Connect with us

World

As more women forgo the hijab, Iran’s government pushes back

Published

on

As more women forgo the hijab, Iran’s government pushes back

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Billboards across Iran’s capital proclaim that women should wear their mandatory headscarves to honor their mothers. But perhaps for the first time since the chaotic days following Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, more women — both young and old — choose not to do so.

Such open defiance comes after months of protests over the September death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in the custody of the country’s morality police, for wearing her hijab too loosely. While the demonstrations appear to have cooled, the choice by some women not to cover their hair in public poses a new challenge to the country’s theocracy. The women’s pushback also lays bare schisms in Iran that had been veiled for decades.

Authorities have made legal threats and closed down some businesses serving women not wearing the hijab. Police and volunteers issue verbal warnings in subways, airports and other public places. Text messages have targeted drivers who had women without head covering in their vehicles.

However, analysts in Iran warn that the government could reignite dissent if it pushes too hard. The protests erupted at a difficult time for the Islamic Republic, currently struggling with economic woes brought on by its standoff with the West over its rapidly advancing nuclear program.

Some women said they’ve had enough — no matter the consequence. They say they are fighting for more freedom in Iran and a better future for their daughters.

Advertisement

Some suggested the growing numbers of women joining their ranks might make it harder for the authorities to push back.

“Do they want to close down all businesses?” said Shervin, a 23-year-old student whose short, choppy hair swayed in the wind on a recent day in Tehran. “If I go to a police station, will they shut it down too?”

Still, they worry about risk. The women interviewed only provided their first names, for fear of repercussions.

Vida, 29, said a decision by her and two of her friends to no longer cover their hair in public is about more than headscarves.

“This is a message for the government, leave us alone,” she said.

Advertisement

Iran and neighboring Taliban-controlled Afghanistan are the only countries where the hijab remains mandatory for women. Before protests erupted in September, it was rare to see women without headscarves, though some occasionally let their hijab fall to their shoulders. Today, it’s routine in some areas of Tehran to see women without headscarves.

For observant Muslim women, the head covering is a sign of piety before God and modesty in front of men outside their families. In Iran, the hijab — and the all-encompassing black chador worn by some — has long been a political symbol as well.

Iran’s ruler Reza Shah Pahlavi in 1936 banned the hijab as part of his efforts to mirror the West. The ban ended five years later when his son, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, took over. Still, many middle and upper-class Iranian women chose not to wear the hijab.

By the 1979 Islamic Revolution, some of the women who helped overthrow the shah embraced the chador, a cloak that covers the body from head to toe, except for the face. Images of armed women encompassed in black cloth became a familiar sight for Americans during the U.S. Embassy takeover and hostage crisis later that year. But other women protested a decision by Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini ordering the hijab to be worn in public. In 1983, it became the law, enforced with penalties including fines and two months in prison.

Forty years later, women in central and northern Tehran can be seen daily without headscarves. While at first Iran’s government avoided a direct confrontation over the issue, it has increasingly flexed the powers of the state in recent weeks in an attempt to curb the practice .

Advertisement

In early April, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared that “removing hijab is not Islamically or politically permissible.”

Khamenei claimed women refusing to wear the hijab are being manipulated. “They are unaware of who is behind this policy of removing and fighting hijab,” Khamenei said. “The enemy’s spies and the enemy’s spy agencies are pursuing this matter. If they know about this, they will definitely not take part in this.”

Hard-line media began publishing details of “immoral” situations in shopping malls, showing women without the hijab. On April 25, authorities closed the 23-story Opal shopping mall in northern Tehran for several days after women with their hair showing were seen spending time together with men in a bowling alley.

“It is a collective punishment,” said Nodding Kasra, a 32-year-old salesman at a clothing shop in the mall. “They closed a mall with hundreds of workers over some customers’ hair?”

Police have shut down over 2,000 businesses across the country over admitting women not wearing the hijab, including shops, restaurants and even pharmacies, according to the reformist newspaper Shargh.

Advertisement

“This is a lose-lose game for businesses. If they warn (women) about not wearing the hijab as per the authorities’ orders, people will boycott them,” said Mohsen Jalalpour, a former deputy head of Iran’s Chamber of Commerce. “If they refuse to comply, the government will close them down.”

Bijan Ashtari, who writes on Iranian politics, warned that business owners who had remained silent during the Mahsa Amini-inspired protests could now rise up.

Meanwhile, government offices no longer provide services to women not covering their hair, after some had in recent months. The head of the country’s track and field federation, Hashem Siami, resigned this weekend after some participants in an all-women half-marathon in the city of Shiraz competed without the hijab.

There are signs the crackdown could escalate.

Some clerics have urged deploying soldiers, as well as the all-volunteer Basij force of Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, to enforce the hijab law. The Guard on Monday reportedly seized an Iranian fishing boat for carrying women not wearing the hijab near Hormuz Island, according to the semiofficial Fars news agency.

Advertisement

Police also say that surveillance cameras with “artificial intelligence” will find women not wearing their head covering. A slick video shared by Iranian media suggested that surveillance footage would be matched against ID photographs, though it’s unclear if such a system is currently operational .

“The fight over the hijab will remain center stage unless the government reaches an understanding with world powers over the nuclear deal and sanctions relief,” said Tehran-based political analyst Ahmad Zeidabadi.

But diplomacy has been stalled and anti-government protests could widen, he said. The hijab “will be the main issue and the fight will not be about scarves only.”

Sorayya, 33, said she is already fighting for a broader goal by going without the headscarf.

“I don’t want my daughter to be under the same ideologic pressures that I and my generation lived through,” she said, while dropping off her 7-year-old daughter at a primary school in central Tehran. “This is for a better future for my daughter.”

Advertisement

___

Gambrell reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Biden Administration Urges Congress to Fund Disaster Relief

Published

on

Biden Administration Urges Congress to Fund Disaster Relief
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Joe Biden’s budget director called on U.S. lawmakers on Monday to quickly pass emergency disaster relief funding in the wake of damaging storms and said it would send Congress a funding package in coming days. Biden’s administration has made multiple requests for …
Continue Reading

World

Netanyahu confirms Israel strike against Iran hit nuke program during October retaliatory strikes

Published

on

Netanyahu confirms Israel strike against Iran hit nuke program during October retaliatory strikes

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the retaliatory attack Jerusalem launched on Iran in late October degraded part of Tehran’s nuclear program.

“It’s not a secret,” Netanyahu said in a Knesset speech reported by the Times of Israel. “There is a specific component in their nuclear program that was hit in this attack.”

Advertisement

Despite the prime minister’s comments, it had not previously been confirmed by Israeli officials that Tehran’s coveted nuclear program, which it has been attempting to beef up since the collapse of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear agreement in 2018, had been targeted in last month’s strike.

An Israeli Air Force plane prepares to strike targets in Iran on Oct. 26, 2024. (IDF Spokesman’s Unit)

IRAN MILITARY HEADS VOW ‘CRUSHING’ RESPONSE TO ISRAEL AS UN ATOMIC CHIEF SAYS NUKE SITES SHOULDN’T BE ATTACKED

Israeli security officials confirmed that military sites had been targeted during the overnight strike on Oct. 26 that caused concern among global leaders about an all-out war as the two nations ramp up direct lines of attack on one another.

The international community, along with the Biden administration, attempted to re-enter into negotiations with Tehran to counter its nuclear development, though to no avail.

Advertisement

The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), earlier this year warned that Iran’s nuclear program has largely run unchecked for the last six years, and it is believed to have increased its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium metals to 60% purity levels; just shy of weapons-grade uranium, which is enriched to 90% purity.

Netanyahu speaks at the opening of the 25th Knesset session

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the opening of the 25th Knesset session in Jerusalem on Oct. 28, 2024. (Debbie Hill/Pool Photo via AP)

But IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has warned that Iran’s nuclear facilities should not become a target as Israel ramps up direct operations against Tehran.

Netanyahu did not expand on how Iran’s nuclear program has been affected after the strikes last month, but on Monday he reportedly said it was not enough to have entirely blocked Iran’s path to obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Iranian nuclear infrastructure

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies has analyzed where Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is located as Israel mulls a retaliatory attack. (Foundation for Defense of Democracies)

UN WATCHDOG WARNS TIME TO ‘MANEUVER’ ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM IS SHRINKING: REPORT

Israel destroyed an active nuclear weapons research facility in Parchin, roughly 20 miles southeast of Tehran.

Advertisement

Grossi visited two Iranian nuclear sites last week and said he would engage in high-level talks with Tehran in a push to get Iran to adhere to international agreements and nuclear safeguards.

In a message later posted to X, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he was ready to engage in international talks but noted Tehran would not succumb to pressure as President-elect Donald Trump returns to the White House with what many believe will be a much stronger approach when it comes to Iran.

An Iranian Qadr H long-range ballistic surface-to-surface missile

An Iranian Qadr H long-range ballistic surface-to-surface missile (AP Photo/Fars News Agency/Omid Vahabzadeh/File)

“The ball is in the EU/E3 court,” the foreign minister said in reference to three European countries, France, Britain and Germany, that represent Western interests, including the U.S., during nuclear talks.

“Willing to negotiate based on our national interest and inalienable rights but not ready to negotiate under pressure and intimidation,” Araghchi said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

European governments bring fossil fuel lobbyists to COP29

Published

on

European governments bring fossil fuel lobbyists to COP29
This article was originally published in French

According to a coalition of NGOs, the European Union’s national delegations brought more than a hundred fossil fuel representatives with them to Baku for the UN climate conference.

ADVERTISEMENT

Representatives of the fossil fuel sector have a strong presence at COP29.

According to a report by the Kick Big Polluters Out coalition, a body of 450 NGOs, up to 1,773 lobbyists travelled to Baku for the United Nations climate conference.

What’s even more head-scratching is that 113 of them were accompanying various European national government delegations.

“Greece led the way with 24, while Italy had 22,” explained Marcella Via of Corporate Europe Observatory, a member of the coalition, followed by Sweden (17) and Belgium (13).

She adds that “Greece and Italy are the countries that buy the most gas from Azerbaijan. It is therefore not surprising that they have so many fossil fuel lobbyists.” Euronews contacted both countries but has yet to receive any comment.

Advertisement

Rome and Athens are counting on the southern European gas corridor linking Azerbaijan to Europe via Turkey. This pipeline could be extended to carry gas from the Middle East, Central Asia and the eastern Mediterranean. If completed, it should be able to transport at least 10 billion cubic metres of gas a year.

Civil society is also denouncing the conclusion of trade agreements at COP29. The report mentions an agreement as early as the second day of the conference between Italgas and SOCAR (State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic), Azerbaijan’s national oil and gas company.

On the other hand, however, the report also points out that the European Commission did not include any lobbyists from the sector in its delegation, unlike last year in Dubai.

At his hearing in early November, the European Commissioner for Climate Action Wopke Hoestra “received increasing pressure from civil society not to bring in any fossil fuel lobbyists,” Marcella Via points out.

Also at his hearing before the MEPs, Hoestra said that “he would support the policy on the fight against conflict of interest at United Nations climate negotiations. And we really, really hope that he will keep his word,” she continued.

Advertisement

A large delegation

The 1,773 lobbyists that have travelled to Azerbaijan’s capital represent companies such as Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP, Shell, Eni and TotalEnergies.

Though there were fewer than last year’s 2,500 total at COP28, the NGOs point out that the lower overall number of participants in Baku compared to Dubai in 2023 means that the proportion of lobbyists has remained high.

The NGO coalition points out that lobbyists outnumber the number of attendees from the national delegations present in Baku, with the only exceptions being host country Azerbaijan, Brazil – who will be the host next year – and Turkey.

Fossil fuel lobbyists received more passes to COP29 than all the delegates from the 10 most climate-vulnerable nations combined.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending