Connect with us

Utah

Feeling ‘a sense of betrayal,’ Rocky Mountain Power customers host ‘hearing’ to protest Utah rate hikes

Published

on

Feeling ‘a sense of betrayal,’ Rocky Mountain Power customers host ‘hearing’ to protest Utah rate hikes


In what some saw as a void of opportunity to weigh in on Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed rate increase, a group of the utility’s customers gathered for their own public “people’s hearing” on Saturday.

A row of five chairs reserved for utility executives and members of Utah’s Public Service Commission sat empty in the front row of a conference room at the Salt Lake City Public Library’s Marmalade Branch while electricity customers shared their personal testimony to a video camera.

“We’re going to send [the recording] to the Public Service Commission as a replacement for the hearing that they were not willing to have,” said Luis Miranda, a campaign organizer for the Sierra Club’s Utah chapter.

Utah’s Public Service Commission is currently considering Rocky Mountain Power’s request to raise its electricity rates for customers by 18% — down from a 30% increase the company initially requested last year. But pro-coal lawmakers and clean energy advocates alike say customers will end up paying the difference in the long run through Rocky Mountain Power parent company PacifiCorp’s Energy Balancing Account (EBA).

Advertisement

The hearing process has been mired in legislative and procedural drama. Legislators tried and failed this year to abolish the EBA for Utah customers. They have also repeatedly asked Rocky Mountain Power to separate from its parent company so that Utah customers did not pay for “poor regulatory decisions” in other states.

Saturday’s testimonies, however, were largely personal.

Jeffery White, a tiny homes architect and self-described senior citizen, said he hoped for “peace” in his retirement years.

Instead, “I find myself, like so many others, at the kitchen table doing math, trying to stretch a fixed income across food, medicine and power bills,” White said. “Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed hike isn’t just a number. It’s a sentence. It leaves people like me in cold homes staring at dark ceilings.”

The meeting, organized by a coalition of clean energy advocates, focused on Rocky Mountain Power’s renewed commitment to coal and natural gas after previously promising to amp up its clean energy portfolio.

Advertisement

“I feel a sense of betrayal as a homeowner,” said Paul Zuckerman, who said he moved to Utah in the 1970s and “fell in love with the clean air environment.”

Utah lawmakers last year passed two bills to keep the state’s two biggest coal plants alive and allow Rocky Mountain Power to pass the associated costs onto Utah customers.

(Shannon Sollitt | The Salt Lake Tribune) The names of Utah Public Service Commissioners and PacifiCorps executives, including Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffet, adorned empty chairs at a meeting Saturday afternoon about Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed rate hike. Berkshire Hathaway owns PacifiCorps, RMP’s parent company.

Shareholders at Berkshire Hathaway, which owns PacifiCorps and Rocky Mountain Power, will consider two proposals ahead of their May 3 shareholder meeting that ask the company to evaluate the financial impacts of its energy-saving initiatives. One proposal suggests the company’s “voluntary environmental activities” are “unnecessary” and do not benefit company shareholders, according to a proxy statement.

The other suggests Berkshire Hathaway’s fossil fuel investments are, in fact, harming the company and its shareholders due to increased insurance rates fueled by climate disasters.

Advertisement

Berkshire Hathaway’s board of directors has recommended voting “no” on both proposals. Organizers of Saturday’s meaning said the proposals would, at least, provide an “accounting of corporate climate change-related activities” and provide information that would benefit “shareholders and RMP ratepayers alike.”

But ratepayers are hit harder by Rocky Mountain Power’s policies, customers said.

“Don’t make the most vulnerable among us pay the price for someone else’s profit,” White said like he was addressing the Public Service Commissioners.

The utility’s customers who attended Saturday morning’s event said they were unwilling to pay more to burn coal and accelerate climate change.

“The people of Utah already pay a high enough price for climate change,” said Emma Verhamme, a Salt Lake City resident and RMP customer.

Advertisement

Verhamme listed, at length, the ways, she said, Salt Lake residents have “paid” for climate change: the dry Great Salt Lake, less snowfall in the winter months, more intense wildfire smoke in summer months, unhealthy air quality that keeps kids inside at recess some days.

“Personally, I don’t want any of that,” Verhemme said.

Some customers might, however, be willing to pay more to invest in renewable energy, said Ted Gurney.

“If they spend it on what we like, we’ll pay the rent,” Gurney proposed.

Shannon Sollitt is a Report for America corps member covering business accountability and sustainability for The Salt Lake Tribune. Your donation to match our RFA grant helps keep her writing stories like this one; please consider making a tax-deductible gift of any amount today by clicking here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Watercooler Talk: Utah Jazz get a new boss, conference shake-ups strike again

Published

on

Watercooler Talk: Utah Jazz get a new boss, conference shake-ups strike again


AROUND THE WATERCOOLER — Just because the on-court action has stopped for the summer doesn’t mean the off-court happenings have slowed down.

Host Caleb Turner discusses the Jazz hiring Austin Ainge as president of basketball operations and Utah Valley University leaving the WAC for the Big West. It’s also an exciting month for local soccer as Diego Luna continues to shine bright as a starring member of the U.S. men’s national team heading into the Gold Cup.

Listen and follow wherever you get your podcasts.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Voices: Trump’s NASA budget will lead to increased wildfire risk and job cuts in Utah

Published

on

Voices: Trump’s NASA budget will lead to increased wildfire risk and job cuts in Utah


Gutting NASA is a preventable disaster. Will Utah’s congressional delegation take action?

(Rick Bowmer | The Associated Press) A helicopter recovery team departs the Michael Army Air Field before the arrival of a space capsule carrying NASA’s first asteroid samples on Sunday, Sept. 24, 2023, to a temporary clean room at Dugway Proving Ground, in Utah. The Osiris-Rex spacecraft released the capsule following a seven-year journey to asteroid Bennu and back.

If Utah’s congressional delegation wants to cede the moon to China, destroy American scientific leadership, increase wildfire risk and eliminate jobs in the Beehive State, then they’ll vote for Donald Trump’s proposed NASA budget.

Advertisement

As the author of a book about the moon, I’m steeped in the history of space science and exploration. I cover it for magazines and websites. And, like many, I’m inspired by what NASA does.

But the White House has proposed a 24% total agency cut — or $6 billion — which itself would hack NASA’s science budget by half. NASA would have nearly $19 billion in 2026, per Trump’s recent proposal. That might sound like a lot but, according to the non-partisan group The Planetary Society, NASA now occupies .3% of the federal discretionary budget.

Yet each dollar NASA spends returns three more, Jack Kiraly at The Planetary Society reports. In 2023, that was some $76 billion in economic impact. That’s 300,000 jobs. NASA is a force-multiplier for good.

Even though this proposal appears to put more money into human spaceflight, the focus appears to be on nonexistent programs to send Americans to Mars as quickly as possible. And The Planetary Society’s policy expert Casey Dreier tells me that “the ‘increase’ to human space flight is still a net decrease given the cuts to ‘legacy’ systems. Nothing is increased in this budget, overall. Adjusted for inflation, this is the lowest request for NASA since January of 1961” — before a human even flew to space.

This reckless plan would mean that the Artemis lunar-return program — which Trump started and President Joe Biden continued — would effectively end after only two flights: a lunar fly-by on Artemis II next year, then Artemis III a year later.

Advertisement

Artemis III has been intended to land on the moon near the water-ice-rich South Pole, a region of considerable scientific and commercial interest. But there is no way the lander, a version of SpaceX’s Starship, will be ready. It keeps blowing up. It isn’t human-rated and hasn’t demonstrated orbital re-fueling crucial to lunar landing. So Artemis III will be another fly-by or an orbital mission.

A red moon

Meanwhile, the Chinese government is pushing forward with its sophisticated space program. Chinese “taikonauts” will land on the moon in a few years. This matters. China has demonstrated zero interest in developing fair, sustainable and cooperative practices on the moon. They haven’t done so here on Earth.

Instead of the American-led Artemis Accords coalition, with more than 50 partner nations — which is committed to cooperation and sustainability on the moon — we will abandon our nearest world to China (and partner Russia). Perhaps they’ll make our new phones there, if we can afford them.

This budget would waste billions already spent for Artemis hardware in production. Such hardware includes the first module of Gateway — a planned lunar-orbiting space station — which happens to be the perfect place to test-drive long-duration flights to Mars.

Advertisement

We have spent a handful of days on the lunar surface. If we are to develop a long-term human presence in deep space, including on Mars, we need more than Elon Musk’s tweets. We need experience.

Science is slashed, too

The Hubble Space Telescope and James Webb Space Telescope would continue. But a third of all missions would be scuttled, according to The Planetary Society. In a statement, the group says “this proposal wastes billions in prior taxpayer investment and slams the brakes on future exploration. It terminates healthy and productive projects like OSIRIS-APEX, an invaluable planetary defense mission, as well as missions making discoveries about the outer solar system, like Juno and New Horizons….These are unique projects that would require billions of new spending to replace.”

This budget cut would end climate-monitoring satellites even as our planet’s temperatures continue to rise and the frequency of extreme weather events increase. A project called FireSense would be at risk. FireSense monitors wildfires and helps us prevent and fight them. Such low-cost, high-benefit programs are exactly the kind of thing this administration hates.

So will America become a scientific backwater? The American Astronomical Society says, that “without robust and sustained federal funding, the United States will lose at least a generation of talent to other countries.”

Advertisement

Impacts in Utah

Closer to home, the changes to the Artemis moon missions will come at a heavy cost.

Until other systems are proven, NASA’s heavy-lift rocket, the Space Launch System, is what we have for human exploration. This proposed budget would cancel SLS. While the SLS has come under criticism — some of it valid — for cost overruns and delays, there is no other heavy lift launcher that has successfully flown a deep-space mission.

Northrop Grumman builds the solid rocket boosters for the SLS in Utah. Nearly 1,600 jobs in the state are directly related to Artemis. That investment yielded $355 million in Utah economic output, according to NASA. The overall NASA investment here is nearly $500 million dollars, from the universities to small businesses.

Gutting NASA is a preventable disaster. Congressional voices on both sides of the aisle are sounding the alarm. Will Utah’s Congressional delegation listen?

Advertisement

(Christopher Cokinos) Christopher Cokinos is a Logan-based writer.

Christopher Cokinos is a Logan-based writer whose most recent book is “Still as Bright: An Illuminating History of the Moon from Antiquity to Tomorrow.”

The Salt Lake Tribune is committed to creating a space where Utahns can share ideas, perspectives and solutions that move our state forward. We rely on your insight to do this. Find out how to share your opinion here, and email us at voices@sltrib.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Heber City PD, Utah DWR wrangle loose moose from driveway | Gephardt Daily

Published

on

Heber City PD, Utah DWR wrangle loose moose from driveway | Gephardt Daily


Heber City Police photo.

HEBER CITY, Utah, June 7, 2025 (Gephardt Daily) — Heber City Police and agents from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources responded to a Friday morning call, and found a moose standing in a residential driveway.

“Around 6:45 this morning, Heber City PD responded to reports of a teenage moose wandering through the neighborhood near 500 North and 100 West,” says a statement issued Friday by Heber City Police.

Advertisement

“The young moose explored the area for about an hour and 15 minutes, likely a little lost and curious.

“Officers worked closely with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DNR) to monitor the animal and ensure public safety.”

The moose was eventually tranquilized and given a free ride to a new wilderness home, the agency said.

“Thanks to teamwork and patience, DNR was able to safely capture and relocate the moose to a more suitable habitat.”

Heber City Police photo





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending