Wyoming
Fear is driving Wyoming politicians, immigrants in divergent directions – WyoFile
At first glance, Jose and Sara are the kind of couple Wyoming politicians like to talk about most. Jose is a welder who works in the oil fields. Until recently, Sara worked at a coal mine.
The couple has helped power the nation, as elected officials often proclaim when touting the state’s energy industry and its workers. And in doing so helped power the state, whose budget leans heavily on tax revenue from the energy sector. They have lived for nearly two decades in Sweetwater County, building community, raising their children and sending them to local schools.
But there’s a wrinkle to this Wyoming story. Jose and Sara are in the country illegally. So elected officials aren’t exalting their lifestyle in speeches in the Wyoming State Capitol or patting them on the back. Instead, through draft legislation, court filings and public remarks, immigrants, even some who are here legally, say Wyoming politicians are putting targets on their backs.
Sara and Jose are not the couple’s real names. WyoFile granted them anonymity so they could speak freely without drawing the attention of federal authorities. Another person in this story also used a pseudonym so that she could talk about members of her family who do not have legal status in the country.
In state politics, as in Washington D.C., illegal immigration is increasingly cast as a near-existential threat, one that drives crime and impoverishes the nation. This legislative session lawmakers have pushed harsh new enforcement measures that they justify with depictions of a flood of dangerous illegal immigrants, often in an echo chamber without opposing voices. Living in the shadows, unable to vote, unfamiliar with the workings of the Legislature and unwilling to draw too much attention to themselves, Jose and Sara think their side of the story goes unheard.
“We came to do the hard work,” Jose said. He’s proud of the labor he and his immigrant colleagues have put into the state’s energy sector over the decades he’s been in Wyoming.
“There are jobs that a lot of people aren’t up for working, and so there’s the Latino,” he said. “When it rains, when it snows, when it gets hot, always there’s the Latino. Working.”
Wyoming residents do not pay a personal income tax, but Jose and Sara both pay state sales taxes and federal income taxes like anyone else drawing a paycheck.
Or at least they used to both draw paychecks.
Sara has recently stopped going to work. She grew too scared of discovery, she told WyoFile. The coal industry is packed with fierce supporters of President Donald Trump, and she worried someone might find out she wasn’t a legal resident of the United States and report her to federal authorities.
Now scared to leave the house, she’s bracing for the worst. She’s afraid she’ll be stopped, found out by law enforcement and deported. She’s afraid her children, even the ones born in the United States, will be harassed. The Trump administration has already challenged the long-held constitutional understanding of birthright citizenship.
Officials in Sara’s adopted state support that endeavor: Wyoming is one of 18 Republican-led states to file a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship.
Mostly today, as the rhetoric directed toward immigrants like her grows ever sharper, Sara is afraid of a future in Wyoming dominated by fear.
“I don’t want to live in fear,” Sara said. “There’s a lot of families like us, in the same situation.”
‘Military-aged male adults’
On Feb. 10, the House Judiciary Committee took testimony from four Wyoming Highway Patrol troopers who deployed to a flashpoint along the Texas border with Mexico. In that hearing, lawmakers and law enforcement together painted a picture of those who come into the country illegally that stood in stark contrast to the story shared by Jose and Sara.
Gov. Mark Gordon sent the troopers in August 2024, as tensions ran high between Texas and the federal government. In a press release announcing the deployment, Gordon said the troopers were going south because Wyoming was “committed to closing the open Biden-Harris border.”
The deployment in fact came amid a sustained drop in illegal border crossings, which had reached a record high in December 2023, according to Pew Research Center, which compiles data on the number of apprehensions of unauthorized migrants by U.S. Border Patrol agents. By August 2024, however, increased enforcement by the Mexican government and actions by President Joe Biden’s administration had brought those encounters to the lowest levels of Biden’s term, and to a level below the high mark of the first Donald Trump administration, according to experts.
The Mexican National Guard began to patrol its side of the border in the winter of 2024, Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, an analyst with the Migration Policy Institute, told WyoFile. Two months before Wyoming troopers’ August deployment, Biden implemented a rule that capped the number of people the country would grant asylum to daily. That spurred a sharp drop in attempts to enter the country outside established ports of entry, Putzel-Kavanaugh said, and drove migrant families, in particular, to wait in Mexico until they could receive a hearing with border patrol authorities.
But whatever the statistics, the troopers told lawmakers that on the ground the border remained a troubled place, where smugglers and migrants kept Texas law enforcement constantly busy. They described constant vehicle pursuits, large-scale warrant services and dangerous traffic stops looking for smuggled migrants.
“The problems that Texas is facing are massive, the amount of police work that is there is infinite,” Trooper Ethan Smith told the committee.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Art Washut, R-Casper, asked the troopers what types of border crossers law enforcement was encountering most.
“Primarily military-aged male adults,” Smith said.
Describing men crossing the border as military-aged or fighting-aged has grown more common among conservatives. Critics of the labeling say younger men are also the demographic most likely to take risks in search of opportunities to earn money — risks like leaving their homeland and illegally crossing into the United States.
Crossing the border is physically taxing, limiting the number of older adults who try it, Putzel-Kavanuagh said. Historically, men have been more common border crossers than women and have generally sought to establish themselves in the United States before bringing up other family members, she said.
Wyoming should consider procuring the type of bulletproof vests, drones and surveillance equipment the 12 troopers saw deployed by their counterparts in Texas, Rep. Lee Filer, R-Cheyenne, said during the meeting. He expressed fear that a threat was massing in Colorado, given its more liberal policies toward undocumented immigrants.
“Not even 100 miles south of here this is allowed,” Filer said. “They’re allowed to just come in.”
Wyoming, he said, may need to better equip its troopers “to make sure that one, they’re protected, and, two, they’re protecting us.”

Sgt. Brad White told lawmakers about his visit to a state park in the border city of Eagle Pass. The park became the flashpoint in a standoff between Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and the federal government in January 2024. Abbott ordered Texas law enforcement and the Texas National Guard to occupy the state park, which is next to an international bridge and block Border Patrol from using it to process people crossing the border.
White described Shelby Park as now militarized, with shipping containers used as walls and long coils of barbed or razor-sharp wire strung across the park and in the Rio Grande River. The Texas trooper he was working with told White about a wash of desperate humanity in the park, with areas “knee deep” in clothing and foreign passports shed by people crossing and seeking asylum. People receiving asylum are required to leave many of their belongings behind and carry only things they can fit into a small Department of Homeland Security-issued bag, according to previous news reporting.
White shared one story about a migrant who was not a military-aged adult. One day, he was tasked with interviewing a 13-year-old girl from Guatemala who had been caught crossing the border. Though the girl had begun her border crossing with a group, but told officers she had been abandoned. The girl was lacerated with cuts from the razor wire, White said.
The ‘right way’
Sweetwater County resident Elizabeth, not her real name, first entered the United States when she was 10 years old. She was not smuggled across the border and did not have to avoid razor wire but instead came in on a visa that expired when she was 15.
Today, she’s a mental health worker. When she was studying for her master’s degree at the University of Wyoming, even some of her close friends did not know she wasn’t legally in the country. Now in her mid-twenties, Elizabeth just became a legal resident last year. She achieved that status by marrying a U.S. citizen. In a few more years she can become a citizen herself.
Had she not gotten married, Elizabeth did not see a path to becoming a legal citizen, she told WyoFile.
“You always hear that argument, ‘If you’re going to come here, do it the right way,’” she said. “There isn’t a right way. The only reason I’m here and I have status is because I got married. I have a master’s degree, I speak English, I’ve been here for more than 10 years and it still wasn’t an option.”
Sara echoed that sentiment. She became eligible for a special visa issued to victims of a crime in 2016, after an assault. That program, called a U-visa, could have provided her protected status at least for a time. But she has spent years pursuing it, she said, and thousands of dollars on lawyers.
“What is the right way?” Sara said. “I’ve been in the immigration system for more than 13 years.”
While Elizabeth now has legal status, her 18-year-old sister, who lives in Wyoming as well, does not. Elizabeth is scared that her sister might be caught up in the Trump administration’s widening drive to deport people, though her sister does not have any criminal record. A recent Senate bill brought by Torrington Republican Cheri Steinmetz would have made it a felony to knowingly transport or shelter an undocumented person. That measure would have made Elizabeth a criminal for giving her sister a ride, she noted.
Senators killed Steinmetz’s bill, 20-10, on Feb. 10.
But Republicans, both at the state level and nationally, aren’t moving toward creating any clearer pathways to citizenship. With Gordon and Wyoming’s government in full support, they seek instead to strike at one of the most bedrock routes.
Until Trump issued an executive order to unilaterally end it, citizenship for babies born in the U.S. had been an unchallenged constitutional principle since a U.S. Supreme Court case in 1898.
In a brief calling for the court to uphold Trump’s order, Wyoming Attorney General Bridget Hill and her colleagues argued that the principle was bad for the country. And in doing so, the Republican attorneys general, like lawmakers in Cheyenne, sweepingly cast immigrants as a public safety threat.
“For the past four years, disastrous immigration policies transformed every State into a border state by flooding them with illegal aliens, including criminals convicted of crimes in their home country, violent international gang members, and suspected ISIS terrorists,” the brief read. “Illegal immigration imposes significant costs on the States and their people. And creating incentives for illegal immigration puts lives at risk.”
The brief contends immigrant births drive up Medicaid and other costs — both for the medical care accompanying the birth and for the life of the child. “As American citizens, these children may, for example, participate in state welfare programs, receive state healthcare, and obtain a driver’s license.” The brief does not note that those children will likely grow up to be tax-paying adults with jobs — and like Elizabeth, the mental health worker, some might even take jobs in fields where Wyoming faces an acute shortage.
Even Jose, with his pride in the Latino work ethic, agrees that some people come into the country with criminal intent, and he takes no issue with the government finding and deporting them. But criminals mark the slimmest minority of those crossing the border, he said.

Media and political attention have focused on specific instances of horrific crimes committed by undocumented immigrants. But outside those cases, academic studies and research conducted by immigration advocacy groups have not found any link between migration and increased crime. Studies instead have found that immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than U.S.-born citizens. The brief by the Republican attorneys general does not offer any statistical rebuke of those studies — stating only that crimes by undocumented immigrants “have elicited national outrage and bipartisan response.”
Migrants that arrive in big waves can strain a community’s services. But Sara feels she and her children benefit, not burden, the state where they’ve long been working, living and going to school.
“We don’t commit crimes, we pay our taxes and we don’t receive any social programming from the government,” she said.
Documents and burdens
Rosa Reyna-Pugh’s family has been in the United States for a long time. Her mom came to the country in 1972 and today has lawful residency — she received a green card during the 1970s and 80s, decades when green cards were more available. It still took her 10 years. Reyna-Pugh and her sister are citizens. They spent their childhood in the Rio Grande Valley along the Texas-Mexico border.
The sisters grew up with immigration agents eating next to them in restaurants and evaluating rumors of deportations and workplace raids, they told WyoFile. A heavy law enforcement presence has been part of life along the Rio Grande River since long before Wyoming troopers deployed there.
That exposure to immigration enforcement has helped them spread calm to friends in Wyoming who are worried.

“We’re not in complete panic, but I think we’re more panicking on the policy side of things, because we better understand it,” Reyna-Pugh said.
She and her husband, a military veteran, moved to Wyoming from Mississippi in 2017, and her family followed. The southern state’s economy was struggling. Reyna-Pugh and her sister also often felt people were looking at them as foreigners, they said. Today, she contributes to Wyoming’s civic life as an organizer with the Equality State Policy Center, including through a program for better Latino political advocacy. She lives in Rock Springs with her family but is a presence in the state capitol.
But the more she reads stories about people being detained and questioned, even though they’re citizens, and the more she sees bills like Steinmetz’s or hears increasing rhetoric about criminalizing all immigrants, the more she worries.
Other legislation that would make life harder for Wyoming immigrant families continues to make its way through the Legislature.
Jose and Sara carry driver’s licenses they acquired in New Mexico. That state issues driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants, as do 18 others. The Wyoming House passed a bill that would invalidate those driver’s licenses in Wyoming. A senate committee advanced that bill Tuesday.
Reyna-Pugh, her sister and mother have begun carrying their passports with them, anytime they leave the house.
“I’m afraid they’re going to come and pull me in, ask me ‘Where are your papers?’” her sister Rosario said.
She and her family, particularly her husband and sister, talk more and more often about moving to Mexico. Reyna-Pugh sees the defeat of Steinmetz’s bill as a temporary setback for political forces bent on making life difficult for immigrants. Regardless of her citizenship status, those efforts will make Wyoming a more complicated place to live for someone with her skin color and heritage.
“It’s never going to stop,” she said, comparing Steinmetz’s bill to the Hydra, the many-headed monster of Greek mythology. “We might kill this bill, but another one is going to pop up.”
Wyoming
Idaho semitruck driver involved in fatal accident at Wyoming FlyingJ – East Idaho News
The following is a news release from the Wyoming’s Rock Springs Police Department:
ROCK SPRINGS, Wyo. — The Rock Springs Police Department is investigating a fatal incident that occurred early this morning in the parking lot of the Flying J Travel Center.
At approximately 5:00 a.m., a Flying J employee was working to direct commercial vehicle traffic within the lot. Initial findings suggest that as one semitruck began to move, the employee was positioned between that vehicle and a second stationary vehicle. The employee was subsequently pinned between the two units.
Rock Springs Fire Department and Castle Rock Ambulance arrived on the scene and coordinated life-saving measures. Despite the rapid response and medical intervention, the employee was pronounced deceased at the scene.
The identity of the deceased is being withheld at this time pending the notification of family members.
The driver involved in the incident, a resident of Idaho, remained on-site and has been fully cooperative with investigators. Following an initial statement and questioning, the driver was released. While the investigation remains open, the incident currently appears to be a tragic accident.
We extend our deepest condolences to the family of the deceased and the staff at Flying J. We also want to commend the rapid response and professional life-saving efforts coordinated by Rock Springs Fire and Castle Rock Ambulance during this difficult call.
=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>
Wyoming
Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon won’t seek a third term. He won’t rule out running for other offices, either
(WYOFILE) – Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon will not seek a third term, his office announced Thursday. However, the two-term Republican governor has not ruled out running for another office.
“He’s still kind of exploring his options,” Amy Edmonds, Gordon’s spokesperson, told WyoFile.
As candidates across Wyoming have announced bids for various statewide offices in recent months, Gordon has been tight-lipped about his own plans, leading to speculation that he would put the state’s gubernatorial term limits to the test.
In two opinions about a decade apart, the Wyoming Supreme Court ruled that term limits on legislators as well as on most top elected positions in the state were unconstitutional. While the high court has not addressed the qualifications for governor, it’s been widely suggested that a court challenge would be successful. Such was the discussion in 2010, when Democratic Gov. Dave Freudenthal ultimately chose not to seek a third term.
There’s also been speculation that Gordon may run for Congress, which he’s done in the past. In 2008, Gordon ran for the U.S. House of Representatives. He was ultimately defeated by Cynthia Lummis in the primary election. If Gordon seeks the seat in 2026, he’ll join a crowded field that has already attracted at least 10 Republicans. It’s possible he could also be eyeing a run for Wyoming’s soon-to-be open U.S. Senate seat — a choice that would pit him against Rep. Harriet Hageman, whom he defeated in the governor’s race in 2018.
Wyoming’s candidate filing period opens for two weeks at the end of May.
As for the rest of Gordon’s final term in the governor’s office, his “focus remains on essential pillars like supporting core industries, growing Wyoming’s economy, strengthening local communities and families, and safeguarding Wyoming’s vital natural resources,” according to the Thursday press release.
Starting in June, Gordon will set out on a series of community visits to “engage directly with citizens,” the release states, and is particularly interested in having discussions about “protecting our resilient property tax base that funds local services like education, fire protection, police services and others, as well as honoring local control, investing in our future through smart saving and continued stewardship of our wildlife, land, and water.”
The governor also pointed to the Aug. 18 primary election.
“You don’t have to be Governor to make a difference in Wyoming,” Gordon wrote. “Participating in elections is something all of us can do to make a real difference, and these conversations are important to have to ensure everyone makes informed decisions about the future of Wyoming.”
Whether Gordon will run for office is one lingering question — to what degree he will support other candidates is another.
In 2024, Gordon personally spent more than $160,000 on statehouse races, backing non-Wyoming Freedom Caucus Republicans who generally aligned with his positions on energy, economic diversification, mental health services and education.
While many of those races did not go Gordon’s way — the Freedom Caucus won control of the House — the governor is coming off a legislative budget session where lawmakers largely approved his proposed budget.
More specifically, the Legislature’s final budget came in about $53 million shy of the governor’s $11 billion recommendations after significant cuts were floated by the Freedom Caucus lawmakers ahead of the session. Many of those notable cuts — including to the University of Wyoming and the Wyoming Business Council — were ultimately rejected.
While Gordon applauded the final budget, he also said in March he was “saddened by some of the reductions,” including the Legislature’s decision to nix SUN Bucks, the summer food program that fills the gap for kids when there are no school lunches. Wednesday, however, the governor signed an executive order that will start delivering food benefits to Wyoming families as early as June.
Details for Gordon’s upcoming community visits will be posted to the governor’s website, according to the press release.
See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.
Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.
Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.
Wyoming
(LETTERS) Wyoming Supreme Court judges, congressional responsibility, pregnancy and US involvement in the Middle East
Oil City News publishes letters, cartoons and opinions as a public service. The content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Oil City News or its employees. Letters to the editor can be submitted by following the link at our opinion section.
Wyoming Supreme Court judge process better than federal’s
Dear Casper,
This letter is in response to Mr. Ross Schriftman’s letter to the editor from April 11. His opinion appears to be that the Wyoming process of selecting Wyoming Supreme Court justices is somehow flawed. Justices are selected through a merit-based assisted appointment process. When a vacancy occurs, a seven-member Judicial Nominating Commission recommends three candidates to the governor, who appoints one.
Appointed justices serve at least one year before standing in a nonpartisan retention election for an eight-year term.
The commission consists of the chief justice as chair/tie-breaker, three attorneys selected by the Wyoming State Bar and three non-attorneys appointed by the governor. The governor must select one of the three nominees provided by the commission to fill the vacancy.
After serving at least one year, justices stand for retention in the next general election. Voters cast a “yes” or “no” vote. If retained, the justice serves an eight-year term.
Candidates must be U.S. citizens, Wyoming residents for at least three years, licensed to practice law, and have at least nine years of legal experience. Justices must retire at age 70.
U.S. Supreme Court are appointed for life!
I would offer that the Wyoming process is superior to that of the U.S. Constitution. Voters are involved the process, which we are not at the federal level.
Wyoming justices can be impeached and removed from office by the state House of Representatives and Senate.
Michael Bond
Casper
Wyoming delegation must answer for President Trump’s Iran policy
Dear Casper,
Sent this to each of our Wyoming congressional delegates. I lived in Montana for years. These are the questions the Daily Montanan asked of their elected congressional representatives.
I ask the same questions of our Wyoming delegation. Montana got no answers. I doubt that we will either.
- President Donald Trump has continued to threaten to hit targets that would affect or kill civilians in Iran. Do you support his stated objectives and deadlines?
- Are you concerned that some of these targets could be construed as attacking civilians and therefore become war crimes?
- Do you have any concerns about wiping out an entire civilization, as Trump has threatened?
- If these are only rhetorical threats, what does that do to our stature in the world when we make threats, but don’t follow through with them?
- Polls have continued to show more than a majority of Americans do not support the efforts against Iran. Why do you support the effort?
- If you do not support the effort in Iran, at what point would you support Congressional intervention or oversight on the issue?
- Have you been briefed and do you believe that there are clear objectives in this war with Iran, and how can you communicate those with your constituents?
- The U.S. has repeatedly criticized Vladimir Putin and Russia for its invasion and treatment of the Ukrainian people and it sovereignty. How does that differ from America’s “excursion” into Iran?
- What is your message for Montanans who are seeing gas prices and the cost of living generally increase?
- Last week, President Trump said that America doesn’t have enough money for healthcare and childcare; further, those things must be left to the individual states in order to fund the military? Do you agree?
- President Trump continues to boost military budgets and request additional funding for the war in Iran. Do you support these?
Tami Munari
Laramie
Pregnancy is personal, not political
Dear Casper,
The recent Wyoming Supreme Court ruling, which affirmed abortion is health care, has caused some who disagree with the ruling to attack Wyoming’s judicial system.
In an opinion letter, candidate Ross Schriftman facetiously writes, “…our God-given First Amendment right of free speech does not apply when criticizing our fellow citizen judges.”
This is the first flaw in his logic because the Constitution was not written by God, therefore the right of freedom of speech was thought up and written by men. God is not the author nor guarantor of personal freedoms — our Constitution and judicial system are.
The second flaw in his argument references a letter signed by 111 professionally-trained, experienced, and well-respected Wyoming judges and attorneys explaining how the courts arrive at their rulings. It is illogical to claim we are all “citizen judges” because even though citizens have a constitutionally-guaranteed right to an opinion, it does not make every citizen a legal expert. The judges’ and attorneys’ excellent letter speaks for itself.
Mr. Schriftman claims the Supreme Court, “… create(d) an absurd definition of health care to include the intentional murder of pre-born human persons; something they did to justify overriding the equal protection clause… .” This logic is flawed because it is based on a conflation of an obsession with “pre-born human persons” and equal protection under the law.
There is significant disagreement on the issue of fetal personhood and who gets to determine it: the doctors? the lawyers? the pregnant woman? the anti-choice crowd?
Many understand and appreciate it has taken women almost 200 years to gain and keep Equal Protection Under the Law, and the disagreement over who is legally, materially, and morally responsible for a fertilized human egg has always been part this historical struggle. But it was the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that finally established a constitutional right, for women and men, to private health care decisions and, since pregnancy is a health condition, that included abortion.
Even though it wasn’t explicit, Roe also effectively affirmed that bestowing of “personhood” is a private determination to be made by the pregnant woman and her God. But, sadly, here we are again, dealing with folks who mistakenly believe they have a right to interfere in someone else’s pregnancy.
The Rev. L Kee
Casper
Why does the U.S. keep troops in oil producing countries?
Dear Casper,
There are two facts that don’t ever seem to be considered by our government that cost us dearly.
Osama Bin Laden said the stationing of U.S. troops in the Middle East was the reason Al Qaeda attacked us on 9/11. Does the U.S. believe that the oil producing countries in the Middle East will only sell us oil if we force them to by stationing troops there? I’m not aware of any other countries that believe that.
The other fact is, the U.S. is the only country to ever use a nuclear weapon offensively. There are several countries that have nuclear weapons, including North Korea. The reason countries have been reluctant to use nuclear weapons is MAD, mutually assured destruction. Consequently, is it reasonable to expect Iran, should they develop a nuclear weapon, to attack the U.S., knowing that our superiority in nuclear capability would assure the complete destruction of their country? It clearly would be suicidal for them to do so.
But, just to be cautious, rather than destroying the entire country to deter Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, wouldn’t it make more sense to destroy their nuclear infrastructure?
Bill Douglass
Casper
Related
-
Oregon4 minutes agoSmall Oregon town residents’ trust shaken as state sues disaster nonprofit founder
-
Pennsylvania10 minutes agoMother, 6 children die in Central Pennsylvania house explosion, state police say
-
Rhode Island16 minutes agoThe Real Housewives of Rhode Island Recap: Wrong Side of the Tracks
-
South-Carolina22 minutes agoSouth Carolina Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for April 19, 2026
-
South Dakota28 minutes agoFCS Football Recruiting Roundup: South Dakota, Montana State Target 2027 Defensive Standouts
-
Tennessee34 minutes agoNashville Sounds and Autism Tennessee partner to host inclusive Beyond the Label Day for local children
-
Texas40 minutes agoTexas A&M Forward Transfer Seemingly on Visit to See Lady Vols Basketball | Rocky Top Insider
-
Utah46 minutes agoGolden Knights vs. Mammoth Game 1 prediction: NHL odds, picks, best bets for Stanley Cup Playoffs