Connect with us

Washington

Washington Has Failed Utterly To Protect American Intellectual Property From Beijing

Published

on

Washington Has Failed Utterly To Protect American Intellectual Property From Beijing


Numerous research – from academia and authorities, in addition to from enterprise – level to the event of latest applied sciences and new practices because the wellspring of financial progress and wealth creation. And it’s the improvement of what’s referred to as “mental property” (IP) that helps the entire course of – the patents and copyrights that encourage companies and folks to dedicate the mandatory money and time to innovation. America has lengthy held delight of place as a supply of such invention and as a spot the place regulation, by defending this property, encourages its improvement. However in a single realm Washington has failed completely to guard the nation’s IP and that’s the place Chinese language theft is anxious. It’s a downside that the Biden administration exhibits no signal of remedying.

For nearly forty years, each American president at one time or one other has beat his chest, claiming that his administration has taken decisive motion to cease Beijing from stealing this nation’s mental property. All these efforts have failed, costing People, in response to Congressional analysis, billions of {dollars} a 12 months. The listing of failure is lengthy and bipartisan. First efforts started whereas Ronald Reagan was nonetheless within the White Home. In 1986 below the auspices of the World Commerce Group (WTO), Washington pressed to halt Chinese language theft of patents and copyrights. The initiative yielded the so-called Buying and selling-Associated Facets of Mental Property Rights settlement (TRIPS). It did nothing to mood Chinese language guidelines coercing know-how transfers from western corporations doing enterprise in China or to strengthen protections for home corporations from outright thefts of commerce secrets and techniques and applied sciences. Lower than ten years later in 1995, the Clinton White Home brokered an settlement, once more by means of the WTO, that was alleged to cease IP theft. Beijing promised to implement numerous IP protections. Little modified.

Advertisement

President George W. Bush entered the fray in 2006. He and Chinese language President Hu Jintao initiated what they referred to as the “Strategic Financial Dialogue.” It aimed to beat IP theft and different commerce difficulties by having the 2 nationwide leaders meet twice a 12 months to debate commerce. 5 conferences occurred between 2006 and 2008. Although the 2 presidents and their brokers mentioned IP theft, america principally turned a blind eye to the continuation of the Chinese language follow. In 2015, American President Barack Obama and Chinese language President Xi Jinping agreed to rename the association the U.S.-China Strategic and Financial Dialogue. That motion added 5 extra syllables to the title however modified nothing. Just a few months after the 2 presidents made their respective bulletins, the primary indicators of the so-called “Cloud Hopper Marketing campaign” revealed how Chinese language hackers had made large efforts to steal American commerce secrets and techniques and parts of U.S.-based applied sciences.

Trump promised extra decisive motion than his predecessors. His administration invoked a Part 301 inquiry into Chinese language IP theft and coercion. This part of the U.S. Commerce Act provides the Workplace of america Commerce Consultant (USTR) authority to research and take motion to implement U.S. rights below commerce agreements but additionally on different commerce violations. This was the idea on which the Trump White Home in 2019 imposed a broad array of tariffs on Chinese language imports. That effort, although IP theft was talked about, failed to focus on particular Chinese language abuses on this regard and so did little to halt Beijing’s continued calls for for know-how transfers and the usage of extra covert means to violate patents and copyrights. Beneath the so-called “Part 1” of the following settlement between Washington and Beijing, China promised to import extra from U.S. producers and streamline procedures for People to guard their IP rights from Chinese language infringements. Because it has turned out, China, as up to now, failed to fulfill any of the targets stipulated within the settlement on both purchases of U.S. merchandise or on IP violations.

Biden has proven the identical lack of will as all of the others. Regardless of his intense anti-Trump vitriol, he has left all his predecessor’s tariffs in place. America’s commerce consultant, Catherine Tai has demanded that China adjust to the Part 1 settlement Beijing signed in January 2020 and has gone out of her option to categorical frustration about persevering with IP theft. Apart from demanding that Beijing honor its settlement with Trump, this administration has supplied nothing new. Prospects then look more likely to comply with previous patterns and do little efficient to cease IP theft, both by means of Chinses coercion or outright stealing. It’s noteworthy on this regard that Washington ignored a latest Chinese language courtroom determination declaring that Chinese language corporations can’t be sued anyplace on this planet for IP theft. One of many protected corporations, Huawei, faces federal fees for racketeering and the theft of commerce secrets and techniques.

Washington’s repeated failures and seeming lack of will has price American companies and inventors billions of {dollars} a 12 months. In the meantime, the nation dominated by the Chinese language Communist Social gathering (CCP) has – freed from cost — used American know-how and commerce secrets and techniques to realize benefit over america. Given this lengthy, sorry monitor report and particularly the Biden administration’s newer inaction, it’s onerous certainly to generate any optimism that issues will change. This historical past and Washington’s current positions additional recommend that the spate of anti-Chinese language laws presently circulating in Congress may have little impact even when handed into regulation. Maybe the White Home will change. Maybe the subsequent resident of the White Home will break with the patterns of the final forty years or so. The chances recommend nonetheless that American enterprise will proceed to get little assist from Washington in maintaining its commerce secrets and techniques and applied sciences out of Beijing’s palms.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Kinkajou found abandoned and wandering Washington state road

Published

on

Kinkajou found abandoned and wandering Washington state road


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Peekaboo!

Advertisement

A small raccoon-like mammal known as a “kinkajou” was rescued earlier this week after being found climbing a dusty Washington road pole. The nocturnal critters are indigenous to the rainforest and were once made popular as an exotic pet by Paris Hilton.

The rescued kinkajou was seen peeking around a wooden sign pole at a rest area in East Selah, Yakima County, according to a photo posted to X Monday by the Washington State Department of Transportation.

The agency says it wasn’t sure if the kinkajou, also known as a honey bear, was dropped off there or escaped, but it has since been brought to the Association of Zoos and Aquariums for a comprehensive wellness exam at its animal hospital.

KINKAJOU BARGES INTO FLORIDA WOMAN’S APARTMENT, ATTACKS HER BOYFRIEND, OFFICIALS SAY

A small raccoon-like mammal known as a kinkajou was rescued this week after being found climbing a dusty Washington state road pole. (Washington State Department of Transportation I SGranitz/WireImage )

Advertisement

“We are awaiting the results of diagnostic testing, including comprehensive blood work, to get a complete assessment of his health,” the zoo posted to Facebook along with a short video of the examination. 

Head Veterinarian Dr. Karen said the young kinkajou is in fair health overall but is very thin, weighing only 2½ pounds. He has a good appetite, and staff is feeding him a full and healthy diet, the zoo said in the post.

“This young kinkajou’s survival is a testament to the collaborative efforts of state wildlife law enforcement and the Zoo, highlighting the dangers of the illegal pet trade,” the post added. 

The zoo said that while kinkajous are not endangered, they are hunted for fur, meat and the exotic pet trade, which threatens their wild population. Its skin is often used to make wallets and horse saddles. 

PARIS HILTON BITTEN BY PET KINKAJOU

Advertisement
Kinkajou in rehabilitation

A small tree-hugging “kinkajou” was rescued this week after being found climbing a dusty Washington road pole. (Washington State Department of Transportation I Point Defiance Zoo & Aquarium, right.)

Kinkajous live in tropical rainforests from southern Mexico through Brazil. They are small carnivores with prehensile tails, often mistakenly called primates, the zoo said. 

The kinkajou has sandy yellow fur, a round head, large black eyes and a short, pointed snout as well as short limbs. Mature kinkajous can weigh up to about 10 pounds and stretch to 52 inches in length. They feed on fruits, roots, shoots, nuts and seeds.

“Despite their cuteness, kinkajous do not make good pets,” the zoo said, although that hasn’t stopped socialite Hilton from owning one. 

The influencer and activist has been pictured in the past holding a kinkajou she called “Baby Luv.” 

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
A Kinkajou

Kinkajou Harley is held by San Francisco Zoo Education Specialist Amy Goodwin during an event at the San Francisco Zoo & Gardens at the Willie Woo Woo Wong Chinese playground Feb. 17, 2016, in San Francisco. (Leah Millis/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

Baby Luv bit Hilton in the arm in 2006, prompting her to go to a hospital, where the wound was treated and given a tetanus shot. 

The National Institutes of Health says kinkajou bites require the usual tetanus prophylaxis, rabies vaccine and wound cleaning. In most cases, antibiotics are prescribed to prevent the development of cellulitis or osteomyelitis.

A photo of Paris Hilton

Paris Hilton attends the 2023 LACMA Art+Film Gala at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Nov. 4, 2023, in Los Angeles. (Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for LACMA)

The zoo said the kinkajou is recuperating at the zoo while officials look to find it a permanent home.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Texas Supreme Court reinstates ban on gender-affirming care for minors

Published

on

Texas Supreme Court reinstates ban on gender-affirming care for minors


The Texas Supreme Court on Friday upheld a state ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors that parents had argued unconstitutionally limited their right to seek care for their children. The 8-1 decision overturned a lower court’s ruling that the legislation violated the Texas Constitution.

The law, which was passed last year, prohibits doctors from prescribing puberty-blocking drugs or hormone treatment for minors, and it bars them from performing surgeries that change patients’ physical characteristics to better match their gender identities. Children who began receiving such treatments before the bill was signed must be weaned off the drugs, according to the legislation, and medical professionals who violate the ban will lose their licenses.

“We conclude the Legislature made a permissible, rational policy choice to limit the types of available medical procedures for children,” Justice Rebeca Huddle wrote for the majority on the all-Republican court.

Texas is one of about two dozen states that have passed such bans as conservatives have pushed to broadly restrict transgender rights, an issue that has emerged as a flash point of the nation’s cultural and political divides. Former president Donald Trump, who is running for a second term, has also pledged to end gender-affirming care for minors, NBC News reported in January. He has equated the procedures, which medical groups say are safe and sometimes medically necessary, to “child abuse.”

Advertisement

Texas is the largest state to have banned gender-affirming care. Republicans there have also pushed to restrict teaching about LGBTQ people and issues in schools, part of an effort framed as expanding parental rights.

Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) said on X that his office would “use every tool at our disposal to ensure that doctors and medical institutions follow the law.”

The measure’s sponsor, Rep. Tom Oliverson (R), added that the state has a “duty” to regulate medical care.

“Very gratifying to see @SupremeCourt_TX concurs,” he wrote on X.

LGBTQ+ advocates criticized the decision, saying it would curtail their rights as parents and hurt their transgender children in a conservative state that has expanded parental control over issues such as their children’s schooling.

Advertisement

“Instead of leaving medical decisions concerning minor children where they belong, with their parents and their doctors, the Court here has elected to let politicians … determine the allowed course of treatment,” said Karen Loewy, a spokesperson for Lambda Legal, which was among the groups that sued on behalf of five Texas families.

Justice Debra Lehrmann, the dissenting justice in Friday’s ruling, agreed with Loewy, calling the law “not only cruel” but also unconstitutional. She added that it allows the state to “legislate away fundamental parental rights.”

“The Court’s ‘parental rights for me but not for thee’ approach has no objective criteria and renders parents entirely without guidance on whether their parental liberty will be meaningfully protected,” Lehrmann wrote. “The Court’s opinion thus puts all parental rights in jeopardy.”

The majority countered that while “fit parents” have a right to make decisions for their children without state interference, legislatures are permitted to enact limits on child labor and regulate medical care.

While the plaintiffs said the court’s ruling left no avenue for further challenges, they will continue to challenge measures like it.

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a Tennessee law that bans gender transition care for minors, the first opportunity the nation’s top court will have to consider the constitutionality of such restrictions.

The American Civil Liberties Union is tracking more than 500 bills it calls “anti-LGBTQ” across the country.

Ash Hall, an ACLU of Texas strategist for LGBTQIA+ rights, said the law has caused suffering among adolescents and families since its passage in June 2023.

“Our government shouldn’t deprive trans youth of the health care that they need to survive and thrive — while offering that exact same health care to everyone else,” Hall said in a statement. “Texas politicians’ obsession with attacking trans kids and their families is needlessly cruel.”

A majority of Americans oppose puberty-blocking medications and hormonal treatments for trans children, according to a Washington Post-KFF poll. For gender-diverse people, however, the ability to access such treatments improves their overall well-being, according to the American Psychological Association.

Advertisement

Major medical associations have said treatment such as puberty blockers lower rates of depression and suicide in transgender people and have opposed this legislation, saying laws should not discriminate against trans patients or interfere with doctors’ ability to provide individualized, evidence-based care for patients.

More than 100,000 transgender youths live in states that ban gender-affirming care, according to the Williams Institute, a research center that reports on LGBT community demographics. It estimates that almost 30,000 Texans between the ages of 13 and 17 identify as transgender.





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Turbulence At Washington Post With Pressure For Profit From Jeff Bezos

Published

on

Turbulence At Washington Post With Pressure For Profit From Jeff Bezos


The Post’s managing editor resigned while a boss has been targeted in the paper’s columns

New York:

The prestigious Washington Post is in crisis, with pressure on from owner Jeff Bezos to change its money-losing ways.

Advertisement

The Post’s managing editor abruptly resigned; a chosen successor withdrew under fire, and a boss has been targeted in the newspaper’s columns.

At the heart of the storm is “WaPo”‘s new CEO, Briton William Lewis, who was given a mission by Amazon founder Bezos when he appointed him last autumn.

Lewis was asked to turn around a newspaper that continues to pile up Pulitzer Prizes half a century after the Watergate scandal it instigated, but which has lost $77 million in 2023 despite job cuts and the disappearance of its Sunday supplement.

However, the former journalist, who made history in the late 2000s with a scoop on the expenses of British MPs when he was editor of the Daily Telegraph, is finding his position increasingly vulnerable.

For weeks now, revelations have multiplied about his role, when he was working for the Murdoch family’s conservative media group about 12 years ago, in a scandal of illegal phone tapping by the tabloid The News of the World.

Advertisement

On Friday, Lewis was at the center of an investigation by his own journalists.

According to the Washington Post, he gave the go-ahead in 2011 for the destruction of thousands of emails, fueling suspicions that he was destroying evidence, which he denies.

“Trump Bump”

As the US presidential election approaches, the affair is poisoning the atmosphere at a long-vaunted newspaper that is “not doing well economically,” Northeastern University journalism professor Dan Kennedy tells AFP.

The Post was among trusted news outlets that benefited from the upheaval that marked Trump’s four years in the White House which ended with his loss to President Joe Biden.

Advertisement

The Post “was seen as a place that offered really tough, truth-telling coverage” of Trump, according to the professor.

Trump’s departure from the White House meant fewer attention-grabbing stories to keep readers engaged.

“When Donald Trump left the White House, the Trump bump that helped a lot of newspapers disappeared,” Kennedy said.

“And the Post was hit especially hard.”

By the end of 2022, the Post would have 2.5 million subscribers compared with 3 million subscribers when Biden took office in early 2021, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, rival New York Times has grown to more than 10 million subscribers, the fruit of a strategy to diversify into fun topics such as games, food, and lifestyle while still serving up hard news.

US media quoted Lewis as telling editorial staff in early June that he “can’t sugarcoat it anymore” — the paper has lost a lot of money and people’s interest in its articles.

Third News Team

The day before that editorial meeting, Post journalists learned of the resignation of editor-in-chief Sally Buzbee.

Buzbee is said to have disagreed with Lewis’s strategy to split the editorial department into three divisions: news, opinion, and a new third unit devoted to social media and service journalism.

Advertisement

The contours of this “third newsroom” remain unclear, but it seems aimed at reviving readership in a leap into the unknown for the newspaper.

Within the Murdoch family group, Lewis was the boss of the Wall Street Journal (2014-2020), another flagship of the US press.

However, articles in the New York Times and the Post pointed to questionable methods employed under his watch and that of former colleague Robert Winnett, whom Lewis chose to replace Buzbee.

Published allegations include paying informants, using data from hacked phones, or intermediaries using phony identification to get information.

Winnett withdrew from consideration for the post following those revelations.

Advertisement

Professor Kennedy believes Lewis has no choice but to leave the Post because he has lost the confidence of the team there.

“The body is rejecting the transfusion,” Post veteran David Maraniss wrote on his Facebook page, adding he didn’t know anyone who thinks the situation can stand as it is.

“If he can’t inspire the staff (…) the Post will sail without direction and its best people will leave,” Kennedy said of Lewis.

For many observers, the outcome of the crisis lies in the hands of billionaire Bezos, who bought the Post for $250 million in 2013.

So far, Bezos has backed his CEO.

Advertisement

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending