Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Shocking decline of former college athlete, 36, raised by supercomputer genius dad in $1.1m home who now spends her days ‘threatening to abduct and kill children on streets of San Francisco’

Published

on

Shocking decline of former college athlete, 36, raised by supercomputer genius dad in .1m home who now spends her days ‘threatening to abduct and kill children on streets of San Francisco’


A former athlete raised by a famed academic in a $1.1 million home now roams the streets of San Francisco where she’s accused of threatening to abduct and kill children.  

Kim Ann Andrews, 36, grew up in Pennsylvania and Southern California with her father, Dr. Philip Andrews, who was a highly-respected computer scientist and was regarded as a leader in the technology field before his death in 2016. 

While his daughter was once an accomplished high school track and field competitor at Torrey Pines High School near San Diego, Andrews is now far from the ‘conscientious and friendly’ team player her former coach remembers her as.  

She has become notorious in multiple ritzy San Francisco neighborhoods for roaming their streets, with multiple locals accusing her of threatening to kidnap frightened children, or even to slit their throats.

Advertisement

Andrews became an accomplished high school track and field competitor at Torrey Pines High School near San Diego

Kim Ann Andrews, 36, has become notorious in San Francisco, as residents repeatedly report terrifying experiences with Andrews over the past four years

Kim Ann Andrews, 36, has become notorious in San Francisco, as residents repeatedly report terrifying experiences with Andrews over the past four years

Posters have been put up around the city warning residents of her behavior and urging anyone who sees her to contact local authorities

Posters have been put up around the city warning residents of her behavior and urging anyone who sees her to contact local authorities 

It is unclear what prompted the sudden and shocking decline in Andrews’ health and behavior.

She ran track for two years at the University of California San Diego, where she remained enrolled for nearly 10 years before dropping out in March 2015 – never completing her degree in biochemistry and cell biology.

Her late father died of a heart attack in 2011 and is survived by his wife Kathleen – Kim’s mother – who still lives in the family’s $1.1 million Ramona home.

Kim also has three siblings, but posted a disturbing Facebook status in 2022 suggesting that her father may not actually be dead.  

And while her father found fame for his achievements, his daughter has now become infamous for her behavior. 

Advertisement

Andrews has become notorious in the Laurel Village, Inner Richmond District, Cole Valley and Inner Sunset neighborhoods of the woke city, as residents repeatedly report terrifying experiences with Andrews over the past four years.

She has faced criminal charges ranging in recent years from battery and robbery to shoplifting and criminal threats.

But residents say nothing has been done to stop Andrews’ aggressive behavior, as she cycles through the jails and court before returning to the streets.

They have since banded together to encourage others to call 911 to report any  harassment of children.

Some have filed police reports and posted on social media, detailing their experiences with Andrews in which she allegedly harassed preschoolers or told children at playgrounds she would ‘slit their throats.’

Advertisement

Inner Richmond resident Kenna Palefsky said she has even started aggregating police reports since 2020 after she said Andrews crouched down and shouted at her son while he was in a stroller.

She grew up in a $1.1 million home outside of San Diego with her father who was well-known for his work with supercomputers and siblings

She grew up in a $1.1 million home outside of San Diego with her father who was well-known for his work with supercomputers and siblings 

A disturbing 2022 Facebook post by Andrews suggested that her father - the late supercomputer genius Professor Philip Andrews - was still alive. He died of a heart attack in 2011

A disturbing 2022 Facebook post by Andrews suggested that her father – the late supercomputer genius Professor Philip Andrews – was still alive. He died of a heart attack in 2011

Yelena Dunduchenko also said she encountered Andrews in 2020, while she was working as a nanny.

‘She started screaming and saying, “I am going to take your child, I am going to kill you,”‘ she recounted. ‘It was really scary.’

Megan Grasser said Andrews’ antics even led her to leave San Francisco.

She said she first encountered Andrews when Grasser was nine-months-pregnant in late 2020.

Advertisement

The second encounter came three months later, when Grasser realized Andrews was chasing her and her dog.

Andrews then spewed a series of vile comments and formed her hand into the shape of a gun, put it to Grasser’s head and said, ‘I was sent here to kill you.’ 

Residents in the Cole Valley and Inner Sunset neighborhoods also noticed an uptick in encounters with Andrews earlier this year.  

Some have detailed their experiences, with one writing on Reddit that Andrews typically approaches people with ‘dogs or young kids, ask weird questions, then get aggressive.’

For her behavior, Andrews has already been arrested several times this year. 

Advertisement

In January, Andrews was arrested on suspicion of battery and trespassing following an argument at a secondhand clothing store on Irving Street, and store owners later obtained a restraining order against her.

Then on the morning of July 19, Andrews allegedly approached a mother who was walking her 18-month-old toddler near Golden Gate Park.

She is accused of holding a lighter to a can of Lysol, and developing a ‘fixation’ on the child.

Andrews then allegedly threatened the mother, ‘I’m going to kill you.’

She was later taken into custody after park rangers spotted her entering a public bathroom.

Advertisement

But prosecutors who reviewed the case declined to immediately press charges, and Andrews was released. 

‘The police had probable cause to make an arrest based on the evidence gathered; however, to make appropriate charging decisions for criminal prosecution further investigation is required,’ Randolph Quezada, a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office told the Chronicle at the time.

Officials finally announced on Tuesday they have a warrant out for Andrews’ arrest. 

A San Francisco Department of Public Health clinician working with the city's Healthy Streets Operations Center told a concerned resident that health officials were aware of Andrews' 'distressing' behavior

A San Francisco Department of Public Health clinician working with the city’s Healthy Streets Operations Center told a concerned resident that health officials were aware of Andrews’ ‘distressing’ behavior

Residents, however, say that is not enough.

‘It’s been four to five years and nothing has happened,’ Palefsky said. ‘She has been given unlimited second chances.

Advertisement

‘Despite her being in and out of the system, they continue to release her back on the streets,’ she said.

In fact in a 2021 email, a San Francisco Department of Public Health clinician working with the city’s Healthy Streets Operations Center told a concerned resident that health officials were aware of Andrews’ ‘distressing’ behavior and were trying to ‘locate her, assess her and connect her with the appropriate services.’

The clinician recommended that the resident call police if they continue to hear ‘threatening statements or feel there is a safety risk.’ 

Part of the problem is that under California law, authorities can only force people into treatment if they pose an immediate danger or if they are gravely disabled.

‘There have been multiple attempts to get her into housing or get her a mental health assessment – she doesn’t want that, and we can’t make her,’ David Burke, the San Francisco Police Department public safety liaison said.

Advertisement

As a result, the only way for Andrews to receive mental health services is through the criminal justice system, according to the police department’s Park Station Captain Jack Hart.

Residents say nothing has been done to stop Andrews' aggressive behavior, as she cycles through the jails and court before returning to the streets

Residents say nothing has been done to stop Andrews’ aggressive behavior, as she cycles through the jails and court before returning to the streets

City officials are now hoping that measures included in Proposition 1, which voters approved earlier this year, may create more opportunities for Andrews to receive assistance.

Under the multibillion-dollar state program, more facilities could become available for people struggling with mental health or drug use.

The city is also moving ahead with its planned adoption of a new law that expands involuntary commitment of people with severe mental illness. 

And in July, a multi-agency task force began dismantling some of the hundreds of tents and temporary shelters that residents in areas racked by crime and drug abuse have tolerated for years. 

Advertisement

The state had spent $24 billion tackling homelessness in the five years to 2023 but did not track if the money was helping the state’s growing number of unhoused people, a damning report revealed in May.

San Francisco now has around 8,300 people sleeping on the streets, with scenes of homeless drug addicts stumbling on sidewalks and fears of violence becoming a national political issue.

Mayor London Breed now says the Supreme Court has finally given her the power to do something about it.

‘The problem is not going to be solved by building more housing,’ she declared.

‘Thank goodness for the Supreme Court decision.’

Advertisement



Source link

San Francisco, CA

Retired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims

Published

on

Retired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The retired San Francisco firefighter at the center of a bitter insurance fight has lost his battle against cancer.

Ken Jones passed away Saturday, 14 months after being diagnosed with stage four lung cancer.

PREVIOUS REPORT: City asked to intervene after SF firefighter’s stage 4 lung cancer treatment denied by Blue Shield

We first told you about Jones in January — when the 17-year veteran and supporters asked the City Commission for help.

Advertisement

The Fire Department’s insurance carrier, Blue Shield, denied coverage for some of his recommended treatments.

Ken Jones was 70 years old.

SF firefighters rally for retiree denied cancer treatment by Blue Shield as more come forward

“After we got some publicity, thank you, a Blue Shield physician reached out to Ken’s physician, and they worked out a different plan that Blue Shield would cover. It’s still an incomplete plan,” said Helen Horvath, Jones’ wife when ABC7 Eyewitness News spoke to her in January, 2026.

Since then, Jones’ story has led to an investigation into other cases, with the city’s mayor vowing to support firefighters.

Advertisement

According to San Francisco’s Health Service Board, about 5,000 city employees and retirees are insured by Blue Shield. Now, city leaders are asking anyone who has been denied cancer treatment to speak up.

Tony Stefani with the Cancer Prevention Foundation said firefighters with a cancer diagnosis have a 14% higher chance of dying than other cancer patients in the general population.

“Current statistics tell us that 65% of the men and women in our profession are going to contract some form of cancer in their lifetime. Some of them will be fatal,” Stefani said.

In a Statement Blue Shield said, in part: “For Medicare members, health plans must follow medical policy established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”


Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock

Published

on

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock


Few things are more valuable in the Bay Area than real estate. In San Francisco, the median house price is now over $2 million. Last month, at least seven houses in the city sold for $1 million over the asking price, and buyers regularly offer to pay in cash or waive contingencies to stay competitive. Yet there is one thing that remains even more valuable than a house, and possibly more valuable than money itself: stock in Anthropic or OpenAI.

Last week, 160 Noe Street, an Edwardian home in San Francisco’s desirable Duboce Triangle neighborhood, was listed for sale at $2.9 million—or the equivalent amount in Anthropic or OpenAI shares, as based on those companies’ current valuations. Rachel Swann, the listing agent, says she was inspired to set these unusual terms after meeting several Anthropic employees at an open house for a different property. “These people have a lot of paper wealth, but they don’t always have the liquidity to do things they want,” Swann says. Some of these employees were expecting to come into as much as $50 million from their Anthropic shares, and wondered if they could use that as leverage to buy a house, according to Swann. “This kept coming up over and over again.”

Swann’s listing is unconventional, but not singular. In April, an investment banker named Storm Duncan offered to exchange his Mill Valley home and an adjacent parcel of land for Anthropic shares. And in May, Vijay Chattha, who owns an agency that does PR for tech companies, listed his Healdsburg home for $2.5 million, or $2 million in Anthropic stock. “I want to sell my house, and I want to invest in Anthropic,” Chattha says. “Why not combine the two?

Chattha’s house—a three bed, three bath with a pool and a bocce court in a part of Sonoma County that abuts some of the region’s most famous wineries—also comes with coveted short-term rental status, allowing the owner to list it on platforms like Airbnb. Only a handful of properties in Healdsburg come with that status, and only about a dozen come up for sale in a given year.

Advertisement

Chattha is offering a $500,000 discount to Anthropic employees because he believes the value of Anthropic shares will grow faster than any other investment, and his vacation home in wine country is the best bargaining chip he has to try to access them. “If you look at Anthropic’s growth last year, it’s insane,” he says, noting the $380 billion valuation the company claimed in February. “Now they’re raising at $965 billion. That’s three X in like three months.” He added that he was open to exchanging the house for shares in Anthropic, but not OpenAI, because he prefers using Anthropic’s products.

The real estate listings come at a time when investors are salivating at the record-high valuations of Anthropic and OpenAI, and even those considered wealthy by Bay Area standards are feeling FOMO about the affluence that could come from these companies’ debuts on the stock market. (On Monday, Anthropic submitted paperwork for its initial public offering; OpenAI is also reportedly preparing to file in the coming months.) Despite the unprecedented valuations of these companies, many people believe their stock prices will only go up, and that anyone who gets a piece now could win the jackpot.

People are clamoring to buy equity in OpenAI and Anthropic on the secondary market, leading to a frenzy of transactions that may or may not be legitimate. As a result, Anthropic updated its policy around “unauthorized Anthropic stock sales” this spring, which notes that “if someone purports to sell Anthropic shares without proper board approval, that transaction is invalid.” A spokesperson for Anthropic pointed back to this policy when asked about the possibility of exchanging company shares for real estate.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026

Published

on

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026


Welcome to our running tally of Election Night results. Or, as this is California, well beyond tonight, as results continue to trickle in.

The first batch of results should arrive at 8:45 p.m., with three more to follow tonight. The Department of Elections has the breakdown.

San Francisco is voting in three special elections, for District 2 and District 4 supervisors and for a Board of Education member. Both supervisor races are referendums on housing, especially District 2, while the main backdrop of the D4 race is all the hot feelings around the fate of the Sunset Dunes Park (nee Great Highway).

The winners of all three special races will have to compete again in November for their seats.

Advertisement

Keeping it local, SF is also voting on four ballot measures. Prop A is for a bond to pay for an emergency water-system. B is for term limits. C and D are dueling measures related to the “overpaid CEO” tax. (Links go to our reporting on each race or issue; or click here for our Election 2026 page.)

Vote local, think national: Which two candidates will advance to the November election to replace Nancy Pelosi?

Statewide races include the primaries for governor, education superintendent, lieutenant governor, and much more.

Polls close soon. If you haven’t voted yet, find your polling station here.

Tuesday, June 2, 5:40 p.m.

Two and a half hours until our polls close. Before we go down the local rabbit hole, a reminder that other states have primary action today: New Jersey, Iowa, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Montana.

Advertisement

Why does it take so long to get results in California? CalMatters has you covered on that story. We shouldn’t expect a call tonight on the governor’s race.

The last big election was November 5, 2024. (Remember?) Ten days later, there were still races to call in San Francisco.


Advertisement

So if you’re waiting for the pundits (and maybe even us) to tell you What It All Means, you might have to wait a while.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending