Connect with us

Wyoming

Tiny Wyoming town is in uproar after a seemingly inoffensive photo left residents bitterly divided – so which side are you on?

Published

on

Tiny Wyoming town is in uproar after a seemingly inoffensive photo left residents bitterly divided – so which side are you on?


A tiny Wyoming town has been embroiled in debate after an image surfaced of a dog sitting at a table inside a restaurant beside its owner. 

The image, captured inside Sapporo Japanese Steakhouse in Rock Springs, Wyoming, shows an elderly woman sitting at a table alongside her small dog. 

Local woman Ellie Croft shared the picture, and her disgust, at how restaurant staff could allow the animal inside. 

In her post, Croft said: ‘If you’ve already made the entitled decision to bring your dog to a restaurant. 

Advertisement

‘DO NOT let it sit on the bench where other people will sit. Disgusting and inconsiderate’, with her post now sparking a wider debate on animals in restaurants.

The image, captured inside Sapporo Japanese Steakhouse in Rock Springs, Wyoming, shows an elderly woman sitting at a table alongside her small dog

The image, and Croft’s caption, has since ignited a deeper heated debate about allowing animals in restaurants.

Some users urged her to be considerate, as she did not know the woman’s full circumstances, questioning if it was possibly a service dog. 

Poll

Should dogs be allowed inside restaurants?

  • Yes 522 votes
  • No 479 votes
Advertisement

Others agreed with her post, saying people need to stop regarding dogs as humans. 

One commenter posted: ‘If your entitled backside is too pristine to sit in the same restaurant as a dog. You are the problem and not the dog.’

Advertisement

Another said: ‘Probably better behaved than most kids around here’, but someone added: ‘Agree!!! Dogs belong at home.’

Another man added: ‘Everyone should take a moment to actually think this through.’ 

‘This is a food establishment, not your home kitchen. Could this be a service dog? Yes, but it would be more responsible for this person to use a designated vest or tag to express that. 

‘People have allergies, and unless you have a certified service animal, you have no right bringing in a pet that could disrupt someone else in public food establishments.’

Croft hit back after receiving some heat for her original post, adding: ‘I’m highly allergic to dogs, and they do not belong on people’s seats in restaurants. 

Advertisement

The post has since sparked a wider debate on animals in restaurants.

The post has since sparked a wider debate on animals in restaurants.

‘It would’ve been alright if the dog stayed on the floor. Have some common sense.’

The owner of Sapporo, Jerry Zhang, told Cowboy State Daily that he leans toward the softer side of the issue for a few reasons. 

According to Zhang, he doesn’t want to force a lonely or disabled person away from her dog and he doesn’t want a dog left in a hot vehicle. 

Zhang also told the outlet that the restaurant is cleaned meticulously between guests anyway.

He said: ‘If the dog is good, no barking — I say OK. From my heart, I feel sorry if I reject (them). 

Advertisement
The owner of Sapporo, Jerry Zhang, seen here, told Cowboy State Daily that he leans toward the softer side of the issue for a few reasons

The owner of Sapporo, Jerry Zhang, seen here, told Cowboy State Daily that he leans toward the softer side of the issue for a few reasons

‘I always tell myself to put yourself in others’ shoes to feel how others feel That’s why I’m (allowing well-behaved dogs).’

According to the Wyoming Department of Agriculture, all animals, except service dogs, are not allowed inside restaurants

Federal rules say that staff can only ask a person if a dog is required because of a disability, and what task the dog must perform. 

The guidance adds that staff should not ask for documentation or proof that the can perform a service. 



Source link

Advertisement

Wyoming

Teton Pass closed in both directions due to avalanche, possibly until Tuesday

Published

on

Teton Pass closed in both directions due to avalanche, possibly until Tuesday


WILSON, Wyo. — Another complicated day for Teton Pass commuters.

WY22 over Teton Pass is closed in both directions due to avalanche control as of 8 a.m. on Monday, Dec. 22, according to an alert issued by the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT). WYDOT’s estimated opening time for the road is between noon and 2 p.m. on Tuesday, Dec. 23.

Photo: Bridger-Teton Avalanche Center

WYDOT had closed the pass at 3 a.m. Monday for avalanche control. According to a post by the Bridger-Teton Avalanche Center (BTAC), a “large explosive triggered avalanche” ended up covering both lanes of the Pass.

“Early this morning, WYDOT crews brought down a large, controlled avalanche at Glory Bowl during their mitigation mission,” the agency posted to Facebook Monday morning. “Due to the extent of the clean up, estimated opening time is between noon and 2 p.m. tomorrow.”

Advertisement
Photo: WYDOT Teton County on Facebook

WYDOT confirmed to Buckrail that the dense, heavy slide is being addressed by a dozer on Monday morning, and that clearing the snow will take several hours. The agency expects to share an updated opening time estimate as the cleanup unfolds.

According to BTAC’s Monday forecast, high avalanche danger exists in the Tetons.

“Heavy snowfall and strong wind has created very dangerous avalanche conditions on wind loaded middle and upper elevation terrain,” its forecast states.

This is a developing story. Buckrail will provide information as details become available.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wyoming

Man taken into custody after police standoff in Wyoming

Published

on

Man taken into custody after police standoff in Wyoming


WYOMING, Mich. (WOOD) — Wyoming police officers were seen taking a man into custody after an hours-long standoff Sunday night.

Police swarmed Thorndyke Avenue near 44th Street SW in Wyoming for several hours after a man barricaded himself inside a home. A News 8 crew watched officers remove a man from the barricaded home in handcuffs around 11:35 p.m. Sunday.

A neighbor who lives on Thorndyke Avenue told News 8 that the incident began when a man who lives on the street left his house to confront a group of men who were working on the roof of a nearby property. The neighbor heard a single gunshot before the man retreated into his home.

Advertisement

Thorndyke Avenue was blocked off for hours with those living on the street unable to get to their houses. Those already inside were asked to remain inside.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Hunting: Arkansas might feel ripples from Wyoming public land access case | Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Published

on

Hunting: Arkansas might feel ripples from Wyoming public land access case | Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette


Hunters won a major decision for public land access in Wyoming recently, and the ripples will ultimately reach Arkansas.

In October, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Iron Bar Holdings, LLC v. Cape et al., preserving a unanimous decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals’ upholding the legality of “corner crossing.” The case involved a Wyoming landowner that pressed trespassing charges against four Missouri hunters who cut across the corner of the landowner’s fence to get from one public parcel to another.

Law enforcement has traditionally supported landowners in “corner crossing” situations. It is an effective method to restrict public access to public land that is surrounded by private land. By restricting corner crossing, landowners have exclusive access to public land abutting their property. They can hunt it without competition, and they can run guided hunts on it.

We have encountered that situation personally while hunting in Oklahoma. A situation in Arkansas occurred about a decade ago where a landowner closed a road on his property that leads to a remote portion of Cache River National Wildlife Refuge. There’s the ongoing conflict between public land hunters in northeast Arkansas and the Hatchie Coon Hunting Club.

Advertisement

Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, which in 2021 successfully campaigned to prevent the University of Arkansas from selling the Pine Tree Experimental Station Wildlife Demonstration Area to private interests, filed amicus filings in the Wyoming case and raised funds for the hunters’ legal defense. Backcountry Hunters & Anglers said in a release that the 10th Circuit’s decision preserves access to more than 3.5 million acres of public lands in Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Kansas and Oklahoma. Impact might also expand to about 8.3 million acres across the West.

“The Supreme Court’s action affirms a principle hunters and anglers have long understood: corner crossing is not a crime,” said Devin O’Dea, western policy and conservation manager for Backcountry Hunters & Anglers. “Access to 3.5 million acres of public lands has been secured because four hunters from Missouri took a leap of faith across a corner, and the Wyoming Chapter of BHA stood up in their defense. It’s a victory worth celebrating, and a key domino in the fight for public land access across the West.”

In a sense, the Iron Bar Holdings decision dovetails with Arkansas v. McIlroy, a landmark 1980 case that preserved and expanded public access to Arkansas streams and rivers with a creative interpretation of the term “navigable.” Before McIlroy, “navigable” referred to the farthest distance upstream that a steamboat could go in high water. Landowners on the Mulberry River strung barbed wire across the river. Sometimes they physically accosted paddlers. McIlroy extended navigability definition to canoes and kayaks, creating the paddling environment that so many people enjoy.

Missouri recognizes public access rights to paddlecraft navigable waters, but one still risks an adversarial encounter with territorial landowners on many streams in the state. My former boss Dan Witter and several other Missouri Department of Conservation employees were forced off a well-known river at gunpoint. As Witter told me at the time, the law was on their side, but a streamside encounter with an armed and angry landowner is not the time or place to debate it.

Some public parcels are entirely enclosed by private land. There is no access to those parcels, corner crossings or otherwise. I have a friend in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma, whose land enclosed a 160-acre public Bureau of Land Management parcel. I quipped that it would be worthwhile for a hunter to hire a helicopter to airlift him into the property.

Advertisement

Without cracking a hint of a smile, the landowner said a helicopter pilot would have to get permission to overfly his property, and that he would not grant it.

As people migrate away from cities and turn rural hamlets into suburbs, the demand for access to public land will intensify. The courts appear to sympathize with the public in access disputes, and the Iron Bar decision will ultimately factor into access disputes in Arkansas.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending