Connect with us

Washington

ACLU sues Washington to stop “Parents Bill of Rights” from becoming law

Published

on

ACLU sues Washington to stop “Parents Bill of Rights” from becoming law


A group of legal advocacy organizations filed a lawsuit against the state of Washington Thursday to prevent a hotly debated voter initiative from taking effect next month.

The organizations claim that the measure, Initiative 2081, conflicts with youth privacy laws and could “result in harm to LGBTQ+ students, youth of color, and students from other marginalized backgrounds,” according to a press release. A court hearing on the lawsuit could happen next week.

I-2081 was one of three Republican-backed voter initiatives that the Legislature approved in March. It’s known as the so-called “Parents Bill of Rights” and outlines more than a dozen rights for parents to oversee their kids’ education and school medical records.

At the time, Democratic lawmakers who decided to vote for the measure said they support parents being involved in their children’s schooling but were concerned about the possibility that the measure didn’t mesh well with existing education policy. A legislative staff analysis showed much of the langauge in I-2081 is duplicative, or in some cases less precise, than state and federal regulations around parental access to school materials and student records — and some lawmakers interpreted this to mean than the measure wouldn’t drastically change current practices.

Advertisement

Several legislators have vowed to keep a close watch on the implementation of I-2081, and said they’d be quick to make changes to the law if it caused harm to young people, particularly LGBTQ youth, or confusion among school administrators.

On Thursday, the American Civil Liberties of Washington, Qlaw, and Legal Voice jointly filed a lawsuit on behalf of 10 plaintiffs to prevent the measure from taking effect on June 6.

The lawsuit alleges that the measure violates the state constitution.

“Our state constitution requires that new laws properly identify how they impact existing laws, and 2081 fails to do that,” said Adrien Leavitt, ACLU staff attorney. “The way that the initiative was written is confusing, and it’s vague and it’s misleading — and it doesn’t explain what important rights that it actually impacts for the youth that attend our state’s public schools.”

The plaintiffs in the case include several nonprofits, like Lavender Rights Project, Sexual Violence Law Center and MomsRising. Two individuals, as well as South Whidbey School District, are also named as plaintiffs in the case.

Advertisement

“Black and Indigenous students rely upon sexual health resources, information, and care within public schools and school-based clinics, and to erode confidentiality in those spaces will acutely impact those students,” Leavitt added.

The lawsuit is the latest development in an ongoing saga of recent voter initiative action in Washington.

A group called Let’s Go Washington started working in 2023 to qualify a handful of voter initiatives for consideration in this year’s legislative session, including I-2081.

Let’s Go Washington founder Brian Heywood said in a statement that the ACLU’s lawsuit is antidemocratic.

“The ACLU has made their disdain for the democratic process abundantly clear,” Heywood said. “We expect [Attorney General] Bob Ferguson to uphold his duty within the law to protect the will of the people and shut down this frivolous attempt by the ACLU to deprive parents of their civil liberties.”

Advertisement

Rep. Jim Walsh (R-Aberdeen) chairs the Washington State Republican party and filed the paperwork for I-2081. He called the lawsuit an attack on rights for families.

“ACLU Washington is damaging its credibility by aligning with several radical left organizations to file an eccentric lawsuit,” he wrote in a text message.

Once I-2081 received enough support from registered voters to be considered in Olympia, Republicans were eager to hold hearings and pass the measure into law. Democrats, who have majority control in the Legislature, expressed concerns about the initiative, but enough of them voted with Republicans to approve it.

Legislative leaders said in March their decision to approve I-2081 and two other voter initiatives was multifaceted. One major point of consideration: Enacting these initiatives in the Legislature – as opposed to letting voters decide on them – preserved lawmakers’ ability to make prompt adjustments to those measures once they became law.

Three additional initiatives are going to the ballot in November. If voters pass any of these initiatives, changing them would require a two-thirds majority in the Legislature for the first two years the voter-approved policies are in effect — a relatively high bar to meet. Legislature-approved initiatives, meanwhile, can be adjusted just like any other part of state law.

Advertisement

Copyright 2024 NWNews





Source link

Washington

Meet the 90-year-old old retired Chicago teacher who stays active by jumping rope

Published

on

Meet the 90-year-old old retired Chicago teacher who stays active by jumping rope


ByABC7 Chicago Digital Team

Monday, March 9, 2026 6:59PM

90-year-old old retired Chicago teacher stays active by jumping rope

CHICAGO (WLS) — Miss Ruth Washington is staying active at 90-years-young!

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

Washington is a retired Chicago Public Schools teacher. She taught from 1969 to 1993.

She spent the last 10 years of her career teaching Pre-K at Fort Dearborn Elementary School on Chicago’s South Side.

She jumps rope with the 40+ Double Dutch Club in Pullman.

Advertisement

The organization was created to give women a fun outlet to improve physical and mental health.

Her advice on staying active into your 90s is: “pray to God, find an activity you love, and remember to treat others with the love that our civil rights leaders taught us.”

To learn about the 40+ Double Dutch Club, click here.

Copyright © 2026 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Classical Review

Published

on

Washington Classical Review


Viviana Goodwin in the title role and Justin Austin as Remus in Scott Joplin’s Treemonisha at Washington National Opera. Photo: Elman Studios

Washington National Opera has survived its exodus from the Kennedy Center. In the first performance since ending the affiliation agreement with its former home, WNO delivered a beautiful and timely production of Scott Joplin’s only surviving opera, Treemonisha. The substitute venue, Lisner Auditorium, resounded with a sold-out audience of enthusiastic supporters, something WNO had not drawn to the KC in months.

Treemonisha is a young black woman found as a baby under a tree by her adoptive parents, Monisha and Ned. Educated by a white woman, she teaches others in her rural community, near Texarkana (where Joplin himself was raised), to read and write. After she defeats the local conjurers, who use superstition to cheat and swindle, the community elects her as their leader.

This version of Treemonisha, while still largely recognizable as Joplin’s work, has been adapted and orchestrated by composer Damien Sneed, with some new dialogue and lyrics by Kyle Bass. The work remains a lightweight piece in many ways: an operetta more than an opera, with spoken dialogue and incorporating a range of popular musical styles, a compendium of the music Joplin heard and played in his youth, from ragtime to spirituals to barbershop quartet. The adaptation tightens some of the dramatic structure, while bringing out the originality of Joplin’s compositional voice.

Advertisement

Soprano Viviana Goodwin, a Cafritz Young Artist heard as Clara in last season’s Porgy and Bess, made an eloquent and winsome Treemonisha. Her lyrical voice suited the character’s dreamy, idealistic arias, and her supple top range provided more than enough power to carry the opera’s major climaxes. The changes to the opera, especially Treemonisha’s romance with and marriage to Remus, only implied in Joplin’s score, made the character more human than idealized savior.

The role of Remus, written by Joplin for a tenor, had to be adjusted somewhat for baritone Justin Austin to sing it. While not ideal musically, the change made sense in terms of casting: the earnest Austin, tall and imposing, proved a sinewy presence. Sneed, while doing away with the duet between Monisha and Ned (“I Want to See My Child”), showed the growing love between Remus and Tremonisha by giving them a hummed duet as they returned to the community, to the tune of “Marching Onward” from the opera’s final number.

Kevin Short as Ned  and Tichina Vaughan as Monisha in WNO’s Treemonisha. Photo: Elman Studios

Tichina Vaughn brought a burnished mezzo-soprano and dignified stage presence to the motherly role of Monisha, with some potent high notes along the way, for a solid WNO debut. Bass-baritone Kevin Short gave humor as well as authority to her husband, Ned, with some of the opera’s most lyrical moments. His big aria in Act III, “When Villains Ramble Far and Near,” had a Sarastro-like gravitas, even venturing down to a rich low D at the conclusion.

Among the supporting cast, tenor Jonathan Pierce Rhodes continues to show a broad acting range. After his turn as a trans woman, among other roles while a Cafritz Young Artist, Rhodes displayed both strutting confidence and vulnerability as the leader of the conjurers, Zodzetrick. In another change to Joplin’s libretto, in this adaptation, Zodzetrick does not take advantage of Treemonisha’s insistence on mercy by going back to his old ways but is sincerely converted.

Advertisement

Both tenor Hakeem Henderson and baritone Nicholas LaGesse had impressive turns, as Andy and Parson Alltalk, respectively. In Sneed’s adaptation, Alltalk is not in league with the conjurers as in Joplin’s libretto. 

Director Denyce Graves, who portrayed the conjurers more as practitioners of an African or Caribbean folk religion, insisted that the staging was “not meant to mock spiritual tradition or folk belief.” Both the Parson and the conjurers, in fact, seem pious in their own ways.

The most obvious change to the score was heard at the opening of Act I, when banjo player DeAnte Haggerty-Willis took the stage to play a number before the Overture. The banjo, Joplin’s mother’s instrument, added a lovely, authentic aura throughout the evening. Sneed himself, seated at an onstage upright piano like the spirit of Scott Joplin, joined the opening number and added musical touches to the orchestral fabric throughout the performance. Sneed’s orchestration used a limited number of strings and modest woodwinds and brass, restricted by Lisner’s small pit. Kedrick Armstrong, appointed as music director of the Oakland Symphony in 2024, held things together at the podium with a calm hand.

The choral numbers, sung by the supporting cast, had a pleasing heft in the small but resonant acoustic. Sneed moved the chorus “Aunt Dinah Has Blowed de Horn” from its position at the end of Act II to open Act I, now sung by Treemonisha’s community instead of the plantation she and Remus pass through on their way home. That piece followed Joplin’s lengthy overture, which Graves decided to accompany with a pantomime. That regrettable choice, too often made by directors these days, was made worse by depicting the story of Treemonisha’s adoption, thus making redundant Monisha’s later narration of those same events.

Graves, who has embarked on a second career as a talented opera director, nonetheless created a visually appealing and dramatically cogent production. The paisley-like vine patterns covering Lawrence E. Moten III’s set pieces recalled the tree central to the plot, as well as the wreaths worn by the girls in the community. The vibrant lighting designed by Jason Lynch brought out different hues in those patterns, suiting each scene’s mood.

Advertisement

The choreography by Eboni Adams, performed by four elegant dancers as well as the cast, added another lively aspect to this worthy staging. The adaptation moved Joplin’s ballet, “The Frolic of the Bears,” to the start of Act II, where it served instead as an expression of the conjurers’ folk beliefs. All in all, this is a worthy staging of an American monument, kicking off a series of three American works to conclude the WNO season in style.

Treemonisha runs through March 15. washnatopera.org

Photo: Elman Studios



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

‘Insult to injury’: Former officers react to location of Jan. 6 plaque

Published

on

‘Insult to injury’: Former officers react to location of Jan. 6 plaque


Just before dawn Saturday, a plaque honoring U.S. Capitol Police along with other law enforcement agencies who protected the Capitol on Jan. 6 was installed.

It comes more than 5 years after insurrectionists stormed the building. The Senate voted to install the plaque after the House GOP refused to display it.

“I think that speaks volumes about they’re doing this because they were forced to do it, and they did it in a manner that really added insult to the injury, to the injury that they had already subjected so many law enforcement officers to,” said former Capitol police officer Michael Fanone.

Fanone was one of the officers attacked by the rioters five years ago. He later suffered a heart attack and resigned from the Metropolitan Police Department.

Advertisement

Fanone says many officers feel betrayed by the institutions they fought to protect.

“They installed it at four in the morning, in a part of the Senate that is not accessible to the public,” he said. “The whole purpose of the plaque is to remind the public when they come visit the Capitol of the selflessness, courage of the Metropolitan police department and the U.S. Capitol Police.”

The riot took place at the tail end of President Donald Trump’s first term while Congress was attempting to certify 2020 election results.

When Trump was sworn in for his second term last year, he pardoned roughly 1,500 criminal defendants who were charged for their actions at the capitol on Jan. 6.

The new marker comes two months after the Senate unanimously agreed to a resolution directing the architect of the capitol to install the plaque honoring the officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Advertisement

The resolution was introduced earlier this year after congress had stalled on plans outlined in a 2022 law to install a similar plaque by March 2023.

The marker was installed on the Senate side of the Capitol and is expected to stay there until both chambers can agree on a more permanent place for it.

Former U.S. Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn, who filed a joint lawsuit seeking the installation of the plaque, took to social media, writing, “The location of the plaque that was just hung, is in a place that it will not be visible to the public. While I am thankful for this first step, our lawsuit continues until the plaque is hung in accordance with the law.”

The plaque reads, “On behalf of a grateful Congress, this plaque honors the extraordinary individuals who bravely protected and defended this symbol of democracy on January 6, 2021. Their heroism will never be forgotten.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending