Connect with us

Utah

He attacked a Utah father and son while yelling he wanted to ‘kill Mexicans.’ Now, he’s been sentenced to prison.

Published

on

He attacked a Utah father and son while yelling he wanted to ‘kill Mexicans.’ Now, he’s been sentenced to prison.


The assailant is behind bars, but the victims are still grappling with the physical and mental scars from this 2018 hate crime.

(Jose Lopez via Google) Lopez Tires photographed in 2016. Jose Lopez and his son, Luis, were attacked by a man in 2018 that has been convicted of three hate crimes. Alan Dale Covington was sentenced Monday, Aug. 7, 2023, to 20 years in prison for the assault.

A Utah man, who had shouted that he wanted to “kill Mexicans,” has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for brutally beating a Latino father and his son outside their family tire shop in one of the state’s highest-profile hate crimes.

The sentencing Monday came five years after the 2018 attack, and after a long time waiting and fearing for Luis Lopez, now 23, who suffered the brunt of the assault.

Advertisement

Lopez said he finally feels some relief that it’s over. He and his siblings sat in the courtroom Monday and watched Alan Dale Covington quietly accept his prison term.

“It was definitely a bittersweet moment,” said Lopez’s sister, Veronica.

Both Luis Lopez and his father, Jose, have struggled with post-traumatic stress disorder from the attack in the ensuing years. While Luis has started to recover from some of that — rearing a son and opening his own food business called the Munch Plug — Jose has gotten worse.

He has closed his tire shop permanently and did not attend the sentencing.

“He unfortunately has had a harder time coping with the attack,” Veronica said.

Advertisement

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Latino shop owner Jose Lopez, who was attacked at his Utah tire store, sits outside the federal courthouse in Salt Lake City on Friday, Feb. 14, 2020, where he has testified against the man who yelled, “I’m here to kill a Mexican.”

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Luis Gustavo Lopez testified against Alan D. Covington, 50, Feb. 18, 2020, in the U. S. District Court in Salt Lake City.

Covington had been convicted in a February 2020 trial of three hate crimes for attacking the father and son, as well as threatening Angel Lopez, Jose’s brother, who also worked at the shop. Covington’s sentencing was delayed several times, though, over his competency to appear in court.

In addition to his prison sentence, which has already started, the 55-year-old Covington will be on probation for five years after he is released.

Covington was found guilty of attacking the family outside Lopez Tires, near 1600 South on Salt Lake City’s Main Street, in November 2018 while screaming he was there to “kill Mexicans.”

Advertisement

Jose and Angel were both born in Mexico. Luis Lopez claims that heritage and is a U.S. citizen.

On the day of the beating, Jose and Luis recounted they heard yelling outside of their office, and Luis went to check it out. There was a man in the courtyard, screaming slurs: “Are you f—ing Mexican? Because I’m going to kill a Mexican.”

Covington was there gripping a metal bar with both hands, they said. Police said he also had a hatchet.

Jose and Luis asked him to leave. Angel heard the commotion and joined them. The three of them tried to escort Covington off the property, but he became more aggravated, according to police reports and court testimony.

Luis ran to the shop to find something to defend his family, grabbing the handle of a car jack. As he approached Covington, trying to scare him off, Covington swung at him.

Advertisement

The first time, Luis was able to duck. The second time, the metal bar struck his face. Jose said he jumped in to try to shield the teen. Covington then hit Luis in the back until Angel eventually scared him away.

Luis has since had a titanium plate put in his face and has suffered memory issues. The father had eight stitches in his arm.

“This has destroyed my life,” Jose said in during the trial through a Spanish translator.

Family members said it was hard to see Covington again for the sentencing, but they hope this will be the last time they come face-to-face with him.

Veronica was disappointed that Covington did not appear remorseful and did not apologize. “It was definitely hard to see him,” she said, “appearing to be nonchalant about the whole situation while our whole family sat there having to relive that day once again.”

Advertisement

Covington was charged federally with the crimes at the time after prosecutors said Utah’s state hate crimes law fell short in the case. It has since been strengthened by state lawmakers, spurred by the attack to add teeth to the statute.

On Tuesday, U.S. Attorney Trina A. Higgins for Utah applauded Covington’s sentencing.

“This was a horrific act of hate-motivated violence and there is no place for it in our state or country,” she said in a statement. “These victims are part of our community, and no one should ever have to fear for their safety because of their race or nationality. With Covington now behind bars, we hope the victims and their families can find peace and heal from this unspeakable act of hate.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

How the SCOTUS ruling on Idaho’s emergency abortion ban will affect patient transfers to Utah

Published

on

How the SCOTUS ruling on Idaho’s emergency abortion ban will affect patient transfers to Utah


SALT LAKE CITY — The United States Supreme Court sidestepped a decision Thursday on whether federal law requires states to provide pregnancy terminations in medical emergencies even in cases where the procedure would otherwise be illegal.

Instead, the court’s opinion – which stems from Idaho’s near-total abortion ban – kicked the legal questions surfaced in the case back to the lower courts and reinstated a previous ruling that will allow doctors in the state to perform emergency abortions in the meantime.

That means women in Idaho are unlikely – at least for now – to be airlifted to nearby states like Utah for the procedure.

“After today, there will be a few months — maybe a few years — during which doctors may no longer need to airlift pregnant patients out of Idaho,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote of the decision’s impact, in an opinion that dissented in part and concurred in part with the broader court’s ruling.

Advertisement

But the dismissal of the case leaves open key legal questions and sets up the potential that the issue of emergency room abortion care will come to the court again in the future.

In her brief, Jackson was critical of the court’s indecision, arguing that the ruling represented “not a victory” for Idaho patients but a “delay” – and that doctors still face the difficult decision of “whether to provide emergency medical care in the midst of highly charged legal circumstances.”

Conservatives Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined Jackson and her liberal colleagues, Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, in the 6-3 opinion, which was erroneously posted online Wednesday. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.

In his opinion, Alito also argued that the legal questions in the case – which come as abortion has become a political flashpoint in the U.S. presidential election – should have been decided, saying it was as “ripe for decision as it will ever be.”

“Apparently, the Court has simply lost the will to decide the easy but emotional and highly politicized question that the case presents,” he wrote.

Advertisement

Alito indicated that he would have ruled against the Biden administration’s interpretation that the federal Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires hospital emergency rooms that receive Medicare funding to provide treatment to people experiencing medical emergencies, supersedes Idaho’s abortion ban.

Idaho law allows doctors to terminate a pregnancy for any woman with emergency health complications who is clearly on the brink of death. But it’s quiet on the question of what to do when pregnancy complications put someone’s health at risk but don’t imminently risk her life.

Under threat of jail time and loss of their medical licenses, Idaho doctors said prior to Thursday’s ruling that they sometimes had no choice under such circumstances but to send a woman across state lines by helicopter or advise her to otherwise get to another state for treatment.

“Those transfers measure the difference between the life-threatening conditions Idaho will allow hospitals to treat and the health-threatening conditions it will not,” Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion Thursday.

Some women were transferred to reliably blue states like Washington and Oregon. But Utah’s capital was “one of the places we’ll tend to call first,” Stacy Seyb, a physician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine at St. Luke’s Hospital in Boise, told FOX 13 earlier this year.

Advertisement

While abortion remains legal up to 18 weeks in Utah, a near-total ban is currently on hold pending a ruling from the Utah Supreme Court.

Rep. Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, sponsored the abortion ban in the House and noted in a statement that “today’s Supreme Court ruling has no direct implications on Utah’s strong pro-life laws, including our trigger law.” “Utah will continue to stand up for policies that protect the unborn,” she added.

Thursday’s ruling does mean doctors in Idaho likely won’t have to airlift patients to Utah and other states, which Planned Parenthood Association of Utah Chief Corporate Affairs Office Shireen Ghorbani called a “small victory.”

“But what should have happened honestly is the Supreme Court should have said you have a right to emergency medical treatment, you’ve had that right for 40 years and you should have the right to an abortion if that is the appropriate medical care for the complication for the experience that you’re having,” she argued.

Regardless of the court’s decision, Ghorbani said she expects some Idaho women will still have to come to Utah for abortion care.

Advertisement

“Twenty two percent of their OBGYNs have left the state, they are running very low on specialists in maternal-fetal medicine,” Ghorbani noted. “That reality has now been created for people who live in Idaho. So there may still be people from Idaho who are seeking emergency medical care in Utah and this is what happens when we ring this bell.”

Recently released data from the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights, showed that 7% of all abortions performed in the state last year were for non-residents coming to Utah from Idaho. The data showed some Utah women also traveled out of state in 2023, to both Nevada and Colorado.





Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Here’s what Utah basketball’s first Big 12 schedule will look like

Published

on

Here’s what Utah basketball’s first Big 12 schedule will look like


The Big 12 released its opponent schedule matrix for men’s and women’s basketball on Thursday, giving a full picture of what the University of Utah will face during its first season in the league.

Utah men’s basketball 2024-25 Big 12 opponent matrix

  • Home-and-away: Baylor, BYU, Cincinnati, Oklahoma State, West Virginia
  • Home-only: Arizona State, Colorado, Kansas, Kansas State, Texas Tech
  • Away-only: Arizona, UCF, Houston, Iowa State, TCU

What stands out?

The Utes’ 20-game conference schedule is highlighted by getting blue blood program Kansas to come to the Huntsman Center in the only matchup between the two schools during the upcoming season.

Utah and BYU will play a home-and-home, and the Utes will also play twice against two other teams appearing in early top 25 projections, Baylor and Cincinnati.

Utah travels to Arizona in the lone matchup with the Wildcats this season, and also must play Houston and Iowa State — two other projected top 25 teams — in their only games against the Cougars and Cyclones, respectively.

The Utes also host Kansas State and Texas Tech in their only matchups this season, as well as two other programs, Arizona State and Colorado, also jumping from the Pac-12 to the Big 12 this year.

Advertisement

Utah women’s basketball 2024-25 Big 12 opponent matrix

  • Home-and-away: Arizona, Arizona State, BYU
  • Home-only: UCF, Colorado, Houston, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma State
  • Away-only: Baylor, Cincinnati, Iowa State, TCU, Texas Tech, West Virginia

What stands out?

Utah’s 18-game league schedule includes home-and-away matchups with three teams, and they’re all longstanding rivals with the Utes: former Pac-12 compatriots Arizona and Arizona State, as well as in-state rival BYU.

The Utes will play three of the four Big 12 teams ranked ahead of them in ESPN’s way-too-early top 25 on the road only — Baylor, Iowa State and West Virginia.

Of the five teams Utah will face at home, Colorado (who finished last year ranked No. 15) and Kansas State (another projected top 25 team) highlight that list.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

What the Runnin’ Utes’ Craig Smith once said in scouting Utah Jazz’s No. 10 selection Cody Williams

Published

on

What the Runnin’ Utes’ Craig Smith once said in scouting Utah Jazz’s No. 10 selection Cody Williams


Craig Smith had multiple opportunities last season to conduct a scouting report on Cody Williams, the Utah Jazz’s first selection in Wednesday night’s opening round of the 2024 NBA Draft.

That’s because Williams’ Colorado Buffaloes faced Smith and the Utah Runnin’ Utes three times during his lone collegiate season, with Williams playing in two of the contests.

Williams and the Buffaloes got the best of Smith and the Utes the two times the 6-foot-7 wing played against them. They beat them by 24 in late February, then blew them out again during the Pac-12 tournament quarterfinals.

Williams missed the teams’ first meeting last season, when Utah edged the Buffaloes in Salt Lake City. Still, getting familiar with Colorado gave Smith several chances to check out film on the future Jazzman.

Advertisement

Before the teams played in February, Smith talked about what Williams brings to the floor.

“He can get it going in any number of ways. At his size and his length, when he gets around the rim, he’s able to finish at all kinds of angles, over shot blockers,” Smith said at the time.

Williams averaged 11.9 points, 3.0 rebounds and 1.6 assists per game last season for Colorado, a squad that included fellow first-round draft pick Tristan da Silva (he went 18th overall to the Orlando Magic on Wednesday night) and guard KJ Simpson, who’s projected to be a second-round selection on Thursday.

Williams also shot 55.2% from the field during the 2023-24 season and 41.5% from 3-point range in limited attempts.

The talented wing never made much of an impact against the Utes. in Colorado’s two wins over Utah, he averaged 5.0 points, 2.0 rebounds and 1.0 assists per game.

Advertisement

Smith was also impressed with what Williams does defensively.

“He’s a good defender because he’s so long,” Smith said. “You can get deep and you might have a half a step advantage, but with his length, he can catch up and make those plays.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending