Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

PIX Now Evening Edition 5-11-24

Published

on

PIX Now Evening Edition 5-11-24


PIX Now Evening Edition 5-11-24 – CBS San Francisco

Watch CBS News


CBS News Bay Area evening edition headlines for Saturday May 11 2024. Watch full newscasts streamed at the CBS SF website or on the app. Website: http://kpix.com

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

The F1 sideshow that went sideways: Peeing, roof-climbing, and a mayor along for the ride

Published

on

The F1 sideshow that went sideways: Peeing, roof-climbing, and a mayor along for the ride


Last August, a Red Bull stunt in which a “skysurfer (opens in new tab)” rode down the suspension cables of the Bay Bridge led to 20 minutes of closures along the interstate as high school students flocked to downtown to take the SAT

In response to complaints, Mayor Daniel Lurie told ABC7 (opens in new tab) that such disruptions were the cost of San Francisco’s comeback.

“I will look into it,” Lurie said, “but if we’re going to be a global city that is on top again, we’re going to have to make sure that we know what’s coming. We have to expect that they’ll be some inconveniences.”

“Inconveniences” is a mild way to describe what happened in the Marina District on Saturday, where neighbors reported people peeing in backyards, climbing fire escapes, trampling landscaping, and scrambling on roofs and balconies to get a view of the Red Bull F1 event.  

Advertisement
Source: Courtesy Patrick Souris

“It was chaos,” said Patrick Souris, a 35-year-old tech worker who lives in the neighborhood. “It was terrible.”

Now the energy drink company known for its audacious stunts and the mayor, who suited up in a bright blue race Ford-branded suit, are under fire, this time for a lack of crowd control.

In the aftermath of the exhibition, which Lurie said drew 50,000 to the Marina, broken pots and branches were splayed out on the sidewalk, along with chipped tiles and cracked windows. Skid scarred the roadway.

The mayor’s office declined to take responsibility for how the event unfolded, deferring questions about event planning to Red Bull and about law enforcement presence to SFPD.

Red Bull did not respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

SFPD said it received several calls about trespassing into private areas, but made no arrests. “Overall, the event was extremely safe, and there were no major public safety incidents,” police spokesperson Robert Rueca told The Standard on Monday.

The lone public statement from City Hall regarding the event was a video posted to social media of Lurie (opens in new tab) in the passenger seat of an F1 car, calling it “one of the most thrilling events” he’s partaken in since becoming mayor.

At least one public official has taken issue with the lack of preparation. District 2 Supervisor Stephen Sherrill, who represents the Marina, acknowledged in a statement to The Standard that the event should have been handled with more care.

“San Francisco must be able to host exciting, world-class events safely and efficiently,” Sherrill said. “In partnership with the Mayor’s Office, I will convene city departments to review what occurred, address any shortcomings, and ensure future events are managed safely and with stronger safeguards in place.”

Advertisement

On social media and on the streets of the Marina, much of the criticism has centered around the traffic gridlock in the neighborhood and frustration about the lack of organized bleacher areas for spectators.

The event and its aftermath has also become yet another culture war debate. Many noted the irony of the Lurie administration allowing the F1 event on public streets while vowing in December to crack down on illegal sideshows (opens in new tab) by doubling fines for street takeovers.

“This fuckin mayor man,” commented @rae_ruckus on Instagram. “We aren’t Monaco bro. If that’s what you want then make us a sovereign city-state too.”

Some touted the tourists and the thrill it brought to the neighborhood, while taking issue with its organization. Others said it was only right that the wealthy homeowners of the Marina saw what parts of the Mission or SoMa regularly experience.

Advertisement

“RIP the victims of The Marina,” commented @drawinmonsters on Instagram. “Hurricane Red Bull was absolutely devastating.”

Two people are climbing a street sign pole labeled “Divisadero” and “END DIVISADERO,” above a large crowd gathered on a sunny day by the water.
Source: Courtesy Patrick Souris





Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Former San Francisco nonprofit CEO charged with misappropriating $1.2 million in public funds

Published

on

Former San Francisco nonprofit CEO charged with misappropriating .2 million in public funds



The former head of a San Francisco-based nonprofit providing services to the homeless has been charged with nine felonies for allegedly stealing and misappropriating more than $1 million in public funds, prosecutors said.

District Attorney Brooke Jenkins’ office announced Monday that charges were filed against 71-year-old Gwendolyn Westbrook, the former CEO of the United Council for Human Services (UCHS). Westbrook was charged following an investigation by the District Attorney’s Public Integrity Task Force.

“Ms. Westbrook is accused of unlawfully misappropriating public money and grant funds on behalf of UCHS, while exercising near-exclusive financial control over the organization,” the DA’s office said in a statement.

Advertisement

Prosecutors charged Westbrook for one count of misappropriation, three counts of grand theft, one count of presenting a false invoice for payment and four counts of filing false California tax returns.

Court documents allege Westbrook misappropriated more than $1.2 million in public funds from the nonprofit’s accounts to herself. Westbrook allegedly used a combination of undocumented cash withdrawals, self-issued payments and fraudulent reimbursement practices between 2019 and 2023.

Prosecutors said additional large sums withdrawn from the group’s accounts remain unaccounted for.

Westbrook is also accused of filing false tax returns for tax years 2020 through 2023.

According to Jenkins’ office, Westbrook is scheduled to be arraigned Tuesday at the Hall of Justice.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco lawmaker to propose plan to let cities break away from PG&E

Published

on

San Francisco lawmaker to propose plan to let cities break away from PG&E


Just two months ago, a massive power outage left parts of San Francisco in the dark for days, and some lawmakers are trying to make sure it never happens again.

“San Francisco has been trying to break up with PG&E for a long time,” said Democratic Senator Scott Wiener. “The rates are extremely high and we know that public power can bring lower rates.”

Wiener says he will announce legislation on Monday that would allow San Francisco and other cities to break away from PG&E and form publicly owned utility companies, and do it quickly.

“San Francisco has already triggered a process to break away at the California Public Utilities Commission, but it is unbelievably slow, it’s taken years and years,” explained Wiener. “The standards set under the law are very unfavorable to a city wanting to break away.”

Advertisement

A professor at UC Berkeley and faculty director of the Energy Institute at Haas School of Business, Severin Borenstein, says he has an idea about what this could look like.

“It means trying to buy out their poles and wires to be the distributor of electricity in the city,” said Borenstein. “San Francisco is already its own entity in securing its electricity from generators. What would change, potentially, is they could own the specific distribution lines.”

He says it could benefit the city if they feel they can do a better job maintaining the lines, and they may be able to reduce the cost. But Borenstein explains that some of the reduction in cost could be because San Francisco and other urban areas are subsidizing the more rural areas in PG&E territory, particularly in fire-prone areas.

“If the cities opt out, or could opt out of PG&E territory, what that’s going to mean is all of those wildfire costs, which are really unavoidable, that’s what climate change is doing to us, will be shifting on to the remaining rate payers,” said Borenstein. 

Borenstein thinks it could start a domino effect of cities wanting to form their own utility companies, and other lawmakers may want to avoid it.

Advertisement

“I don’t think the legislature is going to be very supportive of this because I think a lot of legislatures understand if we go down this road there’s going to be a crisis in the areas that are left holding the bag,” said Borenstein. 

Alameda and Palo Alto already have city-run utilities. Wiener believes San Francisco can join them.

“Right now, PG&E, it is a publicly traded corporation,” Wiener stated. “It is beholden to Wall Street and investors and its bottom line. And public power allows you to break away from that and to focus on the public interest and not on the needs of shareholders.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending