Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com
WASHINGTON, Oct 6 (Reuters) – A manufacturing reduce by the OPEC+ oil cartel is reigniting U.S. voters’ No. 1 worry – excessive inflation – and handing a possible increase to Republican candidates lower than 5 weeks earlier than the Nov. 8 midterm elections.
President Joe Biden’s White Home has condemned the introduced reduce to manufacturing targets by the Saudi Arabia-led cartel, which despatched power costs larger after they’d eased from summer time highs.
The transfer late within the marketing campaign season unsettled a rising consensus that Biden’s Democrats might stem their losses within the U.S. Home of Representatives — although they’re nonetheless anticipated to lose their slim majority. Democrats are nonetheless favored to carry their razor-thin Senate majority.
However political strategists from each events say Democrats’ hopes in both chamber might take a success as voters throughout the nation discover themselves forking over extra money on the pump.
“No Democrat needs an surroundings the place folks need to spend extra money,” mentioned Joel Payne, a Democratic strategist who labored on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential marketing campaign.
Republicans have pounced on the problem.
“Beneath Biden – OPEC controls our future fairly than American power independence,” Pat Harrigan, a Republican Home candidates in North Carolina, mentioned in a tweet.
Republicans have hammered Democrats all yr over inflation, which has reached four-decade highs as gasoline costs surged with Russia’s March invasion of Ukraine. Moscow can be a member of OPEC+ and performed a job within the cartel’s determination this week to chop output.
Inflation is a significant cause that Biden’s public approval score has remained under 50% for greater than a yr, weighing on his social gathering’s congressional candidates. Management of both chamber of Congress might enable Republicans to carry Biden’s legislative agenda to a halt and launch doubtlessly damaging investigations.
Republicans argue for loosening authorities restrictions on U.S. power manufacturing as a option to decrease prices. Biden’s Democrats have responded to excessive inflation with a $430 billion bundle signed into legislation in August which lowers healthcare prices and encourages clear power.
Payne, the Democratic guide, mentioned the social gathering ought to attempt to blunt the unfavorable affect of the power shock by displaying voters they’re making an attempt to handle the problem.
Biden mentioned on Wednesday he’ll proceed releasing oil “as needed” from the federal government’s inventory of reserves to fight excessive costs, and has referred to as on Congress to seek out methods to scale back OPEC+’s energy over costs.
“OPEC have to be held chargeable for this motion,” mentioned U.S. Consultant Mike Thompson, a reasonable Democrat from California who has voted for proposals that will open OPEC to antitrust lawsuits however which have but to win full congressional approval.
Voters, together with Biden’s Democrats, overwhelmingly cite inflation as their prime concern, an echo of the Seventies power disaster that helped Republican Ronald Reagan unseat Democratic President Jimmy Carter within the 1980 presidential election.
A Reuters/Ipsos ballot accomplished Oct. 3 confirmed inflation was the No. 1 concern for 30% of registered voters, together with a fifth of Democrats and two fifths of Republicans. A lot smaller shares mentioned their prime fear was unemployment, crime or immigration.
Respondents cited inflation as their greatest private concern eight instances extra usually than they cited worries about somebody of their family shedding their job.
Furthermore, 41% of registered voters mentioned Republicans had the most effective method for dealing with inflation, in contrast with 30% who picked Democrats.
Within the weeks earlier than the OPEC+ determination to chop output, U.S. gasoline costs had been trending decrease as oil merchants grew involved in regards to the prospects of a world recession.
However the U.S. nationwide common for gasoline costs on Thursday was as much as $3.87 a gallon, about six cents larger than two days earlier, earlier than the OPEC+ announcement, in keeping with information from the American Vehicle Affiliation.
Forecasters don’t count on gasoline costs to surge again to summertime highs. Some elements of the nation — primarily California and elements of the Midwest that skilled a latest surge on account of refinery outages — might see costs ease within the weeks forward.
The worth of U.S. crude has risen greater than a greenback since Tuesday to about $88 a barrel, the very best since mid-September.
“That is dangerous information for Democrats,” mentioned Douglas Heye, a Republican strategist. “The Democratic argument three weeks in the past was, basically, issues are much less dangerous, which is not an important argument. They will’t even use that one now.”
Reporting by Jason Lange and David Morgan in Washington and Joseph Ax in Princeton, New Jersey, further reporting by David Gaffen; Modifying by Scott Malone and Alistair Bell
Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Rental homes will remain an attractive option next year to would-be homebuyers sidelined by high mortgage rates and rising home prices, analysts say.
American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes are two big real estate investment trusts poised to benefit from the trend, say analysts at Mizuho Securities USA and Raymond James & Associates.
Their outlooks boil down to a simple thesis: Many Americans will continue to have a difficult time finding a single-family home that they can afford to buy, which will make renting a house an attractive alternative.
It starts with mortgage rates. While the average rate on a 30-year mortgage fell to a two-year low of 6.08% in late September, it’s been mostly rising since then, echoing moves in the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.
The yield, which has hovered around 4.4% this week, surged after the presidential election, reflecting expectations among investors that President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed economic policies may widen the federal deficit and crank up inflation.
Analysts at Raymond James and Associates say they see mortgage rates remaining “higher for longer,” given the outcome of the election. Last week, they reiterated their “Outperform” ratings on American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes, noting “we are increasingly confident in the longer-term outlook for single-family rental fundamentals and the industry’s growth prospects.”
They also believe the two companies will continue to benefit from “outsized demographic demand for suburban homes,” and the monthly payment gap between renting and owning a home, which they estimate can be as much as 30% less to rent.
Analysts at Mizuho also expect that homeownership affordability hurdles will maintain “a supportive backdrop” and stoke demand for rental houses, helping American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes to maintain their tenant retention rates.
The companies are averaging higher new and renewal tenant lease rates when compared to several of the largest U.S. apartment owners, including AvalonBay, Equity Residential and Camden Property Trust, according to Mizuho. It has an “Outperform” rating on American Homes 4 Rent and a “Neutral” rating on Invitation Homes.
Shares in Invitation Homes are down 1.2% so far this year, while American Homes 4 Rent is up 4.4%. That’s well below the S&P 500’s 24% gain in the same period.
While individual homeowners and mom-and-pop investors still account for the vast majority of single-family rental homes, homebuilders have stepped up construction of new houses planned for rental communities.
In the third quarter, builders broke ground on about 24,000 single-family homes slated to become rentals. That’s up from 17,000 a year earlier. In the second quarter, single-family rental starts climbed to 25,000, the highest quarterly total going back to at least 1990, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data by the National Association of Home Builders.
A U.S. official on Thursday confirmed to Fox News Digital that Ukrainian authorities were briefed ahead of Russia’s “experimental Intermediate-range ballistic missile” attack that this type of weapon may be used against Ukraine in order to help it prepare.
Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed the attack Thursday evening local time in an address to the nation and said it was in direct response to the U.S. and the U.K. jointly approving Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range missiles to target Russia.
It remains unclear if there were any casualties in the attack on the city of Dnipro, which was originally reported as an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) strike, and which would have marked the first time such a weapon had been used during a time of war, sending panic across the globe.
1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES
Putin and U.S. sources have since confirmed the strike was not an ICBM, but the Kremlin chief also claimed that the weapon used poses a significant challenge for Western nations.
“The missiles attack targets at a speed of MACH 10. That’s 2.5 miles per second,” Putin said according to a translation. “The world’s current air defense systems and the missile defense systems developed by the Americans in Europe do not intercept such missiles.”
Fox News Digital could not immediately verify whether the U.S. or its NATO allies are capable of defending against this latest missile, dubbed the Oreshnik.
But according to one U.S. official, Putin may be playing up his abilities in a move to intimidate the West and Ukraine.
“While we take all threats against Ukraine seriously, it is important to keep a few key facts in mind: Russia likely possesses only a handful of these experimental missiles,” the official told Fox News Digital. “Ukraine has withstood countless attacks from Russia, including from missiles with significantly larger warheads than this weapon.
“Let me be clear: Russia may be seeking to use this capability to try to intimidate Ukraine and its supporters, or generate attention in the information space, but it will not be a game-changer in this conflict,” the official added.
US EMBASSY IN KYIV CLOSED AS ‘POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’ LOOMS
Following President Biden’s position reversal this week to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) against the Russian homeland, Kyiv immediately levied strikes against a military arsenal in the Russian region of Bryansk, more than 70 miles from Ukraine’s border.
While Ukrainian troops are the ones to officially fire the sophisticated missiles, the weapons system still relies on U.S. satellites to hit its target — an issue Putin touched on in his unannounced speech Thursday.
“We are testing the Oreshnik missile systems in combat conditions in response to NATO countries’ aggressive actions against Russia. We will decide on the further deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles depending on the actions of the U.S. and its satellites,” he said.
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Putin claimed Russia will alert Ukrainian citizens of an impending attack like the strike he carried out on Thursday, though it remains unclear if he issued a warning to the Ukrainians living in Dnipro.
The Kremlin chief said the “defense industry” was targeted, though images released by the Ukrainian ministry of defense showed what appeared to be civilian infrastructure was also caught in the fray.
The Pentagon on Thursday confirmed that Russia informed the U.S. of the impending attack, which corresponds with information obtained by Fox News Digital, but it is unclear if Moscow clarified which Ukrainian city was the intended target.
A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that the U.S. is committed to helping Ukraine bolster its air defense systems and has done so already by supplying Ukraine with hundreds of additional Patriot and Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles.
South Korea’s national security adviser says North plans to use the weapons to defend its airspace over the capital.
Russia has provided North Korea with anti-air missiles and air defence equipment in return for sending soldiers to support its war against Ukraine, according to a top South Korean official.
Asked what the North stood to gain from dispatching an estimated 10,000 troops to Russia, South Korea’s national security adviser Shin Won-sik said Moscow had given Pyongyang economic and military technology support.
“It is understood that North Korea has been provided with related equipment and anti-aircraft missiles to strengthen Pyongyang’s weak air defence system,” Shin told South Korean broadcaster SBS in an interview aired on Friday.
At a military exhibition in the capital, Pyongyang, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Friday called for developing and upgrading “ultra-modern” versions of weaponry, and pledged to keep advancing defence capabilities, state media reported.
Russia this month ratified a landmark mutual defence pact with North Korea as Ukrainian officials reported clashes with Pyongyang’s soldiers on the front lines.
The treaty was signed in Pyongyang in June during a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It obligates both states to provide military assistance “without delay” in the case of an attack on the other and to cooperate internationally to oppose Western sanctions.
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service told lawmakers this week that the troops deployed to Russia are believed to have been assigned to an airborne brigade and marine corps on the ground, with some of the soldiers having already entered combat, the Yonhap news agency reported.
The intelligence agency also said recently that North Korea had sent more than 13,000 containers of artillery, missiles and other conventional arms to Russia since August 2023 to replenish its dwindling weapons stockpiles.
Experts say Pyongyang could be using Ukraine as a means of realigning foreign policy.
By sending soldiers, North Korea is positioning itself within the Russian war economy as a supplier of weapons, military support and labour – potentially bypassing its traditional ally, neighbour and main trading partner, China, according to analysts.
Russia can also provide North Korea access to its vast natural resources, such as oil and gas, they say.
North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui recently visited Moscow and said her country would “stand firmly by our Russian comrades until victory day“.
North Korea said last month that any troop deployment to Russia would be “an act conforming with the regulations of international law”, but stopped short of confirming that it had sent soldiers.
The deployment has led to a shift in tone from Seoul, which had so far resisted calls to send weapons to Kyiv. However, President Yoon Suk-yeol indicated South Korea might change its longstanding policy of not providing arms to countries in conflict.
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs