Connect with us

Utah

The Triple Team: Damian Lillard’s 60-point night against Utah shows his strengths, Jazz’s weaknesses

Published

on

The Triple Team: Damian Lillard’s 60-point night against Utah shows his strengths, Jazz’s weaknesses


Three ideas on the Utah Jazz’s 134-124 loss to the Portland Path Blazers from Salt Lake Tribune beat author Andy Larsen.

1. Damian Lillard 60-point evening

At a sure level, it’s simply revealing should you permit a participant to have probably the most environment friendly 60 level sport of all time.

Sure, that’s what Damian Lillard’s sport was. He scored 60 factors, taking pictures 21-29 from the sector and a whopping 9-15 from the 3-point line.

Advertisement

Watch this spotlight reel, and take into consideration what the Jazz may have executed at the next stage — and take into consideration the personnel that would have helped.

• That first play of the reel — what on this planet is Malik Beasley doing in transition? He’s simply form of aimlessly dropping into the paint, when everyone knows that Lauri Markkanen can deal with Josh Hart in transition. Guard another person.

• On the 1 minute mark: Walker Kessler exhibiting his weak point — getting up in decide and roll. It was a key focus of the Kyrie Irving sport, and the Jazz merely want him to indicate larger on these performs. That is Damian Lillard, he’s going to take pull-up threes, and Kessler can’t be 10 toes away from him. (Kessler merely isn’t prepared on the 1:30 mark and will get crushed, too.)

• Jarred Vanderbilt simply isn’t a lot of an impactful defender, both in assist protection or one-on-one. At 1:45, he comes over too late, though he has to concentrate on Lillard in that scenario. At 1:50, he will get step-backed. At 2:12, he will get blown by for a layup. This merely can’t be your finest perimeter defender should you’re a contending staff.

There are different performs, after all, however the reality is that the Conley/Clarkson/Sexton backcourt trio isn’t capable of make a lot of an affect on star guards defensively, whether or not it’s 48 factors from Kyrie Irving or 60 factors from Damian Lillard. That must be Danny Ainge’s precedence relating to discovering the subsequent items of this staff: discover complementary guards that may defend the league’s finest.

Advertisement

To make certain, in some unspecified time in the future it’s a must to tip your cap, and Lillard was sensational tonight. However good defenders would have restricted it extra, and the Jazz have lacked that for a number of seasons now.

2. Lauri Markkanen, getting too shut

However I need to zoom in a single piece of the Jazz’s core for nearer defensive inspection: Lauri Markkanen.

What Markkanen has executed this season has been actually superior, and even in defeat, he had one other very stable sport tonight: 24 factors on 7-16 taking pictures, 0 turnovers? Nice. He was not the issue.

However he’s the largest particular long-term constructing block of this Jazz franchise. And so his skillset, his strengths and his weaknesses, merely issues greater than everybody else’s — briefly, it may outline whether or not or not the Jazz win in a playoff collection down the highway.

And so I’ve to notice that he’s proven some defensive weaknesses he has to scrub up.

Advertisement

Take the protection on the 1:15 mark of the spotlight reel above. Markkanen merely seems to be as flat-footed as can probably be. Or at 1:45, Markkanen will get toasted with a comparatively easy crossover. The protection at 2:57 is best, however he nonetheless will get bested at the same time as he’s on the level of the double-team.

On the very highest stage, Markkanen should do extra in these conditions, or groups will exploit him. They’ll carry him up into the defensive play and drive a change, and have a quick guard prepare dinner him.

Typically, Hardy’s stated that Markkanen will generally play too near the opposition when defending them on the perimeter. And I perceive why he did that tonight — Lillard is famously an out-of-this-world shooter! He must be comparatively shut. However no matter Markkanen’s technique, even when it includes fouling, he merely can’t let gamers drive by him as shortly as they did tonight.

This doesn’t make Markkanen a nasty defender. I believe he’s proven sufficient in assist conditions, particularly, to be thought of an above-average one. He’s additionally significantly better in opposition to wings, reasonably than the perfect guards within the league. However ultimately, the containment issue, even on the league’s finest guards, simply must be higher.

3. Cory Jez and Path Blazers broadcasts

Look, I’m extraordinarily biased on this scenario.

Advertisement

I’m an analytics geek, a math main. I believe it’s extraordinarily attention-grabbing how the NBA (and heck, all of sports activities) has modified because of the statistical revolution. Moneyball was a magnum opus.

However even once I take these biases into consideration, I believe it’s fairly neat what Portland has executed with Cory Jez. Jez was the Jazz’s director of basketball analytics from 2017-2020, earlier than he went to MLS’s Austin FC for the same job.

Now, the Blazers have him on because the “NBA’s first full-time on-air statistical analyst” — primarily, he chimes in like a sideline reporter, including shade and commentary about one thing the Blazers are doing properly or poorly statistically that’s impacting the rating of the sport.

Having watched various Blazers video games this season, generally these stats are comparatively apparent. Generally, he’s answering a query posed to him by the staff’s play-by-play (Kevin Calabro) or shade commentator (Lamar Hurd). A number of the time, although, he’s presenting new, attention-grabbing, and well timed information that ought to curiosity followers within the right here and now — I take into account it to be extra insightful and goal than numerous different third-person-in-booth conditions. (They do nonetheless have a conventional sideline reporter, by the best way: Brooke Olzendam.)

Typically, truly, I believe it’s fairly attention-grabbing what the Blazers have executed with their broadcasts. Calabro is terrific, a giant title for them to get who first grew to become well-known with the Seattle Supersonics. Hurd labored his approach up as a school basketball analyst first, and will get terrific opinions from Blazer followers. They employed SportsCenter’s Neil Everett to host a lot of their pregame, halftime, and postgame exhibits.

Advertisement

To be clear, I don’t imply this part to be a slight to anybody on Jazz broadcasts. However I respect that Portland has gone out and tried inventive methods so as to add to their broadcast like Jez, and I believe they’ve executed a very good job in doing so. I hope that, beneath the Jazz’s new TV deal, they’re capable of do the identical.

Editor’s notice • This story is on the market to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers solely. Thanks for supporting native journalism.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

How the SCOTUS ruling on Idaho’s emergency abortion ban will affect patient transfers to Utah

Published

on

How the SCOTUS ruling on Idaho’s emergency abortion ban will affect patient transfers to Utah


SALT LAKE CITY — The United States Supreme Court sidestepped a decision Thursday on whether federal law requires states to provide pregnancy terminations in medical emergencies even in cases where the procedure would otherwise be illegal.

Instead, the court’s opinion – which stems from Idaho’s near-total abortion ban – kicked the legal questions surfaced in the case back to the lower courts and reinstated a previous ruling that will allow doctors in the state to perform emergency abortions in the meantime.

That means women in Idaho are unlikely – at least for now – to be airlifted to nearby states like Utah for the procedure.

“After today, there will be a few months — maybe a few years — during which doctors may no longer need to airlift pregnant patients out of Idaho,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote of the decision’s impact, in an opinion that dissented in part and concurred in part with the broader court’s ruling.

Advertisement

But the dismissal of the case leaves open key legal questions and sets up the potential that the issue of emergency room abortion care will come to the court again in the future.

In her brief, Jackson was critical of the court’s indecision, arguing that the ruling represented “not a victory” for Idaho patients but a “delay” – and that doctors still face the difficult decision of “whether to provide emergency medical care in the midst of highly charged legal circumstances.”

Conservatives Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined Jackson and her liberal colleagues, Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, in the 6-3 opinion, which was erroneously posted online Wednesday. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.

In his opinion, Alito also argued that the legal questions in the case – which come as abortion has become a political flashpoint in the U.S. presidential election – should have been decided, saying it was as “ripe for decision as it will ever be.”

“Apparently, the Court has simply lost the will to decide the easy but emotional and highly politicized question that the case presents,” he wrote.

Advertisement

Alito indicated that he would have ruled against the Biden administration’s interpretation that the federal Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires hospital emergency rooms that receive Medicare funding to provide treatment to people experiencing medical emergencies, supersedes Idaho’s abortion ban.

Idaho law allows doctors to terminate a pregnancy for any woman with emergency health complications who is clearly on the brink of death. But it’s quiet on the question of what to do when pregnancy complications put someone’s health at risk but don’t imminently risk her life.

Under threat of jail time and loss of their medical licenses, Idaho doctors said prior to Thursday’s ruling that they sometimes had no choice under such circumstances but to send a woman across state lines by helicopter or advise her to otherwise get to another state for treatment.

“Those transfers measure the difference between the life-threatening conditions Idaho will allow hospitals to treat and the health-threatening conditions it will not,” Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion Thursday.

Some women were transferred to reliably blue states like Washington and Oregon. But Utah’s capital was “one of the places we’ll tend to call first,” Stacy Seyb, a physician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine at St. Luke’s Hospital in Boise, told FOX 13 earlier this year.

Advertisement

While abortion remains legal up to 18 weeks in Utah, a near-total ban is currently on hold pending a ruling from the Utah Supreme Court.

Rep. Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, sponsored the abortion ban in the House and noted in a statement that “today’s Supreme Court ruling has no direct implications on Utah’s strong pro-life laws, including our trigger law.” “Utah will continue to stand up for policies that protect the unborn,” she added.

Thursday’s ruling does mean doctors in Idaho likely won’t have to airlift patients to Utah and other states, which Planned Parenthood Association of Utah Chief Corporate Affairs Office Shireen Ghorbani called a “small victory.”

“But what should have happened honestly is the Supreme Court should have said you have a right to emergency medical treatment, you’ve had that right for 40 years and you should have the right to an abortion if that is the appropriate medical care for the complication for the experience that you’re having,” she argued.

Regardless of the court’s decision, Ghorbani said she expects some Idaho women will still have to come to Utah for abortion care.

Advertisement

“Twenty two percent of their OBGYNs have left the state, they are running very low on specialists in maternal-fetal medicine,” Ghorbani noted. “That reality has now been created for people who live in Idaho. So there may still be people from Idaho who are seeking emergency medical care in Utah and this is what happens when we ring this bell.”

Recently released data from the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights, showed that 7% of all abortions performed in the state last year were for non-residents coming to Utah from Idaho. The data showed some Utah women also traveled out of state in 2023, to both Nevada and Colorado.





Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Here’s what Utah basketball’s first Big 12 schedule will look like

Published

on

Here’s what Utah basketball’s first Big 12 schedule will look like


The Big 12 released its opponent schedule matrix for men’s and women’s basketball on Thursday, giving a full picture of what the University of Utah will face during its first season in the league.

Utah men’s basketball 2024-25 Big 12 opponent matrix

  • Home-and-away: Baylor, BYU, Cincinnati, Oklahoma State, West Virginia
  • Home-only: Arizona State, Colorado, Kansas, Kansas State, Texas Tech
  • Away-only: Arizona, UCF, Houston, Iowa State, TCU

What stands out?

The Utes’ 20-game conference schedule is highlighted by getting blue blood program Kansas to come to the Huntsman Center in the only matchup between the two schools during the upcoming season.

Utah and BYU will play a home-and-home, and the Utes will also play twice against two other teams appearing in early top 25 projections, Baylor and Cincinnati.

Utah travels to Arizona in the lone matchup with the Wildcats this season, and also must play Houston and Iowa State — two other projected top 25 teams — in their only games against the Cougars and Cyclones, respectively.

The Utes also host Kansas State and Texas Tech in their only matchups this season, as well as two other programs, Arizona State and Colorado, also jumping from the Pac-12 to the Big 12 this year.

Advertisement

Utah women’s basketball 2024-25 Big 12 opponent matrix

  • Home-and-away: Arizona, Arizona State, BYU
  • Home-only: UCF, Colorado, Houston, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma State
  • Away-only: Baylor, Cincinnati, Iowa State, TCU, Texas Tech, West Virginia

What stands out?

Utah’s 18-game league schedule includes home-and-away matchups with three teams, and they’re all longstanding rivals with the Utes: former Pac-12 compatriots Arizona and Arizona State, as well as in-state rival BYU.

The Utes will play three of the four Big 12 teams ranked ahead of them in ESPN’s way-too-early top 25 on the road only — Baylor, Iowa State and West Virginia.

Of the five teams Utah will face at home, Colorado (who finished last year ranked No. 15) and Kansas State (another projected top 25 team) highlight that list.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

What the Runnin’ Utes’ Craig Smith once said in scouting Utah Jazz’s No. 10 selection Cody Williams

Published

on

What the Runnin’ Utes’ Craig Smith once said in scouting Utah Jazz’s No. 10 selection Cody Williams


Craig Smith had multiple opportunities last season to conduct a scouting report on Cody Williams, the Utah Jazz’s first selection in Wednesday night’s opening round of the 2024 NBA Draft.

That’s because Williams’ Colorado Buffaloes faced Smith and the Utah Runnin’ Utes three times during his lone collegiate season, with Williams playing in two of the contests.

Williams and the Buffaloes got the best of Smith and the Utes the two times the 6-foot-7 wing played against them. They beat them by 24 in late February, then blew them out again during the Pac-12 tournament quarterfinals.

Williams missed the teams’ first meeting last season, when Utah edged the Buffaloes in Salt Lake City. Still, getting familiar with Colorado gave Smith several chances to check out film on the future Jazzman.

Advertisement

Before the teams played in February, Smith talked about what Williams brings to the floor.

“He can get it going in any number of ways. At his size and his length, when he gets around the rim, he’s able to finish at all kinds of angles, over shot blockers,” Smith said at the time.

Williams averaged 11.9 points, 3.0 rebounds and 1.6 assists per game last season for Colorado, a squad that included fellow first-round draft pick Tristan da Silva (he went 18th overall to the Orlando Magic on Wednesday night) and guard KJ Simpson, who’s projected to be a second-round selection on Thursday.

Williams also shot 55.2% from the field during the 2023-24 season and 41.5% from 3-point range in limited attempts.

The talented wing never made much of an impact against the Utes. in Colorado’s two wins over Utah, he averaged 5.0 points, 2.0 rebounds and 1.0 assists per game.

Advertisement

Smith was also impressed with what Williams does defensively.

“He’s a good defender because he’s so long,” Smith said. “You can get deep and you might have a half a step advantage, but with his length, he can catch up and make those plays.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending