Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Grading the San Francisco Giants' offseason (for now)

Published

on

Grading the San Francisco Giants' offseason (for now)


An offseason grade for the San Francisco Giants? Nonsense. There’s still offseason left! They can sign Cody Bellinger. They can sign Blake Snell. They can sign Clay Bellinger. They can sign Ian Snell. It’s too early and reductive to give anyone a final grade for the winter.

But you have an idea. Instead of a report card, let’s treat this as a progress report. There’s still time for the grades to get better or worse, but not much, and they probably won’t change that much, either.

Different Giants fans are expecting different things for the team this season, so they’re going to have wildly different grading standards. So we’ll have different grades for different expectations, and remember that most of these are provisional. There’s still a chance for the Giants to shuffle into the Hot Stove League’s office hours and ask if there’s any extra credit they can do.

The provisional offseason grade for the Giants fan who thinks they have (or had) a legitimate shot at the postseason: C-

Trading Mitch Haniger and Anthony DeSclafani for Robbie Ray was a cagey move. It eliminated an outfield logjam of corner outfielders, and it cleared a rotation spot at the same time. It also gave the Giants a trade-deadline acquisition a couple months early, as Ray should be back in the second half of the season after rehabbing from Tommy John surgery. If he opts into his contract, he’ll give the Giants a high-ceiling starter next season.

Advertisement

Ray doesn’t help at all for the first few months of this season, though. The Giants will need wins in April, May, June and July to have a chance at the postseason in a competitive National League, even with the extra wild card.

The Jordan Hicks experiment could work splendidly, and the Giants were probably going to opener their way through the first part of the season without Alex Cobb and Ray anyway. Might as well get someone who can return to his role as a high-leverage reliever if it doesn’t work.

If it doesn’t work, it could cost the Giants wins in April and May. Which, again, isn’t a complaint to brush away. They missed the postseason by six games in 2022 and five games last season. An extra two wins in each of the first three months would have allowed them to squeak in. A “we’ll figure it out” strategy seems like a great way to miss the postseason by a handful of games.

Jung Hoo Lee should help significantly, but apart from him and Hicks, this current 40-man group looks an awful lot like the roster from last season. Dan Szymborski at FanGraphs had a good summary in his ZiPS writeup:

The problem with the hitters is similar to the pitchers in that they’re acceptable everywhere and disastrous nowhere, but don’t have a great deal of high-end upside.

Advertisement

“Acceptable everywhere and disastrous nowhere” isn’t a synonym for “good,” and the Giants still need help preventing and scoring runs

Acquiring one of Cody Bellinger or Matt Chapman could get this grade up to a B- or C+. Acquiring one of them along with one of the few available starting pitchers who are in high demand could even get them in the B+ range. As is, it’s been a rough offseason for the people who thought the Giants entered the offseason with a realistic chance to compete with the Marlins, Reds, Cubs, Padres, Diamondbacks and Phillies for a wild-card spot. They’ve gotten a little better, but they needed to get substantially better to have a chance.


Adding Chapman would help but still wouldn’t push the Giants into automatic playoff contention status. (John E. Sokolowski / USA Today)

The provisional offseason grade for the Giants fan who never thought they were going to compete, regardless of what they did in the offseason: B

There are people reading this who entered the offseason thinking the Giants were so far away from contention that one or two free agents — even the ones the stupid Los Angeles Dodgers got — weren’t going to help them much. There are some folks who correctly assumed that the Giants wouldn’t get those free agents, which meant it was always going to be impossible to spend their way out of fourth place. For these fans, there wasn’t a 16-step blueprint to get the Giants to 90 or 93 wins; the talent deficit was always going to be too much to make up.

While this fan didn’t get the complete teardown, rebuild and tank strategy they might have liked, think about the offseason developments that have aligned with the idea that the Giants need to start thinking more about the future than the present:

• They didn’t get another shortstop to block Marco Luciano, like Willy Adames. Luciano’s bat will be what turns him into an everyday major leaguer, but if he can become even an average defender, he’ll be even more valuable to the Giants. This also gives Tyler Fitzgerald a chance to contribute.

Advertisement

• They moved a right-handed outfielder off the roster, which should give Heliot Ramos and/or Luis Matos more chances for major-league at-bats. The former will likely get the first crack at the job, and the latter will (hopefully) come to spring training stronger than he was last season, and could get regular at-bats if he starts hitting for more power with Triple-A Sacramento.

• Their big free-agent expenditure on the offensive side was on a 25-year-old (Lee), which means he should still be in his prime when the Giants are more serious contenders.

• Their big free-agent expenditure on the pitching side was on a 27-year-old (Hicks), and he also might help a future contending Giants team.

• They cleared room in the rotation for Keaton Winn and Tristan Beck for the start of the season, which means they’ll get extended looks before Carson Whisenhunt, Mason Black and/or Kai Wei Teng force their way into a possible spot later in the season.

It’s that last one that would excite me the most if I were bearish on the Giants’ immediate future. Instead of innings going to Anthony DeSclafani, whose ceiling was somewhere between “meh” and “solid,” they’ll get a chance to evaluate Winn and Beck, who are still unknown quantities. They pitched well enough last season to merit a closer look, but they’re not the kind of blue-chip prospects you drop in a rotation and leave alone, like Kyle Harrison. That means the current arrangement — with Cobb and Ray missing the start of the season, and Ross Stripling and Hicks hardly guarantees to leave Scottsdale in the rotation — should work to the benefit of the last year’s rookie starters. If they hit on just one of them, it’ll have been worth it.

Advertisement

The provisional offseason grade for the Giants fan who just wants to be entertained, dang it: C-

Last year’s team was dreadfully boring. You would like 95 wins and a postseason berth, but you’ll settle for a watchable team that looks like it’s heading in a positive direction. The parallel would be something like the 1986 team, whose motto of “You Gotta Like These Kids” was wonderful and prescient.

Lee should entertain. He makes contact, which means one fewer slow guy with a .330 OBP and a .410 slugging percentage. Those might be Lee’s overall numbers too, but he’ll do it in a significantly less dull fashion.

Hicks will not be boring. His command and control might frustrate, but you’ll tune into his starts and look for signs of progress. He’ll throw pitches that make you cackle, and that’s an important part of the sporting experience.

The Giants will give Luciano every chance to stick, and while he might chase sliders in the opposing on-deck circle, he’ll probably do more than a few encouraging things. He’ll hit the ball harder than anyone else on the roster, that’s for sure.

Advertisement

There should also be room for anyone who hits or pitches their way out of the minors, whether that’s Wade Meckler or Hayden Birdsong, and that should make for a more watchable team. And while new manager Bob Melvin is still going to use openers and platoons as needed, it seems unlikely that he’ll insert himself into your viewing experience as much as his predecessor, for better and worse.

Even considering all of that, the current middle of the order for the Giants is some permutation of Wilmer Flores, Michael Conforto, J.D. Davis, Mike Yastrzemski and others. Again, all of them are major leaguers, and all of them deserve 300-plus at-bats somewhere, but it’s a little rough to watch them simultaneously in the same lineup, especially for a franchise that hasn’t had a 30-homer hitter since Barry Bonds.

The provisional final offseason grade for the Giants fan who wanted a star: F

Win some, lose some. And by “win some,” I meant “win none.” You keep writing things like “Giants + Shohei Ohtani Giancarlo Stanton Bryce Harper Aaron Judge Carlos Correa Shohei Ohtani (the second time)” on your Pee Chee folder, and you keep crossing them out.

The star is going to have to come from inside the organization. Luciano has a shot. Bryce Eldridge does, too. It sure seems like a longshot for anything like this to happen this season, which means attendance isn’t likely to bounce back. Can’t wait for the combination of Juan Soto and Roki Sasaki rumors next year. This time they’ll get their man, for sure.


It’s been an odd offseason in the sense that the fans who are the most pessimistic about the talent level on the active roster should be the happiest about how the offseason has gone. No, Farhan Zaidi or a new president of baseball operations didn’t trade veterans for prospects and commit to a full rebuild, but they signed a couple unique talents in their mid-20s, and they’re in a position to give a lot of playing time to rookies and second-year players. Even if the Giants hover around .500 again, they’ll do it in a more sustainable way, which is the point for anyone who has written them off for 2024.

Advertisement

There’s still offseason left, and I can’t stress that enough. It’s possible for the Giants to acquire another strong position player and a complement to Logan Webb near the top of the rotation. You’re not expecting it, and you’re laughing at the fans who are, but it’s still technically possible.

Until then, the Giants are going to need a lot of internal help in several different areas. Depending on your expectations before the offseason started, this offseason has been surprisingly effective or a squandered opportunity yet again.

(Top photo of Jordan Hicks: Brad Penner / USA Today)





Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco firefighters to retire uniforms linked to cancer

Published

on

San Francisco firefighters to retire uniforms linked to cancer


San Francisco firefighters are finally getting the protective gear they were promised after years’ long research revealed certain chemicals used in traditional firefighter uniforms can cause cancer.

“What none of us could have known is that some of the very gear designed to protect us was quietly harming us,” said San Francisco Fire Chief Dean Crispen, who spoke alongside dozens of first responders on Thursday as he announced the city’s $3.6 million plan to provide protective equipment to all frontline firefighters by the end of the year.  “This is a joyous occasion for our city.”

San Francisco Fire Chief Dean Crispen was flanked by the mayor, state and local lawmakers, and dozens of first responders on Thursday when detailing the city’s plans to provide new, non-PFAS uniforms to frontline firefighters across San Francisco.

Advertisement

The San Francisco fire department, the tenth largest in the nation, has already distributed the redesigned gear to about 80 of its firefighters and hopes to have all 1,100 of its new uniforms in use within the next three weeks – that’s enough protective equipment to provide one uniform to each of the city’s frontline firefighters.  While city leaders hope to eventually purchase a second set of gear, San Francisco firefighters will, for now, need to wash their new gear before returning to work or continue to rely on their old uniform as a backup.

“Public safety relies on the people who stand between danger and our residents,” Mayor Lurie told the crowd during Thursday’s announcement.  “Firefighter health must always be at the center of our decisions.”

San Francisco’s efforts stem from a first-in-the-nation ban that local lawmakers passed last year, which requires the city to outfit firefighters with new uniforms by July 2026. Over the years, studies have shown the jackets and pants firefighters across America have long relied on to keep safe during emergencies are made with materials proven to cause cancer. 

These so-called “PFAS” materials, often referred to as ‘forever chemicals’ because of their reluctance to breakdown, have long been used to bolster the reliability of firefighter clothing by helping to repel flammable liquids and reduce temperatures, even in extreme heat.  Researchers, however, have found the compounds to be harmful when absorbed through skin. While the precise level of PFAS exposure for firefighters and the associated health risks are still being studied, the compounds have been linked to cancer and other negative health effects impacting cholesterol levels and the immune system, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

PFAS aside, the inherit health risks of firefighting, including prolonged exposure to smoke and ash, led the World Health Organization to deem the occupation a “carcinogen.”  Yet, some fear the very safety uniforms firefighters have come to rely on for protection could also be making them sick. 

Advertisement
Female firefighters in San Francisco are six times more likely to develop cancer compared to the national average, according to the San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation.

Female firefighters in San Francisco are six times more likely to develop cancer compared to the national average, according to the San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation.

In San Francisco, female firefighters have a six times higher rate of breast cancer than the national average, according to the San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation. More than 400 firefighters in San Francisco have been lost to cancer over the past 20 years, according to the city’s fire department.

“The cost of inaction is measured in funerals,” said Stephen Gilman, who represents the local chapter of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). “The reward of action is measured in lives saved.”


The cost of inaction is measured in funerals.

Stephen Gilman, International Assoc. of Fire Fighters (IAFF)


While materials laced with PFAS have been shown to pose safety risks, so has fire gear that has been manufactured without it.  Last year, the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit reported on research from North Carolina State University that found non-PFAS fire equipment to be less breathable and more flammable than traditional uniforms made with PFAS.

Advertisement

“We don’t want to just trade one hazard for another,” Dr. Bryan Ormand told the Investigative Unit back in May 2024.  “We’re introducing a potential hazard for flammability on the fire scene where firefighters didn’t have that before.”

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a city-wide ban of what are known as ‘PFAS’ or ‘forever chemicals,’ but replacement options still aren’t widely available and those that are seem be raising new safety concerns. Senior Investigator Bigad Shaban reports.

Milliken & Company, the textile firm that made the material for San Francisco’s latest uniforms, said the new type of gear “meets or exceeds” all industry standards for “breathability and thermal protection.” 

“We refused to trade one hazard for another,” Marcio Manique, senior vice president and managing director of Milliken’s apparel business, noted in a written statement.

“It meets the strictest performance standards without adding weight or compromising breathability – giving firefighters exactly what they asked for.”

Advertisement

We refused to trade one hazard for another

Marcio Manique, senior vice president and managing director of Milliken’s apparel business


In San Francisco, the new gear underwent a 90-day test trial with 50 of the city’s own firefighters.

“What we did was we actually went through a really comprehensive testing process,” Chief Crispen told the Investigative Unit.  “It went to the lab and received testing and everything came back great, so we feel strongly about this product.”


Contact The Investigative Unit

submit tips | 1-888-996-TIPS | e-mail Bigad

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Gas explosion in San Francisco Bay Area damages homes, sends heavy smoke into air

Published

on

Gas explosion in San Francisco Bay Area damages homes, sends heavy smoke into air


SAN FRANCISCO — A gas explosion started a major fire in a San Francisco Bay Area neighborhood on Thursday, damaging several homes and sending heavy smoke into the air.

Local outlets said there are possible injuries from the Hayward explosion.

A spokesperson with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. said a construction crew damaged an underground gas line around 7:35 a.m. The company said it was not their workers.

Utility workers isolated the damaged line and stopped the flow of gas at 9:25 a.m., PG&E said. The explosion occurred shortly afterward.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco restaurant removes tip from check, adds stability for workers

Published

on

San Francisco restaurant removes tip from check, adds stability for workers


It’s another packed night at La Cigale in San Francisco, where chef Joseph Magidow works the hearth like a conductor, each dish part of a high-end Southern French feast for the fifteen diners lucky enough to score a front-row seat. 

It feels like the beginning of any great night out, until you realize this restaurant has quietly removed the part of dining that usually causes the most indigestion.

“You get to the end and all of a sudden you have this check and it’s like a Spirit Airlines bill where it’s like plus this plus plus that,” Magidow said.

So La Cigale made a rare move: they “86ed” the surprise charges, restaurant-speak for taking something off the menu. Dinner here is all-inclusive at $140 per person, but with no tax, no tip, no service fees. Just the price on the menu and that’s the price you pay.

Advertisement

“There’s no tip line on the check. When you sign the bill, that’s the end of the transaction,” Magidow said. 

Though still rare, across the country, more restaurants are test-driving tip-free dining, a pushback against what many now call “tip-flation.” A recent survey found 41% of Americans think tipping has gotten out of control.

La Cigale customer, Jenny Bennett, said that while she believes in tipping, she liked the idea of waiters being paid a fair wage. 

“Everywhere you go, even for the smallest little item, they’re flipping around the little iPad,” she said. 

At La Cigale, servers make about $40 an hour whether the night is slow or slammed. The upside is stability. The downside? No big-tip windfalls. 

Advertisement

But for server and sommelier Claire Bivins, it was a trade she was happy to take.

“It creates a little bit of a sense of security for everyone and definitely takes a degree of pressure off from each night,” she said. 

The stability doesn’t end there. La Cigale offers paid vacation, a perk most restaurant workers only dream of.

For Magidow, ditching tips also means leaving behind a system rooted in America’s painful past.

“It was a model that was created to take former enslaved people, who many of them went into the hospitality industry, after slavery and put them in a position where they are still being controlled by the guest.”

Advertisement

And as for the bottom line? It hasn’t taken a hit. 

“It seems like everyone is leaving happy,” Magidow said. “That’s really all we can hope for.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending