Connect with us

Washington

We can’t let Washington undermine NJ’s economic engine: intellectual property | Opinion

Published

on

We can’t let Washington undermine NJ’s economic engine: intellectual property | Opinion



3-minute read

play

  • New Jersey’s economy relies heavily on intellectual property rights, particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals and technology.
  • The federal government’s Special 301 Report, which addresses global IP threats, has been weakened in recent years.
  • This weakening has emboldened foreign countries to infringe on U.S. IP, potentially harming New Jersey’s economy.
  • Stronger IP protections are needed to encourage investment and innovation in key New Jersey industries.

New Jersey is building the technologies that will define the 21st century. 

We’re a national leader in clean energy, with annual energy savings that surpass those of all but three other states. We’re developing breakthrough cures and treatments as the home of 13 of the nation’s 20 largest drug companies. And our new AI Hub, a collaboration between the New Jersey government and Princeton University, will soon put the Garden State at the forefront of U.S. artificial intelligence research.

Yet federal policymakers have cast a cloud over New Jersey’s bright future. For years, they’ve allowed foreign countries to erode the very foundation of our state’s economy: intellectual property, or IP, rights.

With a new administration and Congress in place, New Jersey’s representatives must take a stand in support of IP, before complacency in Washington tears down the dynamic economy we’ve worked so hard to build.

This is why NJ needs robust IP protections

IP rights are the cornerstone of technological progress. They give inventive companies the legal certainty that their ideas and breakthroughs won’t be stolen, which in turn allows them to bring investors on board. Without these protections, investors would be reluctant to commit the massive sums necessary to embark on risky, trailblazing projects.

Advertisement

New Jersey exemplifies the economic benefits that robust IP protections bring. Manufacturing, a field that relies heavily on patent rights, contributes over 10% of our state’s GDP. Other major sectors, like the life sciences, computer technology, and transportation, are similarly IP-intensive. In total, IP-dependent industries employ one in three New Jersey workers.

That’s why it’s so alarming that, in recent years, the federal government has been derelict in protecting Garden State companies’ IP from violations abroad.

Traditionally, federal policymakers have defended IP through something called the Special 301 Report. Issued annually by the U.S. Trade Representative, this report highlights global IP threats like piracy and patent theft, broadcasting to the rest of the world that America won’t tolerate violations of its citizens’ IP. The report also flags the economic impact of sectors that rely on IP. 

But for the past four years, the Biden administration weakened the Special 301 Report, softening its stance on numerous common IP violations, omitting some entirely, and cutting out the economic impact of IP-intensive industries.

Advertisement

So more than ever, foreign countries have been emboldened to steal the fruits of New Jerseyans’ hard work and ingenuity.

Look no further than the COVID-19 pandemic. Strong patent protections empowered New Jersey firms like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson to lead the way in vaccine development, saving millions of lives. 

Yet soon afterward, despite no evidence that patents were limiting global vaccine distribution, USTR authorized countries around the world to ignore the patents on those vaccines.

In the years since, the Special 301 Report has erased all mention of the threat posed by such unilateral IP seizures, known as “compulsory licensing.” With America’s tacit approval, Colombia and the European Union are moving forward with more expansive compulsory licensing policies that threaten our state’s world-leading biopharma sector.

Advertisement

New Jersey companies cannot lose their ability to invest in innovation

If we don’t act soon to stop these efforts, New Jersey companies will lose much of their ability to invest in new treatments, stunting the medical progress that drives job growth here and saves lives around the globe. Bringing a new drug to market can cost upwards of $2 billion and take over a decade of research, with no guarantee of success. Undermining patent protections makes it harder for companies to justify these high-risk investments, especially in complex areas like oncology or rare diseases.

Those aren’t the only assaults on IP that USTR has permitted. Take drug price controls in Canada that undervalue innovative medicines. Or consider the restrictions on patenting imposed by countries like Argentina and India. 

By limiting U.S. companies’ ability to protect their inventions and earn revenue abroad, these policies hamstring domestic research and development, leading to less investment and fewer jobs in New Jersey’s high-tech industries.

Past Special 301 Reports took strong stands to prevent foreign countries from undermining our economy with policies like these. 

But for the last four years, USTR was silent, even as foreign IP infringement continued to mount.

Advertisement

New Jersey’s representatives in Congress must ensure this year’s report unequivocally condemns attacks on U.S. IP rights. Holding our trading partners accountable for violations will help safeguard our investments in medicine, renewable energy, and AI — ensuring the benefits stay with our workers and residents rather than flowing to foreign competitors.

New Jersey is leading America into the future. It’s time for Washington to do its part by backing our efforts with a strong Special 301 Report.

Sandip Shah, a visiting professor at Rutgers University, is founder and president of Market Access Solutions, which develops strategies to optimize patient access to life-changing therapies.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington

Washington Spirit goalkeeper Aubrey Kingsbury announces she’s pregnant

Published

on

Washington Spirit goalkeeper Aubrey Kingsbury announces she’s pregnant


play

Washington Spirit goalkeeper Aubrey Kingsbury has announced that she and her husband Matt are expecting a baby in July.

Advertisement

The couple made the announcement in a video on the Spirit’s social media channels, holding a baby goalkeeper jersey on the pitch at Audi Field.

Kingsbury becomes the most recent Spirit star to go on maternity leave, following defender Casey Krueger, midfielder Andi Sullivan and forward Ashley Hatch.

Sullivan gave birth to daughter Millie in July, while Hatch welcomed her son Leo in January.

Krueger announced she was pregnant with her second child in October.

Kingsbury has served as the Spirit’s starting goalkeeper since 2018, and has been named the NWSL Goalkeeper of the Year twice (2019 and 2021).

Advertisement

The 34-year-old has two caps with the U.S. women’s national team, and was named to the 2023 World Cup roster.

The club captain will leave a major void for the Spirit, who have finished as NWSL runner-up in back-to-back seasons.

Sandy MacIver and Kaylie Collins are expected to compete for the starting role while Kingsbury is on maternity leave.

Advertisement

The Spirit kick off their 2026 campaign on March 13 against the Portland Thorns.





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington state board awards Yakima $985,600 loan for Sixth Avenue project design

Published

on

Washington state board awards Yakima 5,600 loan for Sixth Avenue project design


Yakima could soon take a major step toward redesigning Sixth Avenue after the Washington State Public Works Board awarded the city a $985,600 loan.

The loan was approved for the design engineering phase of the Sixth Avenue project. The funding can also be used along Sixth Avenue for utility replacement and updated ADA use.

The Yakima City Council must decide whether to accept the award. If the council accepts it, the city’s engineering work will move forward with the design of Sixth Avenue.

The cost of installing trolley lines is excluded from the plan. The historic trolleys would need to raise the funds required to add trolley lines.

Advertisement

The award is scheduled to be discussed during next week’s City Council meeting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Microsoft promises more AI investments at University of Washington

Published

on

Microsoft promises more AI investments at University of Washington


Microsoft will ramp up its investment in the University of Washington.

Brad Smith, the company’s president, made the announcement at a press conference with University of Washington President Robert Jones on Tuesday.

That means hiring more UW graduates as interns at Microsoft, he said.

And he said all students, faculty, and researchers should have access to free, or at least deeply-discounted, AI.

Advertisement

“ Some of it is compute that Microsoft is donating, and some of it is pursuant to an agreement where, believe me, we give the University of Washington probably the best pricing that anybody’s gonna find anywhere,” Smith said. He assured the small group of reporters present that it would be “many millions of dollars of additional computational resources.”

The announcement today didn’t include any specific numbers.

But Smith said Microsoft has already invested $165 million in the UW over several decades.

He pointed to Jones’ vision to spur “radical collaborations with businesses and communities to advance positive change,” and eliminate “any artificial barriers between the university and the communities it serves.”

Advertisement

Microsoft’s goal is for AI to help UW researchers solve some of the world’s biggest problems without introducing new ones.

At Tuesday’s announcement, several research students were present to demonstrate how AI supports their work.

Enlarge Icon

Amelia Keyser-Gibson is an environmental scientist at the UW. She’s using AI to analyze photographs of vines, to find which adapt best to climate change.

It’s a paradox: AI produces carbon emissions. At the same time, it’s also a new tool to help reduce them.

Advertisement

So how do those things square for Keyser-Gibson?

“ That’s a great question, and honestly, I don’t know the answer to that,” she said. “I’m highly aware that there’s a lot of environmental impact of using AI, but what I can say is that this has allowed us to make research innovations that wouldn’t have been possible otherwise.”

“If we had had to manually annotate every single image that would’ve been an undergrad doing that for hours,” Keyser-Gibson continued. “And we didn’t have the budget. We didn’t have the manpower to do that.”

“AI exists. If we don’t use it as researchers, we’re gonna fall behind.”

Advertisement

Microsoft reports on its own carbon emissions. But like most AI companies, it doesn’t reveal everything.

That’s one reason another UW student named Zhihan Zhang is using AI to estimate how much energy AI is using.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending