World
Ukraine is pushing for EU membership. But what are the real chances?
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has a transparent message for the European Union: Ukraine needs in.
“Do show that you’re with us. Do show that you’ll not allow us to go. Do show that you’re certainly Europeans,” the president, carrying army apparel, instructed the European Parliament on Tuesday afternoon.
Yesterday, Zelenskyy had signed an official utility asking for EU membership, a step that any European county is allowed to provoke by itself. Upping the ante, Zelenskyy requested a fast-tracked process to make sure his nation joins the bloc as quickly as feasibly attainable.
The transfer from Kyiv follows feedback made by Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Fee, throughout an interview with Euronews, the place she appeared to endorse Ukraine’s bid.
“They belong to us. They’re one among us and we wish them in,” von der Leyen.
An amazing majority of MEPs additionally backed the thought with a non-binding decision, demanding Ukraine obtain candidate standing according to the EU treaties and a “merit-based” strategy.
“I believe there are moments in time the place you want have the braveness to take nice strides forward, and in the event you have a look at earlier enlargements it was at all times a political determination that needed to do with safety, with freedom,” stated Sophie in ‘t Veld, a Dutch MEP whose liberal occasion has proposed to welcome Zelenskyy’s occasion.
However the path to hitch the bloc is all the pieces however easy.
How do you be part of the EU?
In reality, the so-called accession course of is a posh, arduous and costly enterprise that drags out over a number of years, even a long time, and requires an distinctive dedication from the candidate nation, which is requested to implement a prolonged catalogue of reforms to adjust to EU norms.
Most significantly, the entire course of rests on the political will of the 27 member states. Even when the Fee is the one main the negotiations and conducting the groundwork, it’s as much as the capitals to inexperienced mild each step of the street – by unanimity.
The necessity for consensus has proved to be a recurrent impediment for enlargement. Bulgaria is presently blocking accession talks with North Macedonia – and, by extension, with Albania – as a result of a longstanding dispute involving historic and linguistic grievances.
In the meantime, the opposite three official candidates – Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey – stay caught in a negotiation limbo with no breakthrough in sight. Within the case of Ankara, the beginning date goes again all the way in which to 1987.
The stalemate displays the low political urge for food for widening the bloc, with consideration principally targeted on inner squabbles associated to the democratic backsliding of some member states.
However given its unprecedented nature, may Russia’s invasion give an additional impetus to Kyiv’s nice expectations?
What now?
The EU’s accession course of is designed to totally align the candidate nation with the bloc’s democratic, financial and social requirements.
The process is break up into 4 important steps: utility, candidacy, negotiations, and accession.
The primary one, utility, has already taken place after Zelenskyy’s signature. The Fee is anticipated to look at the request and publish a advice, both supporting or rejecting the bid.
The Council can then approve Ukraine’s utility by unanimity, whereas the Parliament must give its consent with a easy majority.
If all of the votes are in favour, Ukraine can be formally thought of a candidate to hitch the EU.
After that, the Fee will give you a framework for negotiations, which additionally must be unanimously endorsed by the 27. Ukraine will probably be requested to start reforms earlier than discussions happen.
The Fee’s mandate is then used to information the accession talks, that are divided in 35 chapters grouped in six important clusters: fundamentals; inner markets; competitiveness and inclusive development; inexperienced agenda and sustainable connectivity; sources, agriculture and cohesion; and exterior relations.
The method is strictly linear: every chapter opens solely after the earlier is unquestionably closed. Fundamentals, which covers points similar to justice, human rights and public establishments, is the the primary chapter to be opened and likewise the final to be closed, underlining the significance the EU offers to core democratic values.
This emphasis on democracy may pose a significant roadblock for Ukraine’s European path. The nation scores poorly in worldwide indexes: Freedom Home calls it “partly free” whereas the Economist describes it as a “hybrid regime.” Reporters With out Borders says oligarchs’ grip on the media continues to be too “tight.”
“After the [Maidan] revolution in Ukraine, the nation is actually on a pro-democratic and pro-European path. Nevertheless, its democracy continues to be fragile and the rule of regulation continues to be not enforced correctly,” says Jana Juzová, a analysis fellow at EUROPEUM, an unbiased think-tank targeted on European integration.
“By way of democracy, Ukraine is scoring equally and even worse because the Western Balkan international locations. Corruption, functioning and independence of judiciary, and weak democratic establishments are nonetheless among the many most problematic points.”
For Juzová, the truth that Ukraine doesn’t exert full management over its personal territory – Crimea was illegally annexed by Russia and the Donbas has two separatist provinces – may additional complicate issues.
“The candidates for EU membership will need to have clearly outlined and consolidated borders, territorial integrity,” the researcher instructed Euronews.
“The EU accession course of is by definition purported to be very strict,” she added. “I wouldn’t be too optimistic about Ukraine’s prospects of becoming a member of the EU anytime quickly.”
‘Accession would not occur in a single day’
The principle goal of tortuous negotiations is to deliver the candidate nation as shut as attainable to all EU guidelines, legislations and political buildings.
The Copenhagen standards, established in 1993, are the prime reference all through the entire course of. For instance: a rustic that needs to hitch the bloc should have the ability to “deal with the aggressive stress and market forces” throughout the EU’s single market.
As soon as discussions round all 35 chapters come to an finish, an accession treaty is drafted. The textual content must be unanimously ratified by the Council and all nationwide parliaments of every member state (decrease and excessive chambers), in addition to by a majority vote within the European Parliament.
On common, profitable negotiations take between 4 and 5 years to finish.
Austria, Finland and Sweden accomplished the duty below two years, whereas Croatia, the final nation to hitch the EU, wanted virtually eight. The pace is set by each the tempo of the candidate’s reforms and by Council’s political curiosity in closing and opening new chapters.
“This isn’t one thing that may occur in a single day. It’s going to take time each due to the present sensible challenges and priorities confronting the EU,” Corina Stratulat, a senior coverage analyst on the Brussels-based European Coverage Centre (EPC), tells Euronews.
“Entrance to the EU is a course of, not an occasion. Based mostly on what we all know to date, this implies time, persistence and a substantial amount of preparation on each side.”
Stratulat doubts Ukraine is anyplace “shut” to fulfilling the Copenhagen standards and is significantly involved concerning the political dangers inherent in a fast-tracked accession process, an unheard-of choice.
“You’ll be able to have a sooner course of if there may be political will. Nevertheless, if the method stays as it’s now – that’s, advanced and rigorous –, a sooner accession would require all member states to shortly approve all tens of selections related to a rustic,” she says.
“This has not been the case in recent times, even for steps that had been symbolic, like granting candidate standing to an applicant. And there may be additionally the query of how would a fast-track accession for Ukraine be perceived within the Balkan international locations, which have been ready for a very long time and have additionally seen battle and dangers of Russian affect.”
All eyes on the capitals
Declaring Ukraine an official EU candidate within the midst of Russia’s invasion could possibly be seen as a robust proof of dedication and help for a rustic below siege. However its precise energy could possibly be restricted to the realm of political symbolism.
For Ukraine to hitch the bloc within the timeframe requested by Zelenskyy, the entire accession course of must be simplified and overhauled, growing the dangers of a subpar, rushed process that results in water-downed requirements and a sketchy adaptation of EU guidelines.
In the intervening time, the one specific endorsement has come from a coalition of Japanese European states fashioned by Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. In a plea just like the parliament’s decision, the group requires steps to “instantly grant Ukraine an EU candidate standing.”
Doing so would open Ukraine’s door for the Instrument for Pre-Accession Help (IPA), a monetary programme that helps candidate international locations perform the political, institutional, social and financial reforms wanted to face the advanced negotiations.
IPA’s finances for the interval 2021-2027 is €14.2 billion and is being distributed amongst Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey.
From the Western facet, no downright rejection has been voiced as a result of extraordinarily delicate circumstances and a widely-shared respect for the determine of Zelenskyy, seen as a battle hero.
However in latest days, officers from France, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands have expressed warning, arguing that membership just isn’t the suitable option to handle the current battle.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez stated in an interview with RTVE that accession was a “lengthy” course of with “necessities and reforms” to be met, whereas Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte instructed the nationwide parliament that the subject was “not a great dialogue” to have proper now.
“We’re not going to assist Ukraine that means,” Rutte stated.
Welcoming a brand new member state into the 27-strong membership will inevitably alter the stability of energy within the establishments and tilt the consensus additional eastward.
Extra components like Ukraine’s demographic dimension – over 41 million residents, geographical location – an enormous border shared with Russia – and relative poverty – its GDP per capita is the second-lowest in Europe after Moldova –, are set to weigh closely within the pondering of the capitals.
One other concern looming over leaders is likely to be Article 42 of the EU treaties, which imposes an obligation of “support and help by all means” if some other member state is a “sufferer of an armed aggression.”
NATO, which has an identical provision of collective defence and shares 21 members with the bloc, has repeatedly stated it won’t deploy any troops inside Ukraine to combat the Russian military nor assist implement a no-fly zone over the nation.
In latest feedback, Charles Michel, president of the European Council, the very best authority the place EU leaders meet to determine the bloc’s political orientation, provided additional insights on how the 27 really feel about Ukraine’s passionate bid.
“Membership is a long-standing request from Ukraine,” stated Michel.
“However there are totally different opinions and sensitivities throughout the EU on enlargement.”
World
Sports Reporter Michelle Beadle Says She Spoke ‘Incorrectly’ When Making Charged ‘Nuggets’ Gaffe During FanDuel NBA Show — Watch
ad
World
Police, UK pm accused of double standard as suspect indicted for killing 3 girls faces terror related charge
LONDON—The Merseyside police department in England was forced to admit last month that the force is “restricted” from sharing key information about the July Southport attack that killed three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class, as the alleged attacker now faces terror-related charges.
Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, 18, is facing the new charges under the country’s Terrorism Act in addition to the existing three murder charges, ten counts of attempted murder and one count of knife possession, authorities said last week. Rudakubana allegedly committed the July 29 stabbing spree that killed three girls – Alice Dasilva Aguiar, 9, Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, and Bebe King, 6 – and injured several others.
The police said that the suspect produced the deadly poison ricin and had al Qaeda training materials titled “Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The al Qaeda Training Manual” during a search of the suspect’s property. The police have not declared the events a terror incident as no motive has been determined, authorities added.
UK STABBING SUSPECT IN DEATHS OF 3 GIRLS FOUND WITH RICIN, AL QAEDA MATERIAL AND CHARGED UNDER TERRORISM ACT
“We have been given extensive guidance by the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] in relation to what we can say publicly to ensure the integrity of the court proceedings are protected, and therefore we are restricted in what we can share with you now, whilst the proceedings are live,” Merseyside Police said in a statement to dispel the criticism that the force is “deciding to keep things from the public.”
These revelations of the terror-related charges ignited a firestorm over the police and government’s secretive and double-standard approach in the aftermath of the deadly attack in Southport, a town north of Liverpool, back in July.
“I think the rationale was that they didn‘t want to prejudice the trial. And I think motive will be an important issue in the trial, and they didn’t want to release information about the suspect that spoke to his motive,” said Toby Young, the director of the Free Speech Union in the U.K. told Fox News Digital.
But Young added that there was a “kind of double standard when it comes to the information that’s released about attackers in these circumstances,” as the government and authorities would likely have been more forthcoming if the attacker had been “a far-right white supremacist.”
The killing spree led to widespread rioting across England amid speculation about the attacker’s background and the nature of the attack. In response, multiple individuals have been charged and jailed over comments made online that the court perceived as inciting the riots.
Last month, Lucy Connolly, the wife of a local Conservative Party politician, was jailed for over 31 months after making what the authorities claimed were inflammatory posts on social media directed against asylum seekers.
Wayne O’Rourke, who had an X account with over 90,000 followers, was jailed for three years for fueling the arrest after he alleged that a Muslim had carried out the Southport attack. “You were not caught up in what others were doing, you were instigating it,” the judge said during the sentencing. “The flames fanned by keyboard warriors like you.”
UK GOVERNMENT ACCUSED OF CRACKING DOWN ON FREE SPEECH: ‘THINK BEFORE YOU POST’
But while the police remained tight-lipped on the grounds of not prejudicing the trial, issuing only a few details about the incident, British left-wing Prime Minister Keir Starmer was quick to slam the people participating in the unrest as “far right.”
Winston Marshall, Host of The Winston Marshall Show, told Fox News Digital, “Prime minister Starmer has been painstakingly careful not to prejudice the court proceedings of Axel Rudakubana after the new charges of possession of Islamist literature and Ricin were made.”
The British podcaster host noted, “But we the British public remember clearly how Starmer branded the August rioters as “far-right thugs” almost immediately and before any of them were convicted. It is precisely this behavior for which he is rightly and bitterly mocked as “Two-Tier Keir.”
“Keir Starmer unhesitatingly referred to the rioters, some of whom had been arrested and were in custody, as far-right, so he had no hesitation in speculating about the motives of people who’d been arrested for rioting, even though that could easily prejudice their trials, too, and not all of them had pleaded guilty,” Young said.
“To describe someone who’s been arrested and charged, but pleaded not guilty, as a criminal is to potentially prejudice the outcome of their trial, too. It’s to not extend the presumption of innocence to them . . . signaling to potential jurors that the Home Office and, by implication, the Home Secretary believe them to be guilty,” he added.
Right-wing Reform Party Leader Nigel Farage was subject to a barrage of condemnation from a bipartisan group of senior Conservative and left-wing figures and accusations of inciting riots after questioning the lack of information being released to the public.
“I just wonder whether the truth is being withheld from us. I don’t know the answer to that, but I think it is a fair and legitimate question,” Farage said following the attack, asking further whether the suspect had been known and monitored by the country’s security services. Farage also questioned why the incident had not been treated as terror-related.
UK RIOTS PLUNGE COUNTRY INTO WORST UNREST IN YEARS, PRIME MINISTER VOWS TO APPLY ‘FULL FORCE OF LAW’
Neil Basu, a former counter-terrorism police chief between 2018 and 2021, suggested that Farage could be subject to an investigation over these comments and accused the politician of “undermining the police, creating conspiracy theories, and giving a false basis for the attacks on the police.”
Conservative party peer Lord Barwell, a former MP who serves as former Prime Minister Theresa May’s chief of staff, called Farage “utterly shameful” for spreading “misinformation” on social media after the attack.
“He is an MP. If he has questions, he could have asked them in the House of Commons yesterday – but he wasn’t there. Instead, he prefers to encourage those spreading misinformation on here [social media]. Utterly shameful.”
But the latest police statement and the new terror-related charges somewhat exonerated the critics. “Perhaps I was right all along,” Farage said last week in a video posted on X.
Farage wrote in the Daily Telegraph that he and his party colleagues were barred from raising questions about the Southport attack in Parliament because of fears that it may prejudice the public amid the suspect’s trial.
Farage said the authorities had told him he was not allowed to raise the matter in Parliament after he had submitted a written question to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper asking whether the accused attacker had ever been referred to the country’s counter-terrorism initiative.
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“It is impossible to infer anything other than that the apparatus of state are being used to manage this situation,” Farage said. “For now, therefore, it seems that nobody is allowed to ask in the proper forum when the government first knew that the accused was to face the ricin and terror material charges.
He added: “Likewise, nobody can know whether this man was known to the authorities in any way. Do we really want to live in a society where such crucial information is kept from the public? Who decided these details should remain secret?
Police and prosecutors still have not issued information to the public about whether the accused attacker was ever known to the country’s security and counter-terrorism authorities.
The alleged attacker was born in Wales to Rwandan parents, police said later. British media reported that he was raised Christian. The trial for murder charges is provisionally scheduled for January.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
World
Thousands protest in Portugal to demand higher wages
Portugal is one of Western Europe’s poorest countries with official data showing that more than half of all workers in country earn less than €1,000 a month.
Thousands of people have attended protests in two cities in Portugal to demand higher wages and pensions and improvements to social services like housing and healthcare.
Called by the General Confederation of the Portuguese Workers (CGTP), the country’s largest federation of trade unions, marches took place in Porto and the capital, Lisbon.
The CGTP’s Secretary General, Tiago Oliveira, said the protests were directed at both the public and private sectors and wraps up a month of activism under the banner, ‘Increase Salaries and Pensions, Solve the Country’s Problems’.
Oliveira said the day-to-day difficulties faced by workers stem from political decisions and highlighted unaffordable housing and limited access to healthcare as key concerns.
He also criticised a recent deal the government struck with the General Union of Workers (UGT) and four employer confederations which proposes increasing the monthly minimum wage to €870 by 2025. CGTP members were left out of those negotiations.
“There is money in the country. The problem is the distribution of wealth and we need to keep working to ensure that a larger share goes to the workers who produce it every day,” said one protester in Lisbon.
While another in Porto complained that his education hadn’t guaranteed a good job and salary.
“I have a university degree and I thought it would be different, that I would have better conditions and opportunities but unfortunately that’s not the situation and we’ll be here to fight for something better,” he said.
Portugal is one of Western Europe’s poorest countries with official data showing that more than half of workers in country earn less than €1,000 a month.
Currently, workers in Portugal get a minimum wage of €820 a month.
The government has also proposed raising the minimum wage by €50 a year until 2028, increasing the national minimum wage to €1,020 in 2028.
But despite the increase, Portugal’s minimum amount remains far below its European Union counterparts.
Comparing Portugal’s minimum wage
According to data from Eurostat, out of the 22 member states that have a minimum wage, Portugal’s ranks twelfth in the bloc.
The European ranking is led by Luxembourg, where the minimum monthly wage stands at €2,204 per month.
Behind Luxembourg is Ireland, where workers earn a minimum wage of €1,840 a month. The Netherlands comes in third with €1,829 per month.
Belgium is also in the top five highest minimum wage-paying countries in the EU with a monthly salary of €1,774. Germany pays €1,761, while France’s minimum pay is set at €1,550 per month.
-
Business1 week ago
Carol Lombardini, studio negotiator during Hollywood strikes, to step down
-
Health1 week ago
Just Walking Can Help You Lose Weight: Try These Simple Fat-Burning Tips!
-
Business1 week ago
Hall of Fame won't get Freddie Freeman's grand slam ball, but Dodgers donate World Series memorabilia
-
Culture1 week ago
Yankees’ Gerrit Cole opts out of contract, per source: How New York could prevent him from testing free agency
-
Culture6 days ago
Try This Quiz on Books That Were Made Into Great Space Movies
-
Technology1 week ago
An Okta login bug bypassed checking passwords on some long usernames
-
Health2 days ago
Lose Weight Without the Gym? Try These Easy Lifestyle Hacks
-
Culture2 days ago
The NFL is heading to Germany – and the country has fallen for American football