Connect with us

Wyoming

Senate votes to defund University of Wyoming diversity office and gender studies courses but the fight’s not over

Published

on

Senate votes to defund University of Wyoming diversity office and gender studies courses but the fight’s not over


The Wyoming Senate voted to defund gender studies at the University of Wyoming (UW). If that amendment survives the state budgeting process, it could mean big changes for the Gender and Women’s Studies Program at UW.

Immediately following the vote to defund gender studies, the senate also voted to defund UW’s Office of Diversity Equity and Inclusion.

In the coming days, lawmakers will have to hammer out differences between the Senate’s budget bill, which includes both amendments, and the House’s budget bill, which includes neither.

Gender studies vs. traditional values

Gender studies courses take a critical look at institutions and power structures, using insights from feminist or queer studies literature to examine topics or perspectives that have historically been overlooked.

Advertisement

These courses are optional for UW students. But the state senate voted to take away those options last week, adding a footnote to the senate budget that forbids UW from funding such a program with state money. Republican legislators like Senator Bob Ide (R-Casper) argued that the courses conflicted with traditional Wyoming values.

“I think we have a real opportunity to set University of Wyoming apart as a grassroots, traditional-value university,” he said.

Right-wing legislators advanced the amendment along these lines, but several Republican and Democratic senators pushed back. Senator Chris Rothfuss (D-Laramie) said it was inappropriate for the legislature to ban classes it doesn’t like — and he accused the senate of fearing certain ideas.

“My kids are not afraid of ideas,” Rothfuss said. “My kids could take these classes and know what to do with them and learn from them.”

After about 45 minutes of debate, the senate voted to defund the program on an 18-13 vote.

Advertisement

But gender studies at UW will only be defunded if the new footnote survives the budgeting process. It’s included in the Senate version of the state budget, but not in the House’s version. The differences between those versions will have to be smoothed out in the coming days.

This is the second time the senate has attempted to defund the program with a budget footnote. During the last budget session in 2022, the senate approved a similar amendment, but the provision was ultimately dropped from the final state budget bill.

Diversity and its detractors

Also during the senate’s third and final reading of the state budget bill, the chamber added another footnote to UW’s funding.

That footnote says UW is not allowed to spend any of its appropriations on its Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion or on any “program, activity or function” geared toward diversity, equity and inclusion.

Right-wing senators blamed diversity efforts like UW’s for all sorts of things — from the erosion of traditional values to recent airplane failures — before approving the budget cut on a 20-11 vote.

Advertisement

Senator Charles Scott (R-Casper) called the diversity office “a monolith of wokeness” and said the cut was necessary to protect students from being indoctrinated into left-wing ideologies.

Again, Senator Rothfuss (D-Laramie) was among the loudest defenders of UW’s funding, arguing to his fellow senators that the diversity office exists to help racially diverse, first-generation and rural students feel welcome.

“How do we make those students feel like they’re a part of the university?” he said. “How do we ensure that they’re comfortable at the university? That’s what this office works on.”

Like the amendment to defund gender studies, the amendment to defund diversity efforts is not set in stone. It will have to survive the merger of the two versions of the budget bill.

Advertisement





Source link

Wyoming

Property Tax Relief vs. Public Services: Weed & Pest Districts Enter the Debate

Published

on

Property Tax Relief vs. Public Services: Weed & Pest Districts Enter the Debate


As property tax cuts move forward in Wyoming, schools, hospitals, public safety agencies and road departments have all warned of potential funding shortfalls. Now, a new white paper from the Wyoming Weed & Pest Council says Weed & Pest Districts could also be significantly affected — a concern that many residents may not even realize is tied to property tax revenue.

Wyoming’s Weed & Pest Districts didn’t appear out of thin air. They were created decades ago to deal with a very real problem: invasive plants that were chewing up rangeland, hurting agricultural production and spreading faster than individual landowners could manage on their own.

Weeds like cheatgrass and leafy spurge don’t stop at fence lines, and over time they’ve been tied to everything from reduced grazing capacity to higher wildfire risk and the loss of native wildlife habitat.

That reality is what led lawmakers to create locally governed districts with countywide authority — a way to coordinate control efforts across both public and private land. But those districts now find themselves caught in a familiar Wyoming dilemma: how to pay for public services while cutting property taxes. Property taxes are among the most politically sensitive issues in the state, and lawmakers are under intense pressure to deliver relief to homeowners. At the same time, nearly every entity that relies on those dollars is warning that cuts come with consequences.

Advertisement

The Weed & Pest Council’s white paper lands squarely in that debate, at a moment when many residents are increasingly skeptical of property tax–funded programs and are asking a simple question — are they getting what they pay for?

That skepticism shows up in several ways. Critics of the Weed & Pest District funding model say the white paper spends more time warning about funding losses than clearly demonstrating results. While few dispute that invasive species are a problem, some landowners argue that weed control efforts vary widely from county to county and that it’s difficult to gauge success without consistent performance measures or statewide reporting standards.

Others question whether residential property taxes are the right tool to fund Weed & Pest Districts at all. For homeowners in towns or subdivisions, the work of weed and pest crews can feel far removed from daily life, even though those residents help foot the bill. That disconnect has fueled broader questions about whether funding should be tied more directly to land use or agricultural benefit rather than spread across all residential taxpayers.

There’s also concern that the white paper paints proposed tax cuts as universally “devastating” without seriously engaging with alternatives.

Some lawmakers and taxpayer advocates argue that Weed & Pest Districts should at least explore other options — whether that’s greater cost-sharing with state or federal partners, user-based fees, or more targeted assessments — before framing tax relief as an existential threat.

Advertisement

Ultimately, critics warn that leaning too heavily on worst-case scenarios could backfire. As Wyoming reexamines how it funds government, public entities are being asked to do more than explain why their mission matters. They’re also being asked to show how they can adapt, improve transparency and deliver services as efficiently and fairly as possible.

Weed & Pest Districts, like schools, hospitals and other tax-supported services, may have to make that case more clearly than ever before. The video below is the story of Wyoming’s Weed and Pest Districts.

Wyoming Weed & Pest’s Most Notorious Species

Gallery Credit: Kolby Fedore, Townsquare Media

Notorious Idaho Murderer’s Home Is Back On The Market

Convicted murderer, Chad Daybell’s home is back on the market. Could you live here?

Gallery Credit: Chris Cardenas

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming battles tougher flu in 2025–26 season, health experts report

Published

on

Wyoming battles tougher flu in 2025–26 season, health experts report


CASPER, Wyo. — While the fall and winter are often highlighted by snowfall and holiday gatherings, the season is also marked by the coughing, running noses and chills that come with the flu. This year, health experts warn of an especially virulent flu in Wyoming and beyond.

Data from the Wyoming Department of Health show that Wyoming saw 426 new influenza cases reported in just the final week of 2025, with well over 1,000 cases in total through flu season thus far in Wyoming. The report also states that, through Dec. 27, there had been 19 deaths in Wyoming caused by the flu this season. Nationally, the CDC reports more than 7.5 million cases of the flu and more than 3,100 deaths.

The uptick in flu cases is seen locally, too, the Natrona County Health Department told Oil City News on Thursday.

“While we don’t have exact numbers locally and only have the statewide data that’s reported, I can definitely say anecdotally that locally we’re seeing the same trends that we’re seeing statewide and nationally,” health department PIO Hailey Bloom said. “There is a surge in the rate across our community, the state and the country.”

Advertisement

Bloom said the surge in cases can partially be attributed to this year’s particular strain. The current flu is a mutated strain known as subclade K, originating from the common flu-causing virus influenza A and its variant H3N2. The strain is one of the more aggressive influenza variants, Bloom said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, subclade K is also more adept at resisting immune systems that have already built up protections against other strains of the virus. Bloom also said this season’s vaccine may not be ideally suited for combating the current strain.

“We use the flu season in the southern hemisphere as a predictor [when crafting the vaccine], and we did see that there were some strains not as effectively combated by this year’s flu shot,” she said. “Some years we get a really, really good match on the flu shot and all of the circulating strains are perfect matches to that shot, and some years it’s not as perfect.”

However, Bloom also said some of the increased cases can be attributed to a lower number of people getting vaccinated, which remains the best way to avoid the virus.

Bloom said 989 Natrona County residents have gotten a flu shot through the health department so far this season. That’s down from the 1,227 distributed in the 2024–25 flu season and the 1,478 the year before that.

Advertisement

The decline in vaccinations similarly mirrors a nationwide trend. In mid-December, the CDC reported that roughly 32.5 million flu shots had been given thus far, which is down about 1.9 million from the same point the prior flu season.

People still in need of a vaccine can get one at the Natrona County Health Department by calling ahead and setting up an appointment or by walking in, Bloom said. Vaccinations can also be administered at other locations like various local pharmacies.

Other than getting vaccinated, tips for avoiding the flu include regularly washing hands, avoiding people you know to be sick, exercising caution if feeling under the weather and dressing appropriately for the weather, Bloom said.

“This year’s flu is more aggressive, more intense and not as well covered by the vaccine, so it’s definitely nasty,” Bloom said. “All that said, the flu shot is still going to give significantly more protection than not getting one.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Former director of Colorado Parks and Wildlife lands a job in Wyoming

Published

on

Former director of Colorado Parks and Wildlife lands a job in Wyoming


This story is part of our Quick Hits series. This series will bring you breaking news and short updates from throughout the state.

The former director of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) agency is joining Wyoming’s Game and Fish Department.

9-News reported that Jeff Davis was hired as the department’s deputy director in late December. That’s after Doug Brimeyer retired.

He starts the job in February.

Advertisement

Davis resigned from CPW last year instead of being fired as part of a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement Davis signed did not directly cite a reason for his termination.

Davis joined CPW as the state reintroduced wolves. His resignation came shortly after Washington state said it would not provide wolves to Colorado’s reintroduction program.

Before joining CPW in 2023, Davis had a long career in the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. While there, he focused on coordinating conservation initiatives involving interdisciplinary teams and salmon recovery.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending