Connect with us

Utah

Utah takes first step to challenge rule requiring cleaner coal power

Published

on

Utah takes first step to challenge rule requiring cleaner coal power


Petition seeks review of “Good Neighbor Rule,” which aims to keep Utah pollution out of Colorado.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Huntington Power Plant in Emery County, on Thursday, July 21, 2022. Utah officials are challenging a federal proposal to limit pollution from Huntington and other coal plants in Utah.

Utah has begun its legal challenge of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s “Good Neighbor” rule Tuesday, which Utah leaders say “harms Utahns and threatens our ability to provide affordable and reliable baseload energy to our state.”

Also known as the Ozone Transfer Rule, the regulation put forth by the Biden Administration would bring Utah under regulations that limit how much pollution from power plants is allowed to drift to other states. Eastern states have been regulated under the rule for years.

Advertisement

“As Utah’s elected state leaders, we stand united in pushing back against the administration’s egregious power grab that harms Utahns,” said a joint statement from Utah’s governor, attorney general, congressional delegation and legislative leadership. “We will each fight for a responsible energy policy that embraces efficiency and is based in reality because keeping the lights on is the only option.”

Earlier this year, Utah legislators allocated $2 million to fund the legal challenge, and the Utah Attorney General’s office has hired an outside law firm for the fight. Tuesday’s filing was just two pages, and it is just a petition to have the court review the rule. Rich Piatt, spokesperson for the Utah Attorney General’s office, said the petition is the first step in the legal process. At a later step, the state will file its arguments for why it believes the rule should be reversed.

The EPA has said that nitrogen oxides from Utah plants blows east and could form ozone in Colorado. The Denver metro area is not meeting federal ozone standards, so any ozone produced from Utah pollutants would be contributing to that non-attainment. High ozone levels are known to damage lung tissue.

Utah has disputed the idea that the state’s coal plants are affecting health in Colorado. Utah officials also say it would take millions of dollars to install pollution-control equipment to comply with the regulation, which they say would harm Utahns and the state’s economy.

Environmental groups have criticized the state’s decision to challenge the rule, arguing that coal plant operators have had plenty of time to address their pollution. “There’s been numerous rules that have been targeting these coal plants and trying to clean them up for literally decades,” said Lindsey Beebe earlier this year. Beebe is a Utah-based representative of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign.

Advertisement

Rocky Mountain Power, which is Utah’s largest electricity provider and operates two large coal-fired power plants in Emery County, is supporting the lawsuit. Rocky Mountain Director of Government Affairs Thom Carter, director of government affairs for Rocky Mountain Power/PacifiCorp, told legislators last week that the company was fighting the rule in court but was also planning to comply with the regulation while the case is being argued and after that if the suit fails.

Utah has four coal-fired power plants that could potentially be affected by the rule. In addition to the two Rocky Mountain plants, the Intermountain Power Project operates the state’s largest coal-fired power plant near Delta, but IPP officials have already announced their plans to close the coal units and move to natural gas and hydrogen. The other plant is the Bonanza power plant near Vernal, which serves rural electrical cooperatives in Utah and adjoining states.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox called the rule an “egregious power grab” in a tweet about the filing. Utah House Speaker Brad Wilson, who is exploring a run for Sen. Mitt Romney’s seat, championed the filing in his tweet: “We will not stand by as the Biden Administration encroaches on Utah’s reasonable, responsible, and realistic approach to powering our state.”

Utah Sen. Nate Blouin, a Democrat who has worked in the renewable energy industry, said in an interview that he is sympathetic to the argument that clean energy takes time. “We can’t just retire our baseload resources overnight.”

But he said it’s “a planning issue, not a technology issue,” and Pacificorp’s decision to comply with the policy while it’s fighting it is evidence that it can be done without harming Utah. “PacifiCorp knows what it’s doing. They’re driven by profit. And they’re not going to do something that is going to create an unreliable system.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Utah man triggers avalanche and saves brother buried under the snow | CNN

Published

on

Utah man triggers avalanche and saves brother buried under the snow | CNN




CNN
 — 

A man rescued his brother from a “large avalanche” he triggered while the pair were snowmobiling in Utah on Wednesday, authorities said.

The brothers were in the Franklin Basin area of Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest when one of them triggered the avalanche while “side-hilling in a bowl beneath a cliff band in Steep Hollow,” an initial accident report from the Utah Avalanche Center read.

He saw the slope “ripple below and around him” and was able to escape by riding off the north flank of the avalanche, according to the report.

Advertisement

But his brother, who was farther down the slope standing next to his sled, was swept up by the avalanche, carried about 150 yards by the heavy snow and fully buried, the avalanche center said.

Using a transceiver, the man was able to locate his brother underneath the snow, seeing only “a couple fingers of a gloved hand sticking out,” the report said.

The buried brother was dug out and sustained minor injuries, according to the avalanche center. The two were able to ride back to safety.

The Utah Avalanche Center warned that similar avalanche conditions will be common in the area and are expected to rise across the mountains in North Utah and Southeast Idaho ahead of the weekend.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Snow expected in Utah valleys and mountains

Published

on

Snow expected in Utah valleys and mountains


SALT LAKE CITY — According to forecasters, several parts of Utah will receive snow Thursday morning and evening.

On Wednesday, the Utah Department of Transportation issued a road weather alert, warning drivers of slick roads caused by a storm that will arrive in two different waves.

UDOT said the first wave should arrive along the Wasatch Front after 8 to 9 a.m. and will move southward across the state until around noon. By 10 to 11 a.m., most roads are expected to be wet.

“This wave of snow only lasts for a few hours before dissipating around noon or shortly after for many routes,” UDOT stated on its weather alert.

Advertisement

UDOT said an inch or two of snow could be seen in Davis and Weber counties due to cold captures temperatures in the morning.

The Wasatch Back and mountain routes are expected to receive a few inches of snow through noon, with some heavy road snow over the upper Cottonwoods, Logan Summit, Sardine Summit, and Daniels Summit, according to UDOT.

Travelers in central Utah should prepare for a light layer of snow, with an inch or two predicted in the mountains.

Second wave of snow in Utah

According to UDOT, there will be a lull in snow early to mid-Thursday afternoon. But there should be another wave of snow from 4 to 6 p.m.

Advertisement

“With temperatures a bit warmer at this point, the Wasatch Front will likely see more of a rain/snow mix,” UDOT said. “However, some showers may be briefly heavy for short periods of time and be enough to slush up the roads late afternoon/evening with bench routes seeing the higher concern.”

UDOT predicted the Wasatch Back and northern mountain routes to receive another couple of inches during the second wave.

The storm is expected to end around 9 p.m. for the Wasatch Front and valleys, while the mountains will continue to receive snow until about midnight.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Judge orders legal fees paid to Utah newspaper that defended libel suit

Published

on

Judge orders legal fees paid to Utah newspaper that defended libel suit


SALT LAKE CITY — A businessman has been ordered to pay almost $400,000 to the weekly Utah newspaper he sued for libel.

It’s to cover the legal fees of the Millard County Chronicle Progress. In September, it became the first news outlet to successfully use a 2023 law meant to protect First Amendment activities.

The law also allows for victorious defendants to pursue their attorney fees and related expenses. The plaintiff, Wayne Aston, has already filed notice he is appealing the dismissal of his lawsuit.

As for the legal fees, Aston’s attorneys contended the newspaper’s lawyers overbilled. But Judge Anthony Howell, who sits on the bench in the state courthouse in Fillmore, issued an order Monday giving the Chronicle Progress attorneys everything they asked for – $393,597.19.

Advertisement

Jeff Hunt, a lawyer representing the Chronicle Progress, said in an interview Tuesday with FOX 13 News the lawsuit “was an existential threat” to the newspaper.

“It would have imposed enormous financial cost on the on the newspaper just to defend itself,” Hunt said.

“It’s just a very strong deterrent,” Hunt added, “when you get an award like this, from bringing these kinds of meritless lawsuits in the first place.”

Aston sued the Chronicle Progress in December 2023 after it reported on his proposal to manufacture modular homes next to the Fillmore airport and the public funding he sought for infrastructure improvements benefiting the project. Aston’s suit contended the Chronicle Progress published “false and defamatory statements.”

The suit asked for “not less” than $19.2 million.

Advertisement

In its dismissal motion, attorneys for the newspaper said the reporting was accurate and protected by a statute the Utah Legislature created in 2023 to safeguard public expression and other First Amendment activities.

Howell, in a ruling in September, said the 2023 law applies to the Chronicle Progress. He also repeatedly pointed out how the plaintiff didn’t dispute many facts reported by the newspaper.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending