A rising listing of Oregon sheriffs are telling their constituents they received’t implement voter-approved gun restrictions regardless of not but realizing how some points of the regulation will work and never having a transparent position in implementing others.
In a Nov. 9 Fb put up, Linn County Sheriff Michelle Duncan stated Measure 114, which 50.7% of voters accepted the day earlier than, is a horrible regulation for gun homeowners, crime victims and public security. The measure would require a allow to personal a firearm and ban magazines holding greater than 10 rounds.
“I need to ship a transparent message to Linn County residents that the Linn County Sheriff’s Workplace is NOT going to be implementing journal capability limits,” Duncan wrote within the put up, which as of Friday had been shared 12,000 instances and garnered 9,300 feedback.
Duncan was quickly joined by Jefferson County Sheriff Jason Pollock, Wallowa County Sheriff Joel Fish and Union County Sheriff Cody Bowen who additionally stated they might not implement the brand new legal guidelines.
Advertisement
On this 2019 file photograph, Sgt. Brandon White of the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Workplace places a cable lock on a coaching Glock in Portland, Ore. The sheriff’s workplace offers out gun locks totally free to anybody who needs one.
Jonathan Levinson / OPB
Pollock stated he believes “the provisions in Measure 114 run opposite to beforehand determined judicial selections.” Bowen stated the regulation would even be a drain on assets and referred to as it “one other try at defunding the police at its best.”
“To the individuals who chime in with me selecting and selecting which legal guidelines I need to implement or not implement! Hear this!” Bowen exclaimed in his Fb put up. “Relating to our constitutional rights I’ll combat to the demise to defend them. It doesn’t matter what loopy regulation comes out of Salem!”
Sheriffs level to quick staffs
Measure 114 was handed by voters, not state lawmakers in Salem. Sheriffs are usually not legal professionals and don’t interpret the structure — that’s the position of judges.
Advertisement
Bowen and Pollock, in addition to the Oregon State Sheriffs’ Affiliation, didn’t reply to interview requests.
Duncan stated her company always has to handle scarce assets. She stated that as a result of a federal court docket may discover journal bans unconstitutional as early as this spring, she is selecting to not prioritize enforcement.
“I’ve a tough time saying that we’re going to make use of assets to go arrest folks for one thing that has a excessive likelihood of being discovered unconstitutional very shortly,” Duncan stated in an interview with OPB. “That is the place I’m selecting to carry again my assets till that ruling is confirmed or denied.”
Duncan stated if the Supreme Courtroom guidelines the regulation is constitutional, she might must rethink her place.
A number of different sheriffs stated they thought the regulation was poorly written and expressed hope it will be blocked by the courts, however stopped wanting saying they might not implement the provisions.
Advertisement
Marion County Sheriff Joe Kast stated he anticipated the brand new regulation would add important pressure on restricted assets and he wouldn’t focus investigations on journal capability points.
The place of some Oregon sheriffs seems to place them at odds with the Oregon State Sheriffs’ Affiliation, which stated in an announcement the regulation’s constitutionality can be determined by the courts.
“Any authorized problem may doubtlessly end result within the measure being stayed (suspended or a delayed implementation) by a court docket, however that isn’t a certainty,” the affiliation stated. “Whereas it is a enormous enterprise for Oregon regulation enforcement which is already under-resourced, OSSA will work diligently to implement this advanced measure.”
Fringe affect
The regulation requires a security course and a allow to buy a firearm. The state has not but hashed out how the allow system can be administered, however it’s potential will probably be just like the present hid carry allowing course of, which is run by sheriff’s workplaces. Such an association would doubtless add to their workload. Different points of the regulation would have much less affect on sheriffs.
When the regulation goes into impact on Dec. 8, licensed firearms sellers can be prohibited from promoting the magazines or be topic to a category A misdemeanor and danger shedding their federal firearms license. Shops have a 180-day grace interval after they can switch or promote their inventory to somebody out of state. People will even be barred from promoting or freely giving banned magazines.
Advertisement
A member of the Three % of Oregon militia group watches testimony on Senate Invoice 978 within the Capitol in Salem, Ore., Tuesday, April 2, 2019.
Bradley W. Parks / OPB
State gun regulation violations will be investigated by any native or state regulation enforcement company, however it will violate an individual’s civil rights if deputies went door-to-door trying to find high-capacity magazines, as some gun rights advocates have urged may occur. Banned gadgets or substances are extra generally policed in cases the place officers discover the merchandise whereas investigating another situation. For instance, throughout a site visitors cease, deputies may uncover a contraband journal.
Duncan’s declare that her deputies received’t implement the regulation in such a scenario rings hole with some specialists.
“For those who pull over a automotive and the individual has a file, you’re telling me that her workplace just isn’t going to arrest that individual? Significantly if that individual is an individual of shade or poor or has a reasonably lengthy file,” stated Jessica Pishko, a New America fellow writing a e-book about sheriffs. “That’s one the place I’m like, ‘you’ll be able to’t be severe.’”
Duncan stated if her deputies arrest somebody who additionally has a high-capacity journal, it’s as much as the district lawyer to determine if they’ll press fees.
Advertisement
“But when I’ve somebody who just isn’t a felon or I’m not arresting for anything, I’m not going to be arresting them for possession of {a magazine} or do an investigation into the possession of the journal, whether or not it’s lawful or not,” she stated.
Sheriffs, like different elected politicians, are beholden to voters and Duncan stated her workplace has been inundated with messages from involved constituents. Measure 114 handed by a skinny margin, largely carried by broad help within the state’s extra liberal, populous counties. Voters in 29 of Oregon’s 36 counties voted towards it. In additional rural elements of the state, like Linn and Union counties, the vote was greater than 2-to-1 towards.
Pishko stated sheriffs who make sweeping statements about refusing to implement gun legal guidelines after they haven’t been requested to take action are additionally doubtless being influenced by the perimeter constitutional sheriff motion based in 2011 by former Oath Keepers militia board member Richard Mack.
Mack’s group adheres to the false perception that the sheriff is probably the most highly effective regulation enforcement officer within the nation.
“The president of the USA can not inform your sheriff what to do,” he falsely claimed in an interview with the Oath Keepers, a far-right militia group whose high members have been charged with seditious conspiracy for his or her involvement within the Jan. 6 rebellion.
Advertisement
That contradicts the Structure’s supremacy clause, which says federal regulation trumps state regulation. Equally, because of a Nationwide Rifle Affiliation lobbying marketing campaign to forestall extra liberal cities from passing strict gun legal guidelines, Oregon has what’s often called a firearm preemption regulation, which means state gun legal guidelines supersede any metropolis and county legal guidelines.
Additional complicating constitutional sheriff ideology, the county-state relationship is way much less inflexible than the state-federal relationship.
“Counties are solely a assemble of states,” Portland State College political science professor Chris Shortell defined to OPB in a 2019 interview for a narrative about Oregon sheriffs and extremist ideology. “States create them, states may remove them, states can redraw their boundaries and as such, they’re handled as merely part of the state.”
This isn’t the primary time Oregon sheriffs have flirted with extremist concepts. Eight Oregon sheriffs despatched a letter to the Obama administration in 2013 saying they refused to implement any new federal gun legal guidelines. That marketing campaign was led by considered one of Duncan’s predecessors, then-Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller.
Related concepts have been floated by sheriffs refusing to implement Oregon Gov. Kate Brown’s COVID restrictions. Like these most up-to-date refusals to implement the high-capacity journal ban, sheriffs weren’t being requested to implement COVID restrictions in 2020.
Advertisement
The courts weigh in
In 2018, eight counties handed so-called Second Modification Preservation Ordinances, giving county sheriffs authority to find out if state and federal gun legal guidelines are constitutional and barring county assets from getting used to implement them. Columbia County handed an ordinance claiming to nullify state and federal gun legal guidelines.
These ordinances haven’t fared properly in court docket. Harney County withdrew its ordinance after the Oregon Division of Justice petitioned a court docket to invalidate the regulation.
In that petition, Oregon Lawyer Common Ellen Rosenblum cited a state regulation requiring sheriffs to arrest and imprison “all individuals who break the peace, or try to interrupt it, and all individuals responsible of public offenses.”
“Thus, a sheriff and deputies have a statutory responsibility to implement state felony legal guidelines,” Rosenblum wrote.
Yamhill County defended its ordinance, however county Circuit Courtroom choose Ladd Wiles dominated with the state in July and invalidated the ordinance. The county appealed the choice, and if the appellate court docket guidelines with the state, it would apply to each county, nullifying all related ordinances.
Advertisement
On not less than one situation, a authorized problem to Oregon’s Measure 114 may succeed. After the U.S. Supreme Courtroom dominated this summer season that People have a proper to hold a firearm outdoors their residence, the court docket additionally ordered the USA Courtroom of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to revisit a ruling upholding California’s high-capacity journal ban.
The California ban, in addition to an identical regulation in Washington state, stays in impact whereas the court docket deliberates. Given the Supreme Courtroom’s place, hypothesis is working excessive that the legal guidelines can be thrown out.
A federal court docket may get an opportunity to weigh in sooner. On Friday, the Oregon Firearms Federation, Sherman County Sheriff Brad Lohrey and a Marion County gun retailer proprietor filed a federal lawsuit towards Gov. Kate Brown and Rosenblum. The lawsuit alleges Measure 114 infringes on Oregonians’ Second Modification rights and asks a choose to toss the regulation or, at a minimal, situation an injunction stopping the provisions from being enacted. Alternatively, the lawsuit requested a choose to separate the journal ban and rule on solely that portion of the regulation.
The confusion has led to stratospheric firearms gross sales within the state and a fair larger background verify backlog than common. The Oregon State Police stated Wednesday the day by day common of firearms background checks had quadrupled, and a number of other gun shops in Multnomah County have briefly halted some providers anticipating gridlock come December.
If an individual buys a firearm from an out-of-state vendor, the firearm should be shipped to a licensed vendor in Oregon who conducts the background verify and transfers the firearm to the purchaser. With the rising backlog, a number of sellers stopped accepting transfers from out of state, fearing the checks received’t be accomplished by Dec. 8 and the switch may then doubtlessly violate the brand new state regulation.
Advertisement
Regardless of the uncertainty, some Oregon sheriffs have taken a extra measured tone.
Lincoln County Sheriff Curtis Landers pushed again Wednesday towards the thought he or his colleagues may interpret the Structure. Landers stated in an announcement that though he doesn’t agree with the brand new regulation, his workplace will implement it.
“I’ve sworn an oath to uphold the legal guidelines of this state, no matter my opinion,” Landers wrote, including that that doesn’t imply deputies can be going door-to-door trying to find magazines. “Nevertheless, if we study you could have violated the regulation we might take motion, identical to we’re answerable for doing for another crime.”
Janelle Bynum’s journey to Washington, D.C., to begin her work as the U.S. representative for Oregon’s 5th Congressional District was a homecoming of sorts.
The Democratic former state lawmaker, who swam against a red wave in November to flip Oregon’s most competitive congressional district and make history as the state’s first Black member of Congress, grew up in D.C. She left the Beltway three decades ago, first to seek an engineering degree in Florida, then for a job at General Motors while she earned her master’s in business administration from the University of Michigan and finally for her husband’s home state of Oregon.
She had hoped to work as an electrical engineer in Oregon’s Silicon Forest, but employers weren’t hiring in the 2002 recession. So, Bynum and her husband, Mark, took over his mother’s McDonald’s franchise and raised their four children — and when she had the chance to set policy as a member of the state Legislature, she pushed for state investments in the high tech industry to ensure young people graduating from high school or college aren’t turned away like she was.
After winning a bruising campaign last fall against incumbent Republican Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Bynum told the Capital Chronicle she’s looking for ways to make a difference for Oregon and find the “low-hanging fruit” on which Democrats and Republicans can agree.
Advertisement
“I’ve always been an optimist and a person that would stare big challenges down, and I think just the success of my legislative career over the last eight years has proven that Number 1, I will always work across the aisle with my Republican colleagues, even when I don’t have to,” she said. “In this case, I do.”
Most people, she said, ultimately want the same thing — great schools for their kids, child care and good hospitals and doctors in their communities. She sees opportunities to work with Republicans on maternal health care, as research shows that babies born to healthy mothers are less likely to be premature or born with health problems and mothers with access to health care are less likely to die in childbirth.
And she hopes Republicans and Democrats can work together to reduce the ferocity of wildfires, like the Santiam Fire that burned a scar across her district in 2020 and all but wiped out the cities of Detroit and Gates. Congress is now sparring over disaster relief for California’s ongoing wildfires, with Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, pushing for “conditions” on spending.
Bynum also wants to bring her personal experience to congressional conversations about the NCAA. Her older son, Ellis, is a running back for the Oregon Ducks, and she believes it’s important for student athletes to be represented and protected from people who would take advantage of them as sports betting grows in popularity.
Highs and lows
Bynum is one of two new congressional members from Oregon, with Democratic U.S. Rep. Maxine Dexter representing the Portland-based 3rd Congressional District. Both took the oath of office on Friday, Jan. 3, a day Bynum said was exhilarating. She took her oath of office with her family watching and spent time meeting with colleagues with offices on her floor of the Capitol. But on Monday, when she spoke with the Capital Chronicle, she experienced a profound low, with news that Arizona, not Oregon, would receive the last of three semiconductor research hubs. It was a blow for the state’s economy, and it especially stung for Bynum, who led legislative efforts to draw federal funding to Oregon.
Advertisement
The Biden administration opted to place its three research hubs from the $52 billion 2022 CHIPS Act in New York, Silicon Valley and Arizona, skipping Oregon’s Silicon Forest. The administration went on to announce this week that it would award $53 million to HP in Corvallis and $45 million for Oregon State University’s microfluidics research, but those grants are far below the level of federal investment Oregon lawmakers hoped the state would receive from being named a research hub.
“That center would have been an opportunity for us to grow the workforce, and opportunities that our students would have had to intern there and maybe potentially work there,” Bynum said. “So it was a huge missed opportunity for us, and I feel like I’m starting over from scratch again, screaming from the mountaintop like ‘Hey, these are good jobs. This is a good opportunity for our kids, and we have to invest in what we want,’ and we just missed the mark there. I’m bummed.”
That day, Jan. 6, was also the anniversary of an attempted insurrection at the Capitol led by supporters of President-elect Donald Trump trying to block Congress from certifying his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden. It was a somber day, Bynum said, with many of her colleagues clad in black to watch Vice President Kamala Harris certify her own loss to Trump.
“What I experienced in the electoral count acceptance was Vice President Harris exhibiting way more grace than was even fair to ask of her,” Bynum said. “She did her job. She put country over politics, and she did it with a very strong personal constitution. It was tough to watch.”
While she supported Harris and was disappointed in the results of the presidential election, Bynum said she’s open to working with Trump. She thinks they both believe in being disruptive because that’s how businesses advance and innovate.
Advertisement
“What I stand firm on is not allowing him to be destructive,” Bynum said. “Destructive of our democracy, destructive of our families, destructive of our national integrity. That’s where I draw the line. And so where we want to be disruptive and shift the status quo in favor of working families and Americans, I’m willing to do that, but the destructive part, I’ll take a strong stance against that.”
Financial Services Committee
She’ll serve on her top pick of committee, the Financial Services Committee. During her first week in D.C., Bynum took her children on a tour of the White House and told them it wasn’t a coincidence that the Treasury Department is right next door.
She has always been interested in understanding how money moves through the economy, she said, and she wants to make sure that Congress provides the infrastructure and oversight to make sure money moves in a way that unleashes opportunity for families and gives everyone a fair deal.
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California and the ranking member of the committee, said in a statement that she was pleased to welcome Bynum.
“Congresswoman Bynum has a strong track record of fighting to address the affordable housing crisis and lower rising costs for consumers and working-class families in Oregon,” she said. “I have no doubt she will draw on her background and expertise to continue this important effort and I look forward to working alongside her.”
Advertisement
Throughout her eight years in the Legislature, Bynum was one of only a few Black members and frequently the only Black woman. In Congress, she’s part of a historic contingent of 67 Black lawmakers, 62 of whom, including Waters, are members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
“It’s been interesting to be in a much more diverse workplace, I will say that, and it’s been interesting to not have to explain myself as much in D.C.,” Bynum said. “And so I think, on behalf of the kids of Oregon 5 and the residents, I think that I’ll be much more effective here.”
The Unpacking Future Packers Countdown is a countdown of 100 prospects who could be selected by the Green Bay Packers in the 2025 NFL draft.
Joshua Gray is one of the most seasoned offensive linemen in the 2025 NFL Draft. The Oregon State prospect started 56 games during his time in Corvallis, with 44 of those starts coming at left tackle and 12 at left guard.
The battle-tested offensive linemen could be a Day 3 target for the Green Bay Packers and checks in at No. 96 in the Unpacking Future Packers Countdown.
Gray came to Oregon State as a three-star recruit out of California and earned the starting left tackle job as a redshirt freshman in 2020. Following 44 straight starts at left tackle, Gray kicked inside to left guard for his final season as a Beaver.
Advertisement
“Not only was Gray the best lineman on the roster for most of his extended stay at Oregon State, but he was also loyal to the program at a time when it needed leadership the most,” Carter Bahns, a reporter for 247sports, said. “When most of the team’s best players entered the transfer portal amid the coaching change and transition out of the traditional Pac-12, Gray returned for one final year and became a multi-year team captain. His blocking ability made him a star, but his intangibles made him an all-time Oregon State great.”
It’s no secret that NFL teams love offensive linemen who can play multiple positions, and the Packers have had a ton of success turning college offensive tackles into all-pro caliber guards. While Gray never took a snap at center during a game, he is listed as center on the Shrine Bowl website and will likely get looks at center, guard and tackle during Shrine Bowl week in Texas.
“Most of Gray’s career came at the left tackle spot, where he was the most valuable piece of an offensive line that regularly ranked among the nation’s most elite units and Joe Moore Award contenders,” Bahns said. “His NFL projections favored him on the interior, though, so he moved to guard ahead of his final year at Oregon State. The Beavers put a premium on versatility and taught all of their offensive linemen to play multiple positions, and that aided Gray in thriving at the guard spot.”
Gray is a powerful run-blocker, who is aggressive with his hands to initiate contact. He plays with the right about of tenacity to bully defenders. The 56-game starter can move in space and looks nimble as a puller.
“Run blocking has always been Gray’s forte,” Bahns said. “Oregon State regularly boasted one of the nation’s best-rushing attacks throughout his career. His Pro Football Focus run blocking grade ranked No. 8 in the Pac-12 in 2021 and No. 3 in 2022.”
Advertisement
Gray has seen it all. He is alert in pass protection and keeps his head on a swivel. He’s patient in his pass sets and uses a timely punch to get into the frame of rushers. According to PFF, Gray gave up one sack and 13 pressures while playing his new position at left guard this past season.
“What Gray lacks in that elite size NFL teams covet in their tackles, he makes up for in sheer athleticism and effort, and that shows in pass protection,” Bahns said. “He was a lockdown pass blocker on the blind side year after year because of his high motor, discipline and explosiveness.”
Fit with the Packers
Green Bay’s depth along the offensive line was tested during their Wild Card matchup against the Philadelphia Eagles. With Jordan Morgan already on injured reserve, the Packers had to first turn to Travis Glover after starting left guard Elgton Jenkins left the game with an injury. After the rookie flamed out, the Packers turned to Kadeem Telfort.
With Josh Myers headed for free agency, it’s a safe assumption that Brian Gutekunst will target an interior offensive lineman or two this offseason.
Gray likely isn’t somebody you want starting at left tackle on a full-time basis, but he could kick outside in a pinch and potentially offers five-position versatility.
Advertisement
“Gray is a proven standout at multiple positions along the offensive line, who developed across a six-year career under one of college football’s most accomplished offensive line coaches in Jim Michalczik,” Bahns said. “He is about as refined and experienced as college linemen come. That, plus the fact that he is a model teammate and longtime captain, makes him a complete package who should make an impact early in his pro career.”
Brian Gutekunst has had success finding quality offensive linemen on Day 3 of the draft with picks like Myers, Zach Tom, Rasheed Walker Jon Runyan Jr.
With his versatility, experience, run-blocking prowess and football IQ, Gray could be high on Green Bay’s board when Day 3 of the 2025 NFL Draft rolls around.
Derrick Harmon made a huge move when he transferred to Oregon from Michigan State heading into the 2024 college football season.
Not only did Harmon get the opportunity to help Oregon win the Big Ten championship and earn the No. 1 seed for the College Football Playoff, he set up his future for an NFL career.
Harmon, a former standout at Detroit Loyola, was an afterthought for the 2025 NFL Draft after his redshirt sophomore season at Michigan State in 2023 when he got in on 40 tackles from his defensive tackle position, 3½ for lost yardage.
Well, Harmon turned into a star at Oregon, a reason he has declared for the NFL Draft, in which his name is now mentioned in the first round of multiple NFL mock drafts, including No. 17 (Cincinnati Bengals) by Yahoo! Sports and No. 16 (Arizona Cardinals) by CBS Sports. The Pro Football Network projects the 49ers to pick Harmon at No. 11 and has Kentucky defensive tackle Deone Walker (Detroit Cass Tech) headed to the Lions at No. 32.
Advertisement
Walker was a second-team All-American in USA Today’s preseason rankings.
Mel Kiper Jr. of ESPN has Harmon No. 14 on his board, the No. 4 defensive linemen, saying: “He combines quickness with power to cause chaos for opponents.”
Yes, Harmon’s thick build and long arms and athleticism give him the ability to line up anywhere from 3-technique to nose tackle, making him versatile and valuable for the next level.
Harmon made the most of his one year at Oregon, getting in on 41 tackles, 10½ TFL and five sacks while forcing two fumbles and recovering two fumbles.
“I’ve seen it, not putting too much attention to it because a lot can change,” Harmon said of the mock drafts. “I know I still have a lot of work to do.”
Advertisement
So, how impressive was Harmon?
Well, Harmon led the nation in total pressures from an interior defensive lineman with 55, 12 higher than the next-highest player.
One reason for Harmon’s breakout season was his ability to drop 30 pounds and play at 6-foot-5 and 310 pounds after playing his final season at Michigan State at 340.
“Going to Oregon was really good for me,” said Harmon, who said he was filing his papers to declare for the draft Monday and was set to travel to Dallas to prepare for the NFL Scouting Combine. “I had a good season, and we capitalized on a good season. I loved my team. I feel I improved by being more of a leader and I loved my pass-rushing ability too.
Advertisement
“I left (Michigan) State just because I wanted a better opportunity. I feel I’ve always had good technique in the run game just from the coaches I’ve had previously so for me, so it was more tuning up the pass rush. Coach T (defensive line coach Tony Tuioti) and Coach Tosh (defensive coordinator Lupoi) are good coaches, Coach Tuioti taught me a lot about the run game, played a lot of different positions on the line from the 0 all the way to the 5, so all those techniques he was able to teach me to take to the league.
“At State I played at 6-5 and 340 and this year I played at 6-5 at 315, 320. I could tell the difference, more agile and just as strong.”
Harmon said beating Ohio State 32-31 in Eugene during the regular season was his highlight. He had three tackles, and a forced fumble which he recovered at the Buckeyes’ 28 to set up a touchdown.
Harmon still thinks of his days at Loyola, saying “Coach Cal (John Callahan) is a great coach, still coaching to this day (at Hazel Park). He just told me a lot about ball, and he told me I had potential to play at the college level and at the NFL level just like he told me he did with Malik McDowell before me, so that was cool.”
McDowell started his high school career at Loyola before moving on to Southfield, then playing at Michigan State before being picked in the second round of the 2017 NFL Draft by the Seahawks.
Advertisement
High praise for Dante Moore
Former Detroit King standout quarterback Dante Moore started several games at UCLA as a true freshman in 2023 before transferring to Oregon.
Moore stood on the sidelines and watched Dillon Gabriel operate as the Ducks’ quarterback, becoming a Heisman Trophy finalist, completing 72.9% of his passes for 3,857 yards and 30 touchdowns (to just six interceptions). Oregon was 13-0 before a quarterfinal loss to Ohio State in the CFP.
When asked how Moore will perform next season with Gabriel using up his six years of eligibility, Harmon replied: “He’s going to be the truth. You can learn a lot sitting behind a Heisman finalist. Dante Moore is going to be a Heisman finalist next year. He’s that good.”
Moore was ranked No. 5 on CBS Sports listing of 16 players who will define the race for the 2025 national championship, saying Moore is “now the obvious choice to lead the explosive Will Stein’s offense,” and will be aided by receiver Evan Stewart, who announced Tuesday that he will return for ’25 season.
Former Belleville standout Bryce Underwood — the No. 1 recruit in the nation who signed with Michigan — was also among the 16 players listed by CBS Sports for those who will define the race for the national championship.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25822586/STK169_ZUCKERBERG_MAGA_STKS491_CVIRGINIA_A.jpg "Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech")
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25821992/videoframe_720397.png "Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion")
