Connect with us

World

Columbia University leaders face scrutiny over anti-Semitism on campus

Published

on

Columbia University leaders face scrutiny over anti-Semitism on campus

Leaders from Columbia University have appeared before a committee in the United States Congress to face questions about alleged instances of anti-Semitism on campus.

The hearing was a sequel of sorts to a similar panel held in December, featuring the presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

But on Wednesday, Columbia University President Nemat “Minouche” Shafik sought to avoid the same pitfalls that made the previous hearing go viral.

She pledged firm action to combat anti-Semitism, even engaging in discussions about specific Columbia professors and disciplinary measures during the hearing.

“We have already suspended 15 students from Columbia. We have six on disciplinary probation,” Shafik said, laying out her actions before the Committee on Education and the Workforce, part of the House of Representatives.

Advertisement

“These are more disciplinary actions that have been taken probably in the last decade at Columbia. And I promise you, from the messages I’m hearing from students, they are getting the message that violations of our policies will have consequences.”

Still, Republicans on the committee sought to hold Columbia University to account for what they considered failures since the start of the war in Gaza on October 7.

On that date, the Palestinian group Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing upwards of 1,000 people. In the subsequent war, Israeli attacks in Gaza killed more than 33,800 Palestinians, prompting widespread protest.

Like many college campuses, Columbia University has been a centre for student activism in the months since, with demonstrators rallying both in support of the war and against it.

But the university has drawn particular scrutiny, given its prominence as a prestigious Ivy League school and its attempts to crack down on unauthorised gatherings.

Advertisement

Some critics have argued that the suspension of pro-Palestinian students and groups has put a damper on free speech on campus, while others allege the administration has allowed a hostile atmosphere to thrive.

The president of Columbia University, Nemat Shafik, speaks before the House Education and the Workforce Committee on April 17 [Ken Cedeno/Reuters]

Partisan divide over campus activity

Committee chair Virginia Foxx opened Wednesday’s hearing with a statement championing the view that campus administrators have failed to create a safe learning environment for Jewish students.

She pointed to pro-Palestinian activism as evidence that Columbia and other campuses “have erupted into hotbeds of anti-Semitism and hate”.

“Columbia stands guilty of gross negligence at best — and at worst has become a platform for those supporting terrorism and violence against the Jewish people,” she said in prepared remarks.

Her statement referenced an incident on October 11 when an Israeli student was allegedly beaten with a stick while hanging posters of the captives taken by Hamas.

Advertisement

But at several points during the hearing, representatives took to the microphone to point out that anti-Semitism was part of a wider problem of discrimination and hate in the US.

“Anti-Semitism is not the only form of hatred rising in our schools. It’s not the only form of hatred that is impacting our children’s or students’ ability to learn,” Representative Teresa Leger Fernandez, a Democrat, said from her seat on the committee.

“Islamophobia and hate crimes against LGBTQ students have also recently spiked. They’ve led to deaths by suicide, harassment. But this committee has not held a single hearing on these issues.”

Meanwhile, Representative Ilhan Omar, a prominent progressive voice in the House, sought to dispel any conflation of antiwar protests with anti-Jewish hate.

“Have you seen a protest saying, ‘We are against Jewish people’?” Omar asked Columbia President Shafik, who answered, “No.”

Advertisement

Omar continued by highlighting the case of pro-Palestinian students being sprayed with a foul-smelling chemical at Columbia and being “harassed and intimidated” in other instances.

“There has been a recent attack on the democratic rights of students across the country,” she said.

Virginia Foxx speaks from the podium at a congressional hearing.
Committee Chair Virginia Foxx led the hearing called ‘Columbia in Crisis: Columbia University’s Response to Antisemitism’ on April 17 [Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo]

Controversy looms over hearing

Shafik sought to walk a fine line during the hearing, pledging swift and decisive action against anti-Semitism while underscoring her campus’s commitment to free speech.

She was joined by Claire Shipman and David Greenwald, from Columbia’s board of trustees, as well as David Schizer, a member of the campus task force against anti-Semitism.

But looming over the proceedings was the spectre of December’s hearing, which led to the resignations of two university presidents.

On December 5, Claudine Gay of Harvard, Liz Magill of the University of Pennsylvania and Sally Kornbluth of MIT faced the same committee for questions about anti-Semitism on their campuses.

Advertisement

During the meeting, Republican Representative Elise Stefanik pressed the university presidents to explain — with simple, yes-or-no answers — whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” would violate their campus codes of conduct.

In each case, the university presidents sought to differentiate between protected speech and harassment, leading to convoluted answers.

“If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment, yes,” Magill said. She later added: “It is a context-dependent decision, Congresswoman.”

Clips of the hearing went viral shortly thereafter, with politicians on both sides of the aisle slamming the university presidents for failing to make a forceful denunciation of anti-Semitism and genocide.

Magill resigned four days after the hearing, as the public outrage grew. Gay — Harvard’s first Black president — also stepped down in January, facing pressure not only over the hearing but also over questions of plagiarism.

Advertisement

Those events cast a shadow over Wednesday’s panel, and several representatives made direct references to them.

Republican Representative Aaron Bean, for instance, applauded Columbia’s administrators for giving more forthright answers than their counterparts at Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania.

“Y’all have done something that they weren’t able to do: You’ve been able to condemn anti-Semitism without using the phrase, ‘It depends on the context,’” he said.

“But the problem is: Action on campus doesn’t match your rhetoric today.”

A standard approach to hate

On Wednesday, Shafik and the Columbia administrators were also pressed over many of the same issues as their colleagues from Harvard, MIT and the University of Pennsylvania.

Advertisement

Republicans on the committee asked them to weigh in on chants like, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. While some consider the chant anti-Semitic, others see it simply as a call for Palestinian statehood.

“I have received letters from our Jewish faculty who say they also don’t think it is anti-Semitic,” Shafik said at one point during the hearing.

But she also explained that she personally felt that language was “incredibly hurtful”.

One recommendation she said the campus was considering would create specific spaces for that kind of protest.

“If you are going to chant, it should only be in a certain place, so people who don’t want to hear it are protected from having to hear it,” Shafik said, relaying the idea.

Advertisement

Schizer, meanwhile, indicated that he advocated for a standard approach to hate and harassment, no matter who was being targeted.

“I’m a conservative. I’m close to many conservative students. There have been times they’ve gotten the signal that they should really go slow on a particular event or not articulate a particular position because it makes others feel uncomfortable,” Schizer said.

“And it’s striking how that kind of language has not been applied to Jewish students. When Jewish students have said, ‘We feel uncomfortable,’ the emphasis has been: ‘No, no, no, free speech.’”

“Now I want to be clear: I think free speech is essential, but I also think consistency is essential. We need to have the same approach for everyone.”

Elise Stefanik speaks during a congressional hearing.
Representative Elise Stefanik pressed Columbia University’s president over her hiring practices [Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo]

Professors under fire

Some of the fiercest criticism, however, ultimately fell to Columbia professors who were not present at the hearing.

Committee members cited statements from professors like Joseph Massad, Mohamed Abdou and Katherine Franke as evidence of bias and discrimination among the Columbia faculty.

Advertisement

“We have 4,700 faculty at Columbia, most of whom spend all of their time dedicated to teaching their students,” Shafik said at one point, as she defended her hiring practices.

“I have five cases at the moment who have either been taken out of the classroom or dismissed.”

In the case of Abdou, a visiting professor, Stefanik confronted Shafik with a post he wrote on social media on October 11, saying he was “with Hamas”.

“He will never work at Columbia again,” Shafik responded. “He has been terminated. And not just terminated, but his files will show that he will never work at Columbia again.”

Massad, meanwhile, came under fire for an article he wrote in the publication Electronic Antifada, describing the October 7 attack as an act of “innovative Palestinian resistance”.

Advertisement

“Mr Massad is under investigation,” Shafik said, adding that she believed the professor had been removed from a leadership role within the university.

World

Brazil’s BrLab Adds Kids Lab, Green Push for 15th Edition Next April (EXCLUSIVE)

Published

on

Brazil’s BrLab Adds Kids Lab, Green Push for 15th Edition Next April (EXCLUSIVE)

As São Paulo-based development and training hub BrLab gears up for its 15th anniversary edition in 2026, one of Latin America’s most influential project labs has opened submissions and unveiled a raft of changes designed to expand its reach, deepen its support for emerging talent and push sustainability up the regional agenda.

The 15th BrLab will run April 7-14, primarily in São Paulo, with satellite activities in Brasilia and Recife. Producers, directors and writers from across Latin America, Spain and Portugal will convene for a week of labs, market encounters and open-industry programming.

Applications for its four 2026 workshops – BrLab Features, BrLab Rough Cut, BrLab Audience Design and the new BrLab Kids – are free and open from Nov. 12 to Dec. 12, 2025 via the lab’s website.

“For us, every edition is an opportunity to identify what’s being imagined across the region,” says BrLab founder, director and curator Rafael Sampaio. “The industry trusts us with new ideas year after year.”

Founded in 2011 and organized by Klaxon Cultura Audiovisual, BrLab has grown from a small workshop for Latin American features into a compact but influential platform, more training hub than full-blown market, yet firmly embedded in the regional calendar for projects looking to sharpen their creative and financial strategies.

Advertisement

Supported by institutions such as the Ibermedia program, Projeto Paradiso and Spcine – and now Petrobras as a multi-year sponsor – BrLab receives more than 400 submissions annually, curated by a professional selection committee. 

As of 2025, 62 features that passed through its various sections have been produced and released, 17 more are in post-production and another 10 are financed for production through 2026. By next year the tally of completed films linked to the lab is expected to approach 90.

Many have premiered at top-tier festivals, including Cannes, Venice, Berlin, San Sebastián, Locarno, Sundance and Toronto. Recent standouts include “The Mysterious Gaze of the Flamingo,” which won the top prize at Cannes’ Un Certain Regard; “Levante” (Cannes Critics’ Week 2023); “Légua,” which screened at Cannes’ Directors’ Fortnight; Sundance title “Los Tiburones”; Berlinale competition multi-prize winner “Las Heiresses”; and San Sebastián Golden Shell laureate “Los Reyes del Mundo.” “The Wolf Behind the Door,” selected in BrLab’s very first edition in 2011, later bowed at Toronto and San Sebastián, announcing a new talent to track in Fernando Coimbra.

Avoiding the Crowded Fall Festival Corridor

Starting with this 15th edition, BrLab has permanently shifted from its traditional October slot to early April. The move is designed to avoid the crowded fall festival corridor and give projects more time to polish scripts and cuts before premiering in the back half of the year.

Advertisement

“This change creates a more useful rhythm for project development,” Sampaio says. “We want our selected teams to take full advantage of the international circuit, and April positions them well to do that – especially for the Rough Cut Lab.”

In 2021, BrLab launched BrLab CoPro, a curated boutique co-production forum aimed at galvanizing new partnerships with Brazil and other Latin American territories. The forum invites producers, funds, sales agents and broadcasters looking to structure cross-border packages at a time when co-production has become essential for financing and circulation.

This platform is deepening BrLab’s role as a connector not only of talent but of the institutional and industrial players that can actually get films made.

Flagship Labs and Audience Design

The program’s backbone remains BrLab Features, focused on fiction features from Latin America plus Spain and Portugal. 12 projects will receive mentorship on script, direction, production and distribution from a roster of regional heavyweights. Longtime backer Programa Ibermedia, a partner since the first edition, will once again offer participation grants to selected teams.

Advertisement

Running in parallel, BrLab Rough Cut caters to fiction and documentary features in the editing stage from across the Ibero-American world, pairing each project with an editing tutor and a small group of peers to help fine-tune the cut and position the film for festivals, sales and distribution.

After an initial phase centered on Brazil, BrLab’s Audience Design program returns with a broader remit, now open to the whole of Latin America and the Iberian Peninsula. Inspired by methodologies Sampaio first encountered at TorinoFilmLab, the workshop helps teams think strategically about audiences from development onwards, mapping core and secondary viewers and plotting release paths that can combine festivals, theaters, platforms and alternative circuits.

“In Brazil everyone talks about ‘creating new audiences,’ but for years people have become disconnected from our own cinema — they’re simply not educated to see themselves on screen,” Sampaio explained. “That’s why we need spaces like BrLab, where Latin American narratives and histories can be developed and protected, even as we keep one eye on the market, because being represented on screen is a right.”

Kids Lab in Recife

The biggest new innovation now announced for 2026 is BrLab Kids, a new workshop dedicated to film and series projects for children and young audiences, which will unspool in Recife. The initiative responds to what Sampaio sees as a chronic lack of specific public policy and institutional support for kids content in Brazil and much of Latin America.

Advertisement

“If children don’t grow up watching Latin American stories, they won’t feel connected to our history and our cinema when they become adults,” he argued.

Projects selected for BrLab Kids will receive tutorship from writers specialized in young audiences, including Janaína Tokitaka and Gabriella Mancini, alongside pedagogical consultants. Recife-based producer Nara Aragão will oversee production mentoring.

For Sampaio, the kids strand is closely linked to the audience-design push, offering a space to tackle the challenges of family titles competing with U.S. studio fare while trying to build a loyal local audience for regional stories.

Green Initiative With Petrobras

Backed for the first time by Petrobras as presenting partner and lead sponsor, BrLab’s 15th edition will also launch a sustainability push. Curated by pioneering green-production specialist Ariane Ferreira, the lab has assembled Think Tank BrLab Petrobras, together with Cinema Verde Festival, an initiative to adapt emerging international eco-standards to Latin American realities and to encourage local institutions to integrate environmental criteria into film funding.

Advertisement

Sampaio points to new European reports and incentive schemes around greener film and TV production as a reference, but stresses that Latin America is starting from a different baseline. The aim, he says, is to convene the industry around practical steps that can be progressively adopted in the region.

“In many cases, the only real green practices in our region are happening on big international streamer shows that arrive with their own protocols,” he says. “If we can pilot ideas in the audiovisual sector, that can also inspire changes in other parts of society.”

Co-Production Hub in a Rebounding Brazil

BrLab’s 15th edition comes as Brazilian cinema experiences renewed momentum. After years of funding paralysis, minority co-production schemes have been revived and Brazil is once again fast consolidating as a sought-after partner on major Latin American projects, often in combination with European finance.

“Today, foreign projects can come to BrLab to find Brazilian minority co-producers,” Sampaio notes. “When we launched, Ibermedia was practically the only co-production avenue. Now there are multiple funds, and the lab has become a natural meeting point.”

Advertisement

Audience design session at BrLab 2019

Bella Tozini

Continue Reading

World

Gaza militia leader forms rival force against Hamas, warns terrorists are regrouping amid ceasefire

Published

on

Gaza militia leader forms rival force against Hamas, warns terrorists are regrouping amid ceasefire

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: As Hamas uses the ceasefire to regroup and reassert control across parts of Gaza, a small number of emerging Palestinian militias say they are trying to form an alternative force inside the enclave. One of their leaders, Shawqi Abu Nasira, told Fox News Digital the pause in fighting has become a “kiss of life” for Hamas and warned the group is rebuilding.

“Hamas works for Iran,” he said. “They got weakened, yes, true, but the ceasefire, they gave them a kiss of life, and they are now preparing themselves better, trying to equip themselves. They are opening their own centers,” and added, “I’d like to thank President Trump for freezing the assets of Hamas and for labeling the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.”

Abu Nasira, a former senior Palestinian Authority police official who spent 16 years in an Israeli prison, is now operating with a small band of fighters on the eastern side of Gaza’s “yellow line,” in territory under Israeli military control. “I moved to the east of a yellow line, to the area that is now [controlled by the] Israeli Army. I was forced to move because I had no other option but to flee Hamas,” he said.

TRUMP PEACE PLAN FOR GAZA COULD BE JUST A ‘PAUSE’ BEFORE HAMAS STRIKES AGAIN, EXPERTS WARN

Advertisement

According to Jusoor News, a pan-Arab media outlet that recently launched an English-language channel reporting on Gaza, Abu Nasira’s defection began years ago when Hamas killed his only son and “dragged his body through the Strip.” He told Jusoor that the killing and public display of the body solidified his decision to oppose Hamas.

Hamas terrorists in the northern Gaza Strip on Dec. 1, 2025.  (Omar Al-Qatta / AFP via Getty Images)

Abu Nasira told Fox News Digital he acknowledged his own faction is small. “I have dozens of fighters now fighting with me,” he said. “We lack a lot of equipment, and we need better assistance.” But he argued that many Gazans share his view. “People that are now living in tents, people that are starved, people that are living in the street. They have no medication. These people don’t want Hamas.”

The ceasefire has exposed a chaotic landscape of militias, clan groups and local networks that have emerged as Hamas’s control weakened. Although none rival Hamas in size or capability, several factions have gained visibility.

These include the Popular Forces in Rafah, the Popular Army in northern Gaza, the Counter-Terrorism Strike Force in Khan Yunis and the Shujaiya Popular Defense Forces in eastern Gaza City, along with powerful clan-based networks such as the al-Majayda and Doghmosh families. Their alliances shift frequently, and their structure varies widely, but all have appeared or strengthened during the breakdown of centralized rule.

Advertisement

AFTER TRUMP DECLARES ‘WAR IS OVER,’ HAMAS EXECUTES RIVALS IN GAZA TO REASSERT CONTROL

Overview of anti-Hamas militias and local armed groups active in Gaza.  (Jusoor News)

Abu Nasira said many of these groups are in contact. “They are our brothers and sisters,” he said. “All of these people, they are holding arms and fighting Hamas for a reason, because they were the first witness to Hamas terrorism and they are victims of Hamas.”

He said early efforts are underway to unite the factions. “We are coordinating all of these groups together to work under one political umbrella, and they can act as a National Guard for East Gaza,” he said.

Abu Nasira argued that Palestinians, not outside powers, should be the ones to remove Hamas from Gaza. “We can now, as Palestinians, attack them,” he said. “We just need the support in order to win this war, and we can finish it in a few months.”

Advertisement

WARFARE EXPERT CALLS GAZA REBUILDING PLAN ‘DISNEYLAND STRATEGY’ TO DEFEAT HAMAS

Shawqi Abu Nasira, an emerging anti-Hamas militia leader in Gaza.  (Jusoor News)

He rejected the idea that Gazans would fear being labeled collaborators. “Whenever you say no to Hamas, you are accused as an operator, or you will be executed,” he said. “Everybody in Gaza knows that, so that’s not going to scare us anymore.”

In a message to Americans, Abu Nasira said the stakes go beyond Gaza. “Fighting terror is a campaign that we all should fight against,” he said. “It can spread from Gaza to all over the world.”

He described Hamas as part of a broader network. “As long as the triangle of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic Republic in Iran are working all together, that is a threat to the entire human, civilized world,” he said.

Advertisement

Hamas gathers in a show of strength during a parade by the terror group in Gaza on Jan. 25, 2025. (TPS-IL)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

He dismissed the concept known as the “Disneyland strategy,” which envisions building functioning civilian zones east of the yellow line to inspire pressure against Hamas over time. “This is a good, nice talk, but this is a long term,” he said. “We don’t need to give them the time to get strong.”

As Hamas regains strength under the ceasefire, Abu Nasira said Palestinians “are ready” and “want to fight for our future,” insisting that with international backing, a unified alternative can still be built.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Belgian police raid EU External Action Service in anti-fraud operation

Published

on

Belgian police raid EU External Action Service in anti-fraud operation

Belgian authorities raided the offices of the European External Action Service (EEAS), the bloc’s diplomatic arm, on Tuesday morning as part of an anti-fraud investigation.

The premises of the College of Europe in the city of Bruges, which receives funding from the EU institutions, were also searched as part of the operation, as well as the private homes of individuals in Belgium.

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) said it requested the raids as part of a probe into suspected fraud related to EU-funded training for junior diplomats, and that three people were detained.

Euronews has reached out to the Belgian police for comment.

This is a developing story and our journalists are working on further updates.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending