Connect with us

Wyoming

Alec Baldwin looking to toss defamation suit from family of Wyoming Marine killed in Afghanistan

Published

on

Alec Baldwin looking to toss defamation suit from family of Wyoming Marine killed in Afghanistan


Attorneys for Alec Baldwin are asking a federal decide to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him of defaming the household of a Wyoming Marine killed in Afghanistan, current court docket filings present.

Based on a movement for dismissal, Baldwin says he was expressing his constitutionally protected political opinion concerning the Jan. 6 riots, quite than defaming the Marine’s sister and widow as their grievance alleges. The actor’s lawyer additionally argues the case doesn’t have standing in Wyoming, since Baldwin has no connection to the state.

Baldwin donated $5,000 to one in all Rylee McCollum’s sisters after the 20-year-old Marine from Bondurant was killed in a Kabul airport bombing in August, in accordance with the preliminary grievance.

Advertisement

In January, when Roice McCollum posted a photograph from a Jan. 6, 2021, demonstration in Washington, D.C., Baldwin commented to verify she was the one who acquired his donation.

They exchanged personal messages, court docket filings state, through which Baldwin accused her of being a “January sixth rioter” and mentioned her actions resulted in property destruction and the demise of an officer. McCollum instructed him she was protesting legally and had already met with the FBI.

Baldwin reposted her picture to his personal account, which had 2.4 million followers on the time, in accordance with court docket paperwork. He referred to as claims of non-violent protests on Jan. 6 had been “bulls***” and indicated he would take away the submit the next day. The picture, in addition to his touch upon her unique submit, have been deleted.

Advertisement

McCollum acquired tons of of “hostile, aggressive, hateful” messages from Baldwin’s followers after that, in accordance with the grievance, inflicting her and the opposite plaintiffs within the case misery, nervousness and concern.

Whereas McCollum’s counsel argues Baldwin acted maliciously in reposting the picture, alleging he knew it might deliver them harassment, the actor’s movement says the act couldn’t be malicious as a result of there have been no recognized factual inaccuracies in his caption.

It additionally argues Baldwin shouldn’t be held accountable for messages despatched by different individuals.

Advertisement

“Would this case exist if Baldwin weren’t a widely known actor? Would Plaintiffs be asking for $25 million? No, clearly not,” the movement reads. “It is a political dispute masquerading as a lawsuit, motivated additional by cash. The general public sq.—not this Court docket—is the right place to debate Alec Baldwin’s opinion.”

In a response filed this week, legal professionals for the McCollums mentioned Baldwin’s remark calling Roice an “insurrectionist” was accusing her of felony exercise and due to this fact defaming her “by implication.” In addition they say that Baldwin’s actions had been extra severe due to his giant following.

“As evidenced by the followers’ responses to Baldwin’s publication, the implication on this false assertion is that Plaintiffs are rioters, traitors, racists, Nazis, or white supremacists who sought to overthrow the US democracy,” their response states.

Advertisement

Baldwin’s movement argues “riot” isn’t a felony cost, and is quite an expression of his opinion of the occasions of Jan. 6.

“This case isn’t about whether or not you’re a Democrat, whether or not you’re a Republican,” mentioned Luke Nikas, one in all Baldwin’s longtime legal professionals. “It’s about whether or not you imagine within the first modification and within the U.S. and Wyoming constitutions and freedom of speech.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wyoming

Wyoming judge strikes down state's abortion bans – UPI.com

Published

on

Wyoming judge strikes down state's abortion bans – UPI.com


President Biden supporters wave a sign supporting abortion rights at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida during a rally on April 23, 2024. A Wyoming judge struck down that state’s abortion restrictions on Monday. File Photo by Steve Nesius/UPI | License Photo

Nov. 19 (UPI) — A county district judge in Wyoming blocked two state laws that limited abortion access, ruling that they violated the state’s constitution.

Teton County Judge Melissa Owens said the laws — Wyoming’s Life Act and the Medication Abortion Ban — violated a woman’s personal autonomy in making her own medical decisions.

In her ruling, Owens said that Wyoming state legislators had “enacted laws that impede the fundamental right to make health care decisions for an entire class of people, pregnant women.”

She went on to describe the laws, which restrict abortions at the earliest stages of development, did not distinguish between pre-viable and viable fetuses, imposing “unreasonable and unnecessary” restrictions.

Advertisement

Owens had already blocked the laws from going into effect after they were passed last year while court cases challenging the provisions played out in court. The laws are permanently banned, but the state is expected to appeal to the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Jay Jerde, a state special assistant attorney general, told the court last year that Wyoming’s constitutional amendment does not apply to abortions but addresses women’s health in illness. Jerde said the woman is making decisions about her health and the health of the fetus.

But Owens rejected the premise, saying that the “uncontested facts establish that the abortion statutes fail to accomplish any of the asserted interests by the state.

“The state did not present any evidence refuting or challenging the extensive medical testimony presented by the plaintiffs,” she said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Judge strikes down Wyoming’s anti-abortion laws in victory for rights advocates

Published

on

Judge strikes down Wyoming’s anti-abortion laws in victory for rights advocates


A Wyoming judge has struck down the state’s overall ban on abortion and its first-in-the-country explicit prohibition on the use of medication to end pregnancy – in line with voters in further states voicing support for abortion rights.

The Teton county district judge, Melissa Owens, has ruled three times since 2022 to block the laws while they were disputed in court.

The decision on Monday marks another victory for abortion rights advocates after voters in seven states passed measures in support of access.

One of the Wyoming laws that Owens said violated women’s rights under the state constitution bans abortion except to protect a pregnant woman’s life or in cases involving rape and incest. The other made Wyoming the only state to explicitly ban abortion pills, though other states have instituted de facto bans on the medication by broadly prohibiting abortion.

Advertisement

The laws were challenged by four women, two of whom are obstetricians, as well as two nonprofit organizations. One of the groups, Wellspring Health Access, opened as the state’s first full-service abortion clinic in years in April 2023 after an arson attack in 2022.

“This is a wonderful day for the citizens of Wyoming – and women everywhere, who should have control over their own bodies,” said the Wellspring Health Access president, Julie Burkhart.

Abortion rights protesters chant slogans during a gathering to protest against the supreme court’s decision in the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health case on 24 June 2022 in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Photograph: Natalie Behring/Getty Images

Currently, 13 states are enforcing bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with limited exceptions, and four have bans that kick in at or about six weeks into pregnancy – before many women realise they’re pregnant.

Nearly every ban has been challenged with a lawsuit. Courts have blocked the enforcement of some restrictions, including bans throughout pregnancy in Utah and Wyoming. Judges struck down bans in Georgia and North Dakota in September 2024. Georgia’s supreme court ruled the next month that the ban there can be enforced while it considers the case.

In the Wyoming case, the women and nonprofits who challenged the laws argued that the bans stood to harm their health, wellbeing and livelihoods – claims disputed by attorneys for the state. They also argued the bans violated a 2012 state constitutional amendment saying competent Wyoming residents have a right to make their own health care decisions.

Advertisement

As she had done with previous rulings, Owens found merit in both of these arguments. The abortion bans “will undermine the integrity of the medical profession by hamstringing the ability of physicians to provide evidence-based medicine to their patients”, Owens ruled.

The abortion laws impede the fundamental right of women to make health care decisions for an entire class of people – those who are pregnant – in violation of the constitutional amendment, Owens ruled.

Wyoming voters approved the amendment amid fears of government overreach after approval of the federal Affordable Care Act and its initial requirements for people to have health insurance. Attorneys for the state argued that health care, under the amendment, did not include abortion. The Republican governor, Mark Gordon, who signed the abortion laws into effect in 2022 and 2023, did not immediately return an email from the Associated Press on Monday seeking comment.

Both sides wanted Owens to rule on the lawsuit challenging the abortion bans rather than allow it to go to trial in the spring. A three-day bench trial before Owens was previously set, but will not be necessary with this ruling.

The recent US elections saw voters in Missouri clear the way to undo one of the country’s most restrictive abortion bans.

Advertisement

Abortion rights amendments also passed in Arizona, Colorado, Maryland and Montana. Nevada voters approved an amendment in support of abortion rights, but they will need to pass it again in 2026 for it to take effect. Another that bans discrimination on the basis of “pregnancy outcomes” prevailed in New York. Florida, Nebraska and South Dakota, meanwhile, defeated constitutional amendments, leaving bans in place.

The abortion landscape underwent a seismic shift in 2022 when the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade. The 2022 ruling ended a nationwide right to abortion and cleared the way for bans to take effect in most Republican-controlled states.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Five of Wyoming's Nasty Pests Trying to Get into Your Home this Winter

Published

on

Five of Wyoming's Nasty Pests Trying to Get into Your Home this Winter


As the days get shorter and colder, winter pests, including invasive species, are settling into homes across the United States as they seek shelter ahead of winter.

While pests like rodents and cockroaches are well-known by homeowners, others can be just as troublesome, often with less awareness about the threats they pose and their impact on existing ecosystems.

Some species, such as ticks and red fire ants, can be a health concern.

These guys can rapidly take over new environments, disrupting nature and causing concern for both entomologists and pest control. Some species are less harmful than others, but it’s important that homeowners to be informed about each one. This awareness helps prevent unnecessary alarm and ensures homeowners are prepared if a species does become a threat.

Advertisement

5 Potentially Dangerous Pests to Keep Out of Your House

Bugs commonly overwinter indoors to stay toasty and dry. Some are driven in by easy access to food sources. Be on the lookout for the ones that can be dangerous, if not downright repulsive, to keep you and your loved ones safe this winter .

Gallery Credit: Kolby Fedore, TSM

Top 10 Deadliest States for Highway Driving

A study using data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration from 2017 to 2021 determines which states have the highest rates of driver fatalities on freeways.

Gallery Credit: Kolby Fedore, Townsquare Media





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending