Cathedral, Canterbury, United Kingdom, on Dec. 25, 2022. (Stuart Brock/Anadolu Agency)

The timing of the Green Party’s push is particularly sensitive as it comes on the heels of the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026, which passed last month, removing the last hereditary aristocrats from Parliament. With the hereditary principle gone, the presence of the “Lords Spiritual” has become the next logical target for constitutional reformers. There are currently 26 seats reserved for Church of England archbishops and bishops in the House of Lords.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

As the U.K. heads toward a local 2026 election cycle, the “Church and State” debate looks set to become a wedge issue. For the Greens, it represents their commitment to a “diverse and inclusive” Britain. For their detractors, it is a dangerous move that risks “de-Christianizing” the country at a moment of profound social uncertainty.

Whether the proposal will mobilize a new “religious vote” or simply fade behind the urgency of other issues remains to be seen. What is clear, commentators say, is that the image of the established Church is increasingly being viewed through the lens of a much sharper and more polarized political fight.

Continue Reading

World

Hamas armed wing says disarmament demands not acceptable

Published

on

Hamas armed wing says disarmament demands not acceptable

Abu Obeida says calling for the group’s disarmament amounts to an attempt to continue Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza.

Hamas spokesman Abu Obeida has said that calling for the group’s disarmament amounted to an attempt to continue Israel’s genocide.

Hamas’s armed wing has rejected calls for the Palestinian group to disarm, saying that discussing the issue before Israel fully implements the first phase of the United States-brokered “ceasefire” in Israel’s war on Gaza amounts to an attempt to continue the genocide against the Palestinian people.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

In a televised statement on Sunday, Obeida, who is Hamas’s armed wing spokesperson, said that raising the issue of weapons “in a crude manner” would not be accepted.

Advertisement

The issue of Hamas relinquishing its weapons is a major obstacle in talks to implement US President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza, aimed at ending Israel’s war on the besieged territory.

Since the US- and Qatar-brokered “ceasefire” took effect in October, more than 705 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli attacks, according to the Palestinian news agency Wafa.

Hamas has told mediators it will not discuss disarmament without guarantees that Israel will completely withdraw from Gaza, three sources told the Reuters news agency last week.

“What the enemy is trying to push through today against the Palestinian resistance, via our brotherly mediators, is extremely dangerous,” Obeida said.

He said the disarmament demands were “nothing but an overt attempt to continue the genocide against our people, something we will not accept under any circumstances”.

Advertisement

It was not immediately clear whether the comments amounted to a formal rejection of the US-backed plan, which includes a demand that Hamas lay down its arms.

Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, which began after the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel in October 2023, has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians and injured at least 172,000 others.

Obeida urged mediators to pressure Israel to fulfil its commitments under the first phase of the Trump plan before any discussion of the second phase can take place.

“The enemy is the one who undermines the agreement,” he said.

There was no immediate comment from Israel on his remarks.

Advertisement

Obeida also addressed Israel’s role in the US-Israel war on Iran, condemning it for launching strikes on Iran “in the midst of the deception of negotiations, with full collusion and conspiracy with the United States”.

The US had been involved in talks with Iran over its nuclear programme in the weeks before the US and Israel launched the war on February 28.

In Iran, more than 2,000 people have been killed and at least 26,500 others injured since the war began.

Obeida also condemned Israel’s renewed offensive “against sisterly Lebanon”, which it launched on March 2 after the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel.

Israel’s assault on Lebanon has killed more than 1,400 people and displaced over 1.2 million, according to Lebanese authorities.

Advertisement

Obeida commended Iran, Hezbollah and Yemen’s Houthis for their continued strikes against Israel.

Hamas’s spokesman also condemned the Israeli parliament’s passage of a new death penalty law that only applies to Palestinians, urging people in the West Bank “to seek, by every possible means, to liberate the [Palestinian] prisoners” held in Israeli jails.

Continue Reading

World

The Scale of the War in the Middle East in Five Maps

Published

on

The Scale of the War in the Middle East in Five Maps

The geographic scale

To show the extent of the war that the United States and Israel started with Iran, the maps in this article overlay the region onto different parts of the world.

Advertisement

Drag the globe or region to compare the area in different places.

Extent of the attacks

Advertisement

The strikes carried out by both sides in the war have stretched across a vast area of more than four million square miles, as seen in this map overlaid onto Europe.

Advertisement

In comparison with Ukraine

Russia has been trying to control parts of Ukraine for more than a decade. Iran is nearly three times the size of Ukraine and has more than double its population.

Advertisement

Note: Areas controlled by Russia and reclaimed by Ukraine are as of April 2.

Strait of Hormuz

Advertisement

Iran attacked ships in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping route through which a fifth of the world’s oil supply moves. This map overlays the strait over the New York City area.

Lebanon, the other front

Advertisement

Israel’s army has demanded evacuations in areas of southern Lebanon and Beirut, which are comparable in size to New York City.

Continue Reading

Trending