San Francisco, CA
SF leaders want to fix Van Ness high vacancy rate by allowing more chain retailers
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — Some San Francisco supervisors say they have the solution to fill blocks of vacant storefronts along Van Ness Avenue: recruit more chain retailers.
On Monday, Supervisors Stephen Sherrill and Danny Sauter introduced legislation aiming to reduce the time and cost that chain stores such as Target or Home Depot incur when trying to open a storefront along a 1-mile strip on Van Ness north of City Hall.
The proposal would allow more “formula retail” – which the city defines as a chain with 11 or more stores – along Van Ness between Redwood Street and Broadway. If approved, it would reduce the planning and approval process for formula retailers, which can take anywhere from 12 to 24 months and must be approved by the Planning Commission.
MORE: Push underway to bring San Francisco city workers back to the office
It’s a process that commercial real estate developers say is a big enough deterrent for chains that many have abandoned the idea of coming to San Francisco altogether. Laura Tinetti, an executive vice president with JLL San Francisco, said similar processes in other cities take three to six months.
“We’ve developed a reputation in San Francisco as being difficult to deal with or do business in because of this,” she said. “It has impacted our ability to lease space to national retailers.”
San Francisco’s longstanding approach has been focused on preserving locally-owned businesses and preventing big box retailers from taking over. But Sherrill notes that Van Ness is unique in that its vacant spaces are larger and more equipped for chains with larger inventories. He noted that this corridor, part of Highway 101, was long home to automobile showrooms and dealerships, which have since moved to the suburbs.
VIDEO: Downtown San Francisco is safer and cleaner, so why are people still staying away?
San Francisco is better — lower crime, fewer tents, and more people coming back to the office. But it doesn’t feel better to many people. Here’s why.
“When we look at the size of the floor plans of these buildings, they’re huge. When you look at Chestnut Street, you look at Union Street, Fillmore Street – they’re just smaller buildings, smaller spaces. So permitting formula retail allows for more flexibility in these really, really big spaces that you aren’t seeing on some of the neighborhood merchant corridors,” Sherrill said.
Functionality aside, the supervisor described the barrage of “for lease” signs on every block as an eyesore.
“It’s eroding the character of our neighborhoods, it’s hurting our economy and it makes people feel less confident. It’s just not as nice a place,” he said.
While public safety issues like retail theft have certainly fueled the exit of major retailers like Bloomingdale’s – which last week announced it is closing its flagship Union Square store – Tinetti said she still has a slew of interested largescale retail clients that want more storefronts in San Francisco.
“It’s not for lack of interest or demand. There is there is real interest. There is real demand,” she said. “The headlines, unfortunately, have not been friendly to ourselves in San Francisco with regards to telling the story of what’s actually going on the streets. Our streets are safer than they were in 2022 at rock bottom.”
In addition to perception problems, Tinetti said ultimately the bureaucratic barriers for getting storefronts are the biggest deterrents for chains.
“What formula retail was created to protect was the integrity of our neighborhood, fabric of the community retail. But it was just applied broadly and and grossly misinterpreted by the city,” she said. “Van Ness is a great first step. It seems like it’s common sense that it shouldn’t be applicable there, but there’s still more work to do.”
Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco family devastated as they face nearly 90% rent increase
A San Francisco family in the Richmond District is facing a nearly 90% rent increase after the building got new ownership.
Zachary and Ashley Waldman moved into the two-bedroom unit in 2021, knowing they wanted to start a family; their 19-month-old Henry has grown up in the unit and goes to daycare nearby, which is subsidized. Ashley says they feel safe and comfortable.
Last Friday, the family received a notice on their door, letting them know that their rent would go up to $7,000 in September.
“I could cry right now, I’ve been doing a lot of crying. This is our home, so it’s been really difficult,” Ashley said.
When they first moved in, they said they were paying close to $3,500. Over the last few years, they’ve seen a couple of increases, and they’re now paying nearly $3,700.
But the building recently got new ownership toward the end of May. And this notice states that it’s exempt from certain cities and state laws that provide protections to tenants.
Jocelyn Moran has the full report in the video above.
San Francisco, CA
Retired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The retired San Francisco firefighter at the center of a bitter insurance fight has lost his battle against cancer.
Ken Jones passed away Saturday, 14 months after being diagnosed with stage four lung cancer.
PREVIOUS REPORT: City asked to intervene after SF firefighter’s stage 4 lung cancer treatment denied by Blue Shield
We first told you about Jones in January — when the 17-year veteran and supporters asked the City Commission for help.
The Fire Department’s insurance carrier, Blue Shield, denied coverage for some of his recommended treatments.
Ken Jones was 70 years old.
SF firefighters rally for retiree denied cancer treatment by Blue Shield as more come forward
“After we got some publicity, thank you, a Blue Shield physician reached out to Ken’s physician, and they worked out a different plan that Blue Shield would cover. It’s still an incomplete plan,” said Helen Horvath, Jones’ wife when ABC7 Eyewitness News spoke to her in January, 2026.
Since then, Jones’ story has led to an investigation into other cases, with the city’s mayor vowing to support firefighters.
According to San Francisco’s Health Service Board, about 5,000 city employees and retirees are insured by Blue Shield. Now, city leaders are asking anyone who has been denied cancer treatment to speak up.
Tony Stefani with the Cancer Prevention Foundation said firefighters with a cancer diagnosis have a 14% higher chance of dying than other cancer patients in the general population.
“Current statistics tell us that 65% of the men and women in our profession are going to contract some form of cancer in their lifetime. Some of them will be fatal,” Stefani said.
In a Statement Blue Shield said, in part: “For Medicare members, health plans must follow medical policy established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”
Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
San Francisco, CA
What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock
Few things are more valuable in the Bay Area than real estate. In San Francisco, the median house price is now over $2 million. Last month, at least seven houses in the city sold for $1 million over the asking price, and buyers regularly offer to pay in cash or waive contingencies to stay competitive. Yet there is one thing that remains even more valuable than a house, and possibly more valuable than money itself: stock in Anthropic or OpenAI.
Last week, 160 Noe Street, an Edwardian home in San Francisco’s desirable Duboce Triangle neighborhood, was listed for sale at $2.9 million—or the equivalent amount in Anthropic or OpenAI shares, as based on those companies’ current valuations. Rachel Swann, the listing agent, says she was inspired to set these unusual terms after meeting several Anthropic employees at an open house for a different property. “These people have a lot of paper wealth, but they don’t always have the liquidity to do things they want,” Swann says. Some of these employees were expecting to come into as much as $50 million from their Anthropic shares, and wondered if they could use that as leverage to buy a house, according to Swann. “This kept coming up over and over again.”
Swann’s listing is unconventional, but not singular. In April, an investment banker named Storm Duncan offered to exchange his Mill Valley home and an adjacent parcel of land for Anthropic shares. And in May, Vijay Chattha, who owns an agency that does PR for tech companies, listed his Healdsburg home for $2.5 million, or $2 million in Anthropic stock. “I want to sell my house, and I want to invest in Anthropic,” Chattha says. “Why not combine the two?
Chattha’s house—a three bed, three bath with a pool and a bocce court in a part of Sonoma County that abuts some of the region’s most famous wineries—also comes with coveted short-term rental status, allowing the owner to list it on platforms like Airbnb. Only a handful of properties in Healdsburg come with that status, and only about a dozen come up for sale in a given year.
Chattha is offering a $500,000 discount to Anthropic employees because he believes the value of Anthropic shares will grow faster than any other investment, and his vacation home in wine country is the best bargaining chip he has to try to access them. “If you look at Anthropic’s growth last year, it’s insane,” he says, noting the $380 billion valuation the company claimed in February. “Now they’re raising at $965 billion. That’s three X in like three months.” He added that he was open to exchanging the house for shares in Anthropic, but not OpenAI, because he prefers using Anthropic’s products.
The real estate listings come at a time when investors are salivating at the record-high valuations of Anthropic and OpenAI, and even those considered wealthy by Bay Area standards are feeling FOMO about the affluence that could come from these companies’ debuts on the stock market. (On Monday, Anthropic submitted paperwork for its initial public offering; OpenAI is also reportedly preparing to file in the coming months.) Despite the unprecedented valuations of these companies, many people believe their stock prices will only go up, and that anyone who gets a piece now could win the jackpot.
People are clamoring to buy equity in OpenAI and Anthropic on the secondary market, leading to a frenzy of transactions that may or may not be legitimate. As a result, Anthropic updated its policy around “unauthorized Anthropic stock sales” this spring, which notes that “if someone purports to sell Anthropic shares without proper board approval, that transaction is invalid.” A spokesperson for Anthropic pointed back to this policy when asked about the possibility of exchanging company shares for real estate.
-
Los Angeles, Ca60 minutes agoMan claiming to be armed robs Culver City bank, gets away with $10,000
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoFired Detroit TV anchor Taryn Asher files sex discrimination lawsuit against old station, claims new GM protected men
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoSan Francisco family devastated as they face nearly 90% rent increase
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoWings’ top pick Azzi Fudd hosts clinic as Cash App donates to Dallas nonprofit
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoPatients left scrambling for care after Miami-Dade woman accused of operating an unlicensed surgery recovery center
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoClover plans to reopen some locations after sudden closure, thanks to an anonymous investor
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoNew report finds Denver metro home buyers and sellers experiencing ‘unattainability fatigue’
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoSeattle mayor grilled over public safety, affordability, CCTV