Oregon
Oregon governor candidates stake their positions in first debate
The three important candidates for Oregon governor bought an early likelihood to set themselves aside Friday, touting their very own information whereas arguing they’re much better positioned to steer the state previous a sequence of daunting challenges.
Assembly in Welches for a debate organized by the Oregon Newspaper Publishers Affiliation, Democrat Tina Kotek, Republican Christine Drazan and nonaffiliated candidate Betsy Johnson tried to stake out the political lanes they hope to experience to victory in November: Kotek because the completed progressive, Johnson because the centrist unifier, and Drazan because the change agent for a state that has languished underneath one-party management.
The occasion, streamed stay, was the primary likelihood for a lot of voters to see the ladies tackle a few of the most urgent matters going through the state collectively, together with homelessness, substance habit, local weather change, abortion and the deepening variations between city and rural Oregonians. What emerged was a full of life, and principally substantive, debate that helped make clear the variations and similarities the candidates convey to these issues.
Drazan, a former Home Republican chief, and Johnson, a 20-year legislative Democrat who ditched the get together final yr, discovered loads to agree on when requested about pure useful resource administration and local weather change.
Each girls help elevated logging and extra strong forest administration, they stated, and would each rescind a 2020 government order by Gov. Kate Brown capping and lowering greenhouse emissions from some polluters. Kotek, a former Home speaker who repeatedly pushed rules capping carbon emissions, promised to construct on what the state has already performed.
On homelessness, the candidates every argued they’d convey urgency to what all agreed was an unacceptable humanitarian disaster.
Kotek, who made housing a coverage and funding focus whereas within the Legislature, has preached an strategy of increase higher outreach to homeless Oregonians whereas rising shelter area and dealing to ramp up housing manufacturing.
“I’m the one individual on this stage who’s been working laborious during the last 5 years to ensure as a legislator that I do what I can,” Kotek stated.
Drazan and Johnson countered they’d each been energetic on the problem — Johnson in serving to to morph a never-used jail in Portland right into a shelter — and every have hinted at a tougher line strategy they’d use to drive accountability on houseless Oregonians and cut back public tenting.
“What’s gotten higher throughout your time frame [as speaker]?” Johnson requested Kotek at one level. “We now have pitched extra tents than we’ve got pulled permits, I’d submit, for housing.”
The three girls most sharply diverged on weapons. As speaker, Kotek helped push by way of gun security payments to increase required background checks, create a mechanism to confiscate weapons from folks in disaster, and drive gun house owners to securely stow weapons not in use. She helps extra restrictions, together with a measure on the November poll that may require a allow to buy a gun.
Drazan uniformly opposes any additional restrictions however instructed she respects present legal guidelines and wouldn’t attempt to circumvent them. Johnson, a dependable opponent of gun management whereas within the Legislature, has since shifted her stance. She stated Friday she favors rising the age requirement for buying some weapons to 21 and stated she would push for a lot extra aggressive background checks earlier than an individual could buy a firearm — together with, doubtlessly, faculty information.
‘I’d give faculties immunity in the event that they’re offering knowledge that claims little Johnnie was killing cats or was writing darkish emails,” Johnson stated. “That should develop into a part of the everlasting document that may go right into a background test.”
Johnson instructed hers was a center floor between Drazan’s inaction and Kotek eager to “take your weapons.” That was a mischaracterization of Kotek’s stance with which the previous speaker took subject. “It’s actually unlucky and irritating to have the politicization of a difficulty that’s actually necessary to folks proper now,” Kotek stated. “Individuals are scared.”
There was additional separation between the candidates on abortion. Kotek and Johnson each help abortion rights, however Kotek stated Oregon ought to take extra steps to assist make the process obtainable, together with serving to pay for look after folks from out of state. Johnson disagreed with that spending precedence.
Drazan opposes abortion, however, as on weapons, appeared to recommend she’d have little energy to behave unilaterally as governor to vary state legal guidelines. She signaled help for altering Oregon abortion legal guidelines by limiting the supply of the process within the third trimester.
The candidates additionally bought to ask a query of one in all their opponents. Kotek used her query to ask Drazan whether or not she believed Joe Biden gained the 2020 election. Drazan stated she does. Johnson requested Kotek what she would do instantly on homelessness, constructing on her competition the Democratic nominee has lacked urgency. Kotek talked about increasing outreach groups and constructing shelter area. Drazan requested Johnson why she’d supported a tax on companies in 2019. Johnson stated she believes taxes might be worthwhile however has come to remorse the vote.
Past coverage specifics, the three girls tried to promote voters Friday on an general narrative of their candidacies.
Kotek, usually a staid coverage wonk, pitched herself as a gentle hand with an extended background in management. She spoke of falling in love with the state after transferring to Oregon in late 1987, and her perception “in the potential of Oregon and what it might be for everyone who lives right here.”
“Having the ability to ship outcomes proper now’s what actually issues for Oregonians,” she stated in a closing assertion. “I understand how to work with folks and remedy issues. I’ve the monitor document to point out that.”
Regardless of her steady messaging about serving to discover accord between Republicans and Democrats, Johnson was essentially the most aggressive candidate within the debate. A fan of pithy phrasings, Johnson stated Kotek “needs to protect tent cities and produce the tradition wars to your youngsters’ classroom. She’d have us all woke and broke.” Johnson painted Drazan as a right-wing candidate and repeatedly instructed solely she may convey “huge daring change” to the state as a centrist chief.
Drazan argued she is the one true change agent within the race, pointing to the affect Kotek and Johnson each held as a few of the strongest Democrats within the Capitol — Kotek as Home speaker, Johnson as a lead finances author.
“They’ve had all of the levers of presidency at their arms. They’ve been in cost,” Drazan stated. “We bought right here due to their selections. … In the event that they knew how one can repair it they might have already performed it.”
Publicly launched polling within the race has been restricted however has instructed the race is tight months forward of the Nov. 8 election. Two polls from late June — one from the Johnson marketing campaign and one other from Republicans — confirmed Kotek at or close to the entrance, however diverse in whether or not Drazan or Johnson was most carefully difficult the Democrat.
The race has equally confounded political prognosticators and is being carefully watched by nationwide Democrats and Republicans partly due to the rarity of three viable candidates in a normal election.
When the candidates will meet to debate subsequent will not be utterly clear. All three girls have agreed to attend an Oct. 6 occasion in Medford, however different potential occasions have been up within the air on Friday.
Johnson final month instructed seven televised debates in cities across the state. Kotek countered by suggesting eight, together with one on gun rules.
Oregon
Ohio State Buckeyes Quarterback Will Howard in ‘Dark Place’ After Loss to Oregon Ducks
For an athlete, a loss can shake even the strongest mental foundation. For Ohio State quarterback Will Howard, those feelings bubbled up after losing to the Oregon Ducks 32-31 at Autzen Stadium in early October.
While interviewing with ESPN before Ohio State’s semifinal game against the Texas Longhorns for the College Football Playoffs, the quarterback reflected on that feeling of loss.
“It’s been a rollercoaster. Some of the ups and downs that we did go through are why we’re sitting here today in the semifinals and probably playing our best ball right now,” Howard said. “There have been some tough moments. I’d say that Oregon loss early on in the season was rough.”
Howard, who went 28-35 passing for 326 yards and two touchdowns, remembers what he did after that fateful quarterback keeper turned slide that sealed the fate of the Buckeyes during that regular season encounter with the Ducks.
“Coming out of it I felt like I played a good game but it was really just the ending. I sat there and stewed over just how could I have done that differently. But when we got back here I think it was about six in the morning. I didn’t know what to do with myself. I was kind of at a loss. I went into the indoor and I just laid there for about an hour – hour and a half. I was in a dark place. I just wanted another crack at them so bad. I just couldn’t stop thinking about the next chance I could get,” Howard said.
It wasn’t too long before Howard got his second chance with Oregon. After winning the Big Ten Championship, the No. 1 ranked Ducks were seeded for the Rose Bowl. With the Buckeyes easily beating Tennessee at home the previous week, Ohio State faced the Ducks once more.
“Before every game, I listen to two voicemails that my late grandmother sent me and I’ve been doing that every game for the last three years now,” Howard said. “I listened to the voicemail and it just brought this immense peace over me. This year for the playoffs it actually probably got me going even more. It really helped.”
Those voicemails helped Howard correct his headspace before facing Oregon in the Rose Bowl. Howard went 17-26 in passing for 319 yards and three touchdowns. The Buckeyes completely shut out Oregon in the first quarter, with the Ducks only responding at the end of the second quarter with a touchdown and two point conversion. Howard reflected on the point in the game where the Buckeyes were up 34-0 against the No. 1 team in the nation.
MORE: NFL Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Denver Broncos Bo Nix, Washington Jayden Daniels?
MORE: Boise State Football Accuses Oregon Ducks of Tampering
MORE: Oregon Ducks To Sign Transfer Portal Lineman Emmanuel Pregnon From USC Trojans?
“Ecstatic. I mean, at that point it felt like it was almost not real. It was like ‘Man, are we really up on the No. 1 team in the country right now that we were in a dog fight with at their place?’” Howard said.
The Buckeyes won against Oregon 41-21, advancing to the Cotton Bowl Classic against the Texas Longhorns, where Howard and the Buckeyes are knocking on the door of a National Championship.
“You take a big National Championship ring and hoisting the trophy up. It takes a lot of the hardships and bad things that happened this year and kind of go out the window,” Howard said.
MORE: Georgia Bulldogs’ Carson Beck Transfer Destinations: Miami, Colorado, Oregon Ducks?
MORE: San Francisco 49ers’ Deommodore Lenoir Makes Super Bowl Prediction
MORE: Are Oregon Ducks Transfer Portal Winners or Losers? Dan Lanning’s Big Commitments
Oregon
Oregon private colleges offer support to Southern California students impacted by wildfires
Some private universities in Oregon are offering extra assistance — from crisis counseling to emergency financial aid — to students who call Southern California home.
This comes amid the devastating wildfires currently burning in Los Angeles.
Lewis & Clark College, University of Portland and Reed College sent out messages of support to students with home addresses in Southern California this week.
Administrators at Lewis & Clark contacted around 250 undergraduate students in the region affected by the blazes. These students represent close to 12% of the college’s current undergraduate students.
The school, which begins its next term on Jan. 21, is opening up its dorms early for Southern California students at no extra cost.
“We will keep communicating with students in the weeks and months ahead to know how this impacts their next semester and beyond,” said Benjamin Meoz, Lewis & Clark’s senior associate dean of students. “That will mean a range of wraparound academic and counseling support.”
Lewis & Clark also pushed back its application deadline for prospective students from the Los Angeles area to Feb. 1.
Oregon crews arrive in Southern California to aid wildfire response
Reed College began reaching out to about 300 students who live in Southern California on Wednesday. In an email, the college urged students and faculty impacted by the fires to take advantage of the school’s mental health and financial aid resources.
Reed will also support students who need to return to campus earlier than expected. Classes at Reed do not begin until Jan. 27.
Students at University of Portland will be moving back in this weekend as its next term begins on Monday, Jan. 13. But UP did offer early move-in to students living in the Los Angeles area earlier this week. A spokesperson with UP said four students changed travel plans to arrive on campus early.
Students are already back on campus at the majority of Oregon’s other colleges and universities, with many schools beginning their terms earlier this week.
Oregon
Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls
Tips to manage poor air quality
Smoke from wildfires is increasingly impacting the Willamette Valley. Here are a few tips to manage poor air quality.
Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.
The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”
Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.
Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.
Why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to kill barred owls
In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.
Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.
According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.
The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.
Why environmental groups want to stop the plan to kill barred owls
Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.
“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”
In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.
Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Musk to stop the plan to kill barred owls
The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.
The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.
The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.
“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”
USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.
“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”
Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.
Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics7 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health6 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
South Korea extends Boeing 737-800 inspections as Jeju Air wreckage lifted
-
News1 week ago
21 states are getting minimum wage bumps in 2025
-
Technology2 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech