California
California

Two California lawmakers introduced a measure Monday that seeks to ban law enforcement at all levels of government from covering their faces during operations including immigration enforcement.
The legislation would also require officers “to be identifiable via their uniform, whether with name or other identifier,” according to Democratic Sens. Scott Wiener of San Francisco and Jesse Arreguin of Berkeley, who introduced Senate Bill 627, also known as the “No Secret Police Act.”
The bill would prohibit local, state and federal law enforcement officers, or any person acting on behalf of a law enforcement agency from covering their faces. The measure includes exceptions for SWAT teams, medical-grade masks such as surgical or N95 masks, and masks designed to protect against smoke during a wildfire-related state of emergency.
Wiener said the legislation was prompted by the Trump administration’s recent immigration crackdown and reports of federal agents wearing masks and allegedly not identifying themselves during operations.
“People are afraid, families are being torn apart,” the senator said at a news conference in San Francisco on Monday. “And it’s important that anyone who is engaged in law enforcement activity whether state, county or whether its federal that there’s full transparency in terms of what happening.”
The lawmakers said they believed the measure would improve public trust in law enforcement.
“This law is rooted in two principles. One, to protect the safety of California’s communities. And two, to ensure that there is transparency and accountability for law enforcement,” Arreguin said.
In an interview with Margaret Brennan of “Face the Nation” on June 8, Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem has defended law enforcement covering their faces.
“It’s for the safety of those individuals or the work that they’re doing as far as protecting their identity so they can continue to do investigative work,” Noem said.

California
OneRepublic co-founder Tim Myers announces run for California lieutenant governor to ‘fight back’ against Trump

OneRepublic co-founder and former bassist Tim Myers announced his campaign for California lieutenant governor on Monday.
On his campaign website, he cited “a broken political system” and “Trump’s attacks on California” as reasons behind his decision.
“He’ll bring a fresh, strong voice to the Lt. Governor’s office to fight back against the Trump administration’s attacks, take on the rigged system with commonsense solutions, and ensure every Californian has the opportunity to chase their dreams, can afford to make a living here, and feels safe,” his website reads.
Myers had previously announced a run for the U.S. House of Representatives in April.
He explained his shift in campaigns in an Instagram post on Monday.
“I’ve heard from neighbors and friends whose homes and small businesses were robbed. I’ve watched homelessness grow. I’ve seen backdoor deals and political corruption—not just from Trump and his billionaire allies in Washington, but right here in our own backyard in California. I’ve stood shoulder to shoulder with protesters demanding change. But when I looked, I didn’t see our state politicians standing with us. And I realized: I can’t stay silent. I can’t stay on the sidelines,” his Instagram post read.
On TMZ Live Thursday, Myers went further and attacked his fellow lieutenant governor candidates for “not standing up” and using the position as a way to climb the political ladder.
“Every single candidate that’s running right now for lieutenant governor said they want to be governor someday and they’re climbing the political ladder,” Myers said.
“You know the only ladder I care about is the working people here in California climbing up the ladder. They literally can’t afford to buy homes or pay for their rent or pay for groceries or put gas in their tank. So I think it’s honestly insulting for the candidates in this race to say they want to be governor someday. I am not focused on that.”
The lieutenant governor election will be held in November.
Myers’ fellow OneRepublic co-founder, Ryan Tedder, came under his own political fire last month over his post defending President Donald Trump’s military parade that commemorated the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army.
“All politics & parties and righteous indignation aside it’s a super bummer that instead of celebrating the 250th anniversary of the USA ARMY and all those who have fought and died on our behalf… We’re protesting,” Tedder wrote on an Instagram story that was later deleted.
The post added, “I haven’t been a card carrying political member of either side in over 20 years & think at this point everything is absurd 99% of the time. But I’d like to say THANKYOU to all of the Army service members active and retired and those who have given their lives to protect our freedom…to protest.”
California
California Could Flood Like Texas. But Thunderstorms Likely Won’t Be to Blame | KQED

Like in Kerr County in Texas, most California localities don’t use sirens to alert the public about flooding, “because our flooding kind of builds and we can see what is coming in,” state climatologist Michael Anderson said. However, some do, like the Marin County communities of Fairfax, Ross and San Anselmo, which maintain flood horns or sirens that they sound when flooding is imminent.
California relies heavily on the weather service for messaging about potential flooding from storms. For instance, last December, San Franciscans were startled awake by a blaring weather alert on their phones warning them of a potential tornado.
When it comes to flooding, the weather service issues watches, warnings and advisories. Flash flood warnings also have three different levels, ranging from the base level to catastrophic. Beyond the alerts, the weather service leans on traditional radio broadcasts, local authorities and news outlets to get the word out.
Garcia said the difference between a warning and an advisory is that a warning suggests “there could be trouble,” but an advisory means “the trouble is coming to you.” He recommends that all Bay Area residents sign up for text emergency alerts at alertthebay.org and pay attention to any “action statements” within the message.
“If the action statement says something like get to high ground immediately, that is a cue to take immediate action,” Garcia said. “Whether it’s moving to higher floors, going to the top of a hill, or moving yourself to higher ground.”
Flooding from thunderstorms is possible in California
What distinguishes the Bay Area’s localized flash flooding events from those in Texas is the duration of the atmospheric river, its geographic location and the level of wetness in the system. Atmospheric rivers in California can last for days and arrive in a succession train, while thunderstorms last for a few hours at most.
“Texas can get these systems that consist of thunderstorms that don’t move very much over a period of time, producing an enormous amount of rainfall,” said John Monteverdi, emeritus professor of meteorology at San Francisco State University. “That’s different from the kind of flooding that happens when the Russian River floods, maybe once every two or three years.”
Still, a big flash-flood-producing thunderstorm in California isn’t entirely out of the picture and can occur during the summertime in the Sierra Nevada or the deserts across the southeastern part of the state.
“The kind of thing that happened in Texas could also happen in California,” said Nicholas Pinter, associate director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. “Anyone out hiking in confined, rugged topography needs to be aware that we have this risk of flash flooding in California, kind of similar to Texas.”
While the Texas thunderstorm covering a broad geographic area and producing a wall of water is “not typical of California,” the “wettest precipitation events are getting wetter” and in turn elevating flood risk, which is in line with the effects of human-caused climate change on storms in both states, said Noah Diffenbaugh, a climate scientist at Stanford University.
California
California won’t agree to Trump’s demand to ban trans athletes from school sports: report

Tuesday, July 8, 2025 2:06AM
California will reportedly not agree with the Trump admin. to ban transgender athletes from competing on teams that match their gender identity.
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — California will reportedly not agree with the Trump administration to ban transgender athletes from competing on teams that match their gender identity.
According to an email posted by Representative Kevin Kiley, the California Department of Education informed the Federal Department of Education of its decision Monday.
The agreement would have required stripping transgender athletes of their medals and apologize to cisgender athletes who lost to trans athletes.
According to the Chronicle, the state’s decision will likely trigger a lawsuit by the federal government.

Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
-
Business1 week ago
See How Trump’s Big Bill Could Affect Your Taxes, Health Care and Other Finances
-
Culture1 week ago
16 Mayors on What It’s Like to Run a U.S. City Now Under Trump
-
Politics6 days ago
Video: Trump Signs the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Into Law
-
News1 week ago
Video: Who Loses in the Republican Policy Bill?
-
Science1 week ago
Federal contractors improperly dumped wildfire-related asbestos waste at L.A. area landfills
-
Politics1 week ago
Congressman's last day in office revealed after vote on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meet Soham Parekh, the engineer burning through tech by working at three to four startups simultaneously
-
World6 days ago
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,227