San Francisco, CA
SF Civil Grand Jury finds part of 'Vision Zero' failure due to lack police traffic enforcement
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — Eight pedestrians have been killed on San Francisco streets this year. The goal was to have zero by 2024.
Despite all the protections and interventions the city has put in place to keep people safe, a Civil Grand Jury report found the main culprit is the lack of enforcement by police.
Last year, ABC7 news reported that “No Turn on Red” signs were going up in the downtown area. This week, we went looking for them and found many of them, shiny and very visible. Except that the streets didn’t really seem much safer, especially when some drivers just ignore the sign.
Here’s what we saw: an impatient driver who turned right on red with only eight seconds left on the crossing signal. By the way, a driver has to wait only 30 seconds for that light to change. We also saw a delivery motor bike not even pretending to stop before making that right-hand turn on red.
The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency has spent millions of dollars trying to protect both bicyclists and pedestrians.
SFMTA delays vote on banning right turns at red lights anywhere in SF
More than 10 years ago, the city’s Vision Zero plan had a goal: to eliminate traffic deaths by 2024. Yet 2024 marked the deadliest year since 2007.
So when you see a U.S. Postal truck driver not obeying the rules, it begs the question, “Where are the police officers?”
In March 2024, San Francisco Supervisor Rafael Mandelman warned us.
“If there’s no enforcement, you can change all the rules you want to and no one will take them seriously,” he said.
San Francisco’s Tenderloin District has 50 intersections with “No Right Turn on Red” or “No Left Turn on Red” signs. SFMTA told us last year that 92% of drivers were complying with the law.
MORE: SF transportation agency wants to expand ‘No Turn On Red’ restrictions in city
But this week, we saw multiple cars disobeying the law and no one was holding them accountable.
Here’s what SFPD told us: “Keeping people alive and safe is the San Francisco Police Department’s No. 1 priority, and we are using the personnel available to have the maximum impact.”
Let’s go back to that line “the personnel available,” because SFPD continues to blame the lack of traffic enforcement on its ongoing staffing shortage.
“I don’t think it’s an issue of staffing as much as it is an issue of prioritizing,” said Katherine Blumberg who served on a Civil Grand Jury investigating the causes of a failed Vision Zero, which found that “there’s a sense of lawlessness on the city streets, due to the almost complete lack of enforcement in recent years.”
“There’s a lot of reckless driving on the streets, and we’re seeing a complete drop off in enforcement,” Blumberg said.
MORE: Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of it?
The report found that the number of traffic citations dropped by 95% in the 10 years since Vision Zero was first adopted in 2014. 2016 saw the first big drop in citations, even though that same year police staffing increased by 6%.
“It was a drop off in citations while police officer staffing was increasing and at the same time collisions were increasing, so this just has not been a priority for the SFPD,” Blumberg said.
SFPD told us that it has increased traffic enforcement in the last year and that’s true. The Civil Grand Jury report acknowledges that in 2024 there were 15,500 citations, the most significant increase since 2020.
ABC7’s data team also found that traffic stops for running a red light or making that right on red, increased from 19 stops in 2023 to 61 in 2024.
In the report, the Civil Grand Jury calls for “a renewed commitment to traffic enforcement from SFPD” and that SFMTA start “building community trust.”
Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
San Francisco, CA
Fielder may resign from Board of Supervisors, possibly over illegal leak
San Francisco, CA
Trump floats sending federal agents to San Francisco to tackle crime
President Donald Trump was once again floating the idea of sending federal agents to San Francisco to tackle crime.
It happened during a cabinet meeting on Thursday. The president praised Mayor Daniel Lurie’s efforts to lower crime but said he can do it more effectively.
“San Francisco, I know, they have a mayor who’s trying very hard. He’s a Democrat, but he’s trying very hard, but we can do it much more effectively, because he can’t do what we do. He can’t take people out from the city and bring them to back to the country, from where they came, where they were in prisons,” Trump said.
“He’s trying. He’s doing okay, but we could do much better. We could make it a lot safer than it is. San Francisco, a great city, was a great city, could quickly become a great city again. But, you know, they’re going very slowly,” he continued.
The president implied that the mayor needs federal help to battle crime, saying immigrants are responsible for the lawlessness. However, according to a 2025 study by researches at UCLA and Northwestern, arresting and deporting undocumented immigrants was not associated with reduced crime rates.
Gabriel Medina, executive director of La Raza Community Resource Center In San Francisco agrees.
“I think we need to make sure that our city does not also try to play this game of making up ideas about always associating crime with immigrants, when immigrants commit less crime, so that’s really bad,” Medina said.
In response to the president comments, the mayor released a statement that reads: “In San Francisco, crime is down 30%, encampments are at record lows, and our city is on the rise. Public safety is my number one priority, and we are going to stay laser focused on keeping our streets safe and clean.”
This isn’t the first time President Trump has mused with the idea of sending federal agents to the Bay Area; last October, agents were staged at a military base in Alameda, but Trump called off the plan after talking with Lurie and Bay Area tech leaders.
“We cannot normalize what this president is saying from San Francisco, that crime is associated with immigration. We need to stop conflating that,” Medina said.
San Francisco, CA
Man convicted in the deadly 2021 assault of a Thai grandfather in San Francisco avoids prison
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The man convicted in the fatal 2021 attack of an older Thai man in San Francisco, which galvanized a movement against anti-Asian hate, will be able to avoid prison time, a judge ruled Thursday.
Antoine Watson, 25, was sentenced to eight years for manslaughter in the death of Vicha Ratanapakdee, 84. But, having already spent five years in jail awaiting trial, Watson received credit for time served, and San Francisco Superior Court Judge Linda Colfax said he could have the remaining three years suspended if he follows the rules of his probation.
Ratanapakdee’s daughter, Monthanus, expressed her family’s disappointment in a statement shared by Justice For Vicha, the foundation named for her father.
“We respect the court process. However, this is not about revenge — it is about accountability,” she said. “When consequences do not reflect the seriousness of the harm, it raises concerns about how we protect our seniors and public safety.”
Vicha Ratanapakdee was out for his usual morning walk in the quiet neighborhood he lived in with his wife, daughter and her family when Watson charged at him and knocked him to the ground. Ratanapakdee never regained consciousness and died two days later.
Watson testified on the stand that he was in a haze of confusion and anger at the time of the unprovoked attack, according to KRON-TV. He said he lashed out and didn’t know that Ratanapakdee was Asian or older.
San Francisco Public Defender Mano Raju, whose office defended Watson, also said at his trial that the defendant is “fully remorseful for his mistake.”
The Office of the San Francisco Public Defender did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment on Watson’s sentencing.
Footage of the attack was captured on a neighbor’s security camera and spread across social media, prompting a surge in activism over a rise in anti-Asian crimes driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Hundreds of people across several U.S. cities commemorated the anniversary of Ratanapakdee’s death in 2022, seeking justice for Asian Americans who have been harassed, assaulted and even killed in alarming numbers.
Asians in America have long been subject to prejudice and discrimination, but the attacks escalated sharply after COVID-19 first appeared in late 2019 in Wuhan, China. More than 10,000 hate incidents against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders were reported to the Stop AAPI Hate coalition from March 2020 through September 2021.
While the Ratanapakdee family asserts he was attacked because of his race, hate crime charges were not filed and the argument was not raised in trial. Prosecutors have said hate crimes are difficult to prove absent statements by the suspect.
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Sports7 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico5 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Business1 week agoDisney’s new CEO says his focus is on storytelling and creativity
-
Tennessee5 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Texas1 week agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets