Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) gave away the farm to influence radical right-wing holdouts to vote for him for Home speaker, projecting weak spot and hobbling his capacity to be efficient in a job that’s second in line to the presidency. Scarier nonetheless is that wrangling the votes to win early Saturday on the fifteenth poll is perhaps simpler than what’s to come back. The chaos on the ground over the previous week exhibits Home Republicans aren’t prepared to control and casts alarming doubt on whether or not Congress is able to elevating the debt ceiling to keep away from a U.S. authorities default in coming months.
Washington
Opinion | McCarthy’s House now has fewer ways to avert chaos — but still a few
There are nonetheless some methods to avert legislative disaster over the subsequent two years — however, after Mr. McCarthy’s appeasement of political arsonists in his get together, they’re fewer, and the radicals are emboldened.
After insisting it was a pink line he wouldn’t cross, Mr. McCarthy agreed to decrease from 5 to at least one the variety of members required to drive a vote on ousting a speaker. He’s basically agreed to let the rebels maintain a gun to his head with the menace to drag the set off if he makes any strikes they don’t like. Mr. McCarthy additionally agreed to provide members of the Home Freedom Caucus extra seats on the highly effective Guidelines Committee, which units the parameters for flooring debates, and he’s apparently agreed to permit flooring votes on instituting time period limits on members.
It’s unclear but what secret offers Mr. McCarthy has made, however Bloomberg experiences that a part of the settlement that was underneath dialogue would cap fiscal year-2024 spending throughout the federal government at 2022 ranges, which might result in roughly $75 billion in army spending cuts. The Home can freely debate the deserves of protection spending, however budgeting by this sort of brinkmanship isn’t any technique to govern. It’s paying homage to the disastrous 2011 political impasse that led to painful, across-the-board finances cuts.
Satirically, Republicans underperformed within the midterms due to the outsize affect of the identical election-denying troublemakers who now maintain Congress hostage, and one of many concessions Mr. McCarthy made implies that there can be extra kooks within the GOP convention. The Congressional Management Fund, an excellent PAC linked with get together leaders, agreed to not play in Republican primaries for protected GOP seats. However the Membership for Progress, which exacted that promise, and different teams which have a vested curiosity in dysfunction can nonetheless spend limitless quantities elevating hard-liners. That’s a path to extra anarchy.
The anti-McCarthy holdouts had some extra cheap goals, airing grievances concerning the focus of energy within the speaker’s workplace. It was paying homage to when progressive Republicans and Democrats partnered in 1910 to cut back the facility of Speaker Joseph G. Cannon (R-In poor health.) by eradicating the speaker as chairman of the Guidelines Committee and increasing the committee’s dimension from 5 to fifteen.
The Founders meant the Home to be a majoritarian establishment that extra intently displays the altering tides of in style opinion than the Senate, which they envisioned as a extra deliberative physique that will examine the passions of the hour. If the Home have been democratized and the general public got a greater view of the messy give-and-take of legislative sausage-making, possibly fewer payments would finally cross, however the laws that did advance would come out stronger.
Sadly, Mr. McCarthy has additionally pledged to protect the “Hastert Rule,” named for a disgraced former speaker, which requires {that a} majority of the bulk get together help a invoice earlier than it involves the ground. That is anti-majoritarian, and it’s typically stopped payments which have majority help within the Home, and within the nation, from advancing. Except Mr. McCarthy is prepared to depend on Democratic votes when the nice of the nation depends upon it, we worry the Home goes to be a scary place for the subsequent two years.
A technique out lies not with Mr. McCarthy however with particular person members who get fed up with dysfunction. They’ll use extra discharge petitions to drive votes on payments that stand to draw majority help — if they may get onto the ground. With such a intently divided Home, a handful of average Republicans might work with Democrats to avoid the Guidelines Committee and GOP management to carry bipartisan measures to the ground. That is perhaps essential to boost the debt ceiling and defend the complete religion and credit score of the US — or, certainly, to get something completed over the objections of hard-liners whose incentive is to disrupt, and thereby get on TV, reasonably than to control.
Washington
Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard
A measure to lower the legal limit for drunk driving in Washington cleared its first legislative hurdle Thursday.
If passed, Washington would join Utah as the only state with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit. Other states have considered similar legislation, but haven’t passed it.
Utah made the move in 2018. The state was also the first to lower the limit from 0.1% to 0.08% in the 1980s.
After the switch from 0.08% to 0.05%, Utah saw a 20% drop in fatal crashes, but that figure crept back up during the COVID-19 pandemic, in line with national trends.
The bill in Washington is sponsored by Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek. Lovick was a longtime Washington State Patrol trooper before serving as Snohomish County sheriff.
“I see driving behavior beyond anything I could have imagined when I started as a state trooper,” Lovick told the Senate Law & Justice Committee this week. “Drivers are speeding, following too close, passing on the shoulders, running red lights, driving aggressively. Drunk drivers have made our communities unsafe.”
Opponents argue the legislation, Senate Bill 5067, would elevate the liability risk for bars and other establishments that sell alcohol.
Traffic deaths have risen rapidly in recent years, from 538 in 2019 to 809 in 2023, according to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. The 2023 figure was the most deaths on Washington roads since 1990.
Of those 809 deaths, impaired drivers were involved in about half.
Compared to those driving sober, drivers with a blood alcohol concentration over 0.05% are twice as likely to crash, said Mark McKechnie, the director of external relations for the traffic safety commission. When that rises to 0.07%, the risk triples.
Early estimates for the first half of 2024 showed a marked decline in deaths on Washington roads, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The lower legal limit would take effect July 1, 2026.
As part of the legislation, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission would run a campaign to inform the public of the new legal limit. The Washington State Institute for Public Policy would have to evaluate the impacts of the new law in a report submitted to the Legislature.
By way of background
Lovick and others have tried repeatedly in recent years to lower the legal limit. The measure has never reached the Senate floor.
Last year, one of the proposal’s chief backers, Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, expressed frustration after the Senate passed over his drunk driving bill and instead took up legislation to solidify “The Evergreen State” as Washington’s official nickname.
Experts have said consuming a beer or a glass of wine with dinner wouldn’t land drivers above the lowered legal limit.
Two hours after his first drink, a 180-pound man would reach 0.05% after drinking three beers or three glasses of wine. The same is true after two hours for a 140-pound woman, after two beers or glasses of wine.
Worldwide, more than 100 countries have legal limits of 0.05% or lower.
The concerns
As in years past, hospitality industry groups oppose the legislation. They have argued the proposal could hurt bars and other establishments that rely on alcohol sales to stay afloat.
Julia Gorton, a lobbyist for the Washington Hospitality Association, noted it’s already illegal to drive with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration if officers see clear signs of impairment.
This legislation “will impact those who decide to stop drinking before they are impaired,” she said. “These are individuals choosing to behave responsibly, who will now be subject to the strongest and strictest DUI penalties in the country.”
The Washington Wine Institute’s Executive Director Josh McDonald said it would be hard for servers to identify impairment at the lower legal limit so they could cut off service.
Jason Lantz, of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, noted Colorado and New York also have 0.05% limits, but violations at that level come with lower penalties.
He recommended a similar two-tier system, with the 0.05% limit considered “driving after consumption” instead of driving under the influence.
Amy Freedheim, the chair of the Felony Traffic Unit in the King County prosecutor’s office, tried to assuage concerns. She argued the lower limit wouldn’t lead to more arrests or lawsuits against bars held liable for crashes caused by impaired drivers.
On Thursday, Sen. Phil Fortunato, R-Auburn, offered an amendment to Lovick’s bill, lowering a blood alcohol concentration limit already in state law that brings stiffer penalties. The amendment would have dropped the limit from 0.15% to 0.12%.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Penalties for first-time offenders at the higher threshold include a minimum $500 fine and at least two days in jail, 30 days of electronic home monitoring or a 120-day 24/7 sobriety program.
Below the 0.15% level, drunk driving penalties drop to a minimum fine of $350 and at least one day in jail, 15 days of electronic home monitoring or a 90-day sobriety program.
“Right now you go from .08 to .15. There’s nothing in the middle,” Fortunato said.
Sen. Manka Dhingra, D-Redmond, said she didn’t disagree with Fortunato’s change, but recognized the political reality for the proposal.
“I think it has been very challenging to get this bill out of the Senate with even the decrease to .05,” she said. “Let’s try to focus on getting the limit to .05, and then let’s continue working toward making sure that we are addressing the penalties.”
The committee approved Lovick’s proposal without Fortunato’s amendment.
The House version of the bill is set for a committee hearing Tuesday.
Washington
Commanders Coach Knew ‘We’re Going to Win’ When Offense Got the Ball Back
ASHBURN, Va. — Hope is a powerful thing, but belief is even stronger, and that’s what the Washington Commanders have plenty of after defeating the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 23-20 in the Wild Card Round.
That belief didn’t just show up in Florida, however, it has been growing ever since the Commanders first got together for OTAs and into rookie minicamp, and so on. Every step this team has taken, the belief it has in itself has grown.
Because of it, while most are going to predict Washington will lose to the Detroit Lions this weekend, the coaches and players believe in themselves. And they believe that if they have the ball last with a chance to win they’re going to, because that is exactly what defensive coordinator Joe Whitt Jr. believed last weekend – and it came true.
“We’re going to win,” is what Whitt says he felt after his defense stopped the Buccaneers’ last possession of the game. “This game here, so it was a second-and-one. We got the stop. And then third-and-one, they sort of bobbled it, we get the stop. Now, they punted to us, I think it was four minutes or something else. Alright, ‘We’re going to go down and win it,’ That’s winning time. We got the stop that we needed, the special teams secured the ball, and we went down there and kicked the field goal. So, that’s what complementary football was all about, playing as a team.”
Sunday night, the Commanders put together one of the cleanest performances they have had as a team in over a month. Penalties were low–though we’re sure the coaches would say any penalty is too many–mistakes weren’t critical, and like Whitt said, the football was complimentary.
Head coach Dan Quinn knows that’s exactly what his team will need again to keep their season going for at least one more weekend.
“Much like last game, I told you we’ll play our best complimentary game all year, offensively, defensively, and special teams,” said Quinn. “And Detroit in this game calls for that again. And so, we’re working hard on all those things from our field position stuff, our winning time moments, just all of it.”
Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.
• Commanders Get Unexpected Boost in Win vs. Buccaneers
• After Playoff Win, Commanders QB Jayden Daniels Isn’t Satisfied
• Commanders Share Thoughts as Game-Winning Field Goal Doinked In
• Dan Quinn Reveals Emotion During Final Kick in Commanders-Buccaneers
Washington
Purdue vs. Washington player grades: Boilers wake up in second half
Purdue vs. Washington player grades: Boilers wake up in second half
Team GPA: 3.4
Sparse-shooting big man Great Osobor made more 3s than Purdue, but the Boilers won in the paint.
No. 17 Purdue (14-4, 6-1 Big Ten) had initial trouble dispelling Washington (10-8, 1-6), in a similar result on the scoreboard to the Boilers’ win against Minnesota. But, as in that game, Purdue climbed out of a halftime hole to show its superiority away from home in the second half. The main difference Wednesday was that the Boilers created open 3s for themselves and struggled mightily to make them, second period included.
Instead, Purdue found its inside presence via junior point guard Braden Smith’s offensive orchestration and racked up a free throw margin the Huskies couldn’t compete with.
Player stats below, with ratings to follow:
Braden Smith: A-
He played sped up all night, increasingly as the game wore on to its final minutes. The result was more turnovers than usual for the junior guard, but also a great deal of credit for the Boilers’ win.
Smith’s attacking and probing opened things up for Trey Kaufman-Renn (19) and Caleb Furst (15), even if the jumpers never fell in their usual quantity.
Without Smith’s 3 in the mid-second half, it could have been a different ballgame. Instead, he knocked it down, mean-mugged the crowd, and a, “Let’s go Boilers,” chant was clearly audible from my TV speakers in the mid-second half.
Smith’s motor also propelled him to five steals, and Purdue scored 18 points off turnovers.
Fletcher Loyer: B+
Loyer’s first field goal dropped through the net at the nine-minute mark of the second half. Then the rest came. The junior scored 12 points in the final 20 minutes as Washington had too many things to worry about to contain him.
He was uneasy handling the ball and passing in the first half, perhaps due to the bizarre slickness of the court caused apparently by a film on the hardwood or lack of an adequate sticky pad by the scorer’s table, per referee chatter picked up by the broadcast.
Plus, often underrated, Loyer is phenomenal at drawing fouls on defense. He got a big one with less than two minutes to go, and hit a 3 on the other end to stymie the slim chance Washington was clinging to.
Trey Kaufman-Renn: B+
Kaufman-Renn came alive in the second half after an awkward opening period with four turnovers. Once he and Smith found their pick and roll magic, and a few baseline dump-offs here and there, it was all Purdue.
C.J. Cox: B-
Quiet night from the field, but made good decisions and dribbled dangerously enough to shift Washington’s defense.
Caleb Furst: A-
It was an up-and-down game on the defensive side of the ball for Furst: He forced Wildcat star Great Osobor into a big man air ball – all backboard – early in the first half, but got spun around off-ball in the mid-second for an Osobor bucket.
But offensively, he was exactly what Purdue needed. Fifteen points on a perfect night from the field and excellent at the line. Three offensive boards, too.
Myles Colvin: B-
Had his moments as an off-ball weapon on offense, but otherwise quiet as part of a poor shooting night all around for Purdue.
Camden Heide: B
Out-athleted the Huskies with three rebounds (one offensive) and an authoritative swat in the late second half.
Gicarri Harris: B-
Provided good defensive minutes, matching up well with Washington’s athletic guards.
Raleigh Burgess: NA
Played his three minutes, ran like crazy in them, took a seat.
How I do these
A lot is anchored to Game Score, a metric invented by John Hollinger which (quite imperfectly) estimates a player’s box score contributions. It’s just a starting point for the grades, and it’s readily available. During the game, I focus most of my attention on watching defensive reps, box-outs, offensive movement/involvement, and non-assist passing. I’ll add all the off-ball value to these grades that my eyes can catch.
Further, these are role dependent – my grades answer a question that goes something like, “How well did a player take advantage of the opportunities they were given?”
Late game heroics earn bonus points, and the opposite is true for important errors. Oh, and I hate missed free throws.
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science5 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
Business1 week ago
Meta Drops Rules Protecting LGBTQ Community as Part of Content Moderation Overhaul
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump trolls Canada again, shares map with country as part of US: 'Oh Canada!'
-
Education1 week ago
Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire