Connect with us

World

‘Fighting fit’: Trial to show Oath Keepers’ road to Jan. 6

Published

on

‘Fighting fit’: Trial to show Oath Keepers’ road to Jan. 6

The voting was over and virtually all ballots had been counted. Information shops on Nov. 7, 2020, had referred to as the presidential race for Democrat Joe Biden. However the chief of the Oath Keepers extremist group was simply starting to struggle.

Satisfied the White Home had been stolen from Republican Donald Trump, Stewart Rhodes exhorted his followers to motion, suggesting they emulate a preferred rebellion that introduced down Yugoslavia’s president 20 years earlier. He printed a model of his attraction on-line, headlined, “What We The Individuals Should Do.”

“We should now … refuse to just accept it and march en-mass on the nation’s Capitol,” Rhodes declared to fellow Oath Keepers.

Authorities allege that Rhodes and his band of extremists would spend the following a number of weeks amassing weapons, organizing paramilitary coaching and readying armed groups outdoors Washington with a singular aim: stopping Joe Biden from changing into president.

Their plot would come to a head on Jan. 6, 2021, prosecutors say, when Oath Keepers sporting helmets and different battle gear had been captured on digicam shouldering their means by the group of indignant Trump supporters and storming the Capitol in military-style stack formation.

Advertisement

A whole bunch of pages of courtroom paperwork within the case in opposition to Rhodes and 4 co-defendants — whose trial opens with jury choice Tuesday in Washington’s federal courtroom — paint an image of a bunch so decided to overturn Biden’s election that some members had been ready to lose their lives to take action.

The trial is the largest check to date for the Justice Division’s efforts to carry accountable these accountable for the assault on the Capitol, a violent assault that challenged the foundations of American democracy. Rioters briefly halted the certification of Biden’s victory by sheer pressure, pummeling cops in hand-to-hand combating as they rammed their means into the constructing, forcing Congress to adjourn as lawmakers and employees hid from the mob.

Regardless of practically 900 arrests and tons of of convictions within the riot, Rhodes and 4 Oath Keeper associates — Kelly Meggs, Jessica Watkins, Kenneth Harrelson and Thomas Caldwell — are the primary to face trial on the uncommon and difficult-to-prove cost of seditious conspiracy. Prosecutors will attempt to present that the riot for the Oath Keepers was not a spur-of-the-moment protest however a part of a severe, weekslong plot to cease the switch of energy.

The trial may shed new gentle on Trump’s makes an attempt to cling to energy. It comes amid rising authorized peril for the previous president, who faces a number of investigations, together with one by the Justice Division into his dealing with of delicate authorities paperwork.

Protection attorneys for the Oath Keepers will inform jurors the federal government case is all a lie.

Advertisement

The Oath Keepers accuse prosecutors of twisting their phrases and demand there was by no means any plan to assault the Capitol. They are saying they had been in Washington to offer safety at occasions for figures equivalent to Trump ally Roger Stone earlier than the president’s huge out of doors rally behind the White Home. Their preparations, coaching, gear and weapons had been to guard themselves in opposition to potential violence from left-wing antifa activists or to be prepared if Trump invoked the Rebel Act to name up a militia.

Rhodes’ attorneys have signaled that their protection will deal with his perception that Trump would take that motion.

“When he believed that the President would concern an order invoking the Rebel Act, he was ready to observe it. When that invocation didn’t come, he did exactly nothing,” Rhodes attorneys wrote in courtroom paperwork.

“The Authorities would really like this Court docket to imagine that’s sedition, when in actual fact, it’s the reverse. It’s loyalty to an oath taken in protection of the Nation.”

___

Advertisement

Rhodes based the Oath Keepers in 2009 and it has grown into one of many largest anti-government teams in U.S. historical past. It recruits previous and current members of the army, first responders and cops, and promotes the assumption that the federal authorities is out to strip residents of their civil liberties. It portrays its followers as defenders in opposition to tyranny.

On Nov. 9, 2020, lower than every week after Election Day, Rhodes held a convention name and rallied the Oath Keepers to go to Washington and struggle. He expressed hope that antifa (anti-fascist) activists would begin clashes as a result of that will give Trump the “cause and rationale for dropping the Rebel Act.”

”You’ve acquired to go there and also you’ve acquired to make it possible for he is aware of that you’re keen to die to struggle for this nation,” Rhodes informed his folks, in line with a transcript filed in courtroom. He urged these on their option to Washington to cease at Arlington Nationwide Cemetery to see the graves of 1000’s of people that died combating for the USA.

“They had been keen to surrender their whole life,” Rhodes informed them. “Most of us are in our 50s or 60s or older. You’ve lived a great life. You’ve lived well past the age of those younger males. … And if you happen to don’t rise up now, every part they fought for and died for shall be fought for nothing.“

Some Oath Keepers would keep outdoors Washington however be “ready to go in armed in the event that they need to,” Rhodes stated on the decision. In the event that they did not “save” the nation, Rhodes predicted there can be “a bloody, bloody civil conflict.”

Advertisement

After the decision, one other Oath Keeper, Watkins, informed individuals who expressed curiosity in becoming a member of her Ohio militia group about “military-style fundamental” coaching deliberate for early January, prosecutors say. The Florida chapter of the Oath Keepers held coaching in “unconventional warfare.”

Watkins informed one recruit, “I want you combating match” by the inauguration, which was Jan. 20, 2021. Watkins later predicted their “lifestyle” can be over if Biden grew to become president.

“Our Republic can be over. Then it’s our obligation as Individuals to struggle, kill and die for our rights,” she wrote in one other message.

By December, Rhodes and the Oath Keepers had set their sights on Congress’ certification of the Electoral Faculty vote on Jan. 6, prosecutors say.

Trump’s Dec. 19 tweet a few “huge protest in D.C. on January sixth” that he predicted would “be wild” appeared to energise the Oath Keepers.

Advertisement

Days later, Meggs — the chief of the Florida chapter— wrote in a Fb message: “Trump stated It’s gonna be wild!!!!!!! It’s gonna be wild!!!!!!! He desires us to make it WILD that’s what he’s saying. He referred to as us all to the Capitol and needs us to make it wild!!!”

Throughout an interview Dec. 22 with a regional Oath Keepers chief, Rhodes described Jan. 6 as “exhausting constitutional deadline” for stopping Biden from changing into president.

On Dec. 23, Rhodes printed an open letter on the Oath Keepers web site declaring that “tens of 1000’s of patriot Individuals, each veterans and nonveterans” can be in Washington. Many would have their “mission-critical gear stowed close by simply outdoors D.C,” he wrote, warning that they may need to “take to arms in protection of our God given liberty.”

In late December, the Oath Keepers had been planning for “fast response pressure” groups to be stationed at a Virginia lodge with the intention to shepherd weapons into the town shortly if wanted, prosecutors say. In a single message days earlier than the Capitol assault, Caldwell prompt getting a ship to ferry “heavy weapons” throughout the Potomac River into the Oath Keepers’ “ready arms.”

As 2021 approached, Rhodes spent $7,000 on two night-vision gadgets and a weapon sight and despatched them to somebody outdoors Washington, authorities say. Over a number of days in early January, he would spend an extra $15,500 on weapons, together with an AR-platform rifle, magazines, mounts, sights and different tools, in line with courtroom paperwork.

Advertisement

“There is no such thing as a normal political or authorized means out of this,” Rhodes wrote in a message on New 12 months’s Eve.

___

Oath Keepers from throughout the nation started touring to the Washington space.

Rhodes had instructed them to be prepared, if requested, to safe the White Home perimeter and “use deadly pressure if vital” in opposition to anybody, together with the Nationwide Guard, who would possibly attempt to take away Trump from the White Home, in line with courtroom paperwork within the case of 1 member who has pleaded responsible.

On Jan. 5, Meggs and the Florida Oath Keepers introduced gun packing containers, rifle instances and suitcases full of ammunition to the Virginia lodge the place the “fast response pressure” groups can be on standby, in line with prosecutors. A workforce from Arizona introduced weapons, ammunition, and provides to final 30 days, in line with courtroom papers. A workforce from North Carolina had rifles in a car parked within the lodge lot, prosecutors have stated. Surveillance footage reveals Oath Keepers rolling baggage, giant bins and what seems to be at the least one rifle case into the lodge.

Advertisement

On the morning of the riot, one of many fast response pressure workforce members warned on a podcast in regards to the prospect of violence: “We’re making use of as a lot stress as we will. The one and apparent subsequent step is to enter armed battle however hoping very a lot that that doesn’t occur.”

Trump delivered his speech on the Ellipse behind the White Home, repeating his false claims a few rigged election and urging his supporters to “struggle like hell.” The gang began marching to the Capitol, finally combating previous police barricades.

As phrase started spreading that individuals had been storming the Capitol, Rhodes wrote: “All I see Trump doing is complaining. I see no try by him to do something. So the patriots are taking it in their very own fingers. They’ve had sufficient.”

On the Capitol, the Oath Keepers shaped two groups, army “stacks,” prosecutors say.

The primary stack, with members sporting protecting vests, helmets and communication gadgets, pushed by the group and up the Capitol steps. Over a channel referred to as “Cease the Steal J6” on the walkie-talkie app Zello, Watkins stated they had been inside.

Advertisement

“Get it, Jess. … Every thing we (expletive) educated for,” somebody responded.

Some members of the primary stack headed towards the Home of Representatives trying to find Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., however couldn’t discover her, in line with courtroom paperwork. Members of the second stack confronted officers contained in the Capitol Rotunda, prosecutors allege.

Rhodes isn’t accused of going contained in the Capitol however was seen huddled with members outdoors after the riot. Rhodes and others then walked to the close by Phoenix Park Resort, prosecutors say.

Inside a personal suite there, Rhodes referred to as somebody on the cellphone with an pressing message for Trump, in line with an Oath Keeper who says he was there. Rhodes repeatedly urged the individual on the cellphone to inform Trump to name upon militia teams to struggle to maintain the president in energy, courtroom papers say. The individual denied Rhodes’ request to talk on to Trump.

“I simply wish to struggle,” Rhodes stated after hanging up, in line with courtroom papers. Authorities haven’t disclosed the identify of the individual they imagine Rhodes was chatting with on the decision. Rhodes’ lawyer has stated the decision by no means occurred.

Advertisement

That night time, Rhodes and different Oath Keepers went to dinner at an Olive Backyard restaurant in Virginia. In messages over the course of the night, they indicated their struggle was removed from over.

“We aren’t quitting!! We’re reloading!!” Meggs wrote in a single message.

“Patriots coming into their very own Capitol to ship a message to the traitors is NOTHING in comparison with what’s coming,” Rhodes wrote in one other.

Within the days between the riot and Biden’s inauguration, Rhodes spent greater than $17,000 on firearm elements, magazines, ammunition and different objects, prosecutors say.

____

Advertisement

Rhodes returned to his house state of Texas after the Jan. 6 assault and remained free for a yr earlier than his arrest in January 2022.

In interviews earlier than he was jailed, he sought to distance himself from these Oath Keepers who went contained in the Capitol, saying it was a mistake to take action. However he additionally continued to push the lie that the election was stolen from Trump and painted the investigation of the Jan. 6 occasions as politically motivated.

The Oath Keepers’ “workforce chief on the bottom that day was an skilled fight vet. … If he had really supposed for anybody to enter the Capitol and commit an riot, it might have appeared very, very completely different from what we noticed,” Rhodes stated in a March 2021 interview with the web site Gateway Pundit.

“The concept that was someway an riot, with no weapons no precise, apparent intent to do something is simply ridiculous, an entire joke,” he stated.

A lawyer for Caldwell wrote in a latest submitting: “Protection counsel have reviewed 1000’s of textual content messages, Sign messages, emails, Fb Messenger messages, social media posts, and so forth. and have discovered no proof that the Rhodes defendants deliberate any particular acts of civil disobedience or violence on J6.”

Advertisement

The lawyer added: “If Caldwell or the Oath Keepers or each had a plan to forcibly, corruptly, illegally, or violently cease the Electoral Faculty certification on J6, it was the very best stored secret within the annals of American historical past.”

___

For full protection of the Capitol riot, go to https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

What a merger between Nissan and Honda means for the automakers and the industry

Published

on

What a merger between Nissan and Honda means for the automakers and the industry

BANGKOK (AP) — Japanese automakers Honda and Nissan will attempt to merge and create the world’s third-largest automaker by sales as the industry undergoes dramatic changes in its transition away from fossil fuels.

The two companies said they had signed a memorandum of understanding on Monday and that smaller Nissan alliance member Mitsubishi Motors also had agreed to join the talks on integrating their businesses. Honda will initially lead the new management, retaining the principles and brands of each company.

Following is a quick look at what a combined Honda and Nissan would mean for the companies, and for the auto industry.

An industry shakeup

The ascent of Chinese automakers is rattling the industry at a time when manufacturers are struggling to shift from fossil fuel-driven vehicles to electrics. Relatively inexpensive EVs from China’s BYD, Great Wall and Nio are eating into the market shares of U.S. and Japanese car companies in China and elsewhere.

Japanese automakers have lagged behind big rivals in EVs and are now trying to cut costs and make up for lost time.

Advertisement

Nissan, Honda and Mitsubishi announced in August that they will share components for electric vehicles like batteries and jointly research software for autonomous driving to adapt better to dramatic changes in the auto industry centered around electrification. A preliminary agreement between Honda, Japan’s second-largest automaker, and Nissan, third largest, was announced in March.

A merger could result in a behemoth worth about $55 billion based on the market capitalization of all three automakers.

Joining forces would help the smaller Japanese automakers add scale to compete with Japan’s market leader Toyota Motor Corp. and with Germany’s Volkswagen AG. Toyota itself has technology partnerships with Japan’s Mazda Motor Corp. and Subaru Corp.

What would Honda need from Nissan?

Nissan has truck-based body-on-frame large SUVs such as the Armada and Infiniti QX80 that Honda doesn’t have, with large towing capacities and good off-road performance, said Sam Fiorani, vice president of AutoForecast Solutions.

Nissan also has years of experience building batteries and electric vehicles, and gas-electric hybird powertrains that could help Honda in developing its own EVs and next generation of hybrids, he said.

Advertisement

“Nissan does have some product segments where Honda doesn’t currently play,” that a merger or partnership could help, said Sam Abuelsamid, a Detroit-area automotive industry analsyt.

While Nissan’s electric Leaf and Ariya haven’t sold well in the U.S., they’re solid vehicles, Fiorani said. “They haven’t been resting on their laurels, and they have been developing this technology,” he said. “They have new products coming that could provide a good platform for Honda for its next generation.”

Why now?

Nissan said last month that it was slashing 9,000 jobs, or about 6% of its global work force, and reducing global production capacity by 20% after reporting a quarterly loss of 9.3 billion yen ($61 million).

Earlier this month it reshuffled its management and its chief executive, Makoto Uchida, took a 50% pay cut to take responsibility for the financial woes, saying Nissan needed to become more efficient and respond better to market tastes, rising costs and other global changes.

Fitch Ratings recently downgraded Nissan’s credit outlook to “negative,” citing worsening profitability, partly due to price cuts in the North American market. But it noted that it has a strong financial structure and solid cash reserves that amounted to 1.44 trillion yen ($9.4 billion).

Advertisement

Nissan’s share price has fallen to the point where it is considered something of a bargain. A report in the Japanese financial magazine Diamond said talks with Honda gained urgency after the Taiwan maker of iPhones Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., better known as Foxconn, began exploring a possible acquisition of Nissan as part of its push into the EV sector.

The company has struggled for years following a scandal that began with the arrest of its former chairman Carlos Ghosn in late 2018 on charges of fraud and misuse of company assets, allegations that he denies. He eventually was released on bail and fled to Lebanon.

Honda reported its profits slipped nearly 20% in the first half of the April-March fiscal year from a year earlier, as sales suffered in China.

More headwinds

Toyota made 11.5 million vehicles in 2023, while Honda rolled out 4 million and Nissan produced 3.4 million. Mitsubishi Motors made just over 1 million. Even after a merger Toyota would remain the leading Japanese automaker.

All the global automakers are facing potential shocks if President-elect Donald Trump follows through on threats to raise or impose tariffs on imports of foreign products, even from allies like Japan and neighboring countries like Canada and Mexico. Nissan is among the major car companies that have adjusted their supply chains to include vehicles assembled in Mexico.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, analysts say there is an “affordability shift” taking place across the industry, led by people who feel they cannot afford to pay nearly $50,000 for a new vehicle. In American, a vital market for companies like Nissan, Honda and Toyota, that’s forcing automakers to consider lower pricing, which will eat further into industry profits.

____

AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher contributed to this report from Detroit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US military conducts successful airstrikes on Houthi rebel forces in Yemen

Published

on

US military conducts successful airstrikes on Houthi rebel forces in Yemen

The U.S. military confirmed it conducted airstrikes in Yemen, saying it targeted a missile storage site and a command-and-control center operated by Iran-backed Houthi rebels.

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced the successful strikes in a release Saturday, saying they were meant to “disrupt and degrade” Houthi operations.

“CENTCOM forces conducted the deliberate strikes to disrupt and degrade Houthi operations, such as attacks against U.S. Navy warships and merchant vessels in the Southern Red Sea, Bab al-Mandeb and Gulf of Aden,” CENTCOM said in a news release.

DISAPPROVAL MOUNTS BOTH AT HOME AND ABROAD AS US AVOIDS DIRECT ACTION AGAINST HOUTHI REBELS

The U.S. military successfully conducted airstrikes in Yemen, saying it targeted a missile storage site and a command-and-control site operated by Iran-backed Houthi rebels. (CENTCOM via X)

Advertisement

Footage from CENTCOM showed F/A-18’s taking off. The agency said it also used assets from the Navy and the Air Force.

US NAVY SHIPS REPEL ATTACK FROM HOUTHIS IN GULF OF ADEN 

“The strike reflects CENTCOM’s ongoing commitment to protect U.S. and coalition personnel, regional partners and international shipping,” it said.

Houthi rebels

Houthi followers burn the Israeli and American flags on the outskirts of Sana’a, Yemen. (Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images)

The attacks against shipping are ongoing, and Houthi militants have vowed to continue until Israel ends its campaign in Gaza.

Advertisement

The terrorist group has targeted more than 100 merchant vessels since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October 2023.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Fact check: How deadly was 2024 for journalists?

Published

on

Fact check: How deadly was 2024 for journalists?

An estimated 104 journalists lost their lives in 2024, with Palestine the most dangerous territory.

ADVERTISEMENT

An estimated 104 journalists were killed worldwide over the past year, according to data shared earlier this month by the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ).

Another report by NGO Reporters Without Borders (RSF) puts the figure at 54, but its methodology means it only includes killings that are considered “directly related” to journalists’ professional activity.

Both organisations say that Palestine is the deadliest place on earth for journalists. More than half (55) of the 104 killings reported by IFJ were Palestinian media professionals in Gaza, while a further six were killed in Lebanon.

At least 138 journalists have been killed in Gaza since the war between Israel and Hamas broke out on 7 October 2023, making the country one of the “most dangerous in the history of modern journalism, behind Iraq, the Philippines and Mexico,” according to the IFJ.

Reporters without Borders has described the number of killings in Gaza as “an unprecedented bloodbath”.

Advertisement

Israel firmly denies it has intentionally targeted any journalists, but has recognised some that have been killed in its airstrikes on Gaza.

The 104 total killings reported by the IFJ is a slight decrease on the 129 they reported on in 2023, which is considered the bloodiest year for journalists since 1990.

How do other world regions fare?

Asia Pacific is the world’s second most dangerous region for journalists, after the Middle East, according to the IFJ.

It recorded 20 deaths in the region in 2024, of which 70% happened in the southern Asian countries of Pakistan, Bangladesh and India.

The region has seen an “upsurge” in violence, according to the IFJ, with deaths increasing sharply from the 12 recorded in 2023.

Advertisement

Africa was the third most dangerous region for journalists at eight deaths, five of them in war-torn Sudan.

The number of journalists killed in south, central and north America has dropped sharply over the past two years, from 30 in 2022 to six in 2023, and another six in 2024. Mexico, considered to be one of the deadliest places in the world to do journalism, continues to see “threats, intimidation, kidnappings and murders” against journalists, particularly due to reporting on drug trafficking.

Number of journalists behind bars on the rise

According to IFJ estimates on 10 December, there were 520 journalists in prison across the world, considerably more than in 2023 (427) and 2022 (375).

China, including Hong Kong, accounts for most of journalists behind bars, followed by Israel and Myanmar.

The IFJ says the figures show how “fragile” the independent press is and how “risky and dangerous” the profession of journalism has become.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending