Connect with us

Washington

What to watch for in Trump’s federal immunity appeals hearing | CNN Politics

Published

on

What to watch for in Trump’s federal immunity appeals hearing | CNN Politics



Washington
CNN
 — 

A federal appeals court hears arguments Tuesday over whether Donald Trump is immune from prosecution for actions he took after the 2020 election, one of the key questions that could determine the former president’s legal and political fate in 2024.

Trump plans to attend the oral arguments in the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit where a three-judge panel will decide whether the federal charges brought against him by special counsel Jack Smith should be dismissed based on Trump’s claims of immunity.

Trump’s presence at the 9:30 a.m. ET hearing Tuesday – less than week before the Iowa caucuses – underscores how intertwined Trump’s legal and political worlds have become, as the former president has made the four criminal indictments against him a key part of his pitch to his supporters in the 2024 campaign.

Advertisement

The immunity question is ultimately expected to end up before the Supreme Court, one of several consequential questions the high court will take up related to Trump this year. On Friday, the US Supreme Court said it would review next month the Colorado Supreme Court’s unprecedented decision to remove Trump from its state ballot.

Trump faces four counts from Smith’s election subversion charges, including conspiring to defraud the United States and to obstruct an official proceeding. The former president has pleaded not guilty.

Here’s what to know for Tuesday’s arguments:

District Judge Tanya Chutkan has declined to dismiss the election subversion charges against Trump, ruling that he does not have absolute immunity for what he said and did after the 2020 election.

“Whatever immunities a sitting President may enjoy, the United States has only one Chief Executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass,” Chutkan wrote. “Former Presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability.”

Advertisement

Trump appealed that decision to the appeals court.

Trump’s attorneys have argued that his actions trying to overturn the 2020 election fell within his duties as president because Trump was working to “ensure election integrity” as part of his official capacity as president, and therefore he is immune from criminal prosecution.

CNN legal analyst breaks down strength of Trump’s immunity argument

Advertisement

Smith in a filing last month pushed back on Trump’s claims of absolute immunity, arguing that Trump’s sweeping assertion “threatens to license Presidents to commit crimes to remain in office.”

The former president has also argued that because the Senate acquitted him on an impeachment charge in the weeks after the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, that the Justice Department cannot charge him with the same crime.

The three judges who will hear Trump’s case Tuesday are J. Michelle Childs, a Joe Biden appointee; Florence Pan, a Biden appointee; and Karen LeCraft Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee.

Advertisement

Henderson has previously heard several cases involving the former president, including whether Congress could access Trump’s tax records and whether the House could enforce a subpoena on former White House counsel Don McGahn. She has repeatedly expressed concerns about safeguarding the special protections around the presidency in her previous opinions.

Childs took the bench in July 2022. She was on Biden’s shortlist to replace outgoing Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, but he ultimately picked Ketanji Brown Jackson. Before joining the appeals court, Childs was a federal judge in North Carolina since 2010.

Pan was nominated to the appeals court by Biden in mid-2022 to fill the seat vacated by Jackson after she was confirmed to the Supreme Court. Previously, Pan served as a judge for the Superior and District courts in DC for more than 10 years.

John Sauer will be the attorney arguing on behalf of Trump.

James Pearce will be the attorney arguing on behalf of the special counsel’s office.

Advertisement

Trial timing and 2024 campaign on collision course

The appeals court hearing will be the latest courtroom that Trump will turn into part of his presidential campaign.

Trump is attending the arguments Tuesday, though he will not be asked any questions by the judges directly. He then goes ahead to Iowa ahead of Monday’s caucuses, though he will return to the east coast to attend closing arguments in his New York civil fraud trial on Thursday. (Both court appearances are voluntary.)

Trump has made the four criminal indictments against him, including two from Smith, a central part of his presidential campaign, and he’s repeatedly railed against both the criminal and civil prosecutions against him as alleged election interference.

For Smith, the appellate court’s work is significant not just for his indictment to withstand the former president’s challenge, but also because it will affect how quickly the trial against Trump could take place.

Chutkan had originally scheduled the election subversion trial for March, but the trial deadlines are paused while Trump’s appeal moves through the appeals process. The question of presidential immunity is likely to end up at the Supreme Court regardless of how the appellate court rules, meaning the timing of the trial remains up in the air and could be delayed.

Advertisement

Smith took the extraordinary and unusual step late last year to ask the Supreme Court to skip the appeals courts and fast-track the issue of presidential immunity. But the justices denied that request without comment or noted dissent.

Once Tuesday’s hearing concludes in the federal election subversion case, the panel of appeals judges could issue a written ruling at any time. It will not rule from the bench.

In addition to an appeal to the Supreme Court, either side could also ask for the case to be reheard by the entire DC Court of Appeals, which could result in more delays.

The question of presidential immunity goes beyond the special counsel’s election subversion case.

On Monday, Trump made the same claims of immunity in the election subversion case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, saying it should be thrown out because he is protected from prosecution under presidential immunity.

Advertisement

Several courts have already ruled against Trump on the question of presidential immunity and civil cases brought against the former president.

The DC appeals court ruled late last year that Trump was not immune from civil lawsuits brought by Democrats in Congress and Capitol Police officers related to the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack.

“(W)hen he acts outside the functions of his office, he does not continue to enjoy immunity,” the court opinion reads. “When he acts in an unofficial, private capacity, he is subject to civil suits like any private citizen.”

A federal appeals court in New York also rejected Trump’s claims of presidential immunity in his effort to delay his defamation trial in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll. A trial is set to begin next week to determine damages Trump owes Carroll for defamation, after a federal appeals court denied Trump’s effort to delay the trial.

Advertisement



Source link

Washington

Tracking crime in the DMV: Some areas see drop in violent crime, homicide

Published

on

Tracking crime in the DMV: Some areas see drop in violent crime, homicide


It is not the way any homicide squad wants to start an already busy new year.

Prince George’s County police Sunday were trying to figure out who was found dead in a car behind a strip center overnight and why. Police, who responded after a call about gun shots, told News4 they’re still searching for the most basic details.

It comes just a day after three people were shot and killed at a Temple Hills banquet hall early Saturday morning. Police told News4 that investigation is active and showing signs of promise.

But the busy start somewhat hides the bigger picture about crime in the area.

Advertisement

Despite the tough start to 2026, homicide in Prince George’s County was down 40% in 2025 percent compared to 2024, and violent crime on a whole was down 19%, both through mid-December according to Prince George’s County police.

In D.C. is a similar story.

“Now we have no crime in Washington, DC. We have no killing,” said President Donald Trump Saturday during a news conference about action in Venezuela.

While the crime rate is not nearly as good as Trump has repeatedly said, the District recorded five homicides in December and 126 in all of 2025. That’s down 32% over 2024. Violent crime is down 29%, according to D.C .police crime statistics.

In Fairfax, homicide is down 14% — but the county only had 12 total — and violent crime dropped 4%, according to the county’s online reporting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Commanders vs. Eagles | How to watch, listen and live stream

Published

on

Commanders vs. Eagles | How to watch, listen and live stream


Mariota, who is dealing with a cut on his throwing hand and a quad injury, was considered doubtful to play in Week 18, Quinn said earlier in the week, and has not practiced since sustaining his injuries. Josh Johnson is set to make his second start to close out the Commanders’ season.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Cowboys 2025 rookie report: Promise and problems against Washington

Published

on

Cowboys 2025 rookie report: Promise and problems against Washington


The Dallas Cowboys managed to scrape a win on Christmas Day against the Washington Commanders in a game that got close, closer than what some fans would have preferred. But how did the Cowboys rookie class perform during the divisional victory? Let’s take a look.

(Game stats- Snaps: 92, Pass Blocks: 49, Pressures: 1, Sacks: 2, Penalties: 1)

Booker turned in another heavy-workload performance against Washington on Christmas Day, playing all 92 offensive snaps and earning a 74.6 overall grade, one of the better marks on the Cowboys’ offense in the 30–23 win. Dallas leaned hard on the interior run game, piling up 211 rushing yards and repeatedly gashing the middle of the Commanders’ front. Booker was a big part of those double teams and combo blocks with Cooper Beebe, helping Malik Davis and Javonte Williams stay on schedule and letting Brian Schottenheimer live in fourth-and-short territory.

It wasn’t a clean day in protection for the unit as a whole. Dak Prescott was sacked six times and hit repeatedly, with rookie phenom Jer’Zhan Newton racking up three sacks and five QB hits as Washington generated 19 total pressures. Interior pressure was prominent in postgame breakdowns, so Booker clearly had some rough snaps dealing with Newton’s quickness and power on games and stunts, even if not every sack can be laid at his feet.

Advertisement

One blemish on his night was an early bad penalty flagged on Booker on the opening drive, which, paired with a sack, put the offense behind the chains before they worked their way back into scoring range. To his credit, the moment didn’t snowball. He settled in, and as the game wore on his physicality in the run game helped Dallas salt away clock on multiple long marches in the second half.

(Game stats- Snaps: 39, Total Tackles: 2, Pressures: 3, Sacks: 0, TFL: 0)

Ezeiruaku had one of his quietest games of the season against Washington, more solid in assignment than impactful on the stat sheet. He was on the field for just 26 defensive snaps off the edge and registered only one total tackle with zero sacks, zero tackles for loss, and one total pressure. With the Cowboys generating only two sacks and three quarterback hits as a team and still allowing 8.6 yards per play and 138 rushing yards on just 17 carries, this was clearly not a night where the front consistently lived in the Commanders’ backfield.

Through this week, PFF has Ezeiruaku at a 76.4 overall grade with 35 total pressures on 580 snaps, ranking him among the league’s better rookie edge defenders. Pre-game advanced scouting had highlighted his recent 25% pass-rush win rate and 12% pressure rate over the previous month, even though that stretch produced hits rather than sacks. Against Washington, that underlying disruption never really showed up in the box score. He finished the game in a low-impact role while others, notably Jadeveon Clowney and Quinnen Williams, handled the actual finishing on Josh Johnson.

(Game stats- Snaps: 42, Total Tackles: 6, PBU: 1, INT: 0, TD Allowed: 0, RTG Allowed: 109.7)

Advertisement

Revel’s Christmas Day against Washington was another bumpy outing in what has become a tough rookie year, and it ended in a way that almost certainly pushes his focus to 2026. PFF graded him at 50.1 overall, the third-worst mark on the Cowboys’ defense, with of 43.0 against the run, 33.5 in tackling and 59.4 in coverage. On the coverage side of things, he was targeted six times and allowed four catches for 84 yards, his second straight game giving up 80-plus yards, as Washington repeatedly found space on his side of the field. The tackling issues that have dogged him all season showed up again too, he’s now credited with eight missed tackles (18.6%) on the year, and open-field whiffs in this game turned short gains into bigger plays.

Midway through the second half he took a blow to the head, walked off slowly and did not return. Postgame reports confirmed he’s been placed in the concussion protocol, with the team acknowledging he faces an uphill battle to be cleared for Week 18. With only one game left and nothing to play for in the standings, there’s a good argument for Dallas to shut him down, effectively ending his rookie season so he can recover fully and attack 2026. That might be the wisest move given his backdrop coming off an ACL tear, missing the entire offseason program, camp, preseason and a big chunk of the regular season.

(Game stats- Snaps: 36, Total Tackles: 6 TFL: 0, Sacks: 0)

James finally looked like a real part of the defensive plan against Washington, not just a special-teams body. He played 36 defensive snaps, his heaviest load in weeks, and he responded with six total tackles, tied among Dallas’ leaders on the night. He didn’t register a sack, tackle for loss, or any takeaways, and he stayed out of the penalty column, so his stat line is all about volume rather than splash. The Commanders ran only 41 offensive plays but still churned out 138 rushing yards thanks in large part to Jacory Croskey-Merritt’s 72-yard touchdown. James spent most of the evening in clean-up mode by fitting inside runs, rallying to Johnson’s checkdowns and helping get bodies on the ground after chunk gains rather than creating those big negative plays himself.

It’s fair to be harsh on the linebacker group as a whole, especially Kenneth Murray, and calling the heavy dose of Murray and James ugly against the run is also a fair criticism as Washington found creases between the tackles. On film, it’s a mixed bag for James, he was active and around the ball, but there were snaps where he got caught in traffic or arrived a beat late on cutbacks, contributing to a run defense that gave up far too much on a low play count. At the same time, this game underlined why Dallas has been nudging his role upward as he handled a starter-level snap share without blowing assignments, and his six stops push his season totals into genuine starter territory.

Advertisement

The best way to call James’ game is it was a busy but imperfect outing. James was heavily involved, did enough to look like a viable long-term piece, but he was also part of a front seven that made Washington’s ground game look more efficient than it should have.

(Game stats- Snaps: 18, Total Tackles: 1

*Snap count are all special team snaps*

Clark’s Christmas Day against Washington was another quiet but functional special-teams outing. He didn’t log any defensive snaps, with his entire workload coming in the kicking game as a core coverage and return-unit player. On those snaps he made one tackle and didn’t factor into any of the big swings. For a depth safety in his role, that kind of you didn’t notice him performance is basically neutral. He did his assignment work on special teams, avoided hurting the Cowboys in a game where field position and explosive runs were already a problem, but didn’t provide the kind of momentum-changing play that would jump off the tape going into 2026.

(Game stats- Snaps: 15, Total Tackles: 0)

Advertisement

*Snap count include special team snaps*

Bridges played almost entirely on special teams, with just a tiny glimpse of him on defense. He logged the bulk of his work on the kicking units, running lanes, taking on blocks and doing the dirty work that doesn’t show up much in the box score but matters for field position and consistency. On defense he saw only two snaps, essentially a cameo as an emergency outside corner rather than a true part of the game plan, and he didn’t figure in any major targets or tackles on those plays. Bridges handled his special-teams role and gave Dallas a reliable back-end option without ever having the kind of exposure that would define the game one way or the other.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending