Connect with us

Utah

‘A big nut to crack’: Utah commission conflicted on how to react to canyon gondola plan

Published

on

‘A big nut to crack’: Utah commission conflicted on how to react to canyon gondola plan


SALT LAKE CITY — The members of the Central Wasatch Fee’s transportation committee actually have their ideas a couple of proposed plan for a gondola in Little Cottonwood Canyon; nonetheless, they aren’t able to formally touch upon the plan.

The committee’s assembly adjourned Monday afternoon with no remaining suggestion for the way the fee ought to reply to the Utah Division of Transportation’s environmental impression assertion, which was introduced in August. It requires a gondola after different measures, together with enhanced bus service within the canyon, are carried out to ease visitors points throughout the busiest days within the canyon.

A forty five-day public remark window on the proposed plan closes subsequent week earlier than the company information a file of choice, both by the top of the 12 months or early subsequent 12 months. Members of the fee’s transportation committee agreed on Monday to ahead the notes from the assembly to the total fee for extra dialogue earlier than a remaining vote, which is anticipated to be held on the final day of public remark.

Advertisement

“I do know we have now restricted time, however it’s a giant nut to crack,” mentioned Brighton Mayor Dan Knopp, a member of the committee, earlier than its members determined to wrap up their on-line assembly.

A decision wouldn’t alter any of the mission’s timeline, however it might supply a window into how elected leaders of residents closest to the mission really feel concerning the proposed plan. The fee was created in 2017 by an settlement between municipal and county leaders in Salt Lake and Summit counties to handle the transportation, financial system, recreation and surroundings challenges within the mountains between the 2 counties. Its management consists of elected leaders within the communities which have stakes within the land.

Whereas no formal choice was made Monday, its jurisdiction members point out that they imagine one thing must be executed — simply not with a gondola. Each the Salt Lake County and Salt Lake Metropolis councils condemned the gondola proposal final week. The county’s decision, which handed by a slim 5-4 vote, asks for UDOT to think about smaller, much less invasive alternate options earlier than establishing an enormous gondola.

The town’s decision, which handed unanimously, asserts {that a} gondola “has a really excessive value to taxpayers … (that) serves solely two personal ski resorts,” and that UDOT’s environmental impression assertion did not “successfully think about lots of the further water sources dangers” related to the mission. Salt Lake Metropolis holds the water rights within the canyon.

Each Sandy Mayor Monica Zoltanski and Cottonwood Heights Mayor Mike Weichers mentioned Monday that they anticipate to file comparable resolutions within the close to future. Zoltanski defined that she isn’t positive if the Sandy Metropolis Council feels the identical approach as her, however she’s for a phased implementation of alternate options like elevated bus service and towards a future gondola.

Advertisement

“I really feel like we will obtain (UDOT’s objective of) 30% discount in car visitors by doing the phased strategy — tolling, carpooling (and) enhanced bussing with out the street widening,” she mentioned.

Each time we have now a dialog we have now one other hundred questions. I feel that is going to take some peeling of the onion to get the place we should be. — Brighton Mayor Dan Knopp

Weichers mentioned he believes the Cottonwood Heights Metropolis Council has “sufficient consensus” to oppose the proposed gondola. The town can also be “actually, actually towards” a deliberate 2,500-stall parking construction that will be constructed close to the mouth of the canyon.

Different communities are nonetheless attempting to resolve the right way to react to the environmental impression assertion. There are lots of of pages of knowledge to type by, which is why it has taken weeks for communities near the canyon to decide. But regardless of all of this data, a number of the committee members mentioned they’re having a troublesome time attempting to determine the significance of all the pieces that isn’t actually answered within the doc.

Knopp mentioned he believes parking must be addressed in some kind or vogue, however the plan has some holes in it. Brighton lately requested UDOT to make clear how a toll program would work, noting a priority that supply vehicles wouldn’t be allowed up the canyon in some cases. Knopp wasn’t glad with the company’s response, which he mentioned is considerably emblematic of the report.

“For my part, the contortions that they’ve gone by to hit their metrics and hit their marks skip over actuality, and it actually doesn’t handle some or very a lot. … Each time we have now a dialog we have now one other hundred questions,” he mentioned. “I feel that is going to take some peeling of the onion to get the place we should be.”

Advertisement

There are a number of further questions that the transportation committee desires UDOT to handle, resembling what year-round service would appear to be, what the present value is in present greenback figures, and what will likely be executed to make sure the canyon’s surroundings is protected for the lengthy haul, mentioned Blake Perez, the chief director of the fee. Extra questions centered across the timeline of implementation, the origin of journey of canyon guests and what measures ought to be used to find out if the mission is a hit.

With so many unknowns nonetheless forward, Knopp mentioned he’s hopeful that UDOT’s phased strategy to canyon tasks will give members of the Central Wasatch Fee time “type this out as we go alongside.”

Turning an eye fixed to Massive Cottonwood Canyon

Little Cottonwood Canyon wasn’t the one focus of the assembly. Members of the Central Wasatch Fee’s transportation committee additionally mentioned the way forward for journey in Massive Cottonwood Canyon.

The fee is at the moment engaged on an motion plan to handle future journey challenges within the canyon, which is positioned north of Little Cottonwood Canyon. It accepted requests for proposals again in August for tasks that might be included within the plan, which will likely be a “playbook containing a prioritized record of near-, mid- and long-term suggestions,” in line with the fee.

Vehicles travel up Big Cottonwood Canyon on Saturday morning. The canyon road is the subject of an ongoing Central Wasatch Commission action plan.
Automobiles journey up Massive Cottonwood Canyon on Saturday morning. The canyon street is the topic of an ongoing Central Wasatch Fee motion plan. (Photograph: Carter Williams, KSL.com)

Angie Bauer-Fellows, a senior transportation and environmental planner for infrastructure consulting agency AECOM, which is working with the fee in creating a plan, mentioned there are some extra steps in creating a plan anticipated this 12 months however a “extra detailed” dialogue for mobility hub concerns, resembling potential areas and facilities, are scheduled to happen in February 2023.

A draft plan isn’t anticipated till the spring, which means the mission nonetheless has loads of time to take form. The mission will concentrate on year-round visitors considerations as an alternative of seasonal issues, in line with members of the committee.

Advertisement

One factor is definite from Monday’s replace, although: the committee goals to craft a mission that’s clear to everybody.

“I simply need to ensure we’re setting ourselves up for fulfillment and (managing) expectations,” Zoltanski mentioned. “I don’t need to redo the Little Cottonwood Canyon expertise. I simply need to get to the guts of the problems. … That’s our objective.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

White Christmas moves closer to reality for much of Utah

Published

on

White Christmas moves closer to reality for much of Utah


Those who asked Santa Claus for a White Christmas may find what they wanted under the tree… or better yet, on the trees as storms are expected to bring snow to much of Utah on the holiday.

TRACK THE STORMS: Get real-time weather by downloading the FREE Utah Weather Authority app

Southern Utah will wake up on Christmas morning with snow already likely on the ground as a storm moves in overnight. The winds then turn in the afternoon and the snow arrives along the Wasatch Front with a few inches possible in the northern Utah valleys.

Salt Lake City is currently seeing a 60-70 percent chance of receiving over a trace amount of snow, according to the National Weather Service, with the possibility of accumulating snowfall in the benches.

Advertisement

The mountains are expected to get a decent dump of snow, which will please skiers and snowboarders who have waited through a disappointing start to winter. The resorts up the Cottonwood canyons can see up to 10 inches of snow.

Another storm is expected to impact many of the state’s mountains on Thursday and Friday. Overall, the northern mountain areas could receive up to 3 feet of snow throughout all the storms, with the higher amounts possible in the Bear River Mountains and upper Cottonwoods.

The Thursday-Friday storm will only bring light accumulations to valleys.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Hockey Club drops a game it ‘needed and wanted’ in a chase for a playoff spot

Published

on

Utah Hockey Club drops a game it ‘needed and wanted’ in a chase for a playoff spot


Barrett Hayton did not have a concrete answer for Utah Hockey Club’s lackluster second period.

“I don’t know. We’re going to have to sit down and talk about it. I think we have to figure out what causes that,” the forward said. “The mentality we have to figure out.”

It was Hayton’s third-period goal that pulled Utah within one after allowing the Dallas Stars to take a 3-1 lead in the middle frame. However, the attempted comeback was too little too late and the Stars took the two oh-so-valuable divisional points in a 3-2 win at Delta Center Monday night.

“We’re neck and neck [in the standings] with these guys. That’s a game we really needed and wanted,” Nick Bjugstad said. “Tried to fight back in the third, but that’s a good team. Can’t take a period off. That’s kind of what we did in the second.”

Advertisement

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Dallas Stars left wing Mason Marchment (27) vies for the puck with Utah Hockey Club defenseman Olli Maatta (2) and Utah Hockey Club center Barrett Hayton (27) during the first period of the NHL game at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City on Monday, Dec. 23, 2024.

The Stars took a 1-0 lead midway through the first period with a goal from Colin Blackwell. Following a Utah turnover in the neutral zone, the Dallas forward broke out off the rush and sniped it past Karel Vejmelka from the right side.

Kevin Stenlund tied things 1-1 for Utah just over a minute later with his fifth goal of the month and sixth of the season. The veteran forward earned net-front positioning and tipped Ian Cole’s blast from the point in at 12:41.

The back-to-back fatigue became evident in the second period for Utah. The team looked disjointed and slow and it cost it.

“It’s a veteran team on the other side who weathered the storm in the first period,” head coach André Tourigny said. “Then they got us where they wanted us and we didn’t play particularly well at that.”

Advertisement

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah Hockey Club goaltender Karel Vejmelka (70) and defenseman Vladislav Kolyachonok (52) react to a goal from the Dallas Stars during the first period of the NHL game at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City on Monday, Dec. 23, 2024.

Dallas took advantage of its fresh legs by creating frequent odd-man situations simply by beating Utah to the puck.

That is how Roope Hintz’s goal unfolded. He and Mavrik Bourque blew past Stenlund and Michael Kesselring at Utah’s defensive blueline ahead of a give-and-go sequence which found Hintz uncovered in front. He wristed it in for the 2-1 advantage at 12:39.

Jamie Benn’s tally at 17:50 closely resembled the same play. Wyatt Johnston looped the puck behind the net before hitting a wide-open, net-front Benn who unleashed a one-timer to make it 3-1 heading into the third period.

“I think that second period is the learning lesson, obviously. We knew coming into this game it’s a four-point game, division game. Those matchups are huge,” Hayton said. “We’re all pissed off about it and disappointed and frustrated in ourselves. That’s a big game and sucks for it to go that way.”

Advertisement

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Dallas Stars center Wyatt Johnston (53) prepares to shoot as Utah Hockey Club left wing Matias Maccelli (63) defends during the second period of the NHL game at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City on Monday, Dec. 23, 2024.

Utah’s power play — which had been on a seven-game conversion streak — could barely string passes together and did not establish a cycle in the two chances it was given through 40 minutes. The third line of Bjugstad, Lawson Crouse and Matias Maccelli, however, had noticeable jump at the start of the night as it tried to get its production going.

“When you’re not scoring as a line you try to figure out what to do. But for us it’s just simplifying,” Bjugstad said. “Just have to find a way to score. That’s kind of all I’ve got on that front.”

Hayton’s goal came at 11:39 of the final stanza and gave his team just under nine minutes to hunt for an equalizer it ultimately did not find. After Utah won an offensive-zone faceoff, Hayton got between the hash marks and deflected in Nick Schmaltz’s shot from the left side for the 3-2 scoreline and his second goal in two games.

Clayton Keller picked up the secondary assist on the play which extended his point streak to five games — he’s had 10 points through that stretch.

Advertisement

“Proud of the effort of the guys,” Tourigny said. “Proud of the pushback we had. We all talk about the second period which is totally true and fair, but in the third period we had a hell of a pushback and the guys never quit.”

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah Hockey Club celebrate a goal against the Dallas Stars during the first period of the NHL game at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City on Monday, Dec. 23, 2024.

Utah will now have three NHL-mandated days off for the holidays before returning to Delta Center on Friday to host the Colorado Avalanche — another Central Division opponent.

Despite Utah’s two-game losing streak, the team remains confident about its overall play in December and the position it has put them in heading into the new year.

“It’s on us. They pushed, but we have to understand that’s game management,” Bjugstad said. “We’ve got to learn, we’ve got to move on. I think this team has a lot of upside so we want to fulfill that.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

What went wrong in Utah HC's loss to Stars?

Published

on

What went wrong in Utah HC's loss to Stars?


The Utah Hockey Club’s last two regulation losses have now come at the hands of the Dallas Stars following Monday night’s 3-2 loss at home.

An insufficient effort in the second period was Utah HC’s demise. Outside of that, it was as evenly matched as any game.

“I think that second period’s a learning lesson, honestly,” said Utah center Barrett Hayton. “I thought we did a great job in the first period. We were urgent, we were intense, we were on the ball, playing the right way. You just can’t afford those lapses against good teams, and that’s what our second period was.”

A late push from Utah yielded some close calls, but sports fans know “close” doesn’t cut it.

Advertisement

How this works

This is a three-part article geared toward three different audiences.

  • First, we’ll have “Utah hockey for dummies” for all you new hockey fans. Welcome, by the way — we’re glad you’ve taken an interest in the greatest sport in the world.
  • Next, we’ll have a section titled “Utah hockey for casual fans,” aimed at those who have a basic understanding of the sport.
  • Finally, we’ll have “Utah hockey for nerds.” That will be for those of you who, like me, think about nothing but hockey all day, every day.

Feedback is welcome, so let me know what you think in the comments of this article or the comments section on “X.”

Utah Hockey for dummies

Hayton seems to have found his scoring touch once again.

Until this week, the 24-year-old who centers Utah’s top line hadn’t scored since Oct. 30. Now, he has a pair of goals in as many games. It’s his second time scoring in bunches this year, as he scored in each of the team’s first three games and again in its fifth game.

He told the media after the game Monday that there’s not much rhyme or reason to his streaks.

Advertisement

“I think you’ll score and produce when you’re playing well and playing the right way,” he said. “It all comes full circle like that, so I don’t know. It’s just coincidence.”

Regardless of whether the puck goes in the net or not, Hayton has played an immaculate defensive game this year, which has opened his linemates up for offensive success.

Clayton Keller, who plays on Hayton’s left wing, has scored more than a point per game this year. Nick Schmaltz, his other winger, is just below a point per game.

Interesting note: There’s a discrepancy as to how many points Hayton now has in his career. The team is celebrating his goal as his 100th point, but NHL.com says it’s only his 99th, with the same number of games played, goals and assists.

HockeyDB and most of the other sites agree that it’s number 100. I’m not good enough at math to figure out who’s right. Someone add it up and let me know in the comments.

Advertisement

Utah Hockey for casual fans

Although Utah HC managed just 26 shots Monday, Stars goaltender Casey DeSmith was the story of the game. He plays at the top of his crease, which is especially effective when facing shots from medium and close distances. It earned him the honor of first star of the game.

Time and time again, Utah would create plenty of open space, make a great play and put a solid shot on net, only to have it go straight to the crest of DeSmith’s jersey.

“There weren’t many holes on him,” said Utah center Nick Bjugstad. “There were some good chances on our end, but I still feel like traffic and making it a little harder on him would have been beneficial for us.”

Utah Hockey for nerds

The fatigue of a back-to-back affects teams more than we probably think it does. In this, the second game in as many nights for Utah HC, they got much-needed energy from the third line: Bjugstad, Lawson Crouse and Matias Maccelli.

All night long, that line created chances out of thin air. They seemed to have the chemistry together that earned them all the best or second-best point totals of their careers last year.

Advertisement

One example came midway through the first period Monday. Bjugstad was streaking down the left wing but was forced to the outside by the Stars’ defender.

Rather than trying to beat him with speed, Bjugstad threw on the brakes and sent a spinning backhand pass straight to the stick of Crouse.

DeSmith matched him with a perfectly positioned save, but the play gave Utah a jolt of energy.

Then on the first shift of the second period, they had a similar high-energy rush. It was not by coincidence that Utah head coach Andre Tourigny selected his highest-paced line to set the tone for the second.

These are the kinds of things that third lines are typically responsible for, in addition to chipping in a goal once every two or three games. They’re really struggling to do that second part, but they showed on Monday that they can do the first thing.

“When you’re not scoring as a line, you try to figure out what to do,” Bjugstad said. “For us, it’s just simplifying.”

Advertisement

What’s next?

There will be three silent nights for Utah HC — and the rest of the NHL — before getting back into action on Friday as they host the Colorado Avalanche.

It’s the third and final match this season between the two teams. They’re both 1-1-0 against each other so the season series is on the line.

It’s a big game in the sense that both teams are competing for one of the same five playoff spots, so every point matters. It’s a good chance for one team to gain the edge over the other.

Colorado’s Nathan MacKinnon is as hot as ever right now, with 16 points in his last seven games. With that in mind, it shouldn’t surprise you that he has a five-point lead in the NHL points race.

The game starts at 7:30 p.m. It will be broadcast nationally, meaning it won’t be available on the normal channels. Instead, it’s on ESPN2.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending