San Francisco, CA
San Francisco’s Edge In The AI Race: The Role Of Education And Inclusivity
famous Golden Gate Bridge with low fog, San Francisco, USA
San Francisco, with its iconic Golden Gate Bridge and vibrant tech scene, is poised to continue its dominance in the AI race, thanks in part to its well-educated youth. At the heart of this success is Palo Alto, a city within the San Francisco Bay Area, where schools are among the wealthiest in the United States and the world.
The Wealth of Palo Alto Schools
The Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) benefits from high property taxes and significant contributions from parents and the community. The Palo Alto Partners in Education (PiE) foundation, for example, raises millions of dollars annually to support programs and staff positions in PAUSD schools. These schools are equipped with state-of-the-art facilities, including modern classrooms, sports facilities, and technology resources.
The Global Context
When compared to other areas, both within the United States and globally, the disparity is stark. Many school districts struggle with underfunding, aging infrastructure, and limited access to technology. In developing countries, schools often face challenges such as overcrowding and lack of basic amenities. This contrast highlights the global issue of educational inequality, where access to quality education is closely tied to economic status.
The Impact of Wealth on Education
The wealth of Palo Alto schools contributes to high academic performance, with students often achieving top scores on standardized tests and gaining admission to prestigious universities. However, this wealth also underscores the opportunity gap that exists on a global scale.
The Digital Divide
Access to technology is a critical component of modern education. Yet, according to UNICEF, approximately 463 million children globally were unable to access remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic due to a lack of resources, including computers. In low- and middle-income countries, only 67% of the population owns a mobile phone, and a significant portion of the world’s 2 billion children might not have access to a mobile device or the internet!
San Francisco’s AI Ecosystem
The San Francisco Bay Area is a leading hub for AI and technology, home to major companies like OpenAI, Google, Apple, and Facebook. This ecosystem is supported by a strong technological infrastructure, research institutions, and investment capital. Other key global AI hubs include Boston, New York City, Toronto, London, Beijing, Shenzhen, Bangalore, Berlin, and Tel Aviv.
Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce, recently praised Bay Area (San Francisco) as the world’s “Number One A.I. city,” highlighting its growing AI scene and the presence of innovative startups. Despite previous concerns about the city’s homelessness and drug use, Benioff’s comments during Salesforce’s quarterly earnings call underscore the city’s potential as a tech hub. This sentiment is echoed by other tech leaders and entrepreneurs who are drawn to San Francisco’s unique intellectual community and the advantages it offers for startup success. The city’s reputation as a prime location for AI innovation continues to attract attention and investment from the tech industry.
San Francisco’s continued success in the AI race is not just a result of its technological prowess but also its commitment to education and inclusivity. In the ever-evolving landscape of AI, education and inclusivity will be key drivers of sustainable growth and innovation.
Other cities can learn several valuable lessons from Palo Alto and the broader Bay Area to foster a thriving tech ecosystem:
Invest in Education: Palo Alto’s success is partly due to its focus on high-quality education. Other cities can prioritize investing in schools, universities, and research institutions to cultivate a skilled workforce and attract top talent.
Encourage Innovation: The Bay Area is known for its innovative culture, driven by a willingness to take risks and support for entrepreneurship. Cities can create environments that encourage innovation through policies, funding, and resources for startups and research.
Foster Collaboration: Collaboration between academia, industry, and government has been key to the Bay Area’s success. Other cities can foster partnerships that leverage the strengths of each sector to drive technological advancements.
Support Diversity and Inclusion: The Bay Area’s diverse population contributes to its dynamic and creative environment. Cities can focus on inclusivity in their tech ecosystems to ensure a range of perspectives and ideas are represented.
Invest in Infrastructure: The success of tech hubs like Palo Alto relies on strong infrastructure, including transportation, connectivity, and access to resources. Cities can invest in infrastructure to support the growth of their tech industries.
Create a Supportive Regulatory Environment: The Bay Area benefits from a regulatory environment that supports innovation and entrepreneurship. Other cities can examine their policies and regulations to ensure they are conducive to the growth of tech businesses.
Attract and Retain Talent: The Bay Area’s ability to attract and retain top talent is crucial to its success. Cities can focus on creating attractive living and working conditions, competitive salaries, and opportunities for career growth to retain skilled workers.
By adopting these strategies and this mindset other cities can create ecosystems that support the growth of technology industries. But it does require a coordinated effort from government, industry, academia, and the community to create a supportive ecosystem for technology and innovation.
Towns looking to foster innovation and entrepreneurship a la Palo Alto can actually learn from the success of Startup Chile, a government-supported accelerator program.
By offering equity-free funding and visas, Startup Chile has attracted global entrepreneurs, demonstrating the importance of government support and international appeal.
The program emphasizes community building through networking events and educational resources, helping to develop a vibrant startup ecosystem. Additionally, Startup Chile’s focus on diversifying the types of startups has contributed to economic resilience. Public-private partnerships and visionary leaders have been key to the program’s success, showing the value of collaboration between sectors.
Finally, Startup Chile’s commitment to measuring its impact provides valuable data for continuous improvement.
By adopting these strategies, towns can create a conducive environment for startups, drive economic growth, and enhance their reputation and quality of life for all. Achieving this transformation requires leadership, vision, boldness, and a genuine passion for technology.
San Francisco, CA
Thousands in one San Francisco neighborhood heading into another day without power
While many people in San Francisco have their power back, there are still thousands without it.
At a press conference Monday afternoon, Mayor Daniel Lurie said 4,000 PG&E customers in the Civic Center area are still in the dark. One of them is Parvathy Menon.
“We haven’t been able to take showers or use the bathroom,” said Menon. “Our electricity is out. I think all our food started rotting about a day in.”
She lives at 100 Van Ness. She said she’s grateful she’s going out of town tomorrow, but even that’s posing some problems.
“I actually have to pack for a trip tonight, and we’re doing it in full darkness,” Menon explained. “We are using our phone lights, we are using our laptops to charge our phones.”
Her apartment is pitch black, except for the small amount of streetlight coming through the windows. She said the apartment complex has been doing all they can to help, like providing some food and water.
They have a small generator to power some lights in the lobby and one elevator for the nearly 30-story apartment building.
Menon said she is most upset about the lack of communication from PG&E.
“Initially, when this started, we were supposed to get power back within the day, then it went to the next day and now they just stopped calling us completely,” said Menon.
San Francisco City Hall was closed for the day because of the outage, but Mayor Daniel Lurie held a press conference with Supervisors Matt Dorsey and Bilal Mahmood.
Lurie said what residents have gone through is unacceptable, and he’s lost trust in PG&E’s estimated times for repair.
“They gave us a timeline that they believe in, but it’s not one that I can have confidence in any longer,” Lurie said. “So, we don’t have full faith that 6 a.m. is the time tomorrow.”
“Shame on PG&E for having this happen,” said District 6 Supervisor Matt Dorsey. “This is a company that has had a lot of reliability issues and the jury is out on what happened, but if this is negligence, I think it’s going to be really important for people to understand they have rights as customers.”
Leaders encourage everyone who lost anything to file a claim with PG&E; they could be eligible for reimbursements. Mahmood is calling for a hearing after the new year to get some answers for PG&E.
“What went wrong, why weren’t they able to address it this weekend and what steps are they taking to make sure this doesn’t happen again,” said Mahmood about the question he has for the utility company.
PG&E said the outage happened after a fire at its Mission Street substation left significant damage, but the cause is still under investigation.
Meanwhile, Menon has been refreshing social media looking for good news, but she’s starting to lose faith.
“They’re really doing nothing to help us here, so I’m losing hope,” said Menon.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco blackout: What we know
A fire at a Pacific Gas & Electric substation in SoMa knocked out power to as many as 130,000 customers starting Saturday, leaving thousands in the dark heading into the holiday season and a week of intense storms. Here’s what we know about the outage and state of restoration.
What happened?
The fire began shortly before 1:10 p.m. Saturday at PG&E’s Mission substation at Eighth and Mission streets, initially affecting 40,000 customers. As firefighters worked to suppress the blaze, crews de-energized additional portions of the electric system for safety, causing outages to peak at approximately 130,000 customers.
The fire damaged critical equipment, including a circuit breaker — a safety switch designed to de-energize the system when problems are detected. Firefighters faced unusual complexities suppressing the fire in the multilevel building, including ventilating carbon monoxide before crews could safely enter.
When did power come back?
Firefighters made the building safe for PG&E crews to enter by 6:15 p.m. Saturday. Restoration efforts began immediately. Nearly 32,000 customers were reconnected by 8:45 p.m. Saturday, and about 100,000 — roughly 75% of those affected — were up by 9:30 p.m.
By noon Sunday, 90% of affected customers had power restored. PG&E initially projected full restoration by 2 p.m. Monday; however, a spokesperson said the utility was extending restoration times (opens in new tab) for the remaining 4,400 customers without power. No time frame has been announced.
What sparked the fire?
PG&E says it doesn’t know. COO Sumeet Singh said Monday that the extensive equipment damage makes it difficult to determine a root cause. The utility has hired Exponent, a Bay Area-based engineering firm, to conduct an independent investigation.
“We will determine what occurred to ensure it never happens again,” Singh said at a press conference outside the damaged substation.
Was the equipment properly maintained?
PG&E completed preventative maintenance at the Mission substation in October and conducted its most recent bimonthly inspection Dec. 5. Singh said neither inspection identified any problems.
Why were the estimated restoration times wrong?
Many customers were irate as they were repeatedly given estimated restoration times that came and went. Singh acknowledged the failure and said PG&E’s estimation systems typically perform well, with more than 91% accuracy systemwide.
“It obviously did not work effectively in the circumstance over this weekend,” Singh said. “We are committed to understanding exactly what happened, why it happened, and owning the fixes.”
Were other substations damaged?
Residents have observed a large presence of workers at a substation at 24th Avenue and Balboa Street since Sunday, but the utility has not shared details on what is being done there.
Six hulking diesel generators, which one worker said cost $600,000 to operate daily, were parked outside the substation Monday afternoon. The generators are needed to feed power to the grid while both substations are not fully operational. Crews said they are expected to run for at least two to three days.
Two workers said the substation is undamaged and still online, but its output is diminished because it is fed power by the much larger substation at Eighth and Mission.
However, another said one of the substation’s transformers blew out after a power surge following the fire, and the generators are needed to compensate while workers “update the system” of the west-side substation.
How will customers be compensated?
PG&E plans to offer an expedited claims process for affected customers to seek compensation for losses, including spoiled food, lost business revenue, and hotel costs. Singh said details will be available soon on the utility’s website and through customer service.
He declined to specify compensation limits or provide immediate financial relief, saying customers would need to file claims that PG&E would process quickly. The utility opened a community resource center in the Richmond and partnered with 211 to provide hotel accommodations and food vouchers for vulnerable customers.
Could this happen again?
Singh said PG&E has identified no vulnerabilities at other substations and has made significant upgrades systemwide. Two strong storms forecast for Tuesday and Wednesday (opens in new tab) could bring 4 to 10 inches of rain to Northern California; he said more than 5,500 PG&E workers and contractors are positioned to respond.
The outage occurred 22 years to the day (opens in new tab) after a mass blackout at the same substation in 2003, raising questions about aging infrastructure that Singh did not directly address.
San Francisco, CA
Fortune Tech: The sheer scale | Fortune
Good morning. Extremely lean and mean (well, merry, really) for the rest of this week as we head into our annual winter break.
We’ll hang things up for the year on Dec. 24 and pick things back up on Jan. 5.
Happy holidays. (Yippee-Ki-Yay.) —AN
Want to send thoughts or suggestions to Fortune Tech? Drop a line here.
What happened when Waymo robotaxis met a San Francisco blackout
Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu/Getty Images
An extraordinary experiment happened over the weekend in San Francisco.
What would a fleet of autonomous vehicles do when a widespread power outage knocked out traffic lights across one-third of the city?
We quickly found out—and the results were plastered all over social media.
On Saturday afternoon, Waymo vehicles throughout SF opted to stop where they were or pull over and throw on their hazard lights—“blocking intersections” and “compounding gridlock,” observed the San Francisco Standard—leading the Alphabet-owned robotaxi operator to suspend service throughout the city. (It resumed Sunday evening.)
In a statement, Waymo said that its vehicles are “designed to treat non-functional signals as four-way stops” but “the sheer scale of the outage led to instances where vehicles remained stationary longer than usual.”
As locals worked through the outage, a moderate debate about the robotaxi fleet continued online. Was it so wrong to expect Waymo’s vehicles to play it safe when infrastructure stopped working? After all, aren’t human drivers predictably chaotic when things go sideways? What exactly should robotaxis optimize for: traffic flow or citizen safety?
And: Just how safe is stopping if you prompt traffic to go around you?
Waymo resumed service Sunday evening, no doubt grappling with these questions (and what city officials might have to say about them). “We are already learning and improving from this event,” it said. —AN
More tech
—Pirates scrape Spotify. Activists Anna’s Archive release hundreds of terabytes of music and metadata via torrent files.
—Shield AI: Sitting at a global inflection point for fully autonomous warfighting.
—SoftBank cashes out to back OpenAI. The Japanese conglomerate is looking under every rock to fulfill its “all in” OpenAI funding promise.
—Chaos at CISA. A failed, unsanctioned polygraph by its acting director has the U.S. cybersecurity agency in disarray.
—PE firms acquire Clearwater Analytics for $8.4 billion. Permira and Warburg Pincus lead the investor group seeking to buy the fintech firm.
—Uber goes to London. A robotaxi trial in partnership with Baidu will begin in the first half of next year.
—Data center deals reach $61 billion worldwide in 2025, according to S&P Global.
—Chatbots’ uncanny valley. Making AI agents more human-like creates cognitive dissonance and trust issues, researchers say.
—Daylight between David Sacks and tech lobbyists. Tech reps say the AI czar’s push to use Trump’s executive order to suppress state AI regulation is the right idea, wrong execution.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico7 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine7 days agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off