Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Padres storm back on Cubs to remain perfect at home

Published

on

Padres storm back on Cubs to remain perfect at home


The pitching staff’s scoreless streak wasn’t going to go on and on and on. The Padres are not going to win every home game this season, either.

That’s what logic says.

But there’s something else powering Mike Shildt’s team these days.

“Every night they bring it,” the Padres’ second-year manager said. “They’re hungry. The preparation has been really good. The execution has been equal. Everybody’s on board, not giving anything away in competition and ready to take everything.”

Advertisement

Really.

Everything.

A freshly-shaven Dylan Cease buckled, the Chicago Cubs halted the staff’s scoreless streak at 37 innings … and the Padres still battled back for a 10-4 win on Monday to remain perfect at home in front of a crowd 47,078, the third-largest in Petco Park history.

It had quite a lot to cheer, from Fernando Tatis Jr.’s first multi-homer game of the season, to nine runs over the final three innings, to an 11-0 home record that’s propped up baseball’s best team to start 2025. That’s tied for the fifth-longest streak at home to ever start a season. The 1907 New York Giants hold the record with 15 straight wins.

“The crowd on your side is totally huge,” Tatis said after the Padres improved to 14-3 to match the 1998 NL pennant-winner for the best start in franchise history. “It feeds us. It’s great momentum for us. Everybody can see it and feel it. Everybody that is here.

Advertisement

“Happy to play in front of San Diego fans.”

Clearly.

Tatis’ third home run in four days since his shoulder scare plated Monday’s run. It would have been much cleaner to say his second blast of the game bookended the comeback, but Luis Arraez followed Tatis’ eighth-inning homer with the three-time batting champ’s second home run of the year and Jose Iglesias added an RBI groundout to cap the Padres’ third-straight multi-run inning.

In between all that, the Padres nickeled and dimed their way to their second win over the NL Central-leading Cubs in four meetings.

Infield singles from Iglesias and Jason Heyward tied the game at 3-3 in the sixth, a wild-pitch with the bases loaded gave the Padres a lead in the seventh and Gavin Sheets’ two-run single added insurance.

Advertisement

“They’re a machine right now,” Cease said. “I’s impressive to watch. They’re very resilient, and it just feels like we’re always one guy away from scoring three or four runs. It’s really impressive.”

Jason Adam replaced Adrián Morejón in the eighth and coughed up a run to snap the bullpen’s scoreless streak at 10 innings, but Elias Díaz walked to lead off the bottom of the inning and Tatis logged his third triple-digit exit velocity of the game.

First, Tatis sent a 100-mph lineout to third. Then he sent a 108-mph homer over the wall in left off Cubs starter Jameson Taillon (5⅔ IP, 2 ER). The two-run homer off reliever Eli Morgan to left center in the eighth went out on a 111-mph line, providing more and more confidence in the surgically repaired shoulder that forced him from last Tuesday’s game in Sacramento.

“Feels good,” Tatis said with a smile. “In the right place and keep working. Like I’ve said, the training staff is doing a great job and I’m happy I’m on the field.”

Following three straight shutouts of the Rockies, Cease ran the team’s scoreless streak to 37 innings — three shy of the 1984 team record — before Manny Machado cracked the door open in the fourth inning by booting Justin Turner’s leadoff grounder.

Advertisement

Michael Busch followed with a home run to right to immediately erase the advantage provided on Tatis’ solo homer half-inning earlier. Two more doubles that inning, one from Nico Hoerner and one from Pete Crow-Armstrong, pushed the Cubs’ lead to 3-0.

Cease stranded two runners in the fifth inning and exited an inning later after Hoerner’s third hit of the game, a single with two outs in the sixth.

He was coming off a career-high nine runs allowed in his last start against the A’s in Sacramento. Two days later, he showed up in the Padres’ clubhouse at Petco Park looking to flush that start along with every single whisker from the mountain-man growth he carried into the season.

So Monday’s start was certainly better.

Cease struck out six and was charged with three runs — two earned — on seven hits and a walk over 5⅔ innings after Alek Jacob stranded an inherited runner in the sixth.

Advertisement

“I’m very happy I gave us a chance to win,” Cease said after throwing 63 of his 96 pitches for strikes. “I still think there’s a lot of room for improvement, but it was definitely an improvement from the last one.”

The game-tying rally a half-inning after Cease’s exit began with Machado’s one-out walk. Then Sheets’ high fly ball fell in front of left fielder Ian Happ for a single, Xander Bogaerts walked to load the bases and Iglesias’ swinging bunt plated a run and kept the bases loaded.

Heyward followed with a single off shortstop Dansby Swanson’s glove as he attempted a diving stop behind second base, tying the game at 3-3.

The Padres weren’t done.

Tatis walked to lead off the seventh, Arraez doubled down the first-base line and an intentional walk of Machado loaded the bases for Sheets.

Advertisement

That brought the sold-out crowd to a fever pitch as it chanted “Holy Sheets! Holy Sheets!” but a wild pitch somewhat robbed him of a moment as Tatis scampered home.

Sheets still came through with a two-run single to push his RBI total to 10.

“We just keep showing where we’re capable of as a team, as a lineup, as a defense, and I’m just happy for the boys,” Tatis said. “Everybody’s on track, everybody’s moving the line. It’s really good baseball.”

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement

San Diego, CA

More Thoughts on ‘Yes on A’

Published

on

More Thoughts on ‘Yes on A’


By Dave Rice

Is Measure A going to affect a significant number of properties? Is it going to affect affordable housing in any meaningful way? Come now, let’s not be dense – this hits a handful of rich people who can absolutely afford to drop $10K in the city coffers if they’re leaving a vacation home vacant on purpose – let’s say that’s their civic contribution that would be realized in other ways if they actually lived, worked, and shopped here full-time.

Or it hits STVR hosts, who can either factor the cost into their business model or give it up if margins are really that thin (maybe not everyone needs to fancy themselves an amateur hotelier). But let’s not kid ourselves and believe the kind of housing this will free up will be plentiful or affordable.

In the exceedingly rare instances where someone might be eligible for an exemption, will it be too hard to apply for? That’s something we can argue and refine but that’s the bathwater, or just the little bit of it that splashes out of the tub, not the baby. An argument that the whole proposal is DOA because military members are too stupid to file for an exemption is either dismissive of or telling tales out of school about what we really think of military intelligence.

Advertisement

Poor, poor grandma who needs a home near her doctor? If she’s really poor why does she have multiple houses, and if she’s not does this really affect her? I live in a neighborhood where “aren’t you afraid you’re going to get shot?” is the first thing outsiders ask me about where I’m from, and if Grandma has owned her mostly-unoccupied vacation house for any significant time I probably pay a lot more property tax than she does. You couldn’t trip over the limbo bar to gain my sympathy, it’s buried a few feet deep.

This is a tiny nod toward taxing the rich, but that’s all. It’s not significant or meaningful, it won’t do a lot, most of the housing stock in question even if returned to actual residents won’t make a dent in the astronomical cost of living in or anywhere near this city. But it’s a tiny step in the right direction – and watching how hysterical the moneyed class is about the rest of us asking for even the tiniest drop in the goddamned bucket we’re trying to fill without their help is telling.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Annual Rock ’n’ Roll races bring 30,000 runners to San Diego streets

Published

on

Annual Rock ’n’ Roll races bring 30,000 runners to San Diego streets




Annual Rock ’n’ Roll races bring 30,000 runners to San Diego streets – NBC 7 San Diego



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Dining Out — series Part 1: A look at the evolution of La Jolla’s restaurant scene

Published

on

Dining Out — series Part 1: A look at the evolution of La Jolla’s restaurant scene


This is the first installment in a series of stories on the history of dining out in La Jolla, how it’s changed and how it continues to evolve.

It’s hard to imagine La Jolla without its restaurants, from the lines stretching down the block at The Taco Stand to the iconic views at George’s at the Cove.

But the way La Jollans eat and where has changed dramatically since the area’s founding in the 1800s.

In this first part of the new month-long series “Dining Out,” the La Jolla Light looks at local restaurants from the 1880s (when La Jolla was first developed and settled) to the early 1920s.

Advertisement

“La Jolla had very few people at that time,” according to local historian Carol Olten. “There weren’t a lot of restaurants, as far as we know.”

Olten said she gets information about La Jolla’s earliest days from the diaries of local pioneer Anson Mills.

“He kept track of where he went and what he did … but he did a lot of home cooking,” she said. “So when they went to a restaurant for dinner, it was a big occasion. It was something people mainly did on holidays or … a social occasion.”

One restaurant Mills would go to — believed to be one of the first in La Jolla — was Montezuma Cottage. Olten said it is believed to have opened in 1895 near the intersection of Prospect and Jenner streets.

Mills described the restaurant as a popular eating and gathering spot for locals and tourists, Olten said. He wrote an entry about a Thanksgiving dinner there with about 60 people.

Advertisement

Montezuma Cottage later became known as the Seaside Inn and Ocean View restaurant. It was torn down in 1931.

Culturally, eating at a restaurant was a more formal occasion at the time, Olten said.

“You didn’t go to a restaurant just to hang out with friends like you would today. It was purposeful then,” she said.

Around 1900, a restaurant known as the White Rabbit opened near the corner of Girard Avenue and Prospect Street. In addition to a rooftop garden, it featured a tea room, joining a national trend.

“Tea rooms went with the suffragette movement because in those days, [women] didn’t have a place to gather without an escort, so tea rooms started opening in hotels and women could go there and sit down and have a social tea or lunch,” Olten said. “La Jolla got in on the tail end of that thanks to [Green Dragon Colony founder] Anna Held and [La Jolla philanthropist] Ellen Browning Scripps.”

Advertisement

One of them, called The Cricket, opened in the early 1900s with white tablecloths. Olten said it was near what it is now Eddie V’s restaurant.

“It was originally part of the Green Dragon Colony … and was sold to a British woman named Daisy Mitchell,” she said. “It stayed a tea room for many years, and she kept a guest book that was decorated with reds and greens and had a medieval theme. So it was very British.”

Joining a trend toward more upscale dining, one of La Jolla’s “most well-established and well-known restaurants” opened in 1912 at 1227 Prospect St. The Brown Bear had “stylish, fashionable service and a menu to please the gods,” Olten said.

A house specialty was Welsh rabbit served in a silver chafing dish. The restaurant was in operation until 1941.

Several restaurants opened around 1915, about the same time as the Panama-California Exposition, a world’s fair-type event held in 1915-16 that brought 3.7 million people to San Diego.

Advertisement
The Panama-California Exposition in San Diego’s Balboa Park in 1915-16 coincided with several restaurant openings in La Jolla. (San Diego History Center)

One of La Jolla’s new restaurants, the Spindrift Inn, opened in 1916 and was considered a “last stop” out of town.

“Most restaurants at that time were located in the immediate Village area,” Olten said. “The one that was astray would have been the Spindrift Inn [in La Jolla Shores]. This was in the very early days of automobiles, so not very many people had cars, but those that did would … drive their cars and the last stop before you got out of town was Spindrift Inn.”

The Spindrift Inn later became The Marine Room, which still stands.

Olten said the restaurant was operated by the Hannay family for about 20 years. Their “rambunctious” fox terrier, Jiggs, would roam the dining room.

Another Expo-era restaurant was the Dining Car, which operated in an old trolley car parked near Goldfish Point. Dinner was $2 per person. It burned down on Halloween night in 1923.

Advertisement

Next installment: With new hotels being built in La Jolla in the 1920s came new hotel restaurants. But later, World War II would have an impact on La Jollans and San Diegans in general and on where and how they ate. ♦



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending