Utah
Judge to rule if public gets to see Utah attorney general’s work calendar
SALT LAKE CITY – Utahns may finally get to see a record of the day-to-day work life of the state’s top law enforcer.
A yearlong legal battle for access to Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes’ work calendar took KSL to court Monday, where the news organization argued the public has a right to see the schedule but the A.G.’s office maintained the record isn’t subject to release under state law.
5 things to know about KSL’s legal fight for transparency
The notion that an elected official’s work calendar is outside the reach of Utah’s open records law is a “a very dangerous argument,” said attorney David Reymann, who’s representing KSL.
These schedules are important because they can reveal whether public employees are doing their jobs or not, Reymann said.
A lawyer for the Utah Attorney General’s Office said the office isn’t trying to hide anything.“This case is not about secrecy, and it’s not about keeping records from the public. It’s about statutory interpretation,” said assistant attorney general Vanessa Walsh.
Judge Patrick Corum looked visibly surprised when Reymann told him the KSL investigators first requested a copy of Attorney General Sean Reyes’ schedule more than a year ago, in November 2022.
The Utah State Records Committee sided with KSL in May, ordering Reyes’ office to release the calendar but allowing it to redact any information about his personal engagements, along with the locations of his work appointments. Reyes’ office then appealed that decision to 3rd District Court.
On Monday, attorneys parsed a history of changes to the state’s open records law, along with prior federal court decisions handed down far away from Utah and the differences between today’s online calendars and the daily paper ones that predate the digital age.
David Reymann, an attorney for KSL, argues for access to Reyes’ calendar in Salt Lake City’s 3rd District Court on Monday, Feb. 26 before Judge Patrick Corum. (Jay Hancock, KSL TV)
The judge peppered both sides with questions throughout the hourlong hearing and talked about his own practice as a public official trying to keep track of personal appointments.
“The computer system here is subject to GRAMA, so aside from the occasional dentist appointment or something, I do not put things on that, for this very reason,” Corum said.
He didn’t rule from the bench Monday on KSL’s motion for summary judgement in the case, saying he’d do so Tuesday instead. Corum said that he believes the law is straightforward.
“My inclination is, I do not think the statute is ambiguous,” Corum said Monday. But he added that in fairness to the attorney general’s office, he wants to take time to study a 2005 change to the state law, and specifically just one word that lawmakers switched from “and” to “or” in 2005.
The change states that “a daily calendar or other personal note…prepared for personal use” isn’t subject to public release.
The seemingly small change is important, Walsh said, because it distinguishes the mention of a “daily calendar” from a separate type of personal note kept for a public employee’s own use.
Reymann disagreed.
“It’s a semantic distraction,” he said after the hearing. “If the Legislature had intended to make sure all daily calendars off limits – period – it would have said so, and it didn’t.”
As attorney general, Reyes has drawn criticism for globetrotting with the former leader of an embattled charity, Operation Underground Railroad, along with several other controversial trips out of state. As scrutiny of his travels and friendships piled up last year, he announced he’s not running for reelection.
‘More secrecy’: Utah lawmakers advance bills targeting government transparency
Separate from the court case, Utah lawmakers are considering a proposal, SB240, that would explicitly keep these calendars secret in the future.
Have you experienced something you think just isn’t right? The KSL Investigators want to help. Submit your tip at investigates@ksl.com or 385-707-6153 so we can get working for you.
Utah
Muslim man in Utah was targeted in stabbing because of his religion, police say
A Utah man told police he repeatedly stabbed a Muslim man because of the man’s faith and intended to kill him, according to court records filed Monday.
The Muslim man survived the attack Monday afternoon at a mall southeast of Salt Lake City. But he’s expected to face a long recovery after suffering more than 15 stab wounds, according to a GoFundMe page set up to help with medical expenses.
Bystanders were able to get the knife out of the suspect’s hand before police arrived at the scene at Valley Fair Mall, court records show.
The suspect, Peter Michael Larsen, was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and carrying a prohibited dangerous weapon. He told police he targeted the employee over his religious beliefs, according to the court records, which didn’t list an attorney who could comment on his behalf.
The Associated Press was unable to locate any of Larsen’s immediate family in public records.
The Valley Fair Mall did not immediately respond to email and voicemail requests for comment.
Larsen, 48, was on parole for a previous violent felony, court records show. He is being held without bail.
Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill, whose office is determining whether to pursue charges, declined to comment.
“We don’t want to say anything else until we receive the results of the investigation,” Gill said in a statement.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group, called on elected officials to reject anti-Muslim rhetoric.
“Our nation’s political and community leaders have a moral responsibility to reject anti-Muslim hate in all its forms before more innocent people are harmed,” Nihad Awad, the organization’s national executive director, said in a statement.
In May, two teenagers killed three people and then themselves at an Islamic Center in San Diego in an attack that has left the community reeling. The AP obtained writings of both teenagers, including hateful rhetoric toward Jewish people, Muslims and Islam, as well as the LGBTQ+ community, Black people, women, and both the political left and right.
Utah
Legal outcomes difficult to track for hundreds of human-caused Utah wildfires
SALT LAKE CITY (KUTV) — There have been hundreds of human-caused wildfires this year in Utah, but the legal outcomes are hard to track.
At least two people have been charged recently for starting fires: one for the Memory Grove Fire in Salt Lake and one for the Mountain Road Fire in Ogden.
This year alone, 327 wildfires have been started by people in Utah — an act that should carry consequences, according to some.
“Certainly, if it’s intentional, it’s against the law,” resident David Mastroianni said. “If it’s not intentional, then they weren’t being as careful as they should be with something they should be careful with.”
But, before anyone gets to that point, there’s a lot of work that goes into figuring out what started the fire, let alone who.
“The fire investigator will show up on scene and will look at the scene, collect evidence, and then turn it over to the proper authorities,” said Kelly Wickens with Forestry, Fire, and State Lands.
Tracking which fires end with criminal charges or civil suits is difficult.
Wickens said that once the fire is out and the investigator turns the evidence over, their work is done, and it’s up to the proper authorities to press charges.
“Arson does require — this is what makes it difficult — is that you have to establish someone intentionally started a fire,” said former prosecutor Nathan Evershed.
Evershed said there are more charges than just arson, such as reckless burning.
“So, if it’s not intentional and it’s more accidental, it can still be viewed as being reckless,” Evershed said.
That could mean if a firework accidentally causes a fire.
Evershed said that there’s also a difference between causing a structure fire and a grass fire. A structure fire could result in aggravated arson charges.
But what happens if a fire is completely accidental?
“It’s more difficult to find a criminal sanction on that … still could be a civil sanction on that, where somebody would have to pay restitution,” Evershed said.
So, while there’s no concrete number for how many human-caused fires have led to charges or civil suits, there are a lot of avenues if someone does get caught.
Evershed said you can even be charged if you just abandon a campfire that causes a fire.
_____
Utah
One of Utah’s public ski areas is for sale
Four lifts, 174 acres, night skiing and a concert venue near Logan are up for grabs.
(Photo courtesy of Dylan White |@blanco_photovideo/Cherry Peak Resort)
The entire front side of Cherry Peak Resort, located about half an hour north of Logan, is illuminated for night skiing.
-
Montana49 seconds agoGovernor Gianforte Announces Montana Ranks as Top 10 State for Job Growth
-
Nebraska7 minutes agoRoanoke County teen heads to national rodeo finals in Nebraska
-
Nevada13 minutes agoNevada’s modern boomtowns are these fast-growing cities, study said
-
New Hampshire19 minutes agoNH Forests: A Story of Revival and the Challenges Ahead: Business NH Magazine
-
New Jersey25 minutes agoNJ Spine Doctor, Daughter, Granddaughter Killed In Plane Crash, Police Say
-
New Mexico31 minutes agoMcCauley Springs Fire Reaches 100% Containment
-
North Carolina37 minutes agoMassive great white shark spotted off NC coast. See where its headed
-
North Dakota43 minutes agoNeighbors, not competitors