San Diego, CA
Today’s contemporary Black artists continue a legacy of transformation with their work
There are countless examples of the ways that Black creativity in America has literally changed the world — from jazz, rock, and hip-hop, to soul food, to literature, to the power of a picture. The power of this creativity, of this uniquely Black point of view can, of course, be seen today and Denise Rogers has plenty of contemporary art examples to share in her upcoming lecture on “Breaking the Boundaries: The Transformative Power of African Art.”
“This…was something that I sat back and thought about for a few months. I was looking for artists who were, especially after 2020 and George Floyd, there was a lot of attention and energy on African American art and artists,” she says. “So, I was introduced to a lot of artists who were trying to get some attention. Now, it’s like, ‘OK, what has happened since then?’ The art world has transformed, so I wanted to look at how artists have transformed and redefined art, specifically African American art. How they were influenced by prior Black artists, specifically with the issues that we deal with in the U.S.”
The list was tough for her to narrow down, but she’ll discuss the ways that selected Black artists explore with ideas of identity, culture, social transformation. They’re creating installations that transform traditional ideas of a neighborhood barbershop and its unsafe masculinity, into one that would be welcoming to a young, queer boy. Or, artists who acknowledge the history of the Middle Passage and slavery, and also create Afrofuturist art with visions of a world beyond the tragedy and strife we’ve always known.
Rogers, who will speak at 10 a.m. Friday at the Museum of Photographic Art at the San Diego Museum of Art in Balboa Park, is a professor of art history at San Diego Mesa College and currently serves as acting dean of the school’s School of Arts and Languages. She took some time to talk about some of the contemporary Black artists are breaking boundaries and continuing the tradition of transformation their ancestors left them. (This interview has been edited for length and clarity. )
Q: Who are the artists you’re planning to talk about and how did you go about selecting them for this discussion?
A: There’s one, her name is Alisa Sikelianos-Carter and she’s based out of New York. There’s a theme of Afrofuturism that I’m really interested in. There’s the pressure to address issues facing the Black community and issues of identity, within the community — police brutality and injustice. Some of them want to address it, but they also want to see a pathway beyond, a future where there’s a world where that doesn’t exist any longer. How do we survive it, but how do we surpass it? That’s the challenge for a lot of the artists, so she is an artist who creates these worlds where there’s this emphasis on Black resistance, but there’s also this world where those issues don’t exist any longer. She creates them where it’s her materials mixed with realism and mythologies and abstraction. She goes back to the Middle Passage and slavery, but then she brings it up to the present day. Then, she looks to the future and you go into these abstract spaces where nothing makes sense because we’re so inundated with tragedy that sometimes we can’t see beyond it. She’s able to create these spaces where we can see beyond it. It’s just, there are so many layers to it, but you can relate to it because, with the Black community and the experiences of many people, it gives you the pathway to escape. Those are her words. She says she gives you the pathway to escape beyond the tragedy. There’s also Black hair, Black beauty, Black glamour, she mixes all of this in. That’s one of the reasons I chose her, because of the complexity of her work.
There’s another artist, Devan Shimoyama. He’s a queer artist, multimedia artist, and I chose him because one of my favorite works of his is his barbershop installation, which was just exhibited last year in Europe. He talks about how, growing up, he knew he was gay, but the barbershop was this place of masculinity. Within the Black community, you know, we’ve seen all of the movies, “Barbershop”; he felt that pressure to fit in, but then not feeling like he fit in. Then, for him, that became the center of his work and the way it was transformative is that centers his work, but he wasn’t afraid to express it because it was who he was. He celebrates the barbershop. His installation is the barbershop and it includes elements, materials that he connects with — there are sequins, there’s glitter, there are garments, drag queens. So, in some communities, that would be a contradiction, but for him, it makes sense. He transformed that space, which, for him, reflected his own identity and that’s how he felt he could then engage with that space. When I saw it, I’m like, ‘This is beautiful.’ Then, he brings in his grandmother and wood paneling and silk flowers. Some of us grew up with the silk flowers in the entryway that collected dust (laughs). It’s just all of that history that informed his identity, and then he said, ‘I’m going to express who I am in a way that feels comfortable and empowering’ and then in a space that’s an installation. He used real barbershop chairs and they’re like this vibrant, pink color, they’re not the standard brown, they are bright, bright pink. People who come to it visit a barbershop that has been transformed.
Q: What is it about their work, their voice, that stands out to you in a way that compelled you to look at their art in depth in this way?
A: You have artists who follow, I hate to use the words “traditional path” because there’s nothing traditional about Black artists, but our artists are breaking with where you think art is going and they challenge norms, they break through boundaries, or just saying something that takes you in another direction where you think art is not going to go. There are elements, like Devan’s work, that reminds me of Mickalene Thomas with her dazzle and glitter and so on, but it’s different. Then, the artist Alisa Sikelianos-Carter, her work and going back to the Middle Passage and all of the materials, her work is similar to a local artist, Andrea Chung, who lives here in San Diego. There are similarities among artists, but they all have this unique ability to create a different narrative with their work. I share this with my students, that if you also look at yourself differently, that’s another source for someone like LaRissa Rogers (no relation), her work was introduced to me by a student. I had never heard of her, but she describes herself as an Afro-Asian artist and the student was an Asian student and she found this artist. The class was an African American art class and she wanted to connect with her own heritage, but you had to study African American artists because it’s underrepresented in this field. When she showed me her work and the way the student was able to connect across cultures, across ethnicities, across identities, and the way that she saw the intersection of culture, identity, colonization, and the way that the African American experience resonated with her more because of this artist, the class meant more to her. Then, the artist’s work, the material that she did, she talked about the commodification of female bodies, how female bodies are subjected to this, especially when you’re thinking of human trafficking and so on. She found authentic ways of representing not only African women, Asian women, but Afro-Asian women and the way we’re represented in media, the misrepresentation of bodies comes up. She does this with materials that represent Earth and memory; LaRissa Rogers takes this back in time and she traces it back through the U.S. and how female bodies are objectified, whether it’s a pathway back through Asian American history or African American history, she traces it back and then she connects. So, this student who found this artist, she was so excited and I’m like, “Oh my God, this is amazing” and I wanted to incorporate this artist into my classes moving forward.
Q: When you think about art that carries this transformative power, in general, what do you tend to look for or notice? And what is it, specifically, about African American art that you experience as transformative?
A: I think it’s because there’s a sense of defiance because, I was talking about this with a class last week, going all the way back to the period of slavery and how cultural practices were denied and how people, families were split, and even names and language, all of that was denied. When you bring people together, there’s a sense of empowerment, and when people are given a voice, there’s a sense of empowerment. People in positions of power know that and when they deny people access to culture, they know that that will disempower them. So, the reason why African American art, Black art, is so powerful and so transformative is because when artists have access to all of these materials across genres-whether it’s music, like we were just talking about Kendrick (Lamar) and the Super Bowl halftime show-all of that coming together, that creativity, whether it’s music or food, a mixture of materials, it’s so transformative because people have to find the right words because there are no words to express how society, communities, are transformed. They can then see how powerful the Black voice is and Black creativity is. That’s why, going back in time, those cultures were denied, they were suppressed, because they understood how powerful they were. If you allow Black people to come together, the Black community can shift the whole world. We see, even now, why are they going after DEI? Why are they going after the word “black”? Why is the Black community being criticized for not going out and protesting? They know that if the Black community comes together in protest, the world is going to be transformed. If you look back to all of the protests that have happened-Black Lives Matter, Martin Luther King, Marcus Garvey-they know, that’s why it’s so transformative because it’s the power of Black creativity and the Black voice.
Q: While we’re still very early in this current political administration, there has already been so much upheaval, particularly with programs and policies tied to social issues like race, gender, immigration, and health care. Can you talk a bit about what we’ve seen, historically, within African American art and how creators have addressed similar tensions?
A: We can go back to the late 19th century with an artist by the name of Henry Ossawa Tanner and the stereotypical images within art that were meant to oppress and suppress Black people-degrading, demeaning images. He used his art to create positive images of the Black family. Then, Frederick Douglass, again, in the late 19th century, the most photographed Black man during that time period and he did that intentionally because he wanted to combat those types of images. Artists from that point forward, in the different genres of art, they understood their charge to use their craft for social justice. There are periods where artists felt that, ‘This is not my role, I just want to be an artist. I don’t want to be a Black artist’ or for women, ‘I don’t want to be a Black woman artist.’ But, for many artists, they felt that using their craft, their skill, their talent as an artist could transform the world because they knew how powerful it was, especially the visual image people were seeing that countered the propaganda that was coming out from the government or advertisements. Using their craft to create a counternarrative to those images was very powerful and it started centuries ago and it continues today. What artists are doing today is they are creating images that use a variety of materials and textures. Then, they’re creating these Afrofuturist images that are supposed to take us beyond: what does the future look like? When do we get beyond? We thought, with (President Barack) Obama, there was a chance to get beyond, and then we got pulled right back to where now it feels like we have to start over. So, I’m seeing with a lot of artists, they feel like the fight is starting over. I’m seeing them have to challenge the policies that are coming out. Some of this happened in 2020 with George Floyd, they have to challenge police brutality, they have to challenge policies that are coming out in education and government, just make a list. With their images, they are effective. We don’t think art is effective, but the images are effective.
Q: Are there pieces by any of the artists in your upcoming lecture that resonate with you in the way that depict identity, culture, or transformation?
A: Stan Squirewell is an artist who creates these multimedia images. He uses old photographs, like old daguerreotypes. I’m not sure if this came about because of the new administration, but he incorporates the flag. These old photographs are people whose names he doesn’t know, but they are of African American people from the 19th century. He creates them in this collage form and the flag is incorporated onto their image. It reminds me of the Super Bowl performance and this whole history of the lack of acknowledgement of the contributions of Black people in the country, and how he has the flag incorporated there, but also the injustices on Black bodies, as well. He’s recognizing those injustices, but at the same time, by representing them, he’s acknowledging their contributions to the country and how Black people have built the country. Then, he takes another direction where he takes the old photographs and he transforms them into these colorful images where he dresses them and he uses fabric and he paints them. He places fabric onto them, he names them. There’s a video where he says they chose him, rather than him choosing the photographs. He says they have given him permission to give them this new life in the 20th century because they were forgotten in the past. Rather than being these forgotten images of the past, they are these lively, colorful images in the present; they’re beautiful. He’s an artist where his images are so striking because of the images with the flag and the contrast, the juxtaposition of justice and injustice, but then the way he brings to life these forgotten images.
Q: How would you describe the kinds of boundaries African American art has broken and continues to break?
A: Well, being an art historian and focusing on African American art, is a boundary in and of itself (laughs). I think being a Black artist, for Black artists, in an industry where most people don’t see Black art as being art. Even today, having to fight to be represented in magazines and museums, galleries, the price gap for Black art. (Jean-Michel) Basquiat has broken through; unfortunately, he’s not here to see that, but some artists are still struggling. They’re extremely talented artists who are still struggling to get recognition. With 2020 and George Floyd, like I said earlier, out of a tragedy you had this recognition of Black artists and they were receiving so much attention. Galleries, museums, magazines that I subscribe to, you started to see Black artists being featured on the cover and in articles and exhibitions. Then, I thought, ‘OK, how long is this going to last? Please let this last.’ Unfortunately, it didn’t, but it didn’t go back to the way it was before. You’re still seeing the representation that Black art has, I hate to use the word “survived,” but you see younger people starting to recognize this as an avenue of creativity, visual art (in addition to music, literature, poetry). It came out of tragedy, but they have broken down those barriers. It was almost like the early (19)20s again, this energy for the arts, but it was unfortunate how it had to happen.
Originally Published:
San Diego, CA
Feds Will Finally Help Oceanside 73 Years After Admitting Fault for Its Disappearing Beaches
When the U.S. military built the Camp Pendleton Harbor complex just north of Oceanside in 1942, it didn’t set out to steal Oceanside’s beaches for decades to come.
But that’s exactly what’s been happening for the past 73 years.
In 1953, the federal government admitted that construction of harbor jetties at Camp Pendleton was directly contributing to the erosion of Oceanside’s beaches. The jetties block the ocean’s currents that carry sand along the coast, which causes Oceanside’s beaches south of the military base to lose out on sand that would have naturally flowed to them.
Rising sea levels caused by climate change also play a part, but in Oceanside, naturally occurring erosion has been exacerbated by the military base.
But the military is only just now stepping in to help. While the government’s admission of guilt seemed like a win, it somewhat backfired; because the federal government was on the hook for the entire cost, the project got swallowed by a bureaucratic black hole. Tired of waiting, Oceanside launched its own plan to save its beaches, one the military now refuses to help fund.
What Took so Long
In 2000, Congress passed a law mandating the Army Corps to study how it could restore Oceanside’s beaches to pre-harbor conditions.
The government was supposed to pay for the study and complete it in 44 months. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finally released the draft report of the study earlier this month – 26 years later.“Studies require both authorization and funding,” said Shawn Davis, public affairs specialist for the Army Corps, via email. “While the study was initially authorized in 2000, there have been gaps in funding that have impacted the timeline to complete the study.”
Those funding gaps happened until 2022 when Rep. Mike Levin, D-San Juan Capistrano, whose district includes much of North County’s coastal cities, helped secure $1.8 million in federal funding and another $2.27 million in 2025 to complete the study.
So, why did the funding dry up for so long at the federal level? According to Davis, “federal projects can only proceed and continue with appropriations from Congress.”
In other words, the project was stuck in bureaucratic limbo; it had the legal authorization to exist, but it couldn’t secure funds in a highly competitive budget that favored bigger projects.
Jayme Timberlake, Oceanside’s coastal zone administrator, told Voice of San Diego that the city and its representatives tried lobbying Congress for years, but there are often a lot of unknowns when it comes to Army Corps projects.
“It’s very political. It’s very much dependent on what the rest of the nation is going through and where the funds are going and how they’re getting allocated,” Timberlake said. “It’s very tough to navigate and there’s a lot of risk associated with it, meaning we can’t really rely on it.”
Other coastal cities received a plan before Oceanside did: The Corps completed similar studies for two sand replenishment efforts. One is a joint effort in Encinitas and Solana Beach, the other in San Clemente. Congress has already approved both of these projects for sand deliveries every seven to 10 years for the next 50 years.
“The difference is that the … projects that are happening in Encinitas, Solana Beach and San Clemente were initiated by a request to the Army Corps from these cites, and they were cost shared,” Timberlake said.
That means these cities are paying 35 percent of the costs, and the federal government is paying 65 percent. That also applies to sand deliveries every seven to 10 years. These types of projects can cost upwards of $100 million.
“In Oceanside, our mitigation project, at least the study was not cost shared. It was the full responsibility of the federal government because they admitted fault,” Timberlake said. “So, it’s really unfortunate that the mitigation for Oceanside beaches didn’t happen before those requested projects.”
Meanwhile, Oceanside’s Sand Was Disappearing

While Oceanside officials and residents waited for the government’s help, the city’s beaches were rapidly disappearing before their eyes.
Previous Army Corps studies estimate the Harbor has caused a loss of 1.4 to 1.6 million cubic yards of sand volume from Oceanside’s beaches since 1942, with some areas retreating at a rate of 6.6 feet per year. That’s 84 years of consistent and severe sand loss.
El Niño conditions over the years have also exacerbated the problem.
“There was such a dramatic loss of sand that the community really started asking for solutions,” Timberlake said. “There’s a whole generation that has been able to use the beach and then have it be gone, so it has triggered a lot of community interest.”
After 20 years of waiting, Oceanside decided to take matters into its own hands.
“Once there was momentum to fix the problem itself and not rely on the Army Corps any further, the city did a feasibility study in 2020, and that study really unearthed all the possible things that Oceanside could do in the short and long term to fix its beaches,” Timberlake said.
A few years later, city officials held a competition that brought together three design teams from around the world to develop sand retention pilot projects. They chose a concept that includes the construction of two headlands that will aim to stabilize sand on the back beach, with an offshore artificial reef aimed at slowing down nearshore erosive forces.
The project is called RE:Beach and it’s already funded up to the construction phase, Timberlake said. The city has applied for a few different grants to cover construction, which will cost upwards of $60 million.
Timberlake said the city asked the Army Corps to help fund the rest of the RE:Beach project, and the Army Corps denied the request.
The Government’s Plan

Oceanside’s RE:Beach project and the federal government’s recent recommendations won’t conflict with each other, Timberlake said. In fact, the two projects will complement one another.
The Army Corps’ draft feasibility report identified beach nourishment (a lot of sand) as the tentatively selected plan to restore Oceanside’s beaches.
It calls for dredging 4 million cubic yards of sand from an offshore borrow site and then placing it along Oceanside’s beaches, with the goal of sustaining a minimum 85-foot wide beach from Oceanside Harbor south to Buena Vista Lagoon. Sand replenishment would be 1 million cubic yards the first cycle, then repeated every 10 years.
Realistically, though, it could be another couple decades before Oceanside’s beaches start receiving sand, Timberlake said.
That’s because there are other competing projects the Army Corps is working on. Plus,, Congress still has to appropriate funding for the rest of the project to move forward once the feasibility study is completed. Initial costs of construction are currently estimated to be $243,540,000, Davis, spokesperson for the Army Corps, said via email.
It’s still unclear if the government will cover the full costs of construction and the subsequent sand renourishments for Oceanside, but Levin told Voice he thinks it’s unlikely.
“I will advocate for every penny to come from the federal government, given that the government did acknowledge responsibility,” Levin said. “But I do also know how the Army Corps works, and it’s very likely they’ll want some sort of cost share.”
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is proposing major funding cuts to the Army Corps’ budget for fiscal year 2027. If those cuts are approved by Congress, it could have an impact on projects like this one.
Related Posts
San Diego, CA
Mischief San Diego Comic-Con 2026 Exclusive Pins
San Diego, CA
We mapped San Diego County’s voter registration, turnout and governor election results from the June primary
Voter engagement was slightly higher in the June primary election than in recent years’ primaries, with more San Diego County voters registering and casting a ballot, data from the County Registrar of Voters show.
Meanwhile the county’s election results, which still have yet to be certified, show where support for each of the most popular governor candidates was strongest.
Republican Steve Hilton, the single most popular candidate in the county, won more votes than any of his competitors in wide swaths of East and North County, and in many Democratic-leaning neighborhoods including La Jolla and Clairemont. Democratic establishment candidate Xavier Becerra was solid in South County, Escondido and San Marcos, while fellow-party and more progressive candidate Tom Steyer captured many parts of San Diego city proper.
But primary votes are still being counted in Riverside County for what many agree will be the biggest competitive race involving San Diego this November: the 48th Congressional district, a race that will help decide which party controls the House.
The county has finished counting all valid ballots from the June primary, but there are 5,600 mail ballots that need to be cured, meaning they have a missing or mismatched signature. That number is equivalent to less than 0.6% of total ballots.
The county is giving those voters a chance to correct their ballot signatures. After unresolved ballots are cured and counted, the county registrar says it will certify election results by the evening of July 2.
More voters registered
Voter registration was up this year from the last primary, data from the county registrar show. Two million San Diego County residents registered to vote, compared to 1.9 million in 2024.
Political party makeup in the county hasn’t changed much since two years ago.
Democrats still dominate the county overall, but their numbers declined slightly from 2024. About 40.5% of the county’s registered voters filed as Democrats for this primary, down from 41.4% in 2024.
Meanwhile 27.4% filed as Republicans, about the same as in 2024.
A quarter of voters declined to declare a party preference, which is up by half a percentage point from 2024.
San Diego County’s political makeup falls in line with national trends, said Carl Luna, director of the Institute for Civil Engagement at University of San Diego. Republicans dominate the rural and exurban communities of East and North County, while Democrats dominate urban neighborhoods and areas with more young people.
Higher, but uneven turnout
This year’s gubernatorial primary drew higher voter participation than recent similar elections.
About 42% of county registered voters cast a ballot, which is higher than the county’s turnout in each of the past three non-presidential primary elections.
Turnout is also up significantly from the presidential primary two years ago, when it was only about 37%.
Geographic disparities remain. Many of the county’s lowest turnout rates were in the urban cores of El Cajon, Escondido, Vista and San Marcos, as well as precincts in San Ysidro, City Heights, Southeast San Diego, National City, Nestor and western and southern Chula Vista. Precincts in those communities had turnout rates below 30%, and in some cases below 20%.
Those low turnout rates are largely to the Democrats’ disadvantage, as all of those areas lean Democratic.
Turnout tends to correlate with age, education levels and socioeconomic status, said Brian Adams, political science professor at San Diego State.
Primary elections consistently see far lower turnout than general elections. In the 2024 general election, county voter turnout was 76%.
“When you get lower voter-turnout elections, you get biases in who’s voting and who’s not voting. Historically that usually favored Republicans,” Adams said.
The real test that will decide the winners of competitive races in November is which party can turn out more voters, he said.
“Most voters already made up their mind which party they’re supporting. The actual number of persuadable voters is very small. Because of that, what really matters is turnout,” Adams said.
Democratic votes split for governor
In a candidate field that saw far more competition for Democrats than Republicans, GOP candidate Hilton was the single most popular governor candidate in the county, capturing about 30% of the vote.
Democratic votes were split between former Attorney General Becerra, who captured the second most votes in the county with 27%, and billionaire Steyer, who captured the third most at 21%.
Unlike Becerra and Steyer, Hilton didn’t suffer as much from a split vote with Republican Chad Bianco, who got 8% of the county total.
San Diego County favored Hilton more than California as a whole, which gave Hilton about 25% of the vote. San Diego County voters were also less likely than voters statewide to support Steyer or Bianco.
Hilton captured more votes than any other candidate in Republican-dominated areas of the county — the exurbs and rural areas of East County and North County. But he also did well in many parts that lean Democratic, including La Jolla, Point Loma, Del Mar Heights, Scripps Ranch, eastern Chula Vista and parts of Clairemont.
That’s largely because the Democratic vote was split between Becerra and Steyer. It may also be because voters who turn out for primaries have tended to skew more conservative than general elections, Adams said.
“Different people may be voting in November, so we’ll have to see how that plays out,” he said. “When you get lower voter-turnout elections, you get biases in who’s voting and who’s not voting.”
Steyer, the more progressive Democrat, captured the plurality of votes in several parts of San Diego city.
But Becerra remained the clear Democratic favorite in South County, in the urban cores of Escondido and San Marcos, as well as most of Vista and Oceanside. Luna said that reflects Latino support as well as support for a more traditional establishment candidate.
With Republicans Hilton and Bianco combining to capture only 35% of the vote statewide in the primary, Luna and Adams are expecting Becerra to be ushered in easily. The biggest competition out of San Diego County, they said, will be the 48th Congressional district race.
Thanks to last year’s redistricting, the historically Republican seat — which sits partly in Riverside County — is now competitive between the two big political parties.
Republican county Supervisor Jim Desmond will face off with San Diego Councilmember Marni Von Wilpert, a Democrat, for the seat.
In the primary, Desmond won 42% of the vote within San Diego County, while Von Wilpert captured 22% in a field crowded with Democrats. The one other Republican candidate in the primary, Kevin O’Neil, got 3%.
The fate of the seat could help determine party control of the House. “The only significant race is the 48th,” Luna said.
-
North Dakota7 minutes ago
Where can Air Force One land in North Dakota?
-
Ohio10 minutes agoEvery Ohio State Player’s Remaining Eligibility After NCAA Adopts Five-Year Eligibility Model
-
Oklahoma15 minutes agoOklahoma Highway Patrol enters ’37 patrol car in national contest
-
Oregon22 minutes agoNational Weather Service says no tsunami threat after 5.5 quake off Oregon coast
-
Pennsylvania24 minutes agoBlack Cap Brewing to halt happy hour specials due to Pennsylvania liquor code update
-
Rhode Island30 minutes agoState leaders announce millions in funding for road improvements in Aquidneck Island
-
South-Carolina37 minutes agoRecapping South Carolina’s Hot Start to Summer Recruiting As July Approaches
-
South Dakota40 minutes agoNorma Lindell, 93