Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Runners hop, skip, jump and take to the street in year of the rabbit Chinatown run

Published

on

Runners hop, skip, jump and take to the street in year of the rabbit Chinatown run


San Francisco’s forty fifth Annual Chinatown New 12 months Run is Sunday, and the timing could not be extra applicable – 2023 is the 12 months of the Rabbit, in accordance with the Chinese language zodiac.   

The run begins at 8 a.m., rain or shine, at Grant Avenue and Sacramento Avenue. Members can select between a 5K run/stroll or a 10K run. You need to register as a way to participate within the run.   

Advertisement

“2023 is the 12 months of the Hare, recognized for its power, resilience, and compassion,” in accordance with the web site of the YMCA of San Francisco, the organizer of the race.   

WATCH: Chinese language New 12 months 2023

Members who hop to it Sunday can have a uncommon probability to run by way of Chinatown’s historic (and barely hilly) streets, taking within the structure, scents, and sounds of this bustling and vibrant neighborhood.   

Advertisement

The run winds up at 9:20 a.m. on Kearny and Sacramento streets, the place a blowout competition will happen by which runners can devour any quantity of energy with out concern of gaining weight in any case that train. No phrase on whether or not free carrots or different rabbit meals shall be out there.   

For extra info, go to the SF YMCA web site.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

Can the Real San Francisco Airport Please Stand Up? | Connecting California

Published

on

Can the Real San Francisco Airport Please Stand Up? | Connecting California


What’s in a name? wonders columnist Joe Mathews. SFO—or should that be, San Mateo County
International Airport?—
isn’t in the City or County of San Francisco. San Francisco with Oakland, Alameda, and Mt. Diablo in the background. Courtesy of Michael Estigoy/Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0 DEED).

Advertisement

I’ve never much cared for San Francisco International Airport—until SFO decided to take a courageous stand for truth and accuracy in airport names.

Last month, SFO’s leaders filed a lawsuit to stop the Port of Oakland from changing Oakland International Airport’s name to “San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport.”

Author and Oakland native Gertrude Stein famously said “There is no there there” of her hometown. Which is perhaps why the Oakland Port Commission justified the name change by saying it wanted to educate travelers unfamiliar with California that Oakland is an actual place that sits on the bay. I also believe that Oakland may have been combating a widespread misperception among Star Wars fans that it’s on Planet Tatooine; after all, Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) was a native Oaklander.

Fortunately, SFO saw through the Oakland’s airport Jedi mind trick. The lawsuit accuses its East Bay competitor of trademark infringement as part of a grab for more air traffic. SFO also alleges that the name change creates the impression that Oakland is in San Francisco, which it is not.

Advertisement

I admire SFO’s bold commitment to defending geographic integrity. Which is why I’m so excited to see the airport take the next logical step in advancing the same principle, by changing its own inaccurate name.

I can hear it now: My Southwest Airlines pilot asks me to return my seat back to its full upright position—and then welcomes me to San Mateo County International Airport.

Because SFO, just like Oakland, isn’t in the City or County of San Francisco. It’s in an unincorporated corner of northeast San Mateo County, south of San Francisco.

As a lifelong SFO passenger, I can testify that taking San Francisco out of SFO’s name would be a service to the flying public.

Because it’s actually quite difficult to get into or out of San Francisco via the airport with San Francisco in its name.

Advertisement

You might even say that Oakland is a better San Francisco airport than San Francisco’s airport.

SFO’s problems start with flight delays. For years, it’s had among the highest rates of delayed flights in the United States. Other badly delayed airports typically have snow or severe winter weather. Of course, SFO has fog, but fog alone doesn’t make so many flights late. It’s the poor organization of the airport itself. Its two main, parallel runways are too close together to permit landings at the same time. So, when visibility is low, there are delays. This year, a construction project has been creating still more backups.

And if fog and poor organization don’t trap you at SFO, the airport’s design will. Today’s SFO was largely created 20 years ago, via an expansion that was hundreds of millions of dollars over budget. The project left the airport feeling overbuilt and bloated, with too much distance between ground transportation and gates.

Today, getting to your flight at SFO requires taking slow rides on an internal Air Train (whose construction was dogged by corruption allegations) and taking long walks through large, glassy, and often empty halls. Even when security lines are short, walking alone can add 20 minutes to your trip. Travel websites routinely advise SFO passengers to arrive at the airport two or more hours early.

And the transportation options outside the airport are no picnic, either. SFO sits at a traffic chokehold point, with crammed freeways and dead-end streets. Public buses stop at the terminals, but the main line, SamTrans 292, only shows up every 30 minutes or so. And Caltrain, the peninsula commuter line, doesn’t stop at the airport.

Advertisement

BART trains have a station inside the airport, which is nice. But many trains on that line don’t go into the airport, ending their routes four stops earlier at Daly City instead. And there are so many BART stops along the 13 miles between SFO and downtown San Francisco that the trip can take nearly an hour.

When I need to go to downtown San Francisco, I fly into Oakland. It’s faster, less likely to experience delays, and more reliable. And the airport’s two terminals are small and efficient, so that it’s just two minutes from my gate to ground transportation. The airport also has a connector train to BART that can take you into San Francisco in just five stops, or down to Fremont and San Jose with ease.

You might even say that Oakland is a better San Francisco airport than San Francisco’s airport.

Of course, I would never say that. No way. Because your truth-telling columnist is 100 percent behind SFO’s righteous defense of geographic accuracy in airport names.

But I will say this: Until this cross-bay airport dispute is over, and until SFO follows its own principle and changes its name to San Mateo County International, I am changing my own name to honor the Bay Area airport I actually enjoy flying into.

Advertisement

So, for the time being, you can call me San Francisco Bay Joe.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

SF nonprofit meant to help unhoused community accused of fraud after $100K 'disappeared'

Published

on

SF nonprofit meant to help unhoused community accused of fraud after $100K 'disappeared'


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — San Francisco nonprofit Providence Foundation is being accused of fraud.

“We discovered through our investigation that Providence was defrauding the city by submitting false invoices and as a result over $100,000 dollars of public monies that were supposed to benefit individuals experiencing homelessness were not being used for their proper purpose and has disappeared,” said Chiu.

San Francisco city attorney David Chiu said their findings are just the beginning of their push for accountability.

Multiple fake invoices collecting more than $100K led San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu to take action against Providence Foundation

Advertisement

“Our office is going to be seeking the debarment and suspension of a nonprofit called Providence Foundation. Providence Foundation for a number of years has been providing services to the city to address the needs of families who are homeless,” said Chiu.

MORE: Oakland nursing home faces lawsuit alleging rape, neglect and fraud after ‘hiding problems’

The invoices were submitted in 2022 for painting of the exterior of the Oasis Hotel and the removal of locks at the hotel. The city’s attorney’s office discovered that work was never done.

“Our action today starts the process to insure that providence is not able to apply for future contracts. It is up to the city as we are reviewing this if the current contracts would end,” said Chiu.

Providence Foundation operates the Oasis Hotel a shelter for families experiencing homelessness.

Advertisement

Providence receives city funds to operate a navigation center, as well as multiple housing subsidy and voucher programs. For years they have received grants through the city’s department of homelessness and supportive housing.

MORE: How could the US Supreme Court’s case Grants Pass v. Johnson impact SF’s unhoused community?

The case City of Grants Pass v. Johnson is the most significant case on homelessness in more than 40 years.

In a statement the city’s department said in part:

“HSH will be reviewing each contract on a program-by-program basis to determine the best way to continue seamless services for the guests and tenants in these programs.”

Advertisement

“I think it’s very unfortunate the nonprofit contractors do wrong to the city but I think it’s almost foreseeable when you have the avalanche of new programs and new contractors coming in and the city wanting to get more contractors involved and not really scrutinize those,” said Randy Shaw, Director Tenderloin Housing Clinic.

Shaw, Director Tenderloin Housing Clinic the leading provider of permanent supportive housing for homeless single adults in San Francisco is concerned about what these findings will mean for other nonprofits like his.

“Social media is filled with tweets about corrupt nonprofits in the homeless sector but reality is that there are a lot of nonprofits involved and these are still a small number and they give us all a bad name. It’s really unfortunate,” said Shaw.

Our Data Team found that San Francisco has awarded over $213 million to nonprofits in the housing and homelessness sector for contracts starting in 2023 to present.

The city attorney’s office said they will continue their investigation

Advertisement

“Our office we will continue to root out bad actors who take advantage of our public resources we will fine you. We will cut off your funding and hold you accountable,” said Chiu.

We went to the Providence Foundation office for comment and their staff closed their doors. At the time of the publication of this article Providence Foundation did not respond.

MORE: Reformed Nigerian scammer describes how he swindled $70,000 from Bay Area victims

HSH Full statement:

“The Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH) has had a long-standing partnership with the Providence Foundation of San Francisco to provide shelter, housing assistance and supportive services to people experiencing homelessness, particularly in the Bayview and Fillmore neighborhoods. Providence has played a critical role in serving the unhoused community in these neighborhoods.

Advertisement

Providence, like many other small community-based organizations, has at times struggled to maintain compliance with all the City’s contracting requirements. HSH has worked closely with them for years to build their capacity and comply with City requirements because of the important work that they do.

However last fall a series of serious allegations came out from Providence’s own staff about possible fraud, wage theft, and mismanagement. The Providence staff, seeking support and guidance, brought these concerns to us as well as to Office of Labor Standards and the City Attorney’s Office.

The City Attorney’s office launched their own investigation into the situation and have issued a debarment letter to Providence which will make them ineligible for future City contracts for up to 5 years. The debarment does not require that HSH immediately end existing contracts with Providence, HSH will be reviewing each contract on a program-by-program basis to determine the best way to continue seamless services for the guests and tenants in these programs.

HSH’s ultimate responsibility is to the guests and tenants in these programs and we are working diligently to ensure that clients continue to receive the shelter, housing, and services they need.”

If you’re on the ABC7 News app, click here to watch live

Advertisement

Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Americans have now spent all $2.1 trillion of their pandemic savings, San Francisco Fed says

Published

on

Americans have now spent all $2.1 trillion of their pandemic savings, San Francisco Fed says


US households have exhausted the pile of cash squirreled away during the pandemic, according to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

“The latest estimates of overall pandemic excess savings remaining in the US economy have turned negative, suggesting that American households fully spent their pandemic-era savings as of March 2024,” San Francisco Fed economists Hamza Abdelrahman and Luiz Oliveira said in a blog post published Friday. The duo have been updating their estimates regularly over time, and last year flagged that the US savings surplus was lasting longer than previously expected, helping to hold up spending.

Pandemic-era excess savings — the difference between actual savings and the pre-pandemic trend — swelled to $2.1 trillion from March 2020 to August 2021. From that point, households drew on those savings at an average monthly pace of $70 billion, and that spending accelerated to $85 billion per month last fall before dropping to -$72 billion in March, according to the researchers.

Americans were able to build up extra savings while stuck at home during the pandemic, in part due to extraordinary government support. The reserves are widely thought to have helped the US economy continually defy forecasters’ expectations for a downturn, even as the Fed implemented a historically rapid interest-rate hiking cycle.

Advertisement

As long as Americans can keep up their spending through other means — like continuous employment or wage gains, other savings, or more debt — the exhaustion of pandemic cash is unlikely to result in a drop in consumer spending overall, Abdelrahman and Oliveira wrote.

But cracks may be forming. Last week, Amazon and Starbucks earnings reports both pointed to an increasingly budget-conscious consumer, and a pullback in demand would be in line with a Bloomberg Economics forecast for a slowdown in consumer spending this year from 2023’s robust pace.

Read More: US INSIGHT: Three Forecast Methods Say Consumption to Slow (1)

New York Fed President John Williams said Monday the bank has heard from retailers that many consumers are being “much more careful about their spending and we’re seeing some slowing there.”

Lower- and moderate-income households in particular have spent down their pandemic reserves and “we are seeing some delinquency rates on credit cards and auto loans pick up,” Williams said at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles.

Advertisement

“In the big picture, it’s an economy that’s still healthy but growing somewhat slower,” he said.

Learn how to take control of your personal finances with Get Your Due, our six-week email bootcamp. Sign up for free.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending