Connect with us

Utah

Utah’s collaborative effort to make housing more affordable

Published

on

Utah’s collaborative effort to make housing more affordable


  • Housing affordability is Utah’s top concern for legislators to address according to recent voter poll.
  • The Utah Housing Strategic Plan targets outlines tactics for improving housing affordability.
  • One of the main bills this session would help fund regional infrastructure projects.

A Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics poll conducted last month showed that housing affordability is the No. 1 issue Utah voters want the Utah Legislature to address during the current session.

So, what are state lawmakers doing about the affordability of housing?

The state’s objectives for housing are outlined in the Utah Housing Strategic Plan which was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Governor’s Office, the Legislature and other stakeholders.

Steve Waldrip, the governor’s senior adviser for housing strategy and innovation shared that traditionally, government has only been involved in low income and subsidized housing, which involved using public resources to “the least fortunate among us.”

Waldrip said there has been a shift, because now housing prices have increased to the point where the traditional working class can no longer afford a home.

Advertisement

“What we’re facing is having to look at strategies to create affordability for what we didn’t used to have to worry about, which is teachers and firefighters. They can’t afford to buy a home, and that’s a change,” Waldrip said.

Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, agreed Utah is currently in a housing crisis.

The goals and ideas outlined in the plan are guiding the major moves in housing policy that are being made this legislative session.

What is the Utah Housing Strategic Plan?

Last year, the Legislature passed HB37, which directed the governor’s office to make a strategic plan to help solve the housing crisis in the state.

Waldrip said state leaders didn’t want the plan to just come from the governor’s office, or have different groups all make separate plans.

Advertisement

“We tried to do an integrated collaborative process, bringing as many people to the table as we could,” he said. The group worked together to analyze and investigate how the housing problem can be dealt with, he said.

Cameron Diehl, the executive director of the Utah League of Cities and Towns, said his organization was involved in the creation of the plan and gave feedback on the final product. The league represents over 1,400 mayors and city council members and 250 cities and towns across the state.

“It’s been a very collaborative process, it doesn’t mean that we agree with everything in the plan, but it’s been a very collaborative process, and really one of the core principles in the state housing plan is collaboration with all stakeholders,” Diehl said.

The aim of the strategic plan is to “ensure that every resident in Utah has access to safe, affordable and stable housing options.”

The plan has three main goals:

Advertisement
  1. Improve housing availability, affordability and stability.
  2. Foster community well-being and quality of life.
  3. Seek consensus and evidence-based policy and housing support solutions.

The plan outlines over 50 tactics that can help improve the housing situation in the state.

Diehl said that his group is fully supportive of some of the tactics while others give them pause.

“Anytime you have a list of 50 tactics you’re going to like some more than others,” he said.

One of the other objectives of the plan is to achieve the governor’s goal of building 35,000 starter homes by 2028.

The housing affordability issue in Utah

“I believe that if you’re a kid born in Utah, you’re raised here in Utah, you’re educated in Utah, you work hard, you should have the opportunity to afford a starter home,” said Rep. Calvin Roberts, R-Draper, in an interview with the Deseret News.

He added that the younger generations are increasingly getting priced out of the housing market.

Advertisement

The representative shared that over the last 40 years the median home price has risen 5.2% each year, but the median wage has only risen about 3.2% a year.

“You get this massive gap between where home prices are today and where the median wage is,” Roberts said.

Waldrip said the standard used to be that the median home price was three times the median wage. Over the last about eight years, Utah peaked at about 6.2 times the median wage for the median home price. Currently the state is now at about 5.5.

“So we’ve essentially doubled the cost of the median home,” Waldrip said.

Multiple lawmakers and stakeholders emphasized that there is a supply and demand issue; there are just not enough homes available to meet the need in Utah. Because of the demand, the value of the existing homes has gone up.

Advertisement

Waldrip said Utah is currently attracting a lot of growth from outside of the state, making it so people raised in Utah have a harder time buying a home here.

He did acknowledge that the growth is a positive and Utah can continue to grow and “stay great.”

“The goal is always to increase the supply as we’ve been growing fast,” said Sen. Lincoln Fillmore, R-South Jordan, during Thursday’s Senate media availability.

The state government wants to get more people out of renting apartments and into owning homes.

“Our society is built on property ownership and the ability for people to be able to purchase property, create generational wealth, create stability and have that opportunity of what we call the American dream, and that’s what we see slipping away generationally,” Waldrip said.

Advertisement

Lawmakers are implementing the plan through infrastructure investment

One of the biggest housing bills of the session is HB492 which was numbered on Wednesday. Sponsored by Roberts, the bill would help build infrastructure that would unlock thousands of planned houses around the state and allow them to be built.

“So what we’re trying to do is find ways to unlock the building that is ready to occur. We have lots of paper parcels that are ready to build on, but they don’t have the infrastructure they need, so no building is happening,” said Gov. Spencer Cox in an interview with the Deseret News at the start of the session.

This includes regional infrastructure such as sewer lift stations, water treatment facilities, water tanks and big regional roads.

HB492 would allow the state to partner with cities and help invest in the big capacity regional infrastructure, “to support the growth that cities have already planned.”

It would create the State Housing Infrastructure Partnership Fund, which is a revolving loan fund meant to finance these infrastructure projects that support new housing. The funding would come from money that already exists within the state government.

Advertisement

According to numbers from the Utah League of Cities and Towns, eight Utah cities have identified a total of 109,074 entitled units in late 2025, with 12% ready for building and 88% that require infrastructure improvements. Those eight cities are Herriman, West Jordan, South Jordan, Riverton, Bluffdale, Lehi, Saratoga Springs and Eagle Mountain.

Waldrip was told by the mayor of Washington City that there are 2,852 planned lots that are waiting to be built in the city.

“The cities are on board with the state coming in and helping fund these things, because they’re not planning anything, it’s just getting the funds in. That’s that partnership model,” Diehl said.

This infrastructure investment plan is one of the key tactics in the strategic housing plan.

The governor said he thinks this “will have a greater effect than just about anything else that we can do right now.”

Advertisement

Bringing all housing policy together under one roof

Sponsored by Roberts, HB68, would not create any new policy but would rather reorganize and centralize how housing policy is handled by the state.

While presenting to the House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee on Wednesday, Roberts said: “When I first started as a legislator, I wanted to get involved in housing policy, but it’s a challenge, because right now, over 40 housing policies are scattered across at least four different executive agencies.”

He added that this makes it difficult for both legislators and other Utahns because if someone has questions about housing it’s not clear who they should go and talk to.

HB68 would create the Division of Housing and Community Development, which would sit within the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity. The division would have a director who is confirmed by the Senate.

Waldrip said the bill will “create more streamlined accountability in the governor’s office, in the executive branch, we can then report back to the legislature and say, ‘Hey, here’s what we’re doing. Here’s why we’re doing it.’”

Advertisement

He said it will allow the division to share what they’ve done with their appropriations and what their goals and needs are.

Roberts said this bill will essentially accomplish two things:

  1. Legislators who pass housing policy bill will have someone they can hold accountable who has to report back to the lawmakers.
  2. This will bring more efficiency and will remove redundancies involved in the housing policy process.

Other things lawmakers are doing

Rep. Stephen Whyte, R-Mapleton, has introduced a resolution, HCR6, to officially recognize the strategic housing plan.

Waldrip said the point of the resolution is to “make sure that we have the legislature and the governor’s office walking in lockstep on this path.”

One of the key tactics of the plan is to see how and where government land can be used for housing.

“We have a lot of government land in Utah and so we’re starting with the lowest hanging fruit of government land, which are parcels that are scattered within our communities,” Waldrip said.

Advertisement

He added that the Utah Department of Transportation has made 15 parcels available for starter homes. The goal is also to make a list of surplus property that will help provide ownership opportunities at a lower cost.

“We have land, let’s make use of land that’s already served by infrastructure,” Waldrip said.

Adams has made a funding request this session for $10 million to go toward the first time homebuyers programs.

The program “allows $20,000 to be used for a person’s down payment, closing costs or to buy down the rate,” the senator said.

He added that program has helped 3,000 families get into their first home.

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

Utah owns US Magnesium site. Now it has a mess to clean up

Published

on

Utah owns US Magnesium site. Now it has a mess to clean up


Editor’s note: This article is published through the Great Salt Lake Collaborative, a solutions journalism initiative that partners news, education and media organizations to help inform people about the plight of the Great Salt Lake.

SALT LAKE CITY — U.S. Magnesium ceased mineral operations in 2021 amid some equipment failures, which ultimately led to its bankruptcy filing last year.

Yet, state officials say the Tooele County plant was still pulling 50,000 to 80,000 acre-feet of water out of the Great Salt Lake every year, which is about as much as some medium-sized reservoirs can handle and a large chunk of its nearly 145,000 acre-feet in water rights.

It was also the third time that the 4,500-acre facility had shut down over issues, so when its assets went up for auction, Utah leaders decided to strike.

Advertisement

“Rather than just try to reorganize and do the same thing again … the state said, ‘Hey, there’s an opportunity, and we’re going to step up,’” said Joel Ferry, director of the Utah Department of Natural Resources.

Utah agencies and lawmakers acted quickly, swooping in and purchasing it for $30 million during a bankruptcy auction last month. It outbid LiMag Holdings, a company with ties to the plant’s owner, to keep all that water in the lake.

The state’s purchase was finalized last week, after funds from a rainy day account were included in a base budget bill that Gov. Spencer Cox signed. Great Salt Lake Rising, a philanthropic effort to fund lake solutions, ultimately served as a “backstop” to fund the purchase if the state wasn’t able to transfer the funds that quickly.

Utah is now looking at what’s next for the site, including what its duties and obligations are, Ferry told state legislators in a meeting about lake issues on Tuesday.

What the state does know is that it has a mess to clean up. The Environmental Protection Agency included it on its list of hazardous superfund sites in 2009.

Advertisement

“Facility operations and waste disposal practices contaminated soil, air, surface water and groundwater with hazardous chemicals,” the agency wrote, adding that it posed a threat to workers, as well as birds and wildlife.

What the cleanup looks like is still unclear, though. Utah already had a liability with the site because it’s on sovereign lands, and it had leased mineral rights to the company. But now that it owns the site, it doesn’t have a full picture of the situation.

The state has yet to determine how large the contamination is or what all the contaminants are, which will help understand how much it will cost to fix it, said Tim Davis, director of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality. All of that will be compiled into a record of decision outlining how it’ll be cleaned up in the future.

“It’ll take time; it will not happen immediately. A lot of this is very complex, and there will be additional resources. (We’ll) need funding to pay for that cleanup,” he told KSL after the meeting, adding that having the state jump ahead and compile this saves time and money rather than waiting on the federal government.

No timeline has been set for when the report will be released, but Davis suspects the cleanup will take years to complete.

Advertisement

It will be a “significant cost,” which Utah could pay for through new mineral extraction agreements, Ferry said. The critical minerals within the lake, like salt, lithium, potash and, yes, magnesium, are still in high demand, and there are new technologies that can extract them without using much water.

“We’re looking at those kinds of opportunities to do this in the right way,” he said. “But from an air quality perspective (and) from a water quantity perspective, this was one of the biggest things we could have done today to lead to a positive change on Great Salt Lake.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah cheer team seeks help finding missing mother, daughter last seen at New York-New York Hotel

Published

on

Utah cheer team seeks help finding missing mother, daughter last seen at New York-New York Hotel


A Utah cheer team is asking for the public’s help to find a mother and daughter they say are missing on Saturday February 14.

Tawnia McGeehan and Addi Smith were last seen at the New York-New York hotel.

Police have not confirmed the disappearance.

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Anyone with information is urged to contact 385-985-7249.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

We sold our house in Utah to rent in Denver. The move was a big financial risk, but it was worth it.

Published

on

We sold our house in Utah to rent in Denver. The move was a big financial risk, but it was worth it.


Sometimes, a decision doesn’t make sense on paper, but it just feels right to your soul. That’s what my family’s big move was like.

Last year, our family of five sold our affordable home in rural southern Utah to move into a more expensive rental in a Denver suburb.

We had wanted a change for a long time, and the timing finally felt right. We could’ve stayed where we were “safe” financially, but all our family members were struggling in different ways.

I couldn’t shake the feeling that nothing would really get better until we were brave enough to make a big change — so we did.

Advertisement

Moving from Utah to Denver was a difficult financial decision

One of the hardest parts to accept about moving was leaving our extended family and a house that we had lived in for 13 years.

Even more difficult was that our house in Utah was affordable. We were privileged to buy a house when prices were reasonable, and mortgage rates were low. We would have moved a long time ago, but we felt stuck in a home we had outgrown because it was cheap.

We knew that if we sold our house, we would be paying a lot more elsewhere. But the decision still felt right for our family.

We figured Denver was worth the price increase

We chose a Denver suburb because we love the outdoors and also miss the opportunities that a city provides. We have friends in the area, so we knew we would have a community once we arrived.

Advertisement


Katy Anderson's kids in nature in denver

The author’s kids enjoy Denver’s nature.

Courtesy of Katy Anderson



We chose an area known for its “small town feel.” As soon as we moved in, I immediately fell in love with the neighborhood. We are surrounded by an abundance of mature trees, and are within walking distance of wonderful trails for walking and biking.

I’ve been amazed at the wildlife around us, especially considering we live in a Metro area.

Just walking the trails in our neighborhood, we’ve seen rabbits, coyotes, elk, raccoons, turkeys, and many different species of birds. We feel closer to nature here than we did in rural Utah.

Advertisement

After living here for a few weeks, we decided to purchase e-bikes so we could ride much farther along the trails, including to coffee shops, restaurants, city gardens, and parks.

This area also provides us with access to shopping, museums, concerts, and sporting venues. After living in a secluded town for so many years, having these amenities feels like a luxury.

We’re saving money in other ways

Our rent is high in Denver, and that has been the biggest adjustment.

Before we made the move, I was also worried about the cost of living, but I have been pleasantly surprised. Our kids even get free school lunch thanks to a statewide Healthy School Meals for All program. My kids have all commented that the food is of better quality. They actually want to eat the school lunches here.

We are paying much less for gas in Colorado, as we are driving substantially less. In Utah, we lived on the outskirts of town and had to drive 15 to 20 minutes to get to work or to the nearest grocery store.

Advertisement

When we moved to Colorado, we also immediately ended most of our subscriptions and streaming services. We’ve cut down on our discretionary spending and are eating more family meals at home.

We also chose jobs that would help us adjust to our new housing costs

We knew we would be paying more for housing no matter where we moved, so we chose a location with ample work opportunities. My husband is a psychiatric nurse practitioner, and I have picked up a part time job in addition to my freelance writing business.

We are all making more money in Colorado than we could in Utah, where the minimum wage is still $7.25 per hour. Two of my teenage sons were amazed when they realized how much more they could earn in their new city.

Right now, we are enjoying the freedom of renting. Buying a home in this economy feels daunting, and we want to take our time exploring Colorado to see where we may want to buy if it feels right.

For now, I am grateful that my kids have a chance to experience living in a bigger city with more diversity and opportunities. Overall, I feel like we fit in here in a way that we never did in our old town, and that is priceless.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending