Connect with us

Washington

Analysis | No, Biden won’t be on performance-enhancing drugs for the debate

Published

on

Analysis | No, Biden won’t be on performance-enhancing drugs for the debate


Allies of Donald Trump have painted themselves into a cognitive corner. President Biden is unfit for office, they argue, because he is so old, and his mental abilities have deteriorated markedly. But then Biden will, say, deliver a State of the Union address in which he is energetic and pointed for more than an hour.

So they modify their claim: Biden is addled and wandering, except when he is given some sort of medication, perhaps a stimulant, that reverses that effect. And here we are, with Trump and those seeking his reelection to the White House demanding that Biden submit to some sort of drug test before this week’s first presidential debate, purportedly in effort to sniff out this theoretical drug.

Experts who spoke with The Washington Post, though, confirm that no such medicine exists.

At the outset, we should recognize that this claim is generally not offered seriously. It is, instead, an effort to escape the aforementioned contradiction, a way to hold both that Biden is incapable of serving as president and yet, unquestionably at times, not demonstrating any such impairment. What’s more, the demand that Biden undergo a drug test is itself not serious. It is, instead, meant to create a condition that allows Trump and his allies to continue to claim that any strong performance from Biden is a function of medication. The result is win-win for Trump, who can blame any loss on this wonder drug.

Advertisement

If you haven’t been paying close attention to the debate (such as it is) over this idea, consider a snippet of conversation that aired on Fox Business on Tuesday morning.

Host Maria Bartiromo — no stranger to conspiratorial argumentation — hosted Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) where she offered an observation made by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Tex.).

“Jackson says Biden will have been at Camp David for a full week before the debate,” Bartiromo said, “and that they’re probably experimenting with getting doses right. Giving him medicine ahead of the debate.”

Burlison agreed that this was possible, though he offered that it might be more innocuous than medication. Perhaps, he said, Biden’s team is “jack[ing] him up on Mountain Dew.”

Jackson, you will recall, was Trump’s personal doctor while Trump was in the White House. He is not an expert on cognition or cognition-related illnesses, though he is familiar with drug prescription.

Advertisement

“Nothing like that exists,” Thomas Wisniewski, director of the NYU Langone Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, told The Washington Post by phone. “There are no medications or stimulants that can reverse a dementing process transiently.”

“All of those sorts of things can perhaps make an individual more alert, but quite often that can just exacerbate their confusion, as well,” he added. “They can be more stimulated, but they are not going to be behaving in a more cogent or normal fashion as a result of being stimulated by anything. Very often it’s the reverse.”

Adam Brickman, associate professor of neuropsychology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, concurred with that assessment.

“I’m not aware of any medications that would reverse or mask cognitive decline,” Brickman said. What’s more, he noted that “the association between energy and cognition is a very weak one. In other words, someone could have low energy but totally intact cognition and vice versa.”

Both doctors noted that such a medication would be of enormous benefit. Reversing cognitive decline, after all, would mean turning back the damage done from diseases that impair cognition in the first place. It would be akin not just to treating the pain of a broken bone but, instead, to directly healing the break itself. Sadly, no such drug for cognition exists.

Advertisement

Again, the argument that Biden is or could be receiving targeted treatment to improve his mental state fails multiple logical tests. Why, for example, would he not simply take this medication all the time? Why would he need to retest his dosage for a debate after giving a lengthy State of the Union address? The answer is that there is no good answer, that the intent of the allegations is simply to maintain the political argument that Biden is mentally deficient even in the face of his performing above expectations in a debate.

Not that that argument is itself well-grounded, as Brickman noted.

“It’s not possible to conclude or to determine whether someone has subtle cognitive change without doing a true clinical evaluation,” he said. “So to judge whether there’s an underlying disease or neurodegenerative condition based on public speeches or interactions that are captured by the press is irresponsible.”

Wisniewski offered a more succinct dismissal of the claims being made by Trumpworld.

“It’s spurious,” he said. “It’s nonsensical.”

Advertisement

In other words, if Biden fares better in the debate this week, it’s not because of a secret Camp David drug-dosing regimen that enabled the administration to mask Biden’s physical degeneration. It’s because Biden out-debated the guy who won’t accept that that’s possible.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Rutgers topped Washington with clutch defense, but unit needs improvement

Published

on

Rutgers topped Washington with clutch defense, but unit needs improvement


Rutgers has found a way defensively.

The Scarlet Knights have done it by limiting opponents on third downs and buckling down in the red zone, but in its two games against Power Four opponents, Rutgers has not been good enough for a unit that finished last season ranked 16th nationally in yards allowed.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Rutgers knocks off Washington to go 4-0 for first time in over a decade

Published

on

Rutgers knocks off Washington to go 4-0 for first time in over a decade


Rutgers bent but did not break in a down-to-the-wire, 21-18 win over Washington — last year’s national championship runner-up — Friday, moving to 4-0 for the first time since 2012. 

Quarterback Athan Kaliakmanis and running back Kyle Monangai led the offense.

And when they needed it, several boneheaded Huskies penalties helped out the Scarlet Knights.

The nationally televised game against was Rutgers’ first Big Ten matchup of the year after facing Howard, Akron and Virginia Tech to start the season. 

Advertisement

Kaliakmanis completed 14 of 24 passes for 115 yards and a touchdown.

Rutgers quarterback Athan Kaliakmanis (16) throws a pass during the first half of an NCAA football game against Washington, Friday, Sept. 27 2024, in Piscataway, N.J. AP

Monangai produced his third consecutive 100-plus yard rushing game on a night that he surpassed Isiah Pacheco for seventh on Rutgers’ all-time rushing list. 

Monangai ran for 132 yards, which included a commanding rush in which he broke a number of tackles for a 42-yard gain in the third quarter. 

The Huskies managed to make the game interesting with a drive in the final minute, down by just three.

Washington was able to get the ball into Rutgers territory with a series of passes before kicker Grady Gross missed a 55-yard field-goal attempt wide left as time expired.

Advertisement

It was his third missed field goal of the game. 

Rutgers running back Kyle Monangai (5) carries the ball into the Washington secondary during the first half of an NCAA football game, Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Piscataway, N.J. AP

The Rutgers sideline poured out onto the field and the lights flickered in celebration when the final whistle sounded.

The Blackout Game at SHI Stadium drew 54,079 fans, the second-highest attendance in its history. 

“You could feel it in that stadium tonight. That’s what Big Ten football is, and that’s what I want for New Jersey,” Rutgers head coach Greg Schiano said. “That’s what I’ve always wanted for New Jersey, is to have that in our state. … Tonight was a good step, but that’s all it is. It’s one win. It’s an exciting one; it’s a good one.” 

Rutgers wide receiver Ian Strong (9) catches a pass over Washington cornerback Elijah Jackson (25) for a touchdown. AP

Monangai’s 1-yard rushing touchdown run with 11:16 left in the second quarter erased a 3-0 Scarlet Knights deficit. 

Advertisement

Later in the second, the Scarlet Knights took advantage of one of the Huskies’ biggest blunders of the night.

Washington blocked a 38-yard Rutgers field-goal attempt, only to have that negated when Vince Holmes was called for an illegal substitution to give Rutgers new life. 

On the ensuing play, Kaliakmanis connected with receiver Ian Strong for a jump-ball touchdown to extend the Scarlet Knights’ lead to 14-3 with 30 seconds left in the half. 

Washington finally found the end zone late in the third quarter on a six-play drive that culminated with Huskies quarterback Will Rodgers finding Denzel Boston for a 51-yard touchdown pass. 

Washington quarterback Will Rogers (7) throws a pass during the first half of an NCAA college football game against Rutgers, Friday, Sept. 27, 2024, in Piscataway, N.J. AP

While the late third-quarter touchdown pulled the Huskies within five, Rutgers answered back with a touchdown of its own 4:03 into the final quarter as Samuel Brown V bulldozed his way to a 37-yard scoring run, extending the lead to 21-10. 

Advertisement

The Huskies managed to make it close with a late-game drive in the fourth quarter to cut the Rutgers lead back to three on a drive that started on Washington’s 24-yard line.

It culminated in the Huskies keeping it alive with a short rush on fourth-and-1 before Rodgers connected with Boston in the end zone.

The Huskies completed the two-point conversion to cut the lead to 21-18 with 1:40 left on the clock. 

Washington scored first with a 22-yard field goal, marking the first time since Nov. 25 that Rutgers allowed an opponent to score in the first quarter. 

Rutgers celebrates after defeating the Washington Huskies. USA TODAY Sports via Reuters Con

Friday was the first time that the Huskies and Scarlet Knights faced one another since 2017 and it marked Washington’s first road game against a Big Ten opponent as a member of the conference. 

Advertisement

“Hats off to what Greg [Schiano’s] been doing. He’s built this thing right back up. I think that the fans and the students are evolving and growing with him,” Huskies coach Jedd Fisch. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Former Washington Nationals Prospect Named Top Player on New Team

Published

on

Former Washington Nationals Prospect Named Top Player on New Team


As the Washington Nationals finish up the regular season, there is a lot of excitement about what’s to come in 2025. 

This campaign was all about development for the Nationals. This was never going to be a team that was going to compete for a World Series this year, but the plan for their rebuild is looking good. 

Washington has been able to stockpile a lot of top prospects and good young players, as now the franchise is watching these players grow. While young players and prospects provide hope and excitement for a franchise, they don’t always pan out. 

In 2019, the Nationals saw the emergence of a talented young outfielder in Victor Robles. The then 22-year-old totaled a batting average of .255 with 17 home runs, 65 RBIs, and 28 stolen bases. The 4.4 WAR Robles was able to record made it appear like Washington had a star on their hands. 

Advertisement

Unfortunately for Washington and Robles, the 2019 season seemed like an outlier, as he didn’t produce anywhere near that level in the years to follow. This campaign, the Nationals decided that it was time to move on from their once talented prospect, as he was picked up by the Seattle Mariners. 

Whether it was the realization of being let go, or the Mariners finding something to help him improve, Robles is playing arguably the best baseball of his career with Seattle. Recently, Joel Reuter of Bleacher Report named the outfielder as one of the Top-5 most important position players on the team. 

Even though the Mariners had a really tough stretch during the season offensively that likely cost them the American League West, the play of Robles for them was really impressive. In 75 games with Seattle, the slugger has totaled a .327 batting average, four home runs, 25 RBIs, and 29 stolen bases. 

While Robles is playing excellently for the Mariners, the Nationals shouldn’t feel bad about moving on from him. Washington gave him plenty of opportunities over the last few years to produce. 

Since the Nationals moved on from Robles, the team has been able to get more playing time for young outfielders like Jacob Young, James Wood, and Dylan Crews. With those players being potential starters and stars for years to come, Washington should have no regrets. 

Advertisement

For Robles, it has been an excellent half of a season in Seattle. He was a player that was once considered a top prospect, and he might be finding his groove once again. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending