Seattle, WA
Salk: Why Seattle Seahawks may get better without rebuilding
The Seattle Seahawks are not rebuilding. That has become crystal clear in the days following their roster shakeup, which began with the trades of Geno Smith and DK Metcalf.
Seattle Seahawks Offseason Tracker: Free agency, trades and more
This could have gone either way. With their starting quarterback gone and an offense that as of Monday contained legit starters at maybe four or five positions, a rebuild wouldn’t have been out of the question. They had added salary cap space and draft picks. They had a coach that had spent a year building credibility that could have helped get them through a lean year or two. There was no obvious elite franchise quarterback available.
It’s probably what I would have done.
In this alternate, hypothetical reality (in which I was in charge of the Seahawks!), I would have signed Daniel Jones to be the quarterback at something like the $14 million, one-year deal he took in Indy. He might have even taken less given a better opportunity to start and play here. I would have tried to structure it so that the team had a second-year option if he played well.
Jones would have been a likely downgrade from Geno Smith, but I’d be banking on one of two things happening. Either he becomes the next Sam Darnold, thrives in this system, and the team uses the savings to build up the rest of the roster. Or he struggles, the team loses, and then picks a quarterback in the top 10 of the NFL Draft next year.
The idea behind my plan would be to give the team multiple bites at solving the quarterback problem. It would be risky, but the goal would be to wind up with either quality quarterback play for small money or a chance at an elite franchise quarterback in the draft.
The Seahawks had a different plan. It might not have quite the same upside as mine, but it’s safer and probably smarter and easier to achieve in reality.
In trying to understand what the Seahawks have done in the past week, it has helped me to think of the two trades (and the Darnold signing) in a slightly different way.
The first trade could be viewed as Geno Smith straight up for Sam Darnold. This is, quite simply, a smart trade. The Seahawks get a similar-tiered quarterback who is seven years younger and will cost a smaller percentage of their cap than what Geno wanted to be paid.
The Seahawks may lose some accuracy and there is obvious risk in bringing in a quarterback who has only shown one year of success after lots of struggles. But that is balanced by the age, money, and locker room advantages that Darnold brings with him. I think most NFL executives and coaches would make that swap in a heartbeat.
The second trade would then work out to be DK Metcalf for a second and third-round pick (counting the pick from the Geno trade here). That would be a lot closer to the value we had hoped to see for the mercurial wide receiver and gives the team the chance to backfill the position while using at least one pick and the cash/cap savings to reallocate resources on your roster into more important positions.
Sign me up for that one too.
The Seahawks end up with the No. 6 free agent (Darnold, according to NFL Network’s Gregg Rosenthal) and save enough money to re-sign Nos. 27 (linebacker Ernest Jones) and 53 (defensive lineman Jarran Reed), sign No. 48 (pass rusher DeMarcus Lawrence), plus add receiver Marquez Valdes-Scantling. Oh, and they still have resources left to be in the running for Cooper Kupp and are better situated to extend Charles Cross and other young players soon to outgrow their rookie contracts.
Is WA native Cooper Kupp now a fit as Seahawks WR?
Here’s what I like:
• They have a quarterback that seems to be liked by his teammates, doesn’t create much drama, and could continue to progress in his mid-career resurgence.
• They continued to invest in making the defense elite. Yes, you have a flaw to fix on the offensive line, but the quickest path to being great is to be elite somewhere and the defensive line is where they are already closest. Signing Lawrence gives them so much flexibility in the draft.
• By adding MVS (and hopefully someone like Kupp), they get wide receivers that fit their new scheme, won’t need a high volume of passes, and keep them from immediately needing to fill the position with a top draft pick. This is a weak draft if you need a top wideout – there is no reason to take a second receiver in the top 20 in three years.
• They create a roster that is more indicative of what coach Mike Macdonald wants and is relatively free of drama.
It is very possible the Seahawks could end up being a significantly better team in 2025 than they were last season. But for that to happen, we all know what is left to do:
The Seahawks need to address the interior of their offensive line. This isn’t a debate. I don’t think there is another side to this where you point at the existing players and hope that new coaches and technique fixes the problem. This needs both that and better talent.
Seattle has already watched the best free agents go elsewhere (Will Fries, Drew Dolman, Joe Thuney). The Seahawks need to upgrade either the center and/or guard position before the draft to avoid having to rely on rookies to step in and succeed immediately.
If they can do this – and I believe they still can – this will be the best free agent signing period the team has had since the Cliff Avril/Michael Bennett steal of 2013.
All that with five picks in the top 92? That is how you get better without rebuilding.
More on the Seattle Seahawks
• Schlereth: New Seahawks QB Darnold’s resurgence didn’t start last year
• Instant reaction: What WR Valdes-Scantling brings to Seahawks
• Rost: Seattle Seahawks’ free agent strategy hasn’t been a strong suit
• Which version of Sam Darnold are the Seahawks getting?
• Bump & Stacy: Why Seattle Seahawks are in a ‘retool,’ not a rebuild
Seattle, WA
Where Seattle Seahawks’ No. 1 seed odds stand after Week 16
The NFC West is a crowded mess, with three of the NFL’s best teams vying for both the division crown and the NFC’s No. 1 seed.
And it just got messier.
The 49ers’ win over the Colts on Monday night improves their record to 11-4, tying them with the Rams and putting both teams one game behind the 12-3 Seahawks.
Are Seahawks now the NFC favorite? Sheil Kapadia’s take
What does it mean for Seattle? I’ll be using The Athletic’s 2025 Playoff Simulator to navigate through the next two weeks…
First, the basics. What’s next for these three teams?
The 49ers have two at home. They host the 11-4 Chicago Bears (the league’s leader in takeaways and coming off back-to-back wins) for Sunday Night Football and then host the Seahawks. The date and time on that one is TBD, usually settled late Week 17, but it’s a favorite to be another primetime matchup.
The current NFL playoff picture
The Seahawks have two on the road. They head to Carolina to take on a hungry 8-7 Panthers team, also coming off a win, that can clinch the NFC South for the first time in a decade with a victory and a Bucs’ loss to the Dolphins. Then the Seahawks head to Santa Clara to face the 49ers.
The Rams have the easiest slate, facing two teams already eliminated from the postseason. They head to play the 6-9 Falcons and then host the 3-12 Cardinals in the regular-season finale.
What are the Seahawks’ current odds of clinching the No. 1 seed?
The Seahawks entered Monday with 53% odds to clinch the No. 1 seed. There’s not a big hit from the 49ers’ win: Seattle’s odds dip to 48%, but are still the highest of the three (49ers at 27% and the Rams at 11% before games are played this upcoming Sunday).
The only thing eliminated by virtue of the 49ers’ win was the Seahawks’ ability to clinch the top seed this Sunday.
If all three NFC West teams win in Week 17, the Seahawks’ odds are right where they were: 53%. That’s how monumental Week 18’s game against the 49ers is.
Best-case scenario in Week 17: Easy. The Seahawks are the only team of the three to win this Sunday. Their odds would jump to 74%. They get the No. 1 seed one of two ways after that: beat the 49ers, or lose to the 49ers + a Lions win over the Bears.
Worst-case scenario in Week 17: The Seahawks lose, while the Rams and 49ers win. Seattle’s odds would drop to 7%. But they’re not done; in this scenario, they could still get the top seed with a win over the 49ers + a Cardinals win over the Rams.
How would the Rams clinch? The Rams’ loss to the Seahawks last Thursday night took L.A. out of the driver’s seat. The Rams’ simplest path is to: win out + the Seahawks and 49ers lose one game each + the Lions beat the Bears. The Rams need the Seahawks to lose to make up for the one-game lead, and need the Bears to lose to win a tiebreaker (conference record).
What else should we know?
Oh, that’s right, the Bears.
There’s another team here still fighting for the top seed. Chicago’s Saturday night comeback win over the Packers wasn’t just a thriller; it also added some new playoff implications.
The Bears are currently the No. 2 seed. But they have a better conference record than both the Rams and the Seahawks, so keeping a game ahead is massive.
Again, all Seattle has to do is win out. It doesn’t matter what any other team does if that happens. But things become tricky if Seattle drops a game.
In that case, if the Seahawks lose to the Panthers, root for the Lions and Cardinals. And always root against your NFC West foes.
More on the Seattle Seahawks
• What led to Seahawks’ uncharacteristic defensive issues vs Rams?
• NFL upholds 1-game suspension for Seahawks’ Derick Hall
• Walker’s big night an encouraging sign for Seattle Seahawks
• Seattle Seahawks Injury Updates: Status of trio of DBs
• Huard: The reason Darnold was able to lead Seahawks over Rams
Seattle, WA
Seattle Mariners sign free agent OF/1B Rob Refsnyder
The Seattle Mariners have signed veteran Rob Refsnyder to add depth both in the outfield and at first base.
The Mariners could have one of spring training’s biggest stories
The team announced a one-year contract with the free agent on Monday afternoon. The contract is worth $6.25 million with a potential extra $250,000 in incentives, according to Boston Red Sox reporter Chris Cotillo of MassLive.com.
Refsnyder, 34, played 70 games in 2025 for Boston, finishing with 1.2 fWAR. At the plate, he hit .269 with a strong .354 on-base percentage and .838 OPS. He had nine home runs, 12 doubles, 30 RBIs and three stolen bases.
“Rob has been one of the most productive hitters against left-handed pitching over the last four seasons and provides balance and impact offensively to our lineup,” Mariners general manager Justin Hollander said in a press release. “We are excited to welcome Rob and his family to the Mariners.”
Refsnyder hit .302 against lefties with a .399 on-base and .560 slugging last season. Seven of his nine homers and nine of his 12 doubles came against lefties, which he faced 138 times as opposed to 71 plate appearances against right-handed pitching.
Born in South Korea, Refsnyder attended Laguna Hills High School in California and played in college at Arizona. He was a fifth-round pick in the 2012 MLB Draft by the New York Yankees.
The 6-foot, 215-pound Refsnyder is a 10-year MLB veteran, having spent time with the Yankees, Toronto Blue Jays, Tampa Bay Rays, Texas Rangers, Minnesota Twins and Red Sox. He had been with the Red Sox for each of the past four seasons.
Refsnyder has never played more than 93 games in a single MLB season but has solid offensive numbers with a career .255/.343/.387 slash line for a .730 OPS.
While the Mariners listed Refsnyder as an outfielder/first baseman, he has just 29 career appearances at first, and he last played the position in an MLB game in 2020. Refsnyder has 356 career appearances in the outfield, as well as 43 career appearances at second base.
Jorge Polanco embracing new position after leaving Mariners
Refsnyder, who hits right-handed, gives the Mariners a backup option behind one-time All-Star first baseman Josh Naylor, who Seattle re-signed to a five-year contract early this offseason.
The Mariners add Refsnyder to a list of additions in free agency that includes Naylor and backup catcher Andrew Knizner. Seattle also added left-handed reliever Jose Ferrer in a trade with the Washington Nationals.
Seattle Mariners offseason coverage
• Mariners slugger Cal Raleigh receives another award
• What would a Brendan Donovan trade cost the Mariners?
• Two 2025 Mariners pitchers reportedly join new teams
• Jorge Polanco sends impassioned message to Mariners fans
• Seattle Mariners sign backup catcher to one-year deal
Seattle, WA
Rick Steves steps in to save Seattle-area hygiene center serving homeless residents
Rick Steves taking a selfie with community members outside the Lynnwood Hygiene Center near Seattle. He says his purchase of the property secures the future of the center, which provides hot meals and hot showers.
Rick Steves
hide caption
toggle caption
Rick Steves
An anonymous donor stepped in last month to save a Seattle-area community center that was slated to close.
Last week, community members learned that the new owner was travel writer and TV host Rick Steves, who pledged to keep it open and free for people needing hot showers and hot meals.
“I vividly remember what it’s like as a kid backpacking around the world to need a shower, to need a place to wash your clothes,” Steves told a crowd who gathered on Wednesday to celebrate the purchase over cake and with words fait accompli written in red icing.
Many homeless people had come to depend on the Lynnwood Hygiene Center, which had operated rent-free on the property since 2020.
But the center said in November that it would close after the property was sold to a developer.
Steves said he learned about the hygiene center’s impending closure by reading about it in a local online newspaper — just weeks before it was set to shut down.
Despite living nearby, he said he hadn’t even known the center existed.
In fact, Steves told NPR he didn’t even know what a hygiene center was until he read about the closure — a place where people can shower, wash clothes, grab a hot meal and spend a few hours indoors.
“I realized, oh my goodness, there’s an invisible community with an invisible center helping invisible people. And it’s not right. It needs to be kept alive,” Steves said.
In a series of posts on Bluesky, Steves said was struck by how difficult it would be to replace.
Steves said he bought the property for $2.25 million.
Members of the community pitched in another $400,000 in donations, which the center says will go toward renovations and expanding services.
“It’s huge,” said Sandra Mears, executive director of the Jean Kim Foundation, which runs the hygiene center.
Mears says before Steves came in, she had been told to plan a goodbye party.
“I didn’t want a goodbye party,” she said.
Thanks to the donations, Mears says the Lynnwood Hygiene Center will continue serving around 700 people in the community, providing upwards of 16,000 hot meals and 10,000 showers a year.
Steves called the purchase the best $2.25 million he could imagine spending.
But he says private donations are also not a substitute for public investment — and shouldn’t determine whether essential services survive.
He describes his decision as a response to what he sees as a failure of public priorities, not a model to be relied upon.
“If we don’t have [$2.25 million] for a whole county to give homeless people a shower and a place to get out of the rain and a place to wash their clothes, what kind of society are we?” Steves said.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Iowa1 week agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine7 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico6 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms