San Francisco, CA
The Navy Jet Generations of San Francisco Kids Played on | KQED
Episode Transcript
Olivia Allen-Price: Things were different for San Francisco kids back in the 1960s and ’70s. For one, there was a lot more freedom.
Dennis O’Neill: In those days, there were no cars parked on the street for the most part. And there were kids everywhere. You know, there were six or seven kids on my block. My name’s Dennis O’Neill. I grew up on 18th Avenue from about 1963 to 1980.
Olivia Allen-Price: Dennis and the other neighborhood kids spent a lot of time at nearby Larsen Park. It’s right on busy 19th Avenue at Vicente Street.
Dennis O’Neill: We were seven or eight. And our parents, you know, allowed us to cross 19th Avenue, the highway, on a green light and go to the park.
Olivia Allen-Price: Back then, every city park had a park director. They would organize games, keep an eye on the kids and maintain play equipment. But Larsen Park also had something that made it extra special. A real Navy jet.
Dennis O’Neill: It felt like an actual jet landed in Larsen Park.
Olivia Allen-Price: And wow, was that jet beloved by the neighborhood kids!
Dennis O’Neill: It was fantastic, I have to say. I still remember. I’m 64 years old. I remember specifically sitting in that cockpit and being a pilot, you know.
Olivia Allen-Price: Our question asker this week, Aaron Van Lieu, also spent a lot of time at the plane in Larsen Park.
Aaron Van Lieu: It’s some of my earliest memories. My brother, dad and I were going there in the late ’80s, like ’88-’89. So I was like 4, 5, 6.
Olivia Allen-Price: Over a period of 35 years, there were actually three different Navy jets in that park. The last one was placed in 1975, and the nose of it was painted with shark’s teeth. It was there the longest and was known to many as “The Shark in the Park.”
That’s the plane Aaron remembers.
Aaron Van Lieu: Playing tag, but there’s a jet involved. And hide and seek and you know, just running around it. My dad, you know, trying to explain what certain things were because for a long time the canopy was there, and you could see inside of it, and it had all the gauges and stuff.
Olivia Allen-Price: But Aaron also remembers how the jet slowly started falling apart.
Aaron Van Lieu: Little by little, the wings and parts of the jet just started falling off and going and disappearing. So, and then eventually it was like kind of like this, like skeleton.
Olivia Allen-Price: And then, one day, it was gone.
Aaron has spent decades wondering what happened to that jet that he loved so much. He even credits it, in small part, with his love of aviation and a short stint as a flight attendant. He wants to know:
Aaron Van Lieu: What happened to the jet, and why did it get taken out, aside from being covered in graffiti? So I just wanna know where it went from there, you know?
Katrina Schwartz: And, I want to know who thought a jet in a playground was a good idea in the first place.
Olivia Allen-Price: Bay Curious editor and producer, Katrina Schwartz, always the pragmatic one.
Katrina Schwartz: A real fighter jet has to be one of the most expensive pieces of playground equipment ever!
Olivia Allen-Price: So, I did a little math, and the plane cost about 2 million to build originally, which is nearly $24 million today.
Sounds of pickleball
Katrina Schwartz: Our modern obsessions on display at the park are a little more mundane … and a lot less expensive.
Pickleball sounds
Katrina Schwartz: The near constant pop and thwack of the very popular pickleball courts has been the soundtrack to Larsen Park since they opened in 2023.
I visited with Christopher Pollock, historian in residence for the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department, to learn a little more about this park.
Christopher Pollock: So Carl L Larsen is a Danish immigrant who was a cafe owner in downtown San Francisco. He owned the Tivoli Cafe and he was quite a large landowner in San Francisco.
Katrina Schwartz: Larsen gave the city a parcel of land to create a park before this west side neighborhood was even fully built. The park opened in 1926. Bisected by Vicente Street, one side had tennis courts and playground equipment and the other side had an open field and a swimming pool, now called Sava Pool.
Christopher Pollock: He, as a developer, certainly had the vision that San Francisco was going to grow and that things would grow to be what they are today.
Katrina Schwartz: At this point, playgrounds were a fairly new idea. They only came into fashion in the early 1900s as a tool to keep kids off the streets.
Christopher Pollock: Kids were getting into trouble because they didn’t have enough to do in off hours of school. Yeah, they had their playgrounds within the schools, but those were closed when school was not open.
Katrina Schwartz: The first Navy jet came to Larsen Park in 1958. It was during the Cold War and people were obsessed with going to the moon.
Archival video 1: In October 1957, the world entered the Space Age. At that time, a multistage rocket took off from Russia – Sputnik 1.
Archival video 2: More and more teenagers are giving up rock and roll for Rocket Rolls.
Christopher Pollock: People want to go to the moon, and so it becomes a very popular kind of thing that people started designing playground equipment to look like jet planes and rockets and things like that.
Katrina Schwartz: Space exploration was a national obsession. But you know, San Francisco, it had to approach the trend a little differently.
Christopher Pollock: There was surplus jet down at Moffat Field in Mountain View and that it could be had for a song. It just had to be brought to San Francisco. So that becomes our very first plaything in a playground, but it’s the real thing. Our kids were going to learn, you know, the real straight skinny on stuff, not some representation.
Katrina Schwartz: It’s easy to forget that back then, San Francisco was a Navy town. The city was surrounded by Naval stations and there were jets like this one in playgrounds in Bayview, Sunnyvale and San Leandro.
But as any parent knows, kids are hard on stuff. Even military grade materials were no match for their grubby little hands.
Christopher Pollock: About every 10 years these jets had to be replaced because the kids wore them down so much.
Katrina Schwartz: The second jet in Larsen Park came from the Alameda Naval Base and was placed in the park in 1967. But the longest tenured jet — the “shark in the park” our question asker loved — arrived in dramatic fashion eight years later, in 1975.
Newspaper read: A marine helicopter carrying a surplus Navy fighter in its sling, flew under the Golden Gate Bridge yesterday morning — after it had cruised under the Bay Bridge. The old F-8 Crusader was taken from Alameda Naval Air Station to the parking lot of the San Francisco Zoo.
Katrina Schwartz: They then towed the jet two and a half miles northeast … going up Sloat Boulevard and down 19th Avenue to Larsen Park.
Newspaper read: The engineless plane will be used, as was its predecessor, as a giant toy in which San Francisco children may take flights of imagination.
Katrina Schwartz: And there it stayed, delighting generations of children … for 18 years.
Christopher Pollock: When this first started, people weren’t thinking so much about safety, but as the years went by, safety became a much bigger issue.
Katrina Schwartz: The first two planes were propped up, with ladders to climb into the cockpits. Kids would crawl on the wings, fall off and break arms and legs. And, the metal was sharp — many a kid got a nasty gash playing on the jets.
Christopher Pollock: Not only that but it was found that the paint on these jets was lead-based and it was being discovered in later years that this was toxic to children. It was decided in 1993 to remove the last of the three jets. And so we were without a jet for a very long time in this park.
Katrina Schwartz: After 22 jetless years, Larsen Park got an all new playground in 2015, one complete with a play structure that looks like a jet. It may not be the real thing, but kids still like it.
By the time the shark in the park was removed, it was a hunk of junk. The wings were gone, the nose ripped off and it was covered in graffiti.
Aaron Van Lieu: My last memory of it is being like a skeleton. So I would hope that it was maybe fixed a little bit.
Katrina Schwartz: It was in that forlorn state that Aaron, our question asker, last saw the plane. Until I met up with him at the Pacific Coast Air Museum to show him what had become of it. That’s coming up, after this short break.
Sponsor Message
Katrina Schwartz: Aaron Van Lieu has always wondered what happened to the jet in San Francisco’s Larsen Park that made such an impression on him as a child. And it turns out, its new home isn’t too far away, at the Pacific Coast Air Museum in Santa Rosa.
Janet Doto: OK, we ready?
Katrina Schwartz: I guess so.
Janet Doto: All right.
Katrina Schwartz: Aaron and I meet up at the museum and hop in a golf cart for a quick tour with Janet Doto, an Airforce veteran and volunteer here.
Janet Doto: These are the two top gun aircraft, the F-14 Tomcat and then the F-18 Viper.
Aaron Van Lieu: The Tomcat was one of my favorite jets.
Janet Dotto: Oh, it’s a beautiful jet. My favorite’s the F4, but yeah, I’m partial. 23 years in the Air Force, you can’t love a navy aircraft.
Katrina Schwartz: The museum is a small but mighty operation. Almost all outdoors, they have 37 restored aircraft. One plane fought in WWII, another was a first responder to the 911 attacks and of course, parked out on the tarmac they’ve got the Shark in the Park.
Janet Doto: And there she is, the F-8.
Aaron Van Lieu: This one right here.
Janet Doto: That’s the one.
Aaron Van Lieu: Whoa!
Katrina Schwartz: Is it how you remember it looking?
Aaron Van Lieu: Yeah, very much. Yeah, the canopy, it actually looks bigger than I remember.
Janet Doto: That’s probably because there’s more of it.
Laughter
Katrina Schwartz: This F-8 jet is the very one that generations of San Francisco kids played on.
Jim Mattison: Aaron, okay, I’m Jim Mattison. I’m the crew chief. And I’m proud to say I’m responsible for how this came out.
Katrina Schwartz: Jim is also an Air Force veteran and volunteer. But his memories of the Shark in the Park go way back to when he used to be stuck in traffic on 19th Avenue, commuting to Daly City.
Jim Mattison: I look over there, and I say, What’s the city gonna do to that piece of junk? That looks terrible. And it’s just the irony that 30 years later, guess what I’m doing?
Katrina Schwartz: Jim and his team have lovingly restored this 1956 F-8. The paint scheme is mostly gray with accents of red and navy blue.
Jim Mattison: I chose to paint it in the Marine Corps colors. Why? Because that was the last squadron it flew out of. And this was such an amazing paint scheme, I saw that and thought, I know what I want to do.
Katrina Schwartz: The Navy basically begged the museum to take the plane. San Francisco officials wanted the dangerous eyesore gone, especially because by the 90s, the Navy’s presence in the Bay Area had waned.
Jim Mattison: They got a big crane and a low boy truck. Dug it out of the sand, took it apart.
Katrina Schwartz: And like so many jets before it, put it on a truck and drove it up to Santa Rosa
Jim Mattison: And then just like a model airplane, put it all back together. My teammate, he was working on the belly. And every once in a while, he’s busy banging and drilling holes. He’d get a face full of Larson Park sand.
Katrina Schwartz: The museum initially didn’t want to take this plane, but now, it’s one of the most popular attractions. Many visitors who remember playing on the F-8 as kids never knew much about what the jet did before it became playground equipment. That history is something Jim is passionate about sharing.
Jim Mattison: This was designed as a supersonic day fighter for the Navy.
Katrina Schwartz: It would land on incredibly short runways … just 500 feet … on floating aircraft carriers.
Jim Mattison: And it was fast. Very maneuverable and the pilots loved flying it.
Katrina Schwartz in scene: I’m curious, Aaron, what do you think now that you’ve seen it?
Aaron Van Lieu: There’s been a rush and flush of emotions and and memories, you know. I’m on top of the world being able to see it again, really. ‘Cause I’ve always wondered what happened to it.
Katrina Schwartz: And if you remember playing on this jet and have always wondered what happened to it … the Pacific Coast Air Museum is waiting for you.
Olivia Allen-Price: That was Bay Curious editor and producer, Katrina Schwartz.
You can still play on some real Navy equipment if you go to Lincoln and 45th Avenue Playground in Golden Gate Park. There’s a blue boat there that was donated by the Navy … and it’s the real deal.
Are you loving having more Bay Curious episodes in your podcast feed? If so, you can get even more Bay Curious in your life via the Bay Curious newsletter! Head to our website to sign up. As always, at BayCurious.org.
BC is made in SF at member-supported KQED.
Our show is made by Katrina Schwartz, Christopher Beale and me, Olivia Allen Price.
Extra support from Maha Sanad, Katie Sprenger, Jen Chien, Ethan Toven-Lindsey and everyone at team KQED.
Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California local.
I’m Olivia Allen-Price. Cleared for takeoff.
San Francisco, CA
Meet the District 2 candidates: How should SFUSD students be assigned to schools?
Welcome back to our “Meet the Candidates” series, where District 2 supervisor candidates respond to a question in 100 words or fewer. Answers are published every Tuesday.
District 2 covers neighborhoods in the north of the city including the Presidio, the Marina, Cow Hollow, Pacific Heights, Presidio Heights, Anza Vista and portions of the Western Addition and North of the Panhandle.
Every year, confused parents of children entering San Francisco’s public schools have to confront the lottery.
The system is theoretically simple. Parents provide a ranked list of their top choice San Francisco Unified School District picks by late January. SFUSD runs a lottery, and a few months later the district tells parents where their kid is assigned.
But parents hate it.
Making the list of schools is time consuming and the wait is anxiety-inducing, parents say. Plus, the results can be disappointing — an assignment to a school they didn’t want, or one with a start or end time that is impossible to coordinate around work schedules.
So why have a lottery system? The lottery started in 2002 after a court case that prohibited the district from considering race when making school assignments. But SFUSD didn’t want to simply send students to their nearest school, which would result in schools segregated by class and race, mirroring the city itself. So, it started using a lottery.
In the end, though, SFUSD data showed that the lottery system exacerbated inequality in the school system.
So, in 2020, SFUSD’s Board of Education voted to move San Francisco back to a zone-based system of school assignments. The hope was that the new zone system would lead to more predictability, students enrolled in schools closer to home, and more diverse classrooms.
In reality, figuring out how to divide the city into zones that allow for all three of those factors — predictability, proximity, and diversity — is a tall order. Though the new zones were supposed to be implemented by the 2026-2027 school year, there is no current proposal for what the zones would look like and no timeline for SFUSD switching over.
This week’s question: How should SFUSD students be assigned to schools?
Lori Brooke
- Job: President, Cow Hollow Association
- Age: 62
- Residency: Homeowner, moved to the district 31 years ago
- Transportation: Driving and walking
- Education: Bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara
- Languages: English
When assigning schools to students, SFUSD should prioritize accessibility, strong education and ensure schools across the city are equally resourced.
I have heard complaints from many parents that they would like the option to walk their kids to school and not have to send them an hour across the city every day.
We can improve the selection process to ensure that students can choose a school in their neighborhood. Limiting travel time will also give kids one less thing to worry about and ensure that they are more focused on their education.
See Brooke’s full response here.
Endorsed by: Former District 2 Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier, former State Senator and Supervisor Quentin Kopp, UESF, CA Working Families Party … read more here.

Stephen Sherrill
- Job: Appointed District 2 Supervisor
- Age: 39
- Residency: Homeowner, moved to the district 11 years ago
- Transportation: Driving, public transportation, biking
- Education: Bachelor’s degree from Yale University
- Languages: English
SFUSD should move to a simpler, more neighborhood-based assignment system. Families deserve a fair chance to attend a school closer to home, without a confusing citywide lottery or long commutes.
Assignment reform also has to be matched by a serious focus on school quality. In a district facing budget cuts and hard decisions about its footprint, resources should be concentrated so neighborhood schools can offer students the staffing, support, and academic programs they need. While the Board of Supervisors does not control SFUSD policy, I will continue to use this office to advocate for that approach.
See Sherrill’s full response here.
Endorsed by: Mayor Daniel Lurie, GrowSF, Nor Cal Carpenters Union, San Francisco Police Officers Association, SF YIMBY, Northern Neighbors … read more here.
Candidates are ordered alphabetically and rotated each week. Answers may be lightly edited for formatting, spelling, and grammar. If you have questions for the candidates, please let us know at io@missionlocal.com.
You can register to vote via the sf.gov website.
San Francisco, CA
Bay Area bike program pays commuters to ditch their cars
Between surging gas prices and ransom-level parking fees, the cost of the daily grind adds up.
But AbdAllah Abou-Ismail has found a way to make the city foot the bill.
“I was like, you know what? This my reason for biking every day,” he said.
Every morning, he hops on his bike and pedals his way toward a free lunch. Call it a bit of roadside economics: The city of Palo Alto pays him to stay out of traffic. And instead of low-grade road rage, he starts his day on the right foot.
“Actually, my energy levels got a lot better once I started biking. Before I would get to work a lot more sleepy, but with the bike, I come into work 100% I can hit the floor. No downtime, no nothing,” he said.
It’s all thanks to a program called “Bike Love,” which tracks his commute and pays him $5 a day — up to $600 a year — to spend at local businesses. It’s one of several efforts the city has rolled out to get drivers to shift gears. The initiative runs through an app called Motion, which tracks trips automatically on your phone, whether you’re on a bike, e-bike or scooter.
Pat Burt, a Palo Alto city council member who serves on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, said the goal is simple.
“We want this to be a means where they get addicted to biking and as a result, they’re healthier, mentally and physically, and happier,” he said.
According to the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association, the program kept nearly three million car miles off local roads last year and cut more than a thousand tons of greenhouse gas emissions.
Not everyone thinks it goes far enough. Billy Riggs, a professor at the University of San Francisco who studies transportation innovation, says these programs tend to target people who are already biking.
“This is cute, it just can’t be about cute solutions,” he said.
As for Abou-Ismail, the payoff is simple — and daily.
“By the time I reach work, I’ve already had a small little adventure, and five bucks into my account,” he said.
San Francisco, CA
Breakfast Burritos, Galbi Patty Melts, and More Dishes Chef Nyesha Arrington Tried in San Francisco
In this episode of Plateworthy, host Nyesha Arrington makes her way through some of the best bites in San Francisco. First stop on the eating tour: Breakfast Little, owned by Andrew Perez and known for its Mission-style burritos. The tater tot-filled OG breakfast burrito has balanced bites of bacon, creamy avocado, and plenty of spice.
Next, Arrington stops at Sōhn for a galbi patty melt. Chef and owner Deuki Hong preps every aspect of the sandwich, including a square-shaped beef patty, kimchi-style slaw, melted cheddar, and a sweet and salty galbi sauce, all between a sesame-crusted croissant bun. Arrington pairs it with a banana oat milk latte and popcorn chicken skewered with tteokboki, before enjoying in Sōhn’s art-covered dining room. “This is one of those quintessential mashups that actually works,” she announces after her first bit of the patty melt.
Arrington then heads to Sons & Daughters, a cozy fine dining spot with two Michelin stars. Chef Harrison Cheney preps trout for one of the restaurant’s most popular courses. The huge fish from Mount Lassen are cut into filets and each bone is carefully removed with a technique Cheney learned while working at Gastrologik, a famously boundary-pushing restaurant in Stockholm that closed in 2022. The fish is cured overnight before being cut into extremely thin slices that are layered on a sheet pan and left in the freezer overnight. Then they cook down the sauce for the fish dish, layered with shallots, garlic, and lacto-fermented root vegetables along with their two-week-old brine. Arrington helps to smash up currant branches that sit in a neutral oil for about a week, creating a flavorful herb oil for the dish. Egg whites slowly soak into another mixture of herbs, also for the sauce. The leftover trout is mixed with egg yolks, lemon juice, and salt in a food processor to make a mouse that the fish will sit on top of. Finally, Cheney makes the layered dish: the rounds of trout and the mousse at the bottom of a small bowl then topped with the fermented root-vegetable sauce and currant wood oil. Arrington is emotional eating the light dish which showcases Californian produce.
Watch the latest episode of Plateworthy to see Arrington taste a few most-try dishes across San Francisco, from a casual breakfast burrito to a high-end trout dish that take days to prepare.
Chef Harrison Cheney is a rising star in the California fine dining scene having recently been named Michelin Guide California’s 2023 Young Chef Award winner. Since joining the team at one-Michelin-starred Sons & Daughters, he’s sharpened the restaurant’s focus on New Nordic cuisine, drawing in part from his experience cooking at Gastrologik in Stockholm. The menu celebrates seasonal and local ingredients such as Gilfeather rutabaga grown in the North Bay and Half Moon Bay spot prawns. Then Cheney applies a Nordic ethos, resulting in elegant tasting menus that balance the bright flavors of preserved kumquat and green almonds with the delicate notes of a Maine scallop bathed in juniper syrup and brown butter.
-
Atlanta, GA1 week ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Georgia1 week agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Arkansas4 days agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Pennsylvania1 week agoParents charged after toddler injured by wolf at Pennsylvania zoo
-
Milwaukee, WI1 week agoPotawatomi Casino Hotel evacuated after fire breaks out in rooftop HVAC system
-
Ohio10 hours ago‘Little Rascals’ star Bug Hall arrested in Ohio
-
Austin, TX7 days agoABC Kite Fest Returns to Austin for Annual Celebration – Austin Today
-
World1 week agoZelenskyy warns US-Iran war could divert critical aid from Ukraine