Connect with us

Washington

Analysis | 5 key X factors in the Biden vs. Trump rematch

Published

on

Analysis | 5 key X factors in the Biden vs. Trump rematch


Welcome to The Campaign Moment.

(Did a friend forward this to you? If so, sign up here.)

It’s now definitely, assuredly — if not yet officially — general election time (that will happen later summer at the party conventions). Both President Biden and former president Donald Trump secured enough delegates Tuesday to win their parties’ nominations this summer, meaning we can now call them the “presumptive” nominees.

And that means it’s time for a reset about what lies ahead. I think a good way to look at that is isolating a few key X factors that go a long way to determining who wins in November.

Advertisement

There is no question Democrats have lost ground with Black and Hispanic voters, especially among men; the question is how much — and whether it could be decisive.

Many polls show Trump with twice or even three times as much Black support as he got in 2016 (6 percent, according to Pew data) and 2020 (8 percent). If that actually happened — on top of Hispanics’ clear rightward shift in recent elections — it would significantly imperil Biden’s path to victory.

But you rarely see such a major, quick realignment in the American electorate. And there are reasons to be skeptical that’s what we’re about to see.

Still, it’s not just about whether Black or Hispanic voters support Trump; it’s also whether they intend to vote at all. Depressed turnout in the Democratic coalition could be Biden’s worst enemy.

Repeatedly in recent weeks, polling has shown Americans approve of Trump’s presidency more than they ever did when he was in office.

Advertisement

A case in point Wednesday was a USA Today/Suffolk University poll showing nearly half of registered voters did so. That’s despite then-President Trump’s approval rarely reaching beyond the low-40s and falling sharply in his closing days, after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection.

It’s normal for former presidents’ images to improve when they’re out of office. But that’s usually because they fade away and people forget what they disliked. There will be no fading away for Trump over the next eight months, as Democrats will do everything in their power to remind Americans why they disliked about him in the first place — with a potential assist from Trump’s court cases.

Related is just how much Americans have truly absorbed Trump’s increasingly authoritarian vision. Polling suggests they haven’t — not really. But that will surely change as Democrats seek to drive home Trump’s plans for his potential second term. He has, after all, talked about being a dictator for at least one day. Three-quarters of Republicans say that’s “probably” a good thing.

The question from there would become whether stuff like pardoning Jan. 6 defendants, demanding full presidential immunity and directly targeting his political foes for prosecution are deal-breakers for enough Americans.

But Americans already view Trump as extreme, and it’s not been a deal-breaker so far. A CNN poll last month showed that a full 63 percent of Americans labeled Trump “too extreme”; he still led Biden in a head-to-head matchup.

Advertisement

The White House and the Biden campaign suggest this is a media construct, but it’s something the electorate has been very concerned about for a long time. As many as one-quarter of Biden 2020 voters say he’s too old to serve effectively, and 19 percent say it means he’s “not capable of handling the job of president.”

Biden’s State of the Union address last week didn’t appear to allay concerns as much as the left would like (see below).

The real danger here is not so much that it causes Biden voters to flip to Trump, but that it leads them to stay home or vote third-party. Perhaps the specter of Trump will ultimately be enough for these voters to ultimately pull the lever for Biden, but it’s a very significant complicating factor when voters don’t believe you have what it takes to actually do the job.

This has clearly been Biden’s biggest policy liability. But Republicans gave Biden something to work last month with when they killed a bipartisan deal that could have significant shored up the border.

While early polling suggested Americans weren’t exactly clamoring for such a deal, a Wall Street Journal poll last week that described the legislation showed Americans supported it 59 percent to 34 percent.

Advertisement

Americans still strongly disapprove of Biden on immigration — about 2-to-1. And that poll showed they’re still more likely to blame the chaotic border on Biden’s reversal of Trump’s immigration executive orders (45 percent) than on the failure of the congressional deal (39 percent).

But that’s actually a pretty close margin. Given Americans have overwhelmingly favored the GOP on this issue, it suggests Biden could conceivably chip away at that advantage if he drives this issue home like he did in his State of the Union.

A moment for fading protest votes

As for the actual election results on Tuesday?

Nikki Haley’s vote shares fell a week after she dropped out of the race, but she still took 22 percent in Washington state and 13 percent in Georgia.

Advertisement

The Post’s Scott Clement and Lenny Bronner note the Georgia results are something of a mirage. The latest data show Haley got just 7 percent of Election Day voters, compared to 20 percent of early voters. The early vote was overwhelmingly conducted when Haley was still a candidate, beginning Feb. 19 and ending Friday. (Haley also got 28 percent of absentee voters, a much smaller share of the electorate.)

That said, regardless of when the votes came in, Haley continued to do disproportionately well in metro areas and the suburbs, which loom as a potential problem for Trump. She took around 40 percent in Atlanta-based Fulton and DeKalb counties. She also got 34 percent in Seattle-based King County.

As for Biden, he ceded 7.5 percent of the vote in Washington state to “uncommitted,” the option critics of his stance on the war in Gaza have pushed. That’s a smaller share than he previously ceded in Hawaii (29 percent), Minnesota (19 percent), Michigan (13 percent) and Colorado (9 percent).

Biden’s not-so-momentous post-State of the Union polls

On Friday, I noted that all the hype surrounding Biden’s State of the Union address wasn’t really borne out in an instant CNN poll.

Advertisement

And now, more substantial polling would appear to confirm he got no real bump.

  • 33 percent of those who watched at least some of the speech said it improved their view of Biden, the Suffolk poll shows.
  • 28 percent said the opposite.
  • Independents were about evenly split.

Perhaps more troubling for Biden, a Yahoo/YouGov poll showed no real improvement on the issue many Biden supporters wagered he had mitigated with the speech: his age and mental acuity.

  • 29 percent said Biden was fit to serve another term, unchanged from January.
  • 51 percent said his age is a “big problem” that affects his fitness, unchanged from January.
  • 17 percent who watched said Biden seemed “not as old” as expected.

Such questions can get bogged down in polarization. But tellingly, the poll suggests Biden didn’t even gain with Democrats on these issues. And both polls showed virtually no change in his image numbers.

  • Trump’s freewheeling speeches offer a dark vision of a second term (Washington Post)
  • Trump takes control of the RNC with mass layoffs, restructuring (Washington Post)
  • How Donald Trump switched to defending TikTok (Washington Post)
  • Biden aims to repair places left broken by previous economic strategies (Washington Post)
  • Five takeaways from the Hur special counsel hearing (Washington Post)
  • The Biden-Trump Rerun: A Nation Craving Change Gets More of the Same (New York Times)
  • Trump Courts Black Voters Even as He Traffics in Stereotypes (New York Times)



Source link

Washington

1 dead, 2 injured in head-on collision near Sequim

Published

on

1 dead, 2 injured in head-on collision near Sequim


A man is dead, and two others were injured after two vehicles collided near Sequim late Sunday night, according to the Washington State Patrol (WSP).

An SUV with two people was heading west on SR 101 at around 7:15 p.m. when a pickup truck in the opposite direction crossed the center line and crashed head-on.

The SUV passenger, a 39-year-old Lynnwood man, was declared dead by authorities at the scene. A 34-year-old woman driving the vehicle was airlifted to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, and her condition is unknown.

WSP said drugs or alcohol played a part in the collision. The Colorado man is facing charges of vehicular homicide and vehicular assault.

Advertisement

The Colorado man was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the crash and was lifeflighted to Providence Regional Medical Center in Everett. WSP has not released his condition.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

How Washington’s crossing of the Delaware presaged a changing world

Published

on

How Washington’s crossing of the Delaware presaged a changing world


Spend some time staring at the famous painting “Washington Crossing the Delaware,” and you can’t miss the ice. It’s everywhere. Cold weather became part of Washington’s military strategy, says Alex Robb, an educator at Washington Crossing Historic Park outside Philadelphia. “It does a lot to impede the crossing and endanger the whole operation,” he said, “but it actually becomes our shield.”

“Washington Crossing the Delaware” by Emanuel Leutze, 1851. Oil on canvas. From the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. 

GraphicaArtis/Getty Images

Advertisement


At the end of 1776, after a string of losses, Washington’s army was on the verge of collapse. But Robb says that on Christmas, with ice forming in the Delaware River, the enemy assumed it was too dangerous for the Americans to cross.

They were wrong … and the cold weather handed Washington the element of surprise. His victory at Trenton was a sign that the war could still be won.

Robb said, “Looking back, had the weather proven more mild, they most definitely would’ve encountered resistance outside Trenton.”  Just a few degrees made the difference between winning and losing a battle.

revolutionary-war-re-enactors.jpg

Every year, Revolutionary War re-enactors gather to mark the anniversary of Gen. Washington’s crossing of the Delaware on Christmas 1776. 

CBS News

Advertisement


At that time, Americans were used to colder winters. We know that from Thomas Jefferson’s meticulous, handwritten weather records. But since then, winter has gotten warmer. “Ever since Washington was here, there has been a steady increase,” said Jen Brady, a data analyst at the science non-profit Climate Central. Their research shows that average winter temperatures in the Philadelphia area have gone up and down over the years. But overall, they are now 5.5 degrees warmer than they were in 1970.

As for the current weather conditions around Washington Crossing, Pa., Brady said, “It will continue to snow. There will continue to be cold in cold places. But there will be less of it.”

“It’s a time machine”

The best evidence of our changing climate comes from ice cores – long tubes of ice extracted out of glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica. And inside the ice core are perfectly-preserved air bubbles. The deeper you drill, the older the bubbles. “It’s this sort of magical way of going back in time,” said Eric Steig, a glaciologist at the University of Washington in Seattle. “It’s a time machine.”

eric-steig-ice-core.jpg

Glaciologist Eric Steig slices an ice core, showing trapped air bubbles dating back to the birth of the United States.  

CBS News

Advertisement


Steig showed us one ice core that dates from 1776, containing tiny pockets of air from that time. “So, like, you’re breathing a little bit of the air that George Washington breathed,” Steig said.

Those bubbles contain carbon dioxide, a gas that helps regulate Earth’s temperature. And for 800,000 years the carbon levels found in ice cores have gone up and down, but never above 300 parts per million – not until around 1800, when they started to take off.

What changed at that point to make that spike? “We began burning fossil fuels, and we’re doing it really fast,” Steig said.

carbon-levels-over-millennia.jpg

CBS News

Advertisement


Since the Industrial Revolution, which began around the time of the American Revolution, our cars, factories, and power plants have been burning oil and gas and emitting massive amounts of carbon dioxide. That has led to warmer temperatures, which can intensify extreme floods, droughts and fires.

Steig said, “It would seem to me it’s good for people to understand things have changed, and will continue to change, and have an understanding of what to expect going forward.”

So, it turns out, around the time Washington looked out on the icy Delaware, there were two important pictures coming into focus: One, the story of America; the other, the beginnings of climate change.

And both continue to shape our world.

What would Washington say if he showed up in 2026? Steig replied, “You pluck somebody from that time period, they would see things having changed quite dramatically.”

Advertisement

     
For more info:

  • Alex Robb, Washington Crossing Historic Park, Washington Crossing, Pa.
  • Jennifer Brady, senior data analyst and research manager, Climate Central
  • Eric Steig, glaciologist, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle
  • Thanks to Martin Froger Silva, University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership, and the U.S. Ice Drilling Program

      
Story produced by Robert Marston. Editor: Chad Cardin. 

    
See more: 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington panel set to consider Trump’s ballroom project in March

Published

on

Washington panel set to consider Trump’s ballroom project in March


Washington – President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project may get a blessing from Washington planning authorities as soon as next month.

Trump razed the White House’s East Wing in October to make way for a $400 million, 90,000-square-foot (8,400-square-meter) addition that he says will be privately financed. The administration planned the neoclassical building’s ribbon-cutting for summer 2028 as part of the most extensive remaking of the U.S. capital’s landscape in decades.

Advertisement

The National Capital Planning Commission said it would consider “approval of preliminary and final site and building plans” on March 5, according to a tentative meeting agenda posted online.

The commission is one of two federal bodies, along with the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, assigned a role in overseeing key D.C.-area building projects.

Neither group is expected to block or delay Trump’s plans. Trump picked several members of both groups, and his former personal lawyer Will Scharf chairs the National Capital Planning Commission.

But federal courts are scrutinizing the project. A judge last month expressed skepticism about whether the administration had authority to proceed with construction after a demolition that Congress didn’t approve.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued in December, arguing that the project lacked the required approvals and environmental review.

Advertisement

In documents supporting its proposal and posted online by the commission, the Trump administration said it concluded that demolition of the East Wing was “the most effective solution to many longstanding issues affecting the White House” in light of the 120-year-old structure’s limitations, poor energy efficiency and limited accessibility for people with disabilities.

The White House’s disclosures were the most extensive description of the project to date, including illustrations by architect Shalom Baranes.

In those disclosures, the White House said the administration planned to incorporate some preserved items from the East Wing, such as its cornerstone and a pergola designed by the Chinese-American architect I.M. Pei.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending