Connect with us

World

As war rages, EU Green Deal finds itself at a crossroads | View

Published

on

As war rages, EU Green Deal finds itself at a crossroads | View

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is forcing a brand new definition of safety on Europe and the world. 

We’re experiencing an vitality disaster, a army defence disaster, a persistent post-COVID disaster, and now ‘Putinflation’: a commodity worth disaster hurting probably the most weak.

All this raises the price of inexperienced finance, at a time when the IPCC has given us simply three years to slam the brakes on local weather change.

European leaders are conscious of this harmful convergence of safety threats. The EU has lengthy proven its resolve on local weather issues, and, because it did in the course of the peak of the pandemic, continues to show spectacular resilience within the face of turbulence.

As this callous warfare and the mesh of interlocking issues persist, the EU has a possibility to strengthen its unity and set up itself as an anchor of safety: for itself, for the area and for the world.

Advertisement

That is the central message that EU leaders should carry immediately and thru to COP27 in Egypt this November, highlighting the urgency of the transition to renewables as a peace mission.

A fossil fuels-driven warfare

The EU also needs to spotlight the fossil fuels legacy that introduced us up to now. Greenhouse gasoline emissions are one a part of this menace. So is the build-up of states and firms who’ve amassed outsized energy from their manufacturing and export, usually in ways in which assist them evade accountability.

The ‘net-zero by 2050’ imaginative and prescient enshrined by the Paris Settlement, and put into follow by the European Inexperienced Cope with a purpose of 2035, is a blueprint to deal with the foundation failures of this technique. Not directly, it’s a menace to a lot of that system’s beneficiaries.

Russian elites and oligarchs are presently illustrating their very own evaluation of this convergence of crises. Russia’s warfare is each a brazen assault on a sovereign state in its perceived ‘sphere of affect’. Additionally it is a gambit to destabilise Europe’s deep decarbonisation objectives, as a result of these, held as they’re by Russia’s greatest vitality import shopper, threaten the center of the nation’s governance mannequin.

The EU’s response to the invasion up to now, most just lately illustrated by the sixth bundle of sanctions and the launch of REPowerEU, is laudable and in some ways spectacular, even when the geopolitics of fossil fuels leaves it uncovered to some harmful contradictions.

Advertisement

Whereas the newest bundle of sanctions has made progress on oil, the incremental strategy has been constantly delayed, with leaders prevaricating on oil and gasoline, and on the elemental threats they pose to all facets of our safety.

In a perverse illustration of this, the design of the sanctions is presently permitting Russia to amass document present account surpluses, making the most of globally excessive commodity costs and a very tight marketplace for oil and gasoline.

In that regard, Russia is able of power. A well-resourced Russian warfare machine can – and already is, within the case of the Netherlands, Denmark and Finland – reduce off vitality provides to European nations by itself phrases.

This raises the concern of a protracted, arduous European winter marked by much more risky vitality costs, ballooning inflation, and tough decisions over heating and consuming amid which Putin may threaten or inflict much more ache at any time when he chooses.

‘Ripping off the plaster’ of our Russian oil and gasoline imports, as some consultants have lengthy beneficial, may have had Europe in a unique place by the winter. Moreover, it might have enshrined our commitments to renewable vitality relatively than sending combined indicators to the world.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, REPowerEU is a robust and important such sign, backed by a decisive envelope of €300 billion for renewables (versus €10 billion for gasoline), whereas the oil sanctions ought to part out 90 per cent of Europe’s imports by the top of the 12 months. This can finally deprive Russia’s warfare machine of sizeable belongings.

Swapping one threat for an additional

The European Fee’s Worldwide Power Technique, launched alongside REPowerEU, is much less compelling. Whereas REPowerEU injects Europe’s long-term local weather objectives with renewed political will, our instant sprint for gasoline exposes us to a brand new host of dangerous dependencies with different exporters.

A pipeline or LNG terminal will all the time be a node of potential vulnerability, and Russia just isn’t alone in wielding vitality exports as a weapon, as proven by oil within the Nineteen Seventies or immediately’s gasoline freeze between Algeria and Morocco.

As a result of the span of fossil initiatives is measured in a long time, immense capital mobilisation and onerous infrastructure, it’s arduous to see how such dependencies serve Europe or the world’s long-term safety.

This isn’t least as a result of they lock us into long-term vitality decisions that can impede the transition, and trigger a continued launch of greenhouse gasoline into the ambiance.

Advertisement

Leaning into its rising sense of resilience and solidarity, the EU ought to heed classes from the COVID response and construct on its short-term plan to purchase non-Russian gasoline collectively, in such a approach as to minimise the necessity for brand new infrastructure and keep away from damaging competitors between member states and potential exporters.

Strolling the renewables speak

Whereas EU diplomacy is fluent within the language of the renewables transition and does way over most in actuality, the erosion of multilateralism places Europe beneath extra strain to go additional, and converse in a single voice.

For one factor, our world sprint for gasoline is unfolding alongside an extension of coal use in some EU nations. Even when it is a time-bound disaster mitigation measure, it’s tough to reconcile with our worldwide rhetoric. 

Closely coal-dependent G20 nations comparable to South Africa or Indonesia might take a dim view of those selections, particularly whereas we strain them to cut back and transition out of their very own coal industries, and provide solely extra debt because the means for them to finance it.

Furthermore, the EU could also be a frontrunner in offering subsidies for renewable energies, however it’s far slower in lowering its assist to fossil fuels. The 27 member states subsidised renewables to the tune of €73 billion versus a still-enormous €50 billion for fossil fuels. 

Advertisement

This 12 months, an introduced finish to worldwide public finance for fossil fuels within the type of export credit was, whereas welcome, quick on element and even an specific deadline. This went in opposition to the suggestions of the Worldwide Power Company, and in addition the assertion made by many superior economies at COP26 in Glasgow.

The worldwide image is even darker. The world presently faces an annual funding hole of US$4.35 trillion to finance the inexperienced transition till 2030. Regardless of this, 70 per cent of vitality subsidies nonetheless go on fossil fuels, in comparison with 20 per cent for renewables.

Regardless of all this, the EU stays a world local weather chief. These crises put our establishments beneath nice pressure, however they’re additionally clarifying.

They reveal Europe’s singular duty to keep up unity, and provide a rallying imaginative and prescient past its borders, for the peaceable and protected world we wish. A response anchored in safety and solidarity.

Laurence Tubiana is CEO of the European Local weather Basis and was one of many key negotiators of the Paris Settlement.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Amazon’s Cross Adaptation Gets Release Date at Prime Video — Watch Trailer

Published

on

Amazon’s Cross Adaptation Gets Release Date at Prime Video — Watch Trailer


‘Alex Cross’ TV Show: Get Season 1 Release Date, Watch Trailer



Advertisement
























Advertisement





















Advertisement



Advertisement

ad


Advertisement




Advertisement




Quantcast



Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Reformist candidate Masoud Pezeshkian wins Iran's presidential runoff election

Published

on

Reformist candidate Masoud Pezeshkian wins Iran's presidential runoff election

Reformist candidate Masoud Pezeshkian won Iran’s runoff presidential election Saturday, besting hardliner Saeed Jalili by promising to reach out to the West and ease enforcement on the country’s mandatory headscarf law after years of sanctions and protests squeezing the Islamic Republic.

Pezeshkian promised no radical changes to Iran’s Shiite theocracy in his campaign and has long held Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as the final arbiter of all matters of state in the country. But even Pezeshkian’s modest aims will be challenged by an Iranian government still largely held by hardliners, the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip, and Western fears over Tehran enriching uranium to near-weapons-grade levels with enough of a stockpile to produce several nuclear weapons if it chose.

IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER THANKS US COLLEGE STUDENTS FOR ‘STANDING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY’

A vote count offered by authorities put Pezeshkian as the winner with 16.3 million votes to Jalili’s 13.5 million in Friday’s election. Overall, Iran’s Interior Ministry said 30 million people voted in an election held without internationally recognized monitors, representing a turnout of 49.6% — higher than the historic low of the June 28 first round vote but lower than other presidential races.

Reformist candidate for Iran’s presidential election Masoud Pezeshkian, center, reacts after casting his vote as he is accompanied by former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, left, at a polling station in Shahr-e-Qods near Tehran, Iran, Friday. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

Advertisement

Supporters of Pezeshkian, a heart surgeon and longtime lawmaker, entered the streets of Tehran and other cities before dawn to celebrate as his lead grew over Jalili, a hard-line former nuclear negotiator. Pezeshkian later traveled to the mausoleum of the late Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and addressed journalists in a chaotic event.

“In this election, I didn’t give you false promises. I did not lie,” Pezeshkian said. “It’s been many years after the revolution that we come to the podium, we make promises and we fail to fulfill them. This is the biggest problem we have.”

Pezeshkian’s win still sees Iran at a delicate moment, with tensions high in the Mideast and a looming election in the United States that could put any chance of a detente between Tehran and Washington at risk. Pezeshkian’s victory also wasn’t a rout of Jalili, meaning he’ll have to carefully navigate Iran’s internal politics as the doctor has never held a sensitive, high-level security post.

Government officials up to Khameni, the supreme leader, predicted higher turnout as voting got underway, with state television airing images of modest lines at some polling centers. However, online videos purported to show some polls empty while a survey of several dozen sites in Tehran saw light traffic and a heavy security presence on the streets.

Authorities counted 607,575 voided votes — which often are a sign of protest by those who feel obligated to cast a ballot but reject both candidates.

Advertisement

Khamenei praised the turnout Saturday despite what he alleged was a boycott campaign “orchestrated by the enemies of the Iranian nation to induce despair and a feeling of hopelessness.”

Voters in line

Iranian people stand in a queue as they wait to vote at a polling station in Tehran during a snap presidential election to choose a successor to Ebrahim Raisi following his death in a helicopter crash. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

“I would like to recommend Dr. Pezeshkian, the elected president, put his trust in God, the Compassionate, and set his vision on high, bright horizons,” Khamenei added.

Voters expressed a guarded optimism.

“I don’t expect anything from him — I am happy that the vote put the brake on hard-liners,” said bank employee Fatemeh Babaei, who voted for Pezeshkian. “I hope Pezeshkian can return administration to a way in which all people can feel there is a tomorrow.”

Taher Khalili, a Kurdish-origin Iranian who runs a small tailor shop in Tehran, offered another reason to be hopeful while handing out candy to passersby.

Advertisement

“In the end, someone from my hometown and the west of Iran came to power,” Khalili said. “I hope he will make economy better for small businesses.”

Pezeshkian, who speaks Azeri, Farsi and Kurdish, campaigned on outreach to Iran’s many ethnicities. He represents the first president from western Iran in decades — something people hope will aid the county as those in the western part are considered more tolerant because of the ethnic and religious diversity in their area.

The election came amid heightened regional tensions. In April, Iran launched its first-ever direct attack on Israel over the war in Gaza, while militia groups armed by Tehran — such as the Lebanese Hezbollah and Yemen’s Houthi rebels — are engaged in the fighting and have escalated their attacks.

While Khamenei remains the final decision-maker on matters of state, Pezeshkian could bend the country’s foreign policy toward either confrontation or collaboration with the West.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, which has reached a detente with Iran, sent his congratulations to Pezeshkian that stressed his “keenness to develop and deepen the relations that bring our two countries and peoples together.” Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has relied on Iranian-made drones in his war on Ukraine, similarly congratulated Pezeshkian.

Advertisement

Responding to questions from The Associated Press, the State Department called the Iranian election “not free or fair” and noted that “a significant number of Iranians chose not to participate at all.”

“We have no expectation these elections will lead to fundamental change in Iran’s direction or more respect for the human rights of its citizens,” the State Department added. “As the candidates themselves have said, Iranian policy is set by the supreme leader.”

However, it said it would pursue diplomacy “when it advances American interests.”

Candidates repeatedly touched on what would happen if former President Donald Trump, who unilaterally withdrew America from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, won the November election. Iran has held indirect talks with President Joe Biden’s administration, though there’s been no clear movement back toward constraining Tehran’s nuclear program for the lifting of economic sanctions.

Pezeshkian’s win did see Iran’s rial strengthen Saturday against the U.S. dollar, trading 603,000 to $1, down from 615,000 on Thursday. The rial traded 32,000 to $1 at the time the 2015 nuclear deal was reached.

Advertisement

Though identifying with reformists and relative moderates within Iran’s theocracy during the campaign, Pezeshkian at the same time honored Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, on one occasion wearing its uniform to parliament. He repeatedly criticized the United States and praised the Guard for shooting down an American drone in 2019, saying it “delivered a strong punch in the mouth of the Americans and proved to them that our country will not surrender.”

The late President Ebrahim Raisi, whose death in a May helicopter crash sparked the early election, was seen as a protégé of Khamenei and a potential successor as supreme leader.

Still, many knew him for his involvement in the mass executions that Iran conducted in 1988, and for his role in the bloody crackdowns on dissent that followed protests over the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini, a young woman detained by police over allegedly improperly wearing the mandatory headscarf, or hijab.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso military leaders sign new pact, rebuff ECOWAS

Published

on

Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso military leaders sign new pact, rebuff ECOWAS

The military leaders of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have hailed a newly signed treaty as a step “towards greater integration” between the three countries, in the latest showing of their shift away from traditional regional and Western allies.

During a summit in the Nigerien capital of Niamey on Saturday, the three leaders signed a confederation treaty that aims to strengthen a mutual defence pact announced last year, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).

The signing capped the first joint summit of the leaders – Niger’s General Abdourahmane Tchiani, Burkina Faso’s Captain Ibrahim Traore, and Mali’s Colonel Assimi Goita – since they came to power in successive coups in their bordering West African nations.

It also came just months after the three countries withdrew from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) regional bloc in January.

Speaking at the summit on Saturday, Tchiani called the 50-year-old ECOWAS “a threat to our states”.

Advertisement

The West African economic bloc had suspended the three countries after their respective military takeovers, which occurred in July 2023 in Niger, September 2022 in Burkina Faso and August 2021 in Mali.

ECOWAS also imposed sanctions on Niger and Mali, but the bloc’s leaders have held out hope for the trio’s eventual return.

“We are going to create an AES of the peoples, instead of an ECOWAS whose directives and instructions are dictated to it by powers that are foreign to Africa,” Tchiani said.

Burkina Faso’s Traore also accused foreign powers of seeking to exploit the countries. The three nations have regularly accused former colonial ruler France of meddling in ECOWAS.

“Westerners consider that we belong to them and our wealth also belongs to them. They think that they are the ones who must continue to tell us what is good for our states,” he said.

Advertisement

“This era is gone forever. Our resources will remain for us and our population’s.”

For his part, Mali’s Goita said the strengthened relationship means an “attack on one of us will be an attack on all the other members”.

Shifting influence

Reporting from Abuja on Saturday, Al Jazeera’s Ahmed Idris noted that the three military leaders met just a day before ECOWAS was set to have a meeting in the capital of Nigeria.

Efforts to mediate the countries’ return to the bloc were expected to be discussed, Idris said.

“Many people believe that the meeting in Niger was to counter whatever is coming [from] ECOWAS and to also outline their position: That they are not returning to the Economic Community of the West African States,” he explained.

Advertisement

Idris added the newly elected president of Senegal, Bassirou Diomaye Faye, recently visited the three countries in an informal capacity in an effort to mend the ties.

“However, it’s not clear whether or not he’s got a positive response,” he said.

Adama Gaye, a political commentator and former ECOWAS communications director, said the creation of the three-member Alliance of Sahel States has “weakened” the economic bloc.

Still, Gaye told Al Jazeera that “despite its real-name recognition, ECOWAS has not performed well when it comes to achieving regional integration, promoting intra-African trade in West Africa and also in ensuring security” in the region.

“So this justifies the feeling of many in West Africa – [the] ordinary citizenry and even intellectuals – [who are] asking questions about the standing of ECOWAS, whether it should be revised, reinvented,” he said, urging the bloc to engage in diplomacy to try to bridge the rift.

Advertisement

Violence and instability

The Niamey summit also came a day before the United States is set to complete its withdrawal from a key base in Niger, underscoring how the new military leaders have redrawn security relations that had defined the region in recent years.

Armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and ISIL (ISIS) have jockeyed for control of territory in all three countries, unleashing waves of violence and spurring concern in Western capitals.

But following the recent coups, the countries’ ties to Western governments have frayed.

French troops completed their withdrawal from Mali in 2022, and they left Niger and Burkina Faso last year.

Meanwhile, US Air Force Major General Kenneth Ekman said earlier this week that about 1,000 military personnel would complete their withdrawal from Niger’s Air Base 101 by Sunday.

Advertisement

The US is also in the process of leaving a separate, $100m drone base near Agadez in central Niger, which officials have described as essential to gathering intelligence about armed groups in the region.

While pushing out former Western allies, the military leaders in Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali have increasingly pursued security and economic ties with Russia.

However, it remains unclear if the new approach has helped to stem the violence that has plagued the countries, which are home to about 72 million people.

In 2023, Burkina Faso saw a massive escalation in violence, with more than 8,000 people killed, according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) tracker.

In Niger, slight gains against armed groups largely backslid following the coup, according to ACLED.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, an offensive by Malian forces and Wagner mercenaries saw “elements” of the Russian-government-linked group “involved in the indiscriminate killing of hundreds of civilians, destruction of infrastructure, and looting of property, as well as triggering mass displacement”, ACLED said.

About three million people have been displaced by fighting across the countries.

Continue Reading

Trending