World
Italy’s fascist takeover: 100 years on, is the ideology still alive?
Immediately marks 100 years for the reason that begin of the March on Rome, Benito Mussolini’s coup d’état that led to the creation of a 21-year-long fascist regime.
Broadly acknowledged as one of many darkest moments within the nation’s historical past, it’s upheld by historians and commentators as a main instance of how democracy may be eroded.
As Italy remembers the rebellion’s centennial, many marvel: does fascism nonetheless stay a menace to the nation’s democracy?
What was the March on Rome?
Italy entered the Twenties with out having managed to free itself from the shackles of World Battle One. The nation — sad with the outcomes of the post-war peace treaties — was ravaged by riots, strikes and political combating which a weak authorities was unable to curtail.
Among the many newly rising post-WWI political forces have been the fascists, led by a journalist and former socialist, Benito Mussolini.
Whereas fascism’s definition stays debated and controversial, the motion’s early adherents have been largely united by an ultra-nationalist ideology rejecting democratic rules and calling for an authoritarian central authorities.
The motion had grown in measurement rapidly, exploiting Italy’s socioeconomic challenges and the middle-class worry of socialists. Come October 1922, Mussolini realised it was time to grab energy.
On the twenty seventh of October, a band of Blackshirts — the fascist’s paramilitary wing — encroached Rome. Italy’s then-PM, Luigi Facta, tried to declare a state of siege, however the king refused to signal the order, resulting in the federal government’s give up within the face of Mussolini’s forces.
By the top of the month, the switch of energy was full: Mussolini was formally appointed Italy’s new prime minister.
Regardless of sure hiccups that just about introduced his rule to an finish, Mussolini consolidated his energy within the Twenties via intimidation ways and electoral reform. He regularly eroded democracy, arrange a totalitarian regime, invaded components of North and East Africa, and finally allied himself together with his ideological pupil who would come to surpass him – Nazi Germany’s Adolf Hitler.
A century later, is fascism nonetheless a menace in Italy?
At World Battle Two’s shut in 1945, Mussolini was killed and the Fascist Occasion disbanded. The monarchy was overthrown the next yr, and the nation’s first post-war authorities was led by partisans and anti-fascists. By 1952, a legislation was launched banning any fascist propaganda.
This, nevertheless, didn’t kill off fascist concepts.
1000’s of Italians had been a part of the fascist regime’s institutional and bureaucratic machine, had harboured open or hidden sympathies for Mussolini himself, or had gone to battle on Italy’s behalf.
Whereas a number of the extra distinguished fascists have been publicly disgraced and even killed, many former get together members or sympathisers re-entered the political institution.
Amongst these was considered one of Italy’s most essential post-war prime ministers: Amintore Fanfani. Chief of the average Christian Democratic get together for components of the Nineteen Fifties, Sixties and Eighties, he had been a member of the fascist get together and a signatory of the anti-semitic racial legal guidelines (leggi razziali) launched in 1938.
Sure fascists, alternatively, refused to affix the political mainstream and somewhat coalesced to type their very own get together – the Italian Social Motion (Movimento Sociale Italiano, MSI), which revived the primary tenets of the Fascist Occasion in all however identify.
The MSI loved a good quantity of help within the centre and south of Italy — and even ended up courting the Christian Democrats themselves — till it disbanded in 1995 following the collapse of Italy’s main events.
Among the many MSI’s former members? Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s newly-elected prime minister.
A teenage Meloni was a youth activist in Rome, and previously expressed her admiration for Mussolini himself.
“I consider [he] was a great politician,” she advised French TV in 1996. “He did what he did for Italy.”
Meloni would later rise via the ranks of Italian politics, changing into a youth minister underneath Berlusconi’s centre-right authorities from 2008 to 2011, and later the President of Brothers of Italy (Fratelli d’Italia) – a national-conservative get together that’s seen because the ‘inheritor’ of the MSI.
Whereas Brothers of Italy was a minor pressure at first, its recognition grew quickly in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and are available the September 2022 common election, it emerged as Italy’s largest get together.
So does fascism stay an everlasting downside in Italy?
Some critics level to the election of the nation’s most far-right authorities for the reason that finish of the battle and its personal cupboard ministers’ backgrounds for example of the menace the ideology continues to pose.
Ignazio La Russa, Italy’s higher home speaker, has a controversial political historical past, particularly after it emerged he collected fascist memorabilia at dwelling.
Different members of Meloni’s cupboard even have related backgrounds. Daniela Santanchè, the brand new tourism minister, previously advised a rally that “I’ll proudly name myself a fascist, if being a fascist means kicking out all of the unlawful immigrants.”
Three of Mussolini’s personal descendants, who proudly carry his surname, are additionally energetic members of Italian politics.
Essentially the most well-known, Alessandra Mussolini, has been elected to the European Parliament and sparked a significant furore in 2006 after she mentioned “higher a fascist than a f*ggot” on nationwide tv.
To make issues worse, the extra radical neo-fascist actions — CasaPound probably the most distinguished of those — nonetheless interact in public, usually violent, demonstrations.
A typical fable of the “good Italian” — whereby Italians have been harmless bystanders dragged into the battle — has permeated Italian fashionable tradition and led to important historic revisionism and whitewashing of the nation’s fascist previous.
Liliana Segre, a Jewish-Italian senator for all times and Holocaust survivor, has often warned of the danger of fascism in Italy, and lamented the dearth of a powerful anti-fascist motion within the nation.
However, sure commentators keep that the danger of an precise fascist energy seize and dictatorship stays extremely distant, particularly given Italy’s post-war constitutional framework and electoral system.
It’s value noting that Meloni has publicly distanced herself from Fascism, explicitly denouncing the ideology in her maiden speech to parliament this Tuesday.
“I’ve by no means felt any affinity for anti-democratic regimes… together with fascism,” she mentioned, calling Mussolini’s racial legal guidelines “the bottom level in Italy’s historical past” and a “shame that can mark Italian individuals ceaselessly”.
Many members of Meloni’s right-wing coalition, together with the Northern League motion’s chief and Deputy PM Matteo Salvini, have rejected the notion that fascists nonetheless exert any noticeable energy in Italy, describing them as a “factor of the previous”.
However how far can their claims be mentioned to be true?
To evaluate whether or not fascism poses a real menace to Italy’s democracy, Euronews has spoken to 2 teachers who’re consultants within the discipline.
The ‘March on Rome by no means ended’
Journalist Rula Jebreal is amongst those that see fascism as an everlasting menace in Italy, pointing to the brand new Meloni-led far-right authorities as a main instance of this.
“The menace [of fascism] is actual, and the very best that Italy’s constitutional democracy has recognized since World Battle Two,” she advised Euronews.
A Palestinian-born award-winning journalist and tutorial specialising within the correlation between propaganda and genocide, Jebreal moved to Italy for her research and ended up changing into one of many nation’s most recognisable commentators, touchdown a coveted spot as co-presenter of Italy’s Sanremo televised singing contest in 2020.
Jebreal’s place as one of many few ladies of color within the Italian highlight and a sufferer of focused harassment campaigns from far-right trolls and politicians – together with from the Brothers of Italy get together itself – has knowledgeable her view.
“Each genocide begins with phrases, with propaganda and the weaponisation of disinformation, and the criminalisation and demonisation of otherness,” Jebreal remarked.
Most just lately, Jebreal acquired a torrent of criticism after a social media publish through which she highlighted Meloni’s father’s prison previous — which she claims was meant to focus on the far-right’s hypocrisy in scapegoating and judging individuals, reminiscent of migrants, from their background.
“I characterize every part they’re combating towards,” she acknowledged. “I’m a lady of color, I’m a Muslim and a vocal critic of their insurance policies.”
“Meloni herself has promoted the good substitute idea” — a false conspiracy which suggests there’s a deliberate effort by “leftist elites” and “globalists” to interchange white Europeans with non-white immigrants — Jebreal acknowledged.
“Meloni’s language might have softened, however the information converse louder than the rhetoric,” Jebreal claimed, pointing to the appointment of hardline ministers in Meloni’s cupboard.
For Jebreal, nevertheless, it’s not simply the rise of the far-right that’s regarding, however the complacency of moderates too. Very similar to within the March on Rome, the place Italy’s democratically-elected PM surrendered to fascist troops, Jebreal feels there’s a “disaster” amongst liberal journalists, who haven’t carried out sufficient to deal with the difficulty, thus permitting extremism to advance.
“Centrist politicians and media figures are aiding and abetting Meloni, [they] have invested extra power into criticising my tweet about [her] than her personal previous,” Jebreal lamented.
Commenting on Meloni’s success, Jebreal felt that — as occurred within the Twenties — far-right forces handle to make use of socioeconomic challenges to their benefit.
“Meloni exploited all the issues within the system, however particularly the radicalisation of Italian residents towards democracy [and] the delegitimisation of democratic establishments,” she summarised. “There’s by no means been actual accountability in Italy for being Fascists. The march on Rome by no means ended – they’re nonetheless marching.
‘We’re experiencing historic revisionism legitimising fascism’
One other eager observer of political developments in Italy is Andrea Mammone, a Professor of Up to date Historical past at Rome’s Sapienza College.
Considered one of Italy’s pre-eminent consultants within the historical past of Fascism and far-right politics, he has authored quite a few books and papers on the topic.
Not like Jebreal, Mammone doesn’t see an imminent menace to Italy’s democracy.
“A minimum of not within the brief run,” he advised Euronews. “Political establishments are robust. A drift in the direction of fascism would wish years.”
“I see extra issues within the US, the place the Republicans should not accepting the results of a genuinely democratic election,” he added, pointing to the storming of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on 6 January 2021.
Mammone did consider {that a} Meloni-led authorities would have destructive repercussions for Italy, however not by way of direct assaults on the nation’s democratic framework.
“[The threat] is extra by way of xenophobia towards minorities,” he mentioned.
The place Mammone and Jebreal agree, nevertheless, is in the best way fascist rhetoric and symbolism have been normalised in Italian society.
“Italy has developed the concept of ‘italiani brava gente’ [‘good Italians’],” he acknowledged, referencing the frequent fable of Italian innocence in the course of the Holocaust. “Within the final twenty years, since Berlusconi joined politics, criticism of anti-fascism prevailed,” he acknowledged. One instance: Brothers of Italy’s longstanding opposition and hostility in the direction of celebrating Italy’s Liberation Day, which commemorates the Resistance.
“We’re experiencing historic revisionism legitimising fascism,” he mentioned. “[Meloni] will result in an extra rehabilitation of fascism.”
FIRST ON FOX – Aviva Siegel, the wife of American hostage Kieth Siegel and a former hostage herself, is pleading with everyone and anyone involved in the hostage negotiations to get her husband, and the others, freed from Hamas captivity after they have spent more than 440 days in deplorable conditions.
“Hamas released a video of Keith, and I just saw the picture,” Aviva told Fox News Digital in an emotional interview in reference to a video Hamas released in April. “He looks terrible. His bones are out, and you can see that he’s lost a lot of weight.
“He doesn’t look like himself. And I’m just so worried about him, because so [many] days and minutes have passed since that video that we received,” she said. “I just don’t know what kind of Keith that we’re going to get back.”
Keith Samuel Siegel, 64, remains hostage in Gaza by Hamas (Hostage Family Forum)
7 US HOSTAGES STILL HELD BY HAMAS TERRORISTS AS FAMILIES PLEAD FOR THEIR RELEASE: ‘THIS IS URGENT’
“I’m worried about all the hostages, because the conditions that they are in are the worst conditions that any human being could go through,” Aviva said. “I was there. I touched death. I know what it feels being underneath the ground with no oxygen.
“Keith and I were just left there. We were left there to die,” she added.
Aviva and her husband of, at the time 42 years, were brutally abducted from their home in Kibbutz Kfar Aza by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, and held together for 51 days before she was released in the November 2023 hostage exchange after suffering from a stomach infection that left her incredibly ill.
She has since tirelessly fought for Kieth’s release, meeting with top officials in the U.S. and Israel, traveling to the United States nine times in the last year and becoming a prominent advocate for the hostages.
“I just hope that he’s with other people from Israel, and if he has them, he’s going to be okay,” Aviva said. “He’s just the person that will make them feel that they’re together. That’s what he did when I was there – he was 100% for me and the hostages that we were with.”
TEL AVIV, ISRAEL – MARCH 30: Released hostage Aviva Siegel, wife of hostage Keith Siegel, speaks during the final weekly ‘bring them home now’ rally on March 30, 2024 in Tel Aviv, Israel. According to the families of hostages forum, this would be the last week a rally is held at ‘hostage square’ citing that the government is not serious about negotiations and instead will be protesting in front of the Knesset from now on. (Photo by Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images)
“If you get kidnapped, get kidnapped with Keith, because he was outstanding to everybody. He was strong for all of us. And I’m sure that he’s keeping strong and keeping his hope to come out,” she said.
Aviva recounted their last moments together before they were separated ahead of her release, telling Fox News Digital, “When I left him, I told him to be the strongest – that he needs to be strong for me, and I’ll be strong for him.”
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY UNDER PRESSURE AMID RISING RESISTANCE, POPULARITY OF IRAN-BACKED TERROR GROUPS
Top security officials from the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar have been pushing Israel and Hamas to agree to a cease-fire and the return of hostages.
Reports on Thursday suggested that negotiators are pushing for a 42-day cease-fire in which 34 of the at least 50 hostages still assessed to be alive, could be exchanged.
Hamas is also believed to continue to hold at least 38 who were taken hostage and then killed while in captivity, along with at least seven who are believed to have been killed on Oct. 7, 2023 and then taken into Gaza.
Though all the hostages are believed to have been held in deplorable conditions, the children, women – including the female IDF soldiers – the sick and the elderly have reportedly been front listed to be freed first in exchange for Hamas terrorists currently imprisoned.
“I’m keeping my hope and holding on and just waiting – waiting to hug Keith, and waiting for all the families, to get their families back,” Aviva said. “We need to get them back.”
Aviva said she dreams of the moment that she gets to hug her husband again and watch their grandchildren “jump into his arms.”
“We’ll be the happiest people on Earth,” she said. “All the hostages, I can’t imagine them coming home. It’ll be just the happiest moment for all of the families. We need it to happen.”
Reports in recent weeks suggest there is an increased sense of optimism in bringing home the hostages, but Secretary of State Antony Blinken urged some caution when speaking with MSNBC Morning Joe on Thursday when he said, “We are encouraged because this should happen, and it should happen because Hamas is at a point where the cavalry it thought might come to the rescue isn’t coming to the rescue, [Hezbollah’s] not coming to the rescue, [Iran’s] not coming to the rescue.”
“In the absence of that, I think the pressure is on Hamas to finally get to yes,” he added. “But look, I think we also have to be very realistic. We’ve had these Lucy and the football moments several times over the last months where we thought we were there, and the football gets pulled away.
“The real question is: Is Hamas capable of making a decision and getting to yes? We’ve been fanning out with every possible partner on this to try to get the necessary pressure exerted on Hamas to say yes,” Blinken added.
Trump also hinted at China’s growing influence around the canal, which connects the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans.
United States President-elect Donald Trump has threatened to demand control of the Panama Canal after accusing Panama of charging excessive rates on US ships passing through one of the busiest waterways in the world.
“Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Saturday.
“This complete ‘rip-off’ of our Country will immediately stop.”
The US largely built the canal in 1914 and administrated territory surrounding the passage for decades. But Washington fully handed control of the canal to Panama in 1999 after a period of joint administration.
Trump also hinted at China’s growing influence around the canal, which connects the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans.
“It was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else,” he said. “We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!”
The post was an exceedingly rare example of a US leader saying he could push a sovereign country to hand over territory.
“It was not given for the benefit of others, but merely as a token of cooperation with us and Panama. If the moral and legal principles of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” Trump said.
Trump’s tariff plan
It also underlines an expected shift in US diplomacy under Trump, who has not historically shied away from threatening allies and using rhetoric when dealing with counterparts.
Last month, Trump said he would impose tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports on day one of his administration and that the measures would remain until the “invasion” of undocumented migrants and drugs came to an end.
“Both Mexico and Canada have the absolute right and power to easily solve this long-simmering problem. We hereby demand that they use this power, and until such time that they do, it is time for them to pay a very big price!” he posted on his Truth Social platform.
Authorities in Panama did not immediately react to Trump’s post.
An estimated 5 percent of global maritime traffic passes through the Panama Canal, which allows ships travelling between Asia and the US East Coast to avoid the long, hazardous route around the southern tip of South America.
The Panama Canal Authority reported in October that the waterway had earned record revenues of nearly $5bn in the last fiscal year.
World
Lo que nos dice la decisión de Trump de involucrarse en disputa de gastos sobre los próximos 4 años
WASHINGTON (AP) — Tras días de amenazas y exigencias, Donald Trump tuvo por qué mostrar una vez que los legisladores aprobaron un acuerdo presupuestario en las primeras horas del sábado, evitando por poco que las dependencias estatales se vieran obligadas a cerrar antes de Navidad por falta de fondos.
El presidente electo logró que los republicanos de la Cámara de Representantes eliminaran algunos gastos, pero no logró su objetivo principal de elevar el límite de la deuda. Esto demostró que, a pesar de su decisiva victoria electoral y sus frecuentes promesas de represalias, muchos miembros de su partido aún están dispuestos a desafiarlo abiertamente.
La decisión de Trump de involucrarse en el debate presupuestario un mes antes de su toma de posesión también mostró que sigue siendo más hábil para destruir acuerdos que para hacerlos, y presagió que su segundo mandato probablemente estará marcado por las mismas luchas internas, el caos y el juego al borde del precipicio que caracterizaron su primer mandato.
“Estén atentos. Abróchense los cinturones. Prepárense”, dijo el congresista Steve Womack, republicano de Arkansas, un asignador presupuestario sénior.
Una mirada a la agenda de Trump muestra una cascada de oportunidades para enfrentamientos similares en los años venideros. El presidente electo quiere ampliar los recortes fiscales que promulgó hace siete años, reducir el tamaño del gobierno, aumentar los aranceles a las importaciones y tomar medidas enérgicas contra los inmigrantes no autorizados. Muchos de esos esfuerzos necesitarán la aprobación del Congreso.
Para muchos de los seguidores de Trump, la disrupción podría ser un objetivo en sí mismo. El 37% de los que votaron por él este año dijeron que querían “un cambio total y completo”, según AP VoteCast, una extensa encuesta de más de 120.000 votantes. Un 56% adicional dijo que querían “un cambio sustancial”.
Pero los últimos días dejaron claro la dificultad que Trump podría enfrentar para cumplir rápidamente sus objetivos, especialmente dado que los republicanos solo cuentan con mayorías escasas en la Cámara de Representantes y el Senado. Algunos legisladores ya parecen cansados de la aparente ausencia de una estrategia unificada.
El senador Kevin Cramer, republicano de Dakota del Norte, dijo que la batalla presupuestaria fue “una lección valiosa sobre cómo organizarnos”.
El fracaso de las exigencias de Trump
El problema comenzó cuando los principales legisladores publicaron una copia de la iniciativa de ley, conocida como una resolución continua, que era necesaria para asegurar el funcionamiento del gobierno federal hasta marzo. No fue el presidente electo, sino Elon Musk, el hombre más rico del mundo y confidente de Trump, quien primero comenzó a generar oposición a la ley en las redes sociales al calificarla de gasto excesivo.
Trump eventualmente se sumó a la batalla. Ordenó a los republicanos cancelar el acuerdo bipartidista que habían hecho con los demócratas y exigió que aumentaran el límite de la deuda, el tope de cuánto puede pedir prestado el gobierno, con la esperanza de evitar que ese espinoso problema surgiera cuando ya estuviera en funciones.
Aumentó la presión incluso después de haber modificado sus demandas iniciales. Primero quería eliminar el límite de la deuda por completo. Luego quería suspenderlo hasta 2027. Luego propuso una extensión hasta 2029.
Si las dependencias estatales se vieran obligadas a cerrar por falta de fondos, el presidente demócrata Joe Biden sería culpado, insistió Trump.
“Todos los republicanos, e incluso los demócratas, deberían hacer lo que es mejor para nuestro país y votar ‘A FAVOR’ de esta iniciativa de ley, ¡ESTA NOCHE!”, escribió Trump el jueves, antes de una votación sobre una versión del proyecto de ley que incluía un límite de deuda más alto.
En cambio, 38 republicanos votaron en contra. Fue un desaire sorprendente para Trump, quien a veces pareciera no tener ningún control sobre su propio partido.
“Sin esto, nunca deberíamos hacer un acuerdo”, escribió en Truth Social, su red social.
Si no conseguía lo que quería, Trump dijo que debería haber un cierre del gobierno. También dijo que sus correligionarios pagarían el precio en las elecciones primarias si se negaban a seguir adelante, y dijo que “los obstruccionistas republicanos tienen que ser eliminados”. Señaló especialmente al representante Chip Roy, de Texas, por su nombre y con insultos.
Pero al final, los legisladores dejaron fuera ese aumento del techo de la deuda, y un acuerdo final se aprobó el sábado a primera hora.
Musk y otros aliados de Trump intentaron presentarlo como una victoria porque la ley final se redujo significativamente y omitió elementos impopulares como un aumento salarial para los miembros del Congreso. Charlie Kirk, un prominente activista conservador, escribió en X que Trump ”¡ya está dirigiendo el Congreso antes de asumir el cargo!”.
El presidente de la Cámara de Representantes, Mike Johnson, republicano de Luisiana, dijo que había estado en “contacto constante” con Trump, quien, aseguró, estaba “ciertamente feliz con este resultado”.
Si Trump estuvo de acuerdo, él mismo no lo dijo.
Tras días de publicaciones frecuentes en redes sociales, Trump volvió a guardar silencio el viernes. No ofreció una reacción a la votación final ni emitió ningún comunicado. En cambio, fue a jugar golf en su resort en Florida.
Karoline Leavitt, una vocera de Trump, dijo que el presidente electo ayudó a prevenir un acuerdo original “lleno de despilfarros demócratas y aumentos salariales para los miembros del Congreso”.
“En enero, el presidente Trump y el Departamento de Eficiencia Gubernamental (DOGE, por sus siglas en inglés) continuarán esta importante misión de eliminar el despilfarro de Washington, una ley a la vez”, dijo. El DOGE es un panel asesor que será liderado por Musk y el empresario Vivek Ramaswamy.
Más enfrentamientos en el horizonte
La atmósfera circense de la lucha por el presupuesto recordó al primer mandato de Trump. En aquel entonces, un enfrentamiento presupuestario llevó a un cierre del gobierno cuando Trump exigió dinero para su muro fronterizo entre Estados Unidos y México. Después de 35 días, el cierre más largo de la historia, accedió a un acuerdo sin haber logrado los fondos que había exigido.
Fue un punto bajo político para Trump, y el 60% de los estadounidenses lo culparon por el cierre, según una encuesta realizada por The Associated Press y el NORC Center for Public Affairs Research en ese momento.
Trump no dejó de intentar doblegar a los republicanos a su voluntad en ese entonces y ciertamente no lo hará en este momento.
Trump está aumentando la presión sobre su propio partido por sus elecciones para el gabinete, empujando a senadores republicanos reacios a aceptar algunos de sus nombramientos más controvertidos, como el activista antivacunas Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a quien eligió como secretario de Salud y el presentador de Fox News Pete Hegseth como secretario de Defensa.
Pareciera que los debates sobre el presupuesto del próximo año definitivamente pondrán a prueba aún más la influencia de Trump en la Cámara de Representantes. Muchos conservadores ven el rápido crecimiento de la deuda federal como una amenaza existencial para el país que debe abordarse. Pero algunos republicanos temen una reacción negativa de los votantes si se realizan recortes drásticos a los programas federales de los que dependen los estadounidenses.
Las preocupaciones sobre el gasto deficitario podrían intensificarse si Trump impulsa los recortes fiscales costosos que prometió durante la campaña, como eliminar los impuestos sobre las propinas, la Seguridad Social y el pago de horas extras.
Trump también pretende ampliar los recortes fiscales que promulgó en 2017 y que deberán llegar a su fin el próximo año. Ha pedido una reducción adicional de la tasa de impuestos corporativos de Estados Unidos del 21% al 15%, pero sólo para las empresas que producen en Estados Unidos.
Trump ha dicho que pagará las caídas en los ingresos con aranceles agresivos nuevos, los cuales, advierten los economistas, resultarán en precios más altos para los consumidores.
El representante Dan Crenshaw, republicano de Texas, dijo que la reducción del gasto público probablemente seguirá siendo un abismo entre Trump y los republicanos de la Cámara de Representantes.
“Eso nunca ha sido realmente una promesa de campaña de Trump, pero es una gran prioridad para los republicanos de la Cámara de Representantes”, dijo.
No había indicios de que la animosidad estuviera disminuyendo el sábado. Algunos republicanos culparon al liderazgo de la Cámara de Representantes por no asegurar la “bendición” de Trump en el acuerdo original. Los demócratas presentaron a Trump como segundo violín de Musk.
Mientras Trump se mantenía callado, Biden anunció que había promulgado la ley presupuestaria.
“Este acuerdo representa un compromiso, lo que significa que ninguna de las partes obtuvo todo lo que quería”, dijo. “Pero rechaza el camino acelerado hacia un recorte de impuestos para multimillonarios que buscaban los republicanos, y asegura que el gobierno pueda continuar operando a plena capacidad”.
___
Boak reportó desde West Palm Beach, Florida, y Colvin desde Nueva York.
____
Esta historia fue traducida del inglés por un editor de la AP con la ayuda de una herramienta de inteligencia artificial generativa.
Wife of US hostage Keith Siegel pleads for holiday miracle: 'we need to get them back'
The biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024: From presidential immunity to overturning the Chevron doctrine
New skincare trend has people rubbing beef fat on their faces: Dermatologists react
Ravens take down Steelers to keep AFC North race open
Food tracking just got lazy — in the best way possible — with this wearable
Colorado Rockies game no. 116 thread: Zac Gallen vs José Ureña
Why Marjorie Taylor Greene was ‘kicked out’ of the Freedom Caucus according to Rep. Buck
See it: Tesla crashes into Columbus convention center at 70 mph
Fox News Politics: Georgia the whole day through
Death of missing Oregon girl found in stream ruled homicide
The biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024: From presidential immunity to overturning the Chevron doctrine
Trump threatens to take back control of Panama Canal over ‘ridiculous fees’
College students get emotional about climate change. Some are finding help in class
Read Blake Lively’s Complaint Against Wayfarer Studios
Trump announces newest nominations to lead DOJ, regulate US railroads
-
Politics1 week agoCanadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25782636/247422_ChatGPT_anniversary_CVirginia.jpg "Inside the launch — and future — of ChatGPT")
Technology1 week agoInside the launch — and future — of ChatGPT
-
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25789444/1258459915.jpg "OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change")
Technology1 week agoOpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics1 week agoU.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25546252/STK169_Mark_Zuckerburg_CVIRGINIA_D.jpg "Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit")
Technology1 week agoMeta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics1 week agoConservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel
-
Business7 days agoFreddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million
-
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/23951353/STK043_VRG_Illo_N_Barclay_3_Meta.jpg "Meta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age")
Technology7 days agoMeta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age