Connect with us

Utah

Opinion: Campus protests lead to change. It’s how we got the University of Utah to divest from South Africa.

Published

on

Opinion: Campus protests lead to change. It’s how we got the University of Utah to divest from South Africa.


These protests should make you uncomfortable. That’s the point.

(Special Collections, Marriott Library, University of Utah) University of Utah students erect a structure to advocate the university’s divestment of South Africa in 1985. The group, Students Against Apartheid, joined protests around the world to end segregation.

The unrest at the University of Utah around Gaza is a deeply disturbing sight. Not because of the students protesting, but rather the immediate and violent police reaction to forcibly shut it down.

Advertisement

Whatever you think about Israel and Palestine, we can and should and indeed must debate these issues fully — and in public. That debate in the public square is the foundational bedrock on which our republic rests.

And if there’s any place in our society where strident voices should clash, it’s on our campuses. That is their very purpose — to allow ideas and identities to bump against each other, to challenge our accepted beliefs.

I should know. In early 1986, I was part of a group of students that built and occupied shanties at the U. over 18 months, protesting apartheid in South Africa and demanding divestment from companies. The shanties were ugly, annoying, in your face — which was precisely the point, to bring to life something we students were connected to half a world away.

(Special Collections, Marriott Library, University of Utah) University of Utah students erect a structure to advocate the university’s divestment of South Africa in 1985. The group, Students Against Apartheid, joined protests around the world to end segregation.

Opposition was fierce — we were firebombed by students who disagreed with our expression, and they weren’t the only ones.

Advertisement

After six months, administrators moved to forcibly evict the protestors. So we sued in federal court, arguing that a structure was a form of free speech. And in a groundbreaking decision, a federal court agreed and ordered we be allowed to continue our protest.

So the protests continued and, over a year-and-a-half, the issue was debated constantly — because the protests forced the issue onto the agenda. And in the end, we won. The University finally agreed, and joined hundreds of other institutions in voting with their dollars against supporting institutional racism.

In his landmark history of the U.S. and South Africa during the apartheid years, “Loosing the Bonds,” Robert Massie notes divestment, along with trade/financial sanctions and cultural restrictions, broke the back of the racist regime’s ability to operate. It collapsed, Nelson Mandela went free and apartheid ended. We had added our grains of sand to the avalanche that overwhelmed the defenders of oppression and tyranny.

But it doesn’t and shouldn’t matter that we were right in our protests, that history ultimately vindicated our occupation of part of campus as a part of the global struggle to end the institutionalized racism in South Africa.

The value of protest isn’t in being correct, it is a thing unto itself. Democracy is a participatory sport. The fights over who gets to hold power and decide what rules we all live by are the very heart of what makes this country exceptional, in spite of all its many shortcomings.

Advertisement

What really mattered was that we all got to participate, to put our shoulders to the wheel and push along on this great journey of perfecting the American experiment.

It’s been that way from the very beginning. Fights over ideas are literally written into the source code of America, a constant tension between individuality and social responsibility, between freeborn and slave, between native and immigrant. Fights in word and deed. Recall, one of our founding acts that won our freedom had nothing to do with speech at all — it was dumping tea in Boston Harbor.

(Special Collections, Marriott Library, University of Utah) University of Utah students erect a structure to advocate the university’s divestment of South Africa in 1985. The group, Students Against Apartheid, joined protests around the world to end segregation.

Protest is supposed to make us uncomfortable, and it has a rich history at the U. stretching back decades. Protests force us to stop our daily mundanities and look and reckon and reflect. It’s also a pressure valve — it allows us to fight out ideas without guns and violence. Stopping traffic, camping on the lawn, they all have their place. And they are legally protected rights that must not be infringed.

So the shutting down of protests at the U. isn’t some defense of public order, it’s an attack on the very idea of what being an American is, and it’s part of a deeply worrisome trend. The concept of “fake news,” of demonizing science and facts we don’t agree with like that vaccines work or that climate change is real, are acid on the foundation of our society.

Advertisement

I grew up Mormon in Utah, and have always bragged to anyone who’ll listen about how curious Utahns are about other people and ideas. But that can’t be just trying their foods and dances at the Living Traditions festival. It has to embrace their history, culture and conflicts, too.

We should be proud of those students, regardless of opinion, standing up and shouting out for what they believe. They represent the best of us, because they still believe that voices matter, that opinion matters, that ideas matter. If we lose that, we are truly lost.

(Photo courtesy of Tom Price) Tom Price

Tom Price grew up in Provo and attended the University of Utah. He is now a climate entrepreneur in California.

The Salt Lake Tribune is committed to creating a space where Utahns can share ideas, perspectives and solutions that move our state forward. We rely on your insight to do this. Find out how to share your opinion here, and email us at voices@sltrib.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

‘Don’t release him ever. Please.’ Family of slain Utah teen calls for justice at parole hearing

Published

on

‘Don’t release him ever. Please.’ Family of slain Utah teen calls for justice at parole hearing


SALT LAKE CITY — Francisco Daniel Aguilar says he’s sorry for shooting and killing his girlfriend, 16-year-old Jacqueline “Jacky” Nunez-Millan, a Piute High School sophomore, in 2023.

But just as he did when he was sentenced, he didn’t have much of an explanation on Tuesday as to why he shot her not once, but twice.

“It just kinda happened. I was mad. And I stepped out (of my truck) and started shooting,” he said. “When I saw her fall, I just kind of panicked, I just went and shot her again.”

But Jacky’s friends and family members say even before she was killed, Aguilar already had a history of violence, and they now want justice to be served.

Advertisement

“You don’t accidentally take a gun, you don’t accidentally grab a knife … you don’t accidentally shoot someone, those are all choices,” a tearful Rosa Nunez, Jacky’s sister, said at Tuesday’s hearing. “Keep him where he needs to be.

“Don’t release him ever. Please.”

On Jan. 7, 2023, Aguilar, who was 17 at the time, got into a fight with his girlfriend, Jacky, shot her twice and left her body near a dirt road outside of Circleville, Piute County. He was convicted as an adult of aggravated murder and sentenced to a term of 25 years to up to life in prison.

Because of Aguilar’s age at the time of the offense, board member Greg Johnson explained Tuesday that the Utah Board of Pardons and Parole is required to hold a hearing much earlier than the 25-year mark, mainly to check on Aguilar and “see how things are going.” Aguilar, now 20, is currently being held in a juvenile secure care facility and will be transferred to the Utah State Prison when he turns 25 or earlier if he has discipline violations and is kicked out of the youth facility.

According to Aguilar’s sentencing guidelines, he will likely remain in custody until at least the year 2051.

Advertisement

During Tuesday’s hearing, Aguilar told the board that he was feeling “stressed out” during his senior year of high school. He said he and Jacky would often have little arguments. But their bigger fight happened when he failed to get her a “promise ring” around Christmastime, he said.

On the night of the killing, the two were arguing about the promise ring and other items, Aguilar recalled. At one point, he grabbed a knife and then a gun because, he said, he wanted to “irritate” and “scare” Jacky. According to evidence presented in the preliminary hearing, Aguilar and his girlfriend had been “trying to make each other angry” when Aguilar took ammunition and a 9mm gun from his father’s room and then drove to the Black Hill area in his truck with Jacky.

Jacky’s friend, McKall Taylor, went looking for her that night and found her. But after Aguilar shot Jacky in the leg, he began shooting at Taylor, who had no choice but to run to her car to get away. Her car was hit multiple times by bullets. Aguilar then shot Jacky a second time as she lay on the ground and Taylor drove away.

On Tuesday, Taylor’s mother, Lori Taylor, read a statement to the board on her daughter’s behalf.

“My innocence and freedom was taken from me,” she said.

Advertisement

McKall Taylor says the “horrifying events of that night will forever play in my head,” and the sounds of Jacky screaming and the gunshots as well as the sight of Jacky falling to the ground, will never go away.

“Francisco is a murderer who has zero remorse,” her letter states.

Likewise, Rosa Nunez told the board that for her and her family, “nothing in our world has felt safe since” that night as they all “continue to relive this horrific moment.”

After shooting Jacky and driving off, Aguilar says he called his father and “told him I was sorry for not being better, for not making good choices, I told him that I loved him. I was just planning on probably shooting myself, too.”

His father told him that although what he did wasn’t right, “he’d rather see me behind bars than in a casket,” and then told his son to “be a man about it. … This is where you have to change.”

Advertisement

Aguilar was arrested after his tires were spiked by police.

“An apology won’t fix what I did. I’ll never be able to fix what I did. But I want to say I’m sorry,” he said Tuesday. “I don’t even know how to fix what I did. I’m hoping I’m on the right track now.”

Johnson noted that Aguilar has done well during his short time being incarcerated. But that doesn’t change the fact “the crime was horrific,” he said.

The full five-member board will now take a vote. The board could decide to schedule another parole hearing for sometime in the future or could order that Aguilar serve his entire life sentence. But even if that were to happen, Johnson says Aguilar could petition every so often for a redetermination hearing.

The board’s decision is expected in several weeks.

Advertisement

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Lawsuit claims Utah teen killed by counterfeit airbag

Published

on

Lawsuit claims Utah teen killed by counterfeit airbag


A wrongful death lawsuit filed in Utah alleges a counterfeit airbag turned a routine crash into a fatal explosion that killed a teenage driver within minutes.

Alexia De La Rosa graduated from Hunter High School in May of 2025. On July 30, 2025, she was involved in a crash.

The lawsuit alleges that when the vehicle’s driver-side airbag deployed, it detonated and sent metal and plastic shrapnel into the cabin.

MORE | Crashes

A large, jagged piece of metal struck Alexia in the chest, and she died minutes later, according to the complaint.

Advertisement

The lawsuit, filed by Morgan & Morgan in Utah’s Third Judicial District Court, was brought on behalf of Tessie De La Rosa, as personal representative of the estate of her 17-year-old daughter.

The defendants are AutoSavvy Holdings Inc., AutoSavvy Dealerships LLC, and AutoSavvy Management Company LLC.

Morgan & Morgan alleges that the Hyundai Sonata had previously been declared a total loss after a 2023 crash and issued a salvage title. The suit claims AutoSavvy later purchased the vehicle and had it repaired — during which counterfeit, non-compliant, and defective airbag components were allegedly installed — before reselling it to the De La Rosa family.

The complaint further alleges that AutoSavvy knew or should have known the vehicle contained counterfeit and nonfunctional airbag components when it was sold.

“This is the third wrongful death lawsuit we have filed involving alleged counterfeit airbags that we believe turned survivable crashes into fatal incidents,” Morgan & Morgan founder John Morgan said in a statement. “No life should be cut short because a corporation puts profits above safety.”

Advertisement

Attorney Andrew Parker Felix, who is leading the case, said the firm is committed to uncovering how allegedly illegal airbag inflators enter the stream of commerce and are installed in vehicles sold to consumers.

“To make this perfectly clear, these are not supposed to be in the United States at all,” Felix said. “They are not approved for use in any vehicle that’s being driven in the United States.”

“They don’t have approval from any governmental agency to be installed in vehicles that are driven within the United States and regulated here,” he added.

Morgan & Morgan says it is investigating at least three additional deaths involving other defendants and alleged counterfeit airbags.

KUTV 2News reached out to AutoSavvy multiple times by email and phone. We were told a member of the company’s legal team would be in touch, but as of publication we have not received a response.

Advertisement

_____



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Why U. President Taylor Randall, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox plan to meet with Donald Trump this week

Published

on

Why U. President Taylor Randall, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox plan to meet with Donald Trump this week


Randall will be among several key visitors in attendance for a meeting on March 6

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) University of Utah President Taylor Randall speaks on campus during an event on Feb. 7.

University of Utah President Taylor Randall is scheduled to meet with President Donald Trump this week.

Randall is expected to be among several attendees at a White House roundtable meeting on Friday to discuss solutions for the rapidly evolving landscape of college athletics with the president, a U. spokesperson said.

The meeting could be postponed, however, due to the war in Iran. As of Monday, “the odds of it happening this week are 50-50 at best,” according to Yahoo Sports.

Advertisement

If the roundtable happens as scheduled, the guest list includes several current and former notable figures in sports, including NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, golf legend Tiger Woods and former Alabama head coach Nick Saban.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox confirmed in a social media post on X that he would be in attendance as well.

“Thank you [President Donald Trump] for inviting me to participate, and for your commitment to addressing challenges in college sports,” Cox said on X. “[Taylor Randall] is a great university leader who will work with us on solutions for this critical issue.”

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) University of Utah President Taylor Randall speaks on campus on Feb. 7.

Earlier this year, Randall was called on by the federal House Committee on Education and Workforce to schedule a briefing to discuss the school’s planned private-equity partnership with Otro Capital, according to a report from Sportico.

Advertisement

The Utes announced their proposal in December of last year, which is a first-of-its-kind agreement between a university’s athletic department and a private equity company.

Utah’s deal with Otro has yet to be finalized. In a Feb. 10 interview with The Salt Lake Tribune, Randall said the university is “still just working through all of the issues systematically.”

“We want to do this in the right way to set both of us up for future success,” he added.

The move is expected to infuse hundreds of millions of dollars into the U.’s athletic department to help sustain the financial future of the program with rising deficits across the industry.

“I don’t think any of us would prefer to be in this situation right now,” Randall said in a faculty senate meeting in January. “But it just is what we’re facing.”

Advertisement

For over 150 years, The Salt Lake Tribune has been Utah’s independent news source. Our reporters work tirelessly to uncover the stories that matter most to Utahns, from unraveling the complexities of court rulings to allowing tax payers to see where and how their hard earned dollars are being spent. This critical work wouldn’t be possible without people like you—individuals who understand the importance of local, independent journalism.  As a nonprofit newsroom, every subscription and every donation fuels our mission, supporting the in-depth reporting that shines a light on the is sues shaping Utah today.

You can help power this work.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending