Connect with us

Oregon

Oregon housing chief Andrea Bell on rent assistance rollout, tackling ever-growing affordability crisis: Q&A

Published

on

Oregon housing chief Andrea Bell on rent assistance rollout, tackling ever-growing affordability crisis: Q&A


Andrea Bell took the reins of the Oregon Housing and Group Providers company throughout a time of upheaval: The company was in the midst of rolling out its pandemic emergency rental help program to combined outcomes.

Whereas this system delivered $302 million in support to about 60,000 households, it was beset by reviews of delayed or diverted funds, and tenants typically waited weeks with out an replace on their software.

Bell, beforehand the company’s director of housing stabilization, was appointed interim director of the state division, then gained the publish completely, after when former chief Margaret Salazar left for a job with the federal authorities. Bell had beforehand labored as a housing administrator with the Arizona Medicaid program, and he or she labored in a homeless shelter early in her profession.

Because the housing division strikes from reacting to the results of the pandemic to tackling housing instability extra broadly, Bell spoke to The Oregonian/OregonLive about her imaginative and prescient for the company and the way her background in social work, well being administration and housing will inform her management. The dialog has been edited for size and readability.

Advertisement

Q: How have your experiences framed your method to main Oregon’s housing company?

A: I grew up in a working-class household from the Dominican Republic. My grandfather labored on a farm. I bear in mind, as early as 6 or 7, a number of the conversations round my grandfather’s dream of reasonably priced housing. That was at all times one of many ambitions of a lifetime for our household. It ended up being one of the vital formative experiences for me as a frontrunner.

Working within the Medicaid system, it actually elevated for me the alignment of well being and housing on a systemic stage. To grasp quick, medium and long-term options, it requires that we’ve got a whole-health understanding and requires that we’ve got built-in approaches.

Q: Whenever you took over at OHCS, the company was in the midst of distributing hire aid funds. Do you consider that program was a hit total? How may the company have averted points like gradual distribution of funds or logistical errors?

A: This program was transformative for our company on a number of ranges. It was birthed out of the situations and circumstances of the financial fallout of the pandemic. Traditionally, OHCS doesn’t present direct companies, as a substitute working by means of grants and connecting with neighborhood companions. This program required one thing totally different, and it challenged our operations by way of scaling to that dimension.

Advertisement

On the early onset of this program, we introduced on about 50 extra individuals to staff OHCS to help this administration, and at its peak, the rental help program had effectively over 300 individuals supporting it.

I believe even having the ability to have a centralized system in place to promptly diagnose what’s working effectively and the place we have to make pivots is essential. However that we’d want 300 individuals to help the administration of this group, that was one thing we didn’t challenge.

I believe it’s essential to notice that the necessity continues to be there. And it’s only a reminder of how we’ve got to proceed to pursue long-term housing options and affordability.

Q: What do you see because the position of the company?

A: Oregon’s housing finance company is definitely fairly distinctive in that we put money into reasonably priced housing and preserving pathways to dwelling possession, housing stabilization and homeless companies.

Advertisement

However we even have a complete neighborhood companies arm. That features homeless companies and addressing vitality burdens. Most of the identical individuals in Oregon who’re rent-burdened are energy-burdened as effectively.

Over the past couple of years, we’ve invested almost $43 million in shelter capability and road outreach, and far of that work was actually knowledgeable by neighborhood. As we stay up for the following couple of years, we’re asking for $800 million (from the Legislature) in housing investments, which is daring and audacious and acceptable.

Q: What are your priorities for long-term options to Oregon’s housing wants?

A: My perception is that the prism by means of which we do our work is that each single individual on this state deserves secure and reasonably priced housing locally they select.

We set forth our five-year strategic plan with some actually aggressive however achievable targets. For instance, we got down to enhance the pipeline of everlasting supportive housing by a thousand. We’re at almost 990 models of everlasting supportive housing throughout the state. (Everlasting supportive housing combines companies with reasonably priced housing to assist individuals who have been chronically homeless get steady housing and reside independently.)

Advertisement

We got down to enhance the pipeline of reasonably priced rental housing by 25,000 models. And we’ve got over 19,000 models of reasonably priced rental housing.

We additionally have to proceed to put money into preservation of reasonably priced housing and put money into down cost help and entry to dwelling possession. And we have to proceed to middle racial justice and fairness.

Q: How do you go about centering racial justice?

A: This work requires first an acknowledgement that traditionally, authorities hasn’t at all times centered racial justice. We can’t be in dialog with communities if we aren’t keen to acknowledge these realities.

I wish to elevate a few issues which might be actually essential for us.

Advertisement

One, we’ve continued to listen to from communities, culturally particular entities, Black, Indigenous and folks of color-led businesses, across the continued investments wanted.

And we’d like to verify we’re investing in place-based initiatives. Along with needing extra housing in all kinds, in all styles and sizes, we have to additionally care about the place the housing is constructed, the atmosphere through which it’s constructed.

—Jayati Ramakrishnan



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Oregon private colleges offer support to Southern California students impacted by wildfires

Published

on

Oregon private colleges offer support to Southern California students impacted by wildfires


Lewis & Clark College is opening up its residence halls early to students impacted by the wildfires in Los Angeles. Odell Annex pictured here, is a residence hall on the Lewis & Clark campus in Portland.

Adam Bacher courtesy of Lewis & Clark College

Some private universities in Oregon are offering extra assistance — from crisis counseling to emergency financial aid — to students who call Southern California home.

This comes amid the devastating wildfires currently burning in Los Angeles.

Advertisement

Lewis & Clark College, University of Portland and Reed College sent out messages of support to students with home addresses in Southern California this week.

Administrators at Lewis & Clark contacted around 250 undergraduate students in the region affected by the blazes. These students represent close to 12% of the college’s current undergraduate students.

The school, which begins its next term on Jan. 21, is opening up its dorms early for Southern California students at no extra cost.

“We will keep communicating with students in the weeks and months ahead to know how this impacts their next semester and beyond,” said Benjamin Meoz, Lewis & Clark’s senior associate dean of students. “That will mean a range of wraparound academic and counseling support.”

Lewis & Clark also pushed back its application deadline for prospective students from the Los Angeles area to Feb. 1.

Advertisement

Oregon crews arrive in Southern California to aid wildfire response

Reed College began reaching out to about 300 students who live in Southern California on Wednesday. In an email, the college urged students and faculty impacted by the fires to take advantage of the school’s mental health and financial aid resources.

Reed will also support students who need to return to campus earlier than expected. Classes at Reed do not begin until Jan. 27.

Students at University of Portland will be moving back in this weekend as its next term begins on Monday, Jan. 13. But UP did offer early move-in to students living in the Los Angeles area earlier this week. A spokesperson with UP said four students changed travel plans to arrive on campus early.

Students are already back on campus at the majority of Oregon’s other colleges and universities, with many schools beginning their terms earlier this week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls

Published

on

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls


play

Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.

The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.

Advertisement

In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”

Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.

Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.

Why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to kill barred owls

In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.

Advertisement

Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.

According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.

The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.

Why environmental groups want to stop the plan to kill barred owls

Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.

Advertisement

“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”

In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Musk to stop the plan to kill barred owls

The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.

The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.

The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.

Advertisement

“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”

USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.

“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”  

Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.

Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat

Published

on

Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat


A rebound basket with 3.5 seconds left in overtime allowed Santa Clara to escape with an 82-81 overtime win over Oregon State in men’s basketball Thursday night.

The Beavers, looking for their first road win of the season and their third since 2021, just missed when Tyeree Bryan’s tip-in with 3.5 seconds left was the difference.

Oregon State, leading 81-78, had two chances to rescue the win.

Adama Bal, fouled while shooting a three-pointer with 10 seconds remaining, made his first two free throws but missed the third. But Bal outfought OSU for the rebound, then kicked the ball out to Christoph Tilly, whose three-point shot glanced off the rim. Bryan then knifed between two Beaver rebounders, collecting the ball with his right hand and tipping it off the backboard and into the basket.

Advertisement

OSU (12-5, 2-2 WCC) came up short on a half-court shot at the buzzer.

The loss spoiled what was a 12-point second-half comeback for Oregon State, which led by as many as four points in overtime.

Parsa Fallah led the Beavers with 24 points and seven rebounds. Michael Rataj had a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds, while Isaiah Sy scored 12 points and Damarco Minor 11.

Elijah Maji scored 21 points for Santa Clara (11-6, 3-1), which has won eight of its last nine games.

The game was tied at 32-32 at halftime following a first half where OSU trailed by as many as 12 points. Fallah and Minor combined to score the final eight points as OSU finished the half on a 10-2 run.

Advertisement

The game began to get away from the Beavers again as Santa Clara built a 60-48 lead with 9:43 remaining. Sy got OSU going with a three-pointer, as the Beavers whittled away at the deficit. OSU eventually grabbed the lead at 67-65 with 5:19 left on another three by Sy. It was a defensive brawl for the rest of regulation, as neither team scored during the final 1:58.

Oregon State never trailed in overtime until the final three seconds. A Sy three with 1:29 left gave the Beavers a four-point cushion. After the Broncos later cut the lead to one, Fallah’s layup with 17 seconds left put OSU up 81-78.

Oregon State returns to action Saturday when the Beavers complete their two-game road trip at Pacific. Game time is 7 p.m.

–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending