Connect with us

Utah

The Utah County clerk says he's tracked how politicians cast their ballots. Here's how a lawmaker responded

Published

on

The Utah County clerk says he's tracked how politicians cast their ballots. Here's how a lawmaker responded


Utah County Clerk Aaron Davidson says he tracks how politicians cast their ballots.

Davidson, who wants to encourage voters to use drop boxes to return their ballots rather than the U.S. Postal Service, told the Deseret News that one of his critics, Sen. Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork, is among the voters who “didn’t put a stamp on his return ballot last election. I’m not sure what he did this election.”

How does Davidson know whether McKell used a stamp or not when he mailed his ballot?

“Because I track. Every ballot envelope is tracked,” he said. “I mean, the tracking mechanism tracks who returns their ballot how. I don’t publicize it for everybody, but I think politicians that are out there advocating to make Utah County pay for your ballot return, those politicians need to be called out and said how they return their own ballot.”

Advertisement

Davidson said he’s tracked the way other political figures voted, too.

“I have a list of all the politicians, so I did,” the county clerk said. “But I’m not publicizing it. If they want to make a big stink the way Mike McKell did, there’s nothing in statute that says how you voted is a private record.” He said he was referring to the process used to return a ballot and that the information is collected in a data file.

Davidson said he doesn’t believe his action was inappropriate. “For politicians, I don’t think it’s inappropriate, if they’re out there advocating a process that’s not as safe and secure as another process and saying it’s the same whether you put it in the mail or vote in person. Because I don’t believe it’s the same.”

McKell said he said he intends to have Davidson’s actions reviewed, possibly by the state Elections Office.

“I think if Aaron Davidson is tracking my personal ballot, I think that crosses a serious ethical line and is extremely troubling to me,” McKell said, adding “it’s none of his business how I vote, the method I use to vote. I am entitled to a constitutionally protected private ballot.”

Advertisement

The state senator said he sent his June primary election ballot in without paying for postage “because a stamp is not required. I went online and made sure people knew that.” He said he put his Nov. 5 general election ballot in a drop box.

Ahead of the primary, McKell posted a picture of the ballot instructions that stated postage was now required on X, formerly known as Twitter, telling followers, “Just a reminder in Utah County, if you forget to put a stamp on your ballot, it will still be delivered. This instructional piece is mostly political from the Utah County Clerk. Postage is NOT required.”

McKell also posted a message aimed at Davidson: “This is political for you. Stop playing politics with my ballot. You need to be neutral and stop seeking your desired result” that ended with, “This is not okay or over!” In his response on X to that post, Davidson said he couldn’t “help that my predecessors wanted to use taxpayer money to win your approval.”

Davidson said Utah County doesn’t pay for return postage on ballots to encourage voters to instead use the 28 drop boxes located in communities throughout the county, including a few that are inside municipal buildings that are available only during business hours.

Advertisement

“We do it because we feel that it’s safer, it’s more secure if you use our drop boxes as opposed to using the postal service. If you want the convenience of using the mail system, it’s 73 cents,” he said. Ballots without stamps are still processed, but the post office charges the county for the postage.

Davidson said it’s McKell who’s “making a political argument on that but for me, it was strictly a cost savings for the county and also to promote the use of a more secure way of returning your ballot.” Asked if that could discourage some voters, Davidson said he doesn’t “give too much credence to that argument because I’m not hearing it from the people themselves.”

The “average person” who mails their ballot in without postage, he said, is “just taking advantages of the other taxpayers.”





Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah Supreme Court considers defamation lawsuit over ‘Sound of Freedom’ movie

Published

on

Utah Supreme Court considers defamation lawsuit over ‘Sound of Freedom’ movie


SALT LAKE CITY — The state’s top court is considering whether to allow a defamation lawsuit to move forward over the movie “Sound of Freedom” and its portrayal of a villain in the movie.

On Wednesday, the Utah Supreme Court heard an appeal by Angel Studios, the filmmakers who created “Sound of Freedom” and Operation Underground Railroad founder Tim Ballard. They are being sued by Kely Suarez, who alleges the central villain character in the movie has defamed her and ruined her reputation.

Cherise Bacalski, Suarez’s attorney, said the character of “Katy Giselle” in the film is “a kingpin sex trafficker.”

“And she never was,” Bacalksi said of her client.

Advertisement

Before the Utah Supreme Court, Bacalski argued Suarez was a college student who was caught up in a raid that Ballard was involved with in Colombia.

A lower court allowed Suarez’s lawsuit to move toward trial. The studio and Ballard have appealed, arguing they are protected under a Utah law designed to safeguard speech and that the film is a docudrama that is “based on a true story.” The justices grilled lawyers for all sides about the level of involvement each party had and whether promotion of the film crossed any lines.

“Here it’s alleged the movie itself was defamatory and Angel Studios is the one who is putting out the movie,” Justice Paige Petersen said during Wednesday’s hearing.

Robert Gutierrez, an attorney for Angel Studios, insisted to the court that while the film may be based on Ballard’s experiences, there were disclaimers in the film.

“The Katy Giselle character was, in fact, a composite character in order to make it a subject matter the viewing public could actually watch,” he argued. “And fulfill the writer’s mission about the ugly truth of child trafficking.”

Advertisement

The justices questioned where the line is in a “docudrama” or when things are “based on a true story.”

“So under your definition is this a movie of and concerning Mr. Ballard? Or is that they happen to use the same name?” asked Justice John Nielsen.

Gutierrez replied it was a story “inspired by Tim Ballard.” Later in arguments, he noted that Suarez had actually been convicted of criminal charges in Colombia. That was something Bacalski said was not properly before the court and she argued against the veracity of it.

“We also believe the conviction is unreliable, coming from Colombia and really under suspicious circumstances,” she told FOX 13 News outside of court. “That conviction would not likely stand because of the constitutional protections we enjoy in the United States of America.”

Ballard’s attorney, Mark Eisenhut, argued that his client was not involved in the movie-making itself. Ballard was consulted as the film was being created.

Advertisement

“I do not believe there’s any evidence of him producing, writing, directing, anything of that nature,” Eisenhut argued.

The justices took the case under advisement with no timeline for a ruling. The movie, which starred Jim Caviezel as Ballard, went on to become a box office success in 2023.

“She’s very hopeful our justice system will do her justice,” Bacalski said of Suarez outside court.

Ballard faced a number of lawsuits and accusations of misconduct that led to ties being cut with Operation Underground Railroad, the anti-human trafficking organization he founded. He has denied wrongdoing and filed his own defamation lawsuit against some of his accusers.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

‘Civil war’: Utah, PA governors call out political violence in bipartisan panel

Published

on

‘Civil war’: Utah, PA governors call out political violence in bipartisan panel



Republican Governor of Utah Spencer Cox and Democratic Governor of Pennsylvania spoke in Washington, D.C. They called on Americans to stop using violence against political opponents.

play

Two of the nation’s top state leaders who have had close brushes with political violence in 2025 hosted a panel on Dec. 9 where they called on Americans to stop hating their political enemies before it leads to “civil war.”

“We’re passing all the checkpoints, well ultimately towards failed states and things like civil war, I hate to even use that phrase,” said Spencer Cox, Utah’s Republican governor whose longstanding campaign for political unity was thrust into the national spotlight with the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September.

Cox participated in the panel alongside Pennsylvania’s Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, whose house was firebombed in April. 

Tuesday’s panel comes at a point where in addition to the killing of Kirk and the firebombing of the Pennsylvania governor’s mansion, a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband were killed and another lawmaker and his wife were injured at their homes in June; two Israeli embassy workers were shot and killed in D.C. in May; and a National Guard member was killed and another injured in a shooting also in the nation’s capital in November.

Advertisement

The pair spoke at Washington National Cathedral, about three and a half miles northwest of the White House.

Early on in the panel, Shapiro called out President Donald Trump for stoking hate in politics.  

“When you’re a governor, when you’re a president of the United States, you’re looked to for that moral clarity,” Shapiro said, “and we have a president who fails that test on a daily basis.”

Trump at a rally in September following the killing of Kirk said that he hates his opponents. 

Advertisement

“That’s where I disagreed with Charlie,” Trump said. “I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.”

Cox closed the panel by calling for a return to a period where political party affiliation took a backseat to aspects including profession or one’s family. 

“To my fellow Americans, to my fellow worshipers, whatever it is, whether you’re in a sacred place like this, whether you’re in a synagogue, whether you’re in a mosque, I don’t care where it is, you are are fellow Americans,” said Cox, who has been speaking about the need for political civility since first running for governor in 2020. “We need you now more than ever, this country, if we’re going to make it another 250 years, if we’re going to make it another two point five years, we desperately need you to lay down your swords and treat each other with dignity and respect again.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

University of Utah nears deal with private equity firm to help fund athletics. Here’s what it means for the Utes.

Published

on

University of Utah nears deal with private equity firm to help fund athletics. Here’s what it means for the Utes.


The U.’s board of trustees will vote on the matter Tuesday.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Rice-Eccles Stadium on Saturday, Sept. 6, 2025.

Facing rising costs in college sports, the University of Utah hopes to put the future of its athletics department’s finances in the hands of a new for-profit company backed by a private equity firm.

The U.’s board of trustees will vote Tuesday on whether to approve the deal involving New York private equity firm Otro Capital.

The proposal calls for the creation of Utah Brands & Entertainment, a company to oversee the athletics department’s revenue sources. Otro Capital would be the minority owner of Utah Brands and handle operations such as ticket sales, media, stadium events, concessions, and trademark and licensing matters.

Advertisement

The U., through its nonprofit University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation, would have majority ownership of the company and Utah Athletic Director Mark Harlan would serve as the chairman of its board. The athletics department would continue to oversee student athletes and their scholarships, coaches, fundraising and NCAA compliance.

Otro describes itself as a company with “deep expertise across sports, entertainment, and media.”

University officials have declined to say how much Otro Capital plans to initially invest because the deal has not been finalized. Yahoo! Sports reported the partnership could bring in more than $500 million in revenue. The U. expects the deal to be completed early next year.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Big 12 Conference logo as the Utah Utes prepare to host the Baylor Bears, NCAA football in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Sept. 7, 2024.

Private equity investors have zeroed in on college athletics in recent years.

Advertisement

In the wake of the House vs. NCAA settlement, colleges can now pay their student athletes up to $20.5 million annually.

That has contributed to significant deficits at schools around the country. Last month, the University of Colorado projected a $27 million deficit for its athletics program. Earlier this year, Ohio State University claimed a $37.7 million deficit.

The Tribune will update this developing story.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending